The Latin Mass only unites us to the Saints and Martyrs of the past when the
False Premise is not used to interpret Vatican Council II and the Council II
with the False Premise is rejected and replaced with the Rational Prmeise.-Lionel Andrades
We reaffirm our adherence to the magisterium (including that of Vatican II and what follows), according to the Catholic doctrine of the assent due to it (cf. in particular LUMEN GENTIUM, §25, and Catechism of the Catholic Church, §891 and §892), as evidenced by the numerous studies and doctoral theses carried out by several of us over the past 33 years. - Joint Statement by Superiors General of “Ecclesia Dei” Communities,Courtelain, France, Corpus Christi, Watershed,courtesy of Monsignor Andrew Raymond Wadsworth
The Ecclesia Dei communities in France
are officially supporting Vatican Council II interpreted with an Irrational
Premise which creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. They are
supporting schism and mortal sins of faith. In public they are denying Tradition for political reasons.
1.Vatican Council II interpreted with the
False Premise (invisible people are visible in 1965-2021) creates alleged
practical exceptions for the 2.Athanasius Creed ( all need to be members of the
Catholic Church for salvation from Hell), 3.changes the Nicene Creed ( I believe
in three or more known and visible baptisms which exclude the baptism of water
and so are practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS).With the exceptions there is 4.a new version of ecumenism and a rejection of the ecumenism of return to the
Catholic Church of the Syllabus of Errors. The baptism of desire and invincible
ignorance are interpreted with the False Premise as in the Letter of the Holy
Office 1949 and so 5.there is a rupture with Cantate Domino, Council of Florence
1441 on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
The Church no more teaches outside the Church there is no salvation for the
Ecclesia Dei communities and the 6.Catechism of Pope Pius X (24 Q, 27Q) is obsolete. If they used the Rational Premise ( invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 are always invisible), they would have to affirm the strict interpretation of EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors in public and then Pope Francis and the political Left would go after them. Now with the False Premise they interpret Vatican Council II like the Masons.
It is the same with Fr. Claude Barthe, Dr. Peter Kwasniewski and the owner of the blog Rorate Caeili.They are actually denying Tradition.-Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 9, 2022
Ecclesia Dei communities still interpret Vatican Council II with the False and not Rational Premise : they are politically correct like Pope Francis in Traditionis Custode
The Latin laity at Dijon, France must ask Bishop Roland Minnerath to interpret Vatican Council II rationally in public and admit that he made an objective error in the books he wrote. He interpreted Vatican Council II with the False Premise
The Latin laity at Dijon, France must ask Bishop Roland Minnerath to interpret Vatican Council II rationally in public and admit that he made an objective error in the books he wrote. He interpreted Vatican Council II with the False Premise.
They should ask him to affirm the Athanasius Creed in harmony with Vatican Council II (Rational) and interpret all Magisterial Documents rationally and ask the diocesan priests and laity to do the same.
If Bishop Roland Minnerath does not interpret the Creeds according to their original meaning it is a mortal sin of faith. We cannot change the meaning of the Creeds with the use of the common False Premise. -Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 11, 2022
Parents at Dijon, France who are informed, must demand that the diocesan priests and those from the religious communities, only interpret Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise and support the traditional French ecclesiocentrism like that of St. Joan of Arc and the Vendees.
At First Holy Communion classes in Dijon, France, these days, the FSSP priests are not there for the Latin laity. The children are not being taught by traditionalists (Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest) that the Catholic Church teaches today with a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II ( AG 7) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 845,846 etc) that outside the Church there is no salvation. All must be Catholic to go to Heaven (AG 7 etc). Neither is this taught to the children by the diocesan priests at the Novus Ordo Mass and other liturgies in Dijon.
Instead the FSSP error is repeated. The children are told that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are practical exceptions for the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology (Athanasius Creed) of France, eldest daughter of the Catholic Church.
Parents at Dijon, who are informed, must demand that the diocesan priests and those from the religious communities, only interpret Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise and support the traditional French ecclesiocentrism like that of St. Joan of Arc and the Vendees.
The Rational Premise will end the theological epidemic and the whole Church can return to Tradition and not only those who go for the Latin Mass.-Lionel Andrades