Fr.Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA, must clarify for the people in NH if he interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism or Feeneyism and is this honest, Catholic and legal ?

Fr.Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA, must clarify for the people in NH if he interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism or Feeneyism and is this honest, Catholic and legal ?

Does he expect the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom, St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, to also interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism? Does he expect all the Catholic educational institutions and all the religious communities and organizations in New Hampshire, to be dishonest with Cushingism? How can he legally be a Cushingite?

Pope Francis, Cardinal-designate Victor Manuel Fernandez and Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, NH and the Judicial Vicr in NH, Fr. Georges de Laire,  are also interpreting Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism.

There are also articles/ reports by Brother Andre Marie micm, on the website Catholicism.org in which he has interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally. Those reports are politically correct with the Left and the diocese.He also received his academic degree in theology, since he interpreted the Council irrationally and not rationally.He has also approved/recommended books on the Catholicism.org webiste, written by Roberto dei Mattei, Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton etc who interpreted the Council and other Magisterial Documents with irrational Cushingism. They were Cushingites.This is a common error in the Church. Cushingism has spread throughout the Church.

Brother Andre Marie micm and Brother Thomas Augustine micm, at the St. Benedict Centers in Richmond, NH and Still River, MA were respectively Cushingites on Vatican Council II and they were Feeneyites on EENS.

Also Brother Andre Marie’s Doctrinal Statement on the Catholicism.org website, in response to the Decree of Prohibitions of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF/DDF), Vatican on the website of the Diocese of Manchester,NH does not mention if the Cushingism of the CDF/DDF and the Diocese of Manchester, is Magisterial or not.Is Pope Francis, the CDF and Bishop Peter Libasci Magisterial with public Cushingism?

The St. Benedict Center NH conferences have been held with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. Also there have been reviews and reports in general on different subjects in which the writers/commentators have interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally and they have been posted on the Catholicism.org website, with no mention of the error.

It would seem as if Fr. Leonard Feeney and Fr. Francis micm, the Superior of the St. Benedict Center in NH, were only interpreting Vatican Council II, irrationally.There are no comments by Fr. Leonard Feeney and Brother Francis micm, on Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.

Brother Andre Marie micm, needs to issue a  clarification/correction on the website of Catholicism.org and then point out the same errors on the website of the Diocese of Manchester, NH.

At Boston College and throughout New England in USA, they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally i.e. LG 8,14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. In other words, they refer to physically visible cases; known people saved outside the Catholic Church in the present times. Only in this way they could be practical exceptions for EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc. But we know that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, etc refer to only hypothetical cases for us. So they are not exceptions for an ecumenism of return to the Church, of the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.

Vatican Council II (LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3 etc) does not contradict the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q-outside the Church no salvation).

The Council is not a break with Tradition for me. We have a choice in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. We can interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc, as referring to invisible or visible cases in 1965-2023. 

Fr. John Hardon sj., Fr. William Most, Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Ludwig Ott were interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally i.e. LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc referred to physically visible cases. This was the objetive mistake of also the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.-Lionel Andrades

 AUGUST 9, 2023

In principle a pope has to be a Feeneyite and not a Cushingite.A Cushingite cannot be a pope. Since Cushingism produces the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. It produces heresy and schism. Presently the whole Church is infected with Cushingism. Cushingites accept Magisterial Documents but always interpret them irrationally.

 

In principle a pope has to be a Feeneyite and not a Cushingite.A Cushingite cannot be a pope. Since Cushingism produces the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. It produces heresy and schism.

Presently the whole Church is infected with Cushingism. Cushingites accept Magisterial Documents but always interpret them irrationally. Pope Pius XII was a Cushingite in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office. Pope Francis is a Cushingite in Traditionis Custode and Amoris Laetitia. Also Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was a Cushingite on Vatican Council II.

Sister Marie Philomena micm, Director of the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom in New Hampshire is a Feeneyite on Vatican Council II.

You cannot be a Cushingite and be a Catholic.If a pope, cardinal or bishop forces you to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism, refuse to do so.

- Lionel Andrades

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1991106437591715&set=ecnf.100064429129977

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/08/in-principle-pope-has-to-be-feeneyite.html

ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH      SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.

 Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.

Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/

Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Twitter : @LionelAndrades1

 

Things have changed in the Church. You can know more tell me that you justify your liberalism with Vatican Council, since I can justify my orthodoxy, also with Vatican Council II

 

JULY 28, 2023

Things have changed in the Church. You can know more tell me that you justify your liberalism with Vatican Council, since I can justify my orthodoxy, also with Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/07/things-have-changed-in-church-you-can.html

TALKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II BEING IN HARMONY WITH TRADITION AND THERE BEING TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF THE COUNCIL, ONE IS RATIONAL AND THE OTHER IS IRRATIONAL.

If you are a group of Catholics, liberal or traditionalist, I am willing to speak about this subject. I can present the material on this blog in an orderly way for you to understand quickly what I keep writing about. I available am in Rome ( only Rome) and there is no charge. The information will be given free. It will be illustrated with some graphics and photos.

I am a Catholic and I affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church as I have said often on this blog.

The difference between me and Catholics in general and also the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican,  is that they interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms, Councils etc  irrationally and I am rational.

I choose a rational premise and inference and so my conclusion is traditional.

The presentation could take 20 minutes or less.I will be available to answer questions.I do not have any new theology to offer. I simply avoid an irrational observation and we return to the old theology of the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century at the Latin Mass. This would be the general theology today, which is honest and rational, at every Mass and every Rite. It would have to be the lex orandi.

Please e-mail me at : lionelandrades10@gmail.com

p.s I do not have a telephone contact number and do not travel out of Rome.

ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH      SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.

 Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.

Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/

Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Twitter : @LionelAndrades1