Michael Matt says Archbishop Lefebvre trained priests in Catholic doctrine - this is false.
Lefebvre interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise.
Lefebvre interpreted extra ecclesiam nulla salus with a false premise.
Lefebvre interpreted the Catechism of Pope Pius X with a false premise.
Lefebvre interpreted the Nicene Creed with a false premise.
Lefebvre discarded the Athanasius Creed with a false premise
Etc, etc.
This is not Catholic doctrine.
This is schism with the past popes on de fide teaching of the Church.
This is not traditionalism. It is a rupture with Tradition.
-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 29, 2019
Yves Congar and the progressive group at Vatican Council II did not know that the Council was being interpreted with a false premise. Without this premise the Council would still have the old ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and the traditional exclusive salvation theology
Cardinal Reinhard Marx of Munich organised a meeting on Vatican Council II in Rome. The participants interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise. So there was a rupture with the old ecumenism of return and EENS
Bradley Eli at Church Militant TV uses a list of false premises. He uses it to create a rupture with Tradition.So there is a schism with the past popes and the past Magisterium.Since with a false premise 'objective' exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus are created. Even the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed etc. are contradicted. This is schism. It is officially approved schism
Pope Paul VI and the popes upto Francis have interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism. Pope Paul VI had a choice.He chose the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition : New York Times on Vatican Council II
With Vatican Council II (Cushingite) there is a 'new revelation' in the Catholic Church.This liberal reading causes the hermeneutic of rupture with the past. It is obsolete since it is based upon an irrationality. A rational Feeneyite version is available
People usually say that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) when they really should be saying that they are not exceptions. People have been conditioned to see LG 8 etc as exceptions
A schism from the Left is created when the present two popes and the ecclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and conservative Catholic bishops who blindly follow them, say there are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It is enforced by the Jewish Left with Anti Semitic and other laws.
When it said there are exceptions, it is implied that there are known non Catholics saved outside the Church. There are visible and personally known people saved outside the Catholic Church without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14).They would have to be known and visible to be exceptions. Unknown and invisible people cannot be examples of salvation outside the Church.So they are not exceptions to EENS.
Since there are exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology there is a change in doctrine and theology in the Church.There is a new theology which says outside the Church there is salvation.Every one does not need to be a member of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.
Hypothetical cases and speculative possibilities known only to God are considered real and known people saved outside the Church. The are saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water. So with these 'exceptions' the Creeds and catechisms have been changed.Vatican Council II is interpreted irrationally.LG 8 is an 'exception' to EENS. There is a new ecclesiology.It is based upon invisible non Catholics being visible.
The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is made obsolete and so the dogma EENS defined by three Church Councils in the Extraordinary Magisterium is also contradicted.This is schism. It is schism with a false premise supported by the Left.
So today to be a Catholic in good standing with the Church one has to reject the Athanasius Creed.The dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus too has to be put aside.So also other de fide teachings of the past popes.There is a new understanding of the Nicene Creed and the Apostles Creed.This is first class heresy and more schism.The Profession of Faith is now modernist. With the false premise (invisible non Catholics arevisible), the old ecclesiology and traditional ecumenism of return, are finished. There are allegedly known Protestants saved outside the Church. The past popes have been rejected on ecumenism. Traditional rational theology, is replaced,with the false premise. So now it is the New Ecumenism, New Theology, New Ecclesiology, New Evangelisation...but with a rupture between faith and reason and a violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction.
To reject the Creed or change its meaning is a mortal sin of faith. EENS is a de fide teaching of the Church.It has to be accepted and not changed.
This is a schism with the popes and Magisterium of the Catholic Church before Pius XII.
What I write here is not a condemnation.I write so that the problem is identified and then corrected.
We need to stop saying that there are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS since there are none that we can know of as human beings.
We need to stop saying that outside the Church there is salvation.Not any more. Since there is no person whom we can know who is saved outside the Church in the present times. No one saw St. Emerentiana in Heaven without the baptism of water.The Church does not say that someone had the charism to see her in Heaven without the baptism of water. To end the schism with the magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century, the popes and the CDF, need to affirm EENS and the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I).This was what the popes before Pius XII did. BOD, BOB and I.I must not be seen as exceptions to EENS. Similarly LG 8, LG14, LG16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc must not be seen as exceptions to 16th century EENS.This is being rational.
Cardinals and bishops must interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with 16th century EENS or they become schismatic.
They need to affirm the past exclusivist ecclesiology , an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors, and the Athanasius Creed without mixing up what is invisible as being visible.They must make the subjective-objective distinction.Hypothetical cannot be considered objectively known and seen in the present times(2019), even if this is politically correct with the Left.
Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider though conservative on many issues are schismatic on Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms. This is first class heresy. Vatican Council II is a rupture with Feeneyite EENS, the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors etc for them.
They need to affirm magisterial documents without confusing what is invisible as being visible and then projecting these documents as a rupture with EENS according to the 16th century Magisterium.
BOD,BOB and I.I are not exceptions to EENS.We can affirm EENS and BOD, BOB and I.I.It is not either-or. They are compatible. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/ten-prominent-examples-of-cushingism-in.html The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.It assumed BOD, BOB and I.I were exceptions to EENS. So the Letter implied that BOD, BOB and I.I referred to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Chrch. This irrationality was overlooked at Vatican Council II and theology was de-reailed.An irrationality and falsehood is the basis of the New Theology , Cushingite theology.
Cushingite theology, approved by the Left in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, is predominant in the whole Church.The Church today is Cushingite like it once was Arian.No one today speaks of Feeneyite theology for the intepretation of the Council-text. Cushingism is approved by the bishops' conferences which needto identify the error and correct it, with a clarification.
The ordinary lay Catholic in Germany, Malta, USA, England etc must be told that the Catholic Church still teaches the strict interpretation of EENS. Since EENS (Feeneyite) is not contradicted by Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite- without the false premise), the Catechisms (interpreted without the false premise) and the Creeds ( interpreted without the false premise and inference). So we are back to the old ecclesiology .Mission based on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church only.There is no rupture any more with the Church Fathers and the popes of the Middle Ages.
With Cushingite philosophy ( invisible people are physically visible) and theology( outside the Church there is known salvation), an artificial and schismatic rupture is created, with the past.It leads to mortal sins of faith, scandal and sacrilege.
Without the irrationality ( outside the Church there is known salvation, since possibilities are known people saved outside the Church today) the ecclesiology of the Church is the same at Holy Mass in all rites.Mass in the vernacular is the same Mass of the centuries.
Posts
