Monday, November 8, 2021
When those who support the writings of Fr. Denis Fahey, interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Cushingism ; with the False Premise, they really are negating the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation
Since if for example, 29 C ( invincible
ignorance) in the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradicts the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus ( 24Q and 27 Q) and there is alleged known salvation
outside the Church of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance and without
the baptism of water and Catholic faith – then why proclaim Jesus in the Church
as the center of all politics, it is asked?People are being saved without Jesus
and the Church since outside the Church there is salvation according to the New
Theology it is said -and the New Theology is used by the Lefebvrists, Thucs and liberals to
interpret Vatican Council II.
So when those who support the writings
of Fr. Denis Fahey, interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla
salus with Cushingism ; with the False Premise, they really are negating the
proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political
legislation.
Instead if they interpreted the
Catechisms and Creeds with the Rational Premise, with Feeneyism ( invisible
cases are simply invisible in the present times, there are no literal cases of
the baptism of desire), then outside the Church there is no salvation,
according to the old exclusivist theology not contradicted by Vatican Council
II ( rational).So the priority once again is Traditional Feeneyite Mission and
the necessity of the Government being Catholic, to promote the one true
religion (UR 3),the new people of God(NA 4) and save souls outside the
Catholic Church from going to Hell,without faith and the baptism of water (AG 7/CCC 846).
Michael Davies did not notice the False
Premise in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO). So he was interpreting the
Creeds and Catechisms with the False Premise to reject the dogma EENS.So
theologically he had made the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the
King, which he supported in his writings, obsolete.
Those who accept the False Premise of
the LOHO, reject the Old Theology, which says outside the Church there is no
salvation.They also re-interpret the Nicene Creed irrationally and reject the
Athanasius Creed, supporting mortal sins of faith.The Creeds are de fide
teachings which are obligatory for all Catholics to affirm - but if there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II ( Rational and Irrational) then there are two interpretations of the Creeds.
We can affirm the Four Marks of the Church but with two different interpretations, one rational and the other rational and we will have two different conclusions, one traditional and the other non traditional. -Lionel Andrades
When Michael Voris went to New Hampshire and asked Fr. Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar in the Diocese of Manchester, if he would like to be interviewed , he declined. No one in the Manchester-Curia responded. But I had e-mailed them at that time. My reports were also there on this blog. They knew about the False Premise and they were not correcting the mistake.
When Michael Voris went to New Hampshire and asked Fr. Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar in the Diocese of Manchester, if he would like to be interviewed , he declined. No one in the Manchester-Curia responded. But I had e-mailed them at that time. My reports were also there on this blog. They knew about the False Premise and they not correcting the mistake. They were maintaining the Decree of Prohibitions upon the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire to coerce them to interpret Magisterial Documents with the Fake Premise and create a false rupture with Tradition.- Lionel Andrades
NOVEMBER 1, 2021
If Bishop Mark Pivarunas avoided the False Premise then Vatican Council II would no more be a break with traditional de fide teachings. They could accept Vatican Council II in harmony with the past Magisterium – and then ask Bishop Libasci to do the same.
The sedevacantist religious community Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen (CMRI) have their church in New Hampshire, in the diocese of Manchester where the bishop is Peter Libasci. He has forbidden Catholics from visiting that church according to the diocese website.
The CMRI community, under Bishop Mark Pivarunas, like Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Prefect of the Congregation for the Docrtrine of the Faith, Vatican, and Bishop Peter Libasci use the same False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS.So when there has to be, the expected break with Tradition, because of the False Premise, the CMRI community chooses sedevacantism since Vatican Council II emerges as a rupture with Tradition.
But if Bishop Mark Pivarunas avoided the False Premise then Vatican Council II would no more be a break with traditional de fide teachings. They could accept Vatican Council II in harmony with the past Magisterium – and then ask Bishop Libasci to do the same.
Similarly if Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Libasci choose to interpret Vatican Council II without the False Premise and instead with the Rational Premise, there would no more be a break with Tradition and they could ask Bishop Pivarunas to give up his sedevacantism and be re-united with the mainstream Catholic Church of Pope Francis. There would no more be doctrinal division or theological liberalism.
I have e-mailed Bishop Pivarunas and Fr. Benedict Hughes many times but they will not answer. May be they do not want to be politically incorrect with the Left, and really go back to Tradition.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.olmc-mission.org/
It's a scandal when Archbishops Giacomo Morandi and Augustine di Noia Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican use a False Premise
NOVEMBER 8, 2021
It's a scandal
Daily Reading for Monday, November 8th, 2021
Gospel, Luke 17:1-6
1 He said to his disciples, 'Causes of falling are sure to come, but alas for the one through whom they occur!
2 It would be better for such a person to be thrown into the sea with a millstone round the neck than to be the downfall of a single one of these little ones.
3 Keep watch on yourselves! 'If your brother does something wrong, rebuke him and, if he is sorry, forgive him.
4 And if he wrongs you seven times a day and seven times comes back to you and says, "I am sorry," you must forgive him.'
5 The apostles said to the Lord, 'Increase our faith.'
6 The Lord replied, 'If you had faith like a mustard seed you could say to this mulberry tree, "Be uprooted and planted in the sea," and it would obey you.
https://www.catholic.org/bible/daily_reading/
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/11/its-scandal.html
It's a scandal
Daily Reading for Monday, November 8th, 2021
Gospel, Luke 17:1-6
1 He said to his disciples, 'Causes of falling are sure to come, but alas for the one through whom they occur!
2 It would be better for such a person to be thrown into the sea with a millstone round the neck than to be the downfall of a single one of these little ones.
3 Keep watch on yourselves! 'If your brother does something wrong, rebuke him and, if he is sorry, forgive him.
4 And if he wrongs you seven times a day and seven times comes back to you and says, "I am sorry," you must forgive him.'
5 The apostles said to the Lord, 'Increase our faith.'
6 The Lord replied, 'If you had faith like a mustard seed you could say to this mulberry tree, "Be uprooted and planted in the sea," and it would obey you.
https://www.catholic.org/bible/daily_reading/
Posts
