Children at
First Holy Communion and Confirmation are not taught to interpret Vatican
Council II rationally and so affirm the traditional strict interpretation of
the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which was the theological basis for
proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation,
the non separation of the Church and State and the necessity of the Government
to be Catholic, to save souls from Hell.The irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II by the Rome Vicariate and the Vatican is approved by the Chief Rabbinate of Israel and the U.S State Department.
Today from the
parish priest to the pope they teach error at First Holy Communion and
Confirmation classes throughout the world to avoid being Anti Semitic. I
mentioned the previous blog post, Pope Francis, the cardinals and bishops
interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally and permit this
error to be taught to children and adults.
This is ideological. The
children are taught to interpret Vatican Council II as a break and not
continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS),
the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. The children do not believe
there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. So they do not see the
necessity of the Government being only Catholic.
LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are projected as physically visible people; known non Catholics, saved outside the Church in 1965-2024. The children are taught not to be exclusivist. So the position of the religious sisters and priests teaching them Catechism is not Anti Semitic.
The children are
not taught, for example, to read the book The Little Flowers of St.
Francis of Assisi. This book’s moral theology is not contradicted by
Vatican Council II (rational). But for the bishops Vatican Council II
interpreted irrationally is a break with the moral theology of St. Francis of
Assisi and the saints and popes of the Middle Ages. This error is taught to
adults at the universities.
St.
Francis of Assisi believed in Hell, mortal sin and apostasy. He believed that
outside the Catholic Church there was no salvation, when he met the Muslim
Sultan. He sent his Friars to Muslim countries. Some were martyred and became
the First Franciscan martyrs. The Sultan converted on his death bed when friars
mysteriously appeared to him.
When the
children today become adults they must not be taught the new moral theology of
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. Since it based upon Vatican Council II
interpreted irrationally i.e. for the cardinals and bishops today , LG 8, 14,
15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are explicit . They are objective cases of salvation outside the
Church. They are objective exceptions for the dogma EENS
according to the old Catechisms. For me they are implicit, non objective
and hypothetical.
The new
moral theology, like the new ecumenism, is now obsolete. Since we have
discovered how to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so in harmony with Tradition.
We can proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King since the Council says
outside the Church there is no salvation ( AG 7) and does not mention any
exceptions ( LG 16 is an invisible case in 2024). Italian children here do not know about Vatican Council II rational and it
being in harmony with Feeneyite EENS. This is
EENS according to the Church Councils which do not mention any exceptions.
This is EENS according to the Catechisms, which do
not mention any exceptions.
It is EENS according to the Catechism of the
Catholic Church (845, 846, and 1257) which does not mention any exceptions.
It is EENS according to Vatican Council II (AG
7) which does not have
exceptions in LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, and GS 22.
At
religion classes in the secular and Catholic schools, the teaching is political
on Vatican Council. So EENS has exceptions in Vatican
Council II.
The interpretation
of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms is irrational. It is political.Even
political organizations like Militia Christi, Lega Salvini and Fratelli Italia
of Georgia Melloni are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally like the
political Left.
Catholic
journalists adapt what they write to avoid being Anti Semitic and so they allow
the children to be taught error.
Diana
Montagna, Edward Pentin, Michael Voris and John Henry Weston are prudent on Vatican
Council II.
LIFE SITE NEWS
At Life Site News John Henry
Weston and Steve Jalsevec, avoid the Anti Semitic charge by interpreting
Vatican Council II irrationally i.e. LG 8,14,15,16 refers to visible cases. The deception helps them
maintain their tax exempt status. The correspondents at the National Catholic
Reporter also want to maintain the deceptive status quo on Vatican Council, as
do the pontifical universities in Rome. They do not want restrictions placed
upon them because of traditional Catholic beliefs which emerge alive and intact
with the Council interpreted rationally i.e. without confusing what is invisible
as being visible. All the reports on
Vatican Council II approved by John Henry Weston have the Council interpreted
irrationally.1
The liberals say the Church
cannot go back to the past. They mean there is an automatic and
easy way for the Church to go back to Tradition and they don’t want it.
All they have to do is interpret the Vatican Council II rationally and they are
back to the past ecclesiology. The traditionalists want the Church
to go back to the past but they do not want to be Anti Semitic. Today
morning I was asking someone who finished his theological studies what had he
say when I say that I affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Vatican
Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. I am a Catholic. I am not
rejecting Tradition and neither Vatican Council II. I told him Vatican Council
II supported me as do other Magisterial Documents which I interpret rationally
only. He had nothing to say. - Lionel
Andrades
1
Was Vatican II a valid ecumenical council?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/was-vatican-ii-a-valid-ecumenical-council/
Jewish podcaster Eric Weinstein says ‘Vatican 2 may
have been a big mistake’ in discussion about Latin Mass
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/jewish-podcaster-eric-weinstein-says-vatican-2-may-have-been-a-big-mistake-in-discussion-about-latin-mass/