The SSPX affirms Tradition and Bishop Bernard Fellay has said that they accept 90% of Vatican Council II. They now only have to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. Then they are not in schism with the popes over the centuries. It is Pope Francis who is in schism since he rejects Tradition when he interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. He must correct the error by interpreting Vatican Council II rationally

 

The SSPX affirms Tradition and Bishop Bernard Fellay has said that they accept 90% of Vatican Council II. They now only have to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. Then they are not in schism with the popes over the centuries. It is Pope Francis who is in schism since he rejects Tradition when he interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally.

We have a schismatic pope and this is a scandal. His error is being followed by the cardinals, bishops and the rest of the Church. A schismatic pope is automatically excommunicated until he corrects his mistake.

A pope has to be Catholic and affirm Catholic teachings in public otherwise he is not a pope.

The first 100 popes were martyrs. - Lionel Andrades

MARCH 24, 2023

The Boston Heresy is like the Arian heresy of past times

 

                                                                                                                                  -Lionel Andrades

MARCH 23, 2023

The Boston Heresy is an objective error which can be verified in public. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/the-boston-heresy-is-objective-error.html

 MARCH 23, 2023

A pope cannot be Magisterial who supports the Boston Heresy. He must correct the error.There are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.

 

A pope cannot be Magisterial who supports the Boston Heresy. He must correct the error.There are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.

LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are always hypothetical.They are invisible cases in 1965-2023. So where are the exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed ?

Why do Catholic Answers and EWTN for example,  officially reject the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church ?

Why must Catholics change the interpretation of the Creeds? This is a mortal sin of faith.

Why must Catholics affirm the Boston Heresy of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston?

Pope Francis and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith must correct the error in public .

In inter-religious dialogue and ecumenism non Catholics must be told to interpret Vatican Council II without the Boston Heresy. Mortal sins of faith send people to Hell.

Without the Boston Heresy Vatican Council II would be saying that all non Catholics need faith and the  baptism of water for salvation ( AG 7/LG 14, CCC 845,846 etc).LG 8,14 and 16 etc are not practical exceptions for Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14, CCC 846 etc. There is no break with Tradition. So the Council does not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442).Vatican Council II is not a break with the Magisterium of the 12^th to 16^th century.- Lionel Andrades

MARCH 23, 2023

Roberto dei Mattei, Christopher Ferrara, Fr.Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari, Louie Verrecchio, Ann Barnhardt, David Domet, Eric Sammons and Michael Matt, were all interpreting Vatican Council II with the Boston Heresy. It was the same with Mons. Brunero Gherardino, Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon and Fr. William Most. This was the mistake of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX and SSPX Resistance bishops.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/roberto-dei-mattei-christopher-ferrara.html

 MARCH 22, 2023

I have not written books on this subject and I have no intention of writing books in future. But one thing of which I am sure is that - there are no physically visible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in the present times.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/i-have-not-written-books-on-this.html

MARCH 22, 2023

Michael Voris and Michael Lofton are not Magisterial when they do not affirm the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as do the priests of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX). So why do they say the SSPX is not Magisterial?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/michael-voris-and-michael-lofton-are.html

MARCH 21, 2023

Faculty of Theology, University of Munich is legally dishonest

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/faculty-of-theology-university-of.html

 MARCH 20, 2023

An Augustinian Recollect priest at the church Sant Ildefonso e Tomasso Villanova, via Sistina, Rome, yesterday agreed with me. He said Vatican Council II has a continuity with the past.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/an-augustinian-recollect-priest-at.html

MARCH 19, 2023

This is interpreting Church Documents with the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/this-is-interpreting-church-documents.html

MARCH 19, 2023

Without the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits - the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) could interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/without-boston-heresy-of-pope-pius-xii.html

CMTV says Judaism today is not that of the times of the Old Testament and Jews need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation, since outside the Church there is no salvation.Simon Rafe refers to the new religion of the Jews and not their ethinicity or race

MARCH 25, 2023

Kasper and Bequart choose the same irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II

 
Cardinal Walter Kasper has criticized the Synod. But Sister Nathalie Bequart has defended the Synod. She said the Synod is theologically based upon Vatican Council II. Of course, she means Vatican Council II, irrational and not rational.

Cardinal Kasper has always interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally.

He chose this irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II to publically justify Amoris Laetitia. He said if Vatican Council II (irrational and not rational) could change the ecclesiology of the Church then why could not the Eucharist be given to the divorced and remarried?

Caption: All this is based upon the fake interpretation of Vatican Council II. It is dishonesty.

With Vatican Council II (rational) there could not be an Abu Dhabi Declaration or a New Ecumenism for Pope Francis and Cardinal Kasper.

Caption: How can there be reconciliation with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally?. There is deception.
With Vatican Council II (rational) the German bishops cannot justify their Synod. They need the Boston Heresy to produce exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

       Caption : This is possible only with the fake interpretation of Vatican Council II.

The German liberals say that if the Church has changed its position on EENS with Vatican Council II (interpreted irrationally) then why cannot there be innovation in faith and morals?

                                       Caption: Walking together unethically. 

 Vatican Council II (irrational) is ‘a revolution’ in the Church says Reuters. It is ‘a new revelation’ for Pope Francis.

Caption: How can Vatican Council II be orthodox when it is not interpreted rationally ? An orthodox Vatican Council II would say that all need faith the baptism of water for salvation. There can only be an ecumenism of return.

Cardinal Arthur Roche calls it ‘the new magisterium’ of the Church. So the 1962 Missal is obsolete for him.

We know that the 1962 Missal supports the dogma EENS with no exceptions. It is in harmony with Vatican Council II (rational). The SSPX , for example, could affirm Vatican Council II (rational) and also use the 1962 Missal.

 But Cardinal Roche and the Liturgy Department of the University of St. Anselm, Rome cannot use the 1962 Missal.Since EENS is contradicted with the irrational interpretation of LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 2, NA 2, and GS 22 etc.

 They are unethical. This is not Catholic. We cannot have a new Missal based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. There cannot be a New Magisterium based upon Vatican Council II, interpreted with a fake premise and inference. 

The German Synods are flawed. This is known to the theologians at the University of Munich. They can only ethically interpret Vatican Council II rationally.-Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 4, 2022

Archbishop Arthur Roche, Andrea Grillo, Dr. Peter Kwasniewski and Dr.Joseph Shaw use the same False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a false break with Tradition, supporting the common liberalism

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/02/archbishop-arthur-roche-andrea-grillodr.html

_______________________________

MARCH 19, 2023

Feast of St.Joseph today : protector of the Catholic Church and destroyer of heresies

  

FUORI DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA 

NON C’E SALVEZZA

(OUTSIDE THE CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION)

GIOV.3:5, MC.16:16

(JOHN 3:5, MARK 16:16)

CONCILIO VATICANO II (AG7/LG14)

(VATICAN COUNCIL II (Ad Gentes 7/ Lumen Gentes 14)

CATECHISMO DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA (846)

(CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH 846)

CATECHISMO DEL TRENTO, CATECHISMO DEL PAPA PIO X,

(CATECHISM OF TRENT, CATECHISM OF POPE PIUS X)

CONCILIO LATERANO (1215), CONCILIO DI FIRENZE (1442)

(FOURTH LATERAN COUNCIL (1215), COUNCIL OF FLORENCE (1442))

Name: Lionel Andrades

https://twitter.com/AndradesLionel

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Blog: eucharistandmission ( Lionel’s blog).               

 March 19, 2023 Feast day of St. Joseph

P.S: THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE (BOD), BAPTISM OF BLOOD(BOB) AND BEING SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE (I.I) ARE ALWAYS HYPOTHETICAL AND PHYSICALLY INVISIBLE CASES. SO THEY DO NOT CONTRADICT THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS (EENS).

THE BOD, BOB AND I.I ARE  NOT KNOWN PEOPLE IN PERSONAL CASES. THERE ARE NO PHYSICALLY VISIBLE CASES OF BEING SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE.SO THEY ARE NOT OBJECTIVE EXCEPTIONS FOR THE DOGMA EENS IN 1965-2023.

AD GENTES 7 AND LUMEN GENTIUM 14 SUPPORT THE DOGMA EENS .LG 8,14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 ETC ARE NOT PRACTICAL EXCEPTIONS FOR  AG 7/ LG 14 AND THE DOGMA EENS. THE COUNCIL HAS THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY WITH THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS, THE ATHANASIUS CREED AND THE CATECHISM OF POPE PIUS X ( 24Q,27Q).

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/feats-day-of-stjoseph-today-protector.html

It cannot be said, ‘to follow Pope Francis is to follow the Magisterium’ since Pope Francis rejects the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence, Cantata Domino (1442) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX when he accepts and interprets Vatican Council II irrationally.

 

It cannot be said, ‘to follow Pope Francis is to follow the Magisterium’ since Pope Francis rejects the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence, Cantata Domino (1442) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, when he accepts and interprets Vatican Council II irrationally. With alleged exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), he produces a false break with Tradition. This cannot be Magisterial. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake.

How can the pope change the interpretation of the Nicene Creed to, ‘I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins and they exclude the baptism of water ?'.

How  can he change the original understanding of the Apostles Creed to, ‘we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church’ which in the past taught that outside the Church there is no salvation but today teaches that outside the Church there is known salvation; there is salvation, with invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) and the baptism of desire (BOD) being visible and so contradicting the Magisterium over the centuries, for which it was invisible?'

How can there be a pope who re-interprets the Athanasius Creed to say not everyone needs to be a member of the Catholic Church since Pope Pius XII in 1949  said invisible cases of the BOD and I.I are visible in daily life ?. –Lionel Andrades

A FUTURE RAD TRAD POPE. ROME RETURNS TO THE FAITH.

Without the Boston Heresy, of Pope Pius XII, the Catholic Church returns to the pre-1949 times. Rome comes back to the Faith. The Novus Ordo, main line Church, returns to Tradition. The theology is outside the Church there is no salvation. We simply re-interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II rationally and we return to the past. It’s so simple that it is hard to believe. But we can see the proof immediately. Anyone can test it. When Pope Francis interprets LG 8 etc rationally he returns to Tradition. He becomes a traditionalist on faith and morals. So a future pope can only be a traditionalist, a rad trad pope. Then he can affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics, based upon the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church, which does not change.-L.A