When they accept Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO) interpreted with a false premise, inference and conclusion, Pope Francis and Pope Benedict create a new theology.It is based upon alleged practical exceptions, to exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. They create confusion on doctrine and exceptions in the following Church documents.
1.The proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation has exceptions.Since extra ecclesiam nulla salus has exceptions. So it is made obsolete, theologically.Why should we affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church when Vatican Council II for him, says there are exceptions. Similarly he could ask why is there a need to proclaim th Social Reign of Christ when Vatican Council II says....
2.Extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) is made obsolete since unknown cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are projected as practical exceptions.EENS is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century stated Pope Benedict(Avvenire).
3.The Great Commission is obsolete since there is alleged known salvation outside the Church.So Pope Benedict has asked why should there be mission when for him Vatican Council II says there is salvation outside the Church( Avvenire).He has used the false premise and no one has corrected it.
4.The First Commandment does not mean believing that there is true worship in only the Catholic Church.Since there is alleged known salvation outside the Catholic Church, practical exceptions to EENS etc.So non Christians and atheists can be saved outside the Church even in a violation of the First Commandment.
5.The Nicene Creed remains changed when the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are accepted as known examples of salvation outside the Church. So we no more believe in 'one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' but in three or more baptisms.They exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church ( LG 8, UR 3, GS 22 etc ) and so are practical exceptions to EENS according to two theological papers of the International Theological Commission approved by Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria.
6.The Athanasius Creed is obsolete.Since the Church no more teaches that outside the Church there is no salvation.Theologically, there are practical exceptions to EENS created with the fake premise.
7.Jesus in the Bible is contradicted. Since there are alleged known exceptions to John 3:6 and Mark 16:16 when the false premise is used to interpret the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance.The popes accept the LOHO with the objective error. LOHO was placed in the Denzinger and is referenced in Vatican Council II(LG 16).
8.The Catechism of the Catholic Church (n.846) which says outside the Church there is no salvation, citing Ad Gentes 7( all need faith and baptism for salvation), has alleged practical exceptions now.Similarly CCC 845 which states the Church is like the Ark of Noah that saves in the flood has alleged exceptions.So all do not need to enter the Ark to be saved.Also the Catechism of the Catholic Church (n.847,848) are projected as exceptions to traditional eccesiocentrism and dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus defined by three Church Councils in the Extraordinary form.
Vatican Council II is interpreted with the false premise to create an artficial hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition, instead of a continuity.Based upon this false interpretation of Vatican Council II we have Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus and other Church documents which are considered Magisterial by Pope Benedict.
9.The Catechism of Pope Pius X contradicts itself when it mentions being saved in invincible ignorance which is interpreted as a reference to visible and known non Catholics saved outside the Church, without faith and the baptism of water. This contradicts 24Q and 27 Q in the same Catechism.
10.The baptism of desire ( the deire thereof) mentioned in the Catechism of the Council of Trent is proejected as an exception to the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q). So the Catechisms contradict each other when the fault really lies with the false premise,used in the interpretation.
Vatican Council II is interpreted in a non Magisterial way by the two popes.
The Holy Office (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) made an objective error in the LOHO with reference to Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.Invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance could not be objective exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. The same mistake was repeated by Pope John XXIII at the start of Vatican Council II and Pope Paul VI at the conclusion of Vatican Council II(1965).
Pope Paul VI had a choice. He could have interpreted LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as refering to only hypothetical cases and so not practical exceptions to the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology.This choice is still there before the present two popes.
Pope Francis and Pope Benedict popes need to correct the error which has spread throughout the Catholic Church like a theological epidemic. All the bishops conferences have been affected by the mistake.-Lionel Andrades
____________________
Posts
