Understand this. It means all the books authored on Vatican Council II have a fault line

Understand this. It means all the books authored on Vatican Council II have a fault line. They are written with Cushingism i.e. what is invisible is confused as being  visible. These books are irrational and not rational. New books have to be written on the Council and the old ones discarded. 

Understand this. It means all the encyclicals, apostolic letters etc of the popes from Pius VI to Francis were written with Cushingism. The popes from Pius XII did not check Cushingism in the Catholic Church. It has spread.

Understand this. All the videos and websites, secular and those of the Vatican, have interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism and not Feeneyism. -Lionel Andrades

 

 AUGUST 15, 2023

She has broken through the mess in the Church. I am only reporting it.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/08/she-has-broken-through-mess-in-church-i.html

 

 

AUGUST 15, 2023

She has broken through the mess in the Church. I am only reporting it.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/08/she-has-broken-through-mess-in-church-i.html

 

 

She has broken through the mess in the Church. I am only reporting it.

We have a discovery which has taken the Catholic Church back to the past. It is the discovery of Cushingism and Feeneyism.It is interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally or rationally.

Presently the understanding of the Church Councils, Catechisms and Nicene, Apostles and Athanasius Creed is irrational. We can switch to the rational interpretation. Then there is a continuity and not rupture with Tradition. The liberal-conservative (traditionalist) division in the Church ends.

Vatican Council II is then orthodox and traditional. It is unethical for the cardinals, for example, to choose Cushingism. They must elect a pope who is a Feeneyite i.e. he interprets invisible cases as being invisible. This is common sense. It is something obvious.

The liberalism we have seen over the last 60 years comes with Cushingism. When it is said that Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Murray and Balthazar were liberals, it is a reference, to their being Cushingites.

When it is said that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was a traditionalist, it is false. He was a Cushingite. A Cushingite cannot be a traditionalist.

For Lefebvre, invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 16(being saved in invincible ignorance) and Lumen Gentium 14 (being saved with the baptism of desire), were visible examples of salvation outside the Church. So they were objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Lefebvre was following the Cushingite 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.

The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office has been a source of Cushingism in the Catholic Church.

She has broken through the mess in the Church. I am only reporting it.

I was a Staff Reporter at daily Morning News Karachi, Pakistan.  -Lionel Andrades