Tuesday, December 20, 2022

We have a rational and traditional choice and it is not political

 

The Church must oppose the Satanists. We must oppose the Left. The Church must not accept their irrational version of Vatican Council II. We can choose a Vatican Council II which is always rational, traditional and honest. We can choose the Vatican Council II of the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire, USA. Brother Andre Marie mcim interprets Vatican Council II without the common heresy. The Council has the hermeneutic of continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

Catholics must reject the irrational version of EENS of the popes from Pius XII to Francis. All the cardinals can reject the irrational Vatican Council II of the popes from Paul VI to Francis. They can re-interpret the baptism of desire (BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) rationally like the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire in the diocese of Manchester, USA. In this way we go back to the past understanding of the Church and what it teaches. Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7), like the past Magisterium, still teaches that all need faith and baptism for salvation. All. The Catechism of the Catholic Church has Ad Gentes 7 placed under the title Outside the Church there is no Salvation(CCC 846).The Catechism of Pope John Paul II says God the Father wants all to be united in the Catholic Church. The Church is like the Ark of Noah that saves in the flood (CCC 845).The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), under Pope John Paul II, corrected the liberal Jesuit Fr. Jacques Dupuis sj. The CDF issued a Notification. It said that all the members of the other religions are oriented to the Church.

So this is official and Magisterial. The Magisterium says today, like the Apostles, the Church Fathers and the Bible (John 3:5, Mark 16:16 etc) that outside the Church there is no salvation. In Heaven there are only Catholics.

The irrational 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston was wrong and Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct. The Jesuit priest said there are no visible cases of the baptism of desire.

So the Boston Heresy Case referred to the heresy of the Archbishop of Boston, Cardinal Richard Cushing and Pope Pius XII. They interpreted physically invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I as being visible exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors,the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q) and the dogma EENS ( Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1442).

Now we know that the BOD, BOB and I.I are not objective people in 1949-2022.We will not be able to see or meet a BOD, BOB and I.I case in 2023.

But Pope Pius XII, Pope Paul VI and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not seem to know this. This is the heresy now of the popes from Pius XII to Francis on EENS, BOD, BOB, I.I etc. This is the real Boston Heresy. They were all contradicting the dogma EENS. They believed that everyone did not need to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation. The present two popes have also accepted the heretical 1949 Letter of the Holy Office. The Letter projected invisible cases of the BOD and I.I as being visible exceptions for apostolic EENS. So the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the original interpretation of the Nicene Creed were rejected. This was done by confusing what is invisible as being visible, unknown as known and implicit as explicit. 

"There are no literal cases of the baptism of desire", said Bishop Athanasius Schneider in an interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall. Marshall confirmed the same. He said there are no explicit cases of St. Thomas Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire. Here Schneider and Marshall rejected the political version of EENS and Vatican Council II.

Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson also said that the BOD and I.I were not exceptions for EENS. He also thought that the SSPX could accept Vatican Council II and come into the Church with canonical recognition. He meant of course, Vatican Council II rational and not irrational. There would be the hermeneutic of continuity with the traditional strict interpretation of EENS.

Today we can also have unity not only with the traditionalists, but also the sedevacantist bishops Pivarunas and Sanborn. Vatican Council II (rational) is traditional. It is the liberals who will have a problem. EWTN, National Catholic Register, Catholic Answers, Catholic Culture and the main line Church interpret Vatican Council II and EENS politically. They are supported by the CDF and the rest of the Vatican. The heresy of EWTN is seen in a report on line, titled The Tragic Errors of Fr. Leonard Feeney by Fr. William Most. It indicates that everyone does not need to be a card carrying member of the Catholic Church. It interprets the BOD and I.I of the 1949 Letter, and LG 14 and LG 16 of Vatican Council II, as being objective exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. So this is a rupture with Vatican Council II (AG 7) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845, 846, 1257 etc).It makes Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1442 on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, obsolete.



This public heresy created with an irrational premise, inference and conclusion in philosophy, is supported by Mark Brumley, the President at Ignatius Press, Jeff Mirus at Catholic Culture,Tim Price and Douglas Bushman at the Augustine Institute, Denver and Jimmy Akins at Catholic Answers. Also Fr. Mitch Pacwa, Scott Hahn and the Department of Theology at the University of Stuebenville, have succumbed to this liberalism which has no theological foundation in Vatican Council II.

Lay Catholics must oppose this political interpretation of Vatican Council II. We are not obligated to follow the public mistake of Rahner, Congar, Ratzinger and Kung. We have a rational and traditional choice and it is not political.- Lionel Andrades



LINKS FROM THE RIGHT HAND SIDE BAR. CLICK TO ACCESS





FROM THE RIGHT HAND BAR. CLICK TO ACCESS




















































































__________________________








Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)