Saturday, August 21, 2021

Alla conferenza stampa di Placuit Deo (2018) il Cardinale Ladaria ha criticato l'eresia di neo-gnosticismo e pelagiana. Ora sappiamo che si riferiva all'ortodossia Cattolica. Coloro che affermano l'ortodossia cattolica sarebbero gnostici. È simile all'odio politico del politico sinistra


 21 AGOSTO 2021


Alla conferenza stampa di Placuit Deo (2018) il Cardinale Ladaria ha criticato l'eresia di  neo-gnosticismo e pelagiana. Ora sappiamo che si riferiva all'ortodossia Cattolica. Coloro che affermano l'ortodossia cattolica sarebbero gnostici. È simile all'odio politico del politico sinistra. Alla conferenza, quando gli è stato chiesto di fornire esempi concreti di eresia nel presente, non l'ha fatto.

Quindi i peccati mortali di fede saranno ufficialmente scomunicati dalla Congregazione per la Dottrina della Fede (CDF) e rafforzata come nuova dottrina cattolica.La CDF lavorerà per Satana invece che per Dio.

La Chiesa ha fatto marcia indietro su fede e morale.

La dichiarazione critica della CDF sulle unioni omosessuali era ortodossia.Potrebbe essere gnosticismo in futuro, dopo il pensionamento del Cardinale Ladaria.

Nel XVI secolo lo gnosticismo si riferiva all'eresia che rifiutava l'ortodossia cattolica. Ora è il contrario.

Dal 1965 abbiamo una versione politica del Concilio Vaticano. E' conclusione gnostica per il Magistero cinquecentesco e missionario di quel tempo.

In futuro, quando il Concilio Vaticano II sarà interpretato senza la falsa premessa, l'inferenza e la conclusione non tradizionale, sosterrà la Tradizione. Con la premessa razionale non si opporrà alla Tradizione come oggi. Allora il Concilio Vaticano II sarà considerato eretico e gnostico.

I segni pubblici della "vera Chiesa" saranno proibiti. Word on Fire del vescovo Robert Barron e il National Catholic Reporter, ecc. interpretano il Concilio Vaticano II con una premessa falsa. Saranno consentiti. - Lionel Andrades


 

AT THE PLACUIT DEO PRESS CONFERENCE(2018) CARDINAL LADARIA WAS CRITICAL OF NEO GNOSTICISM AND PELAGIANISM HERESY.NOW WE KNOW THAT HE WAS REFERRING TO CATHOLIC ORTHODOXY. THOSE WHO AFFIRM CATHOLIC ORTHODOXY. THOSE WHO AFFIRM CATHOLIC ORTHODOXY WOULD BE GNOSTIC

At the Placuit Deo press conference (2018) Cardinal Ladaria was critical of neo Gnosticism and Pelagianism heresy.Now we know that he was referring to Catholic orthodoxy.Those who affirm Catholic orthodoxy would be gnostic.It is  similar to the political hate of the political Left.At the conference when he was asked to give specific examples of heresy in the present times, he would not do so.

So mortal sins of faith will officially be excommunicated by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).It will be enforced as new Catholic doctrine.The  CDF will work for Satan instead of God.

The Church has gone into reverse on faith and morals.

The CDF’s critical statement on homosexual unions, was orthodoxy,It  could be gnosticism in future, after Cardinal Ladaria retires.

In the 16th century gnosticism referred to heresy whch rejected Catholic orthodoxy. Now it is the opposite.

Since 1965 we have a political version of Vatican Council It'  conclusion would be gnostic for the 16th century Magisterium and missionaries of that time.

In future when Vatican Council II is interpreted without the fake premise, inference and non traditional conclusion, it will support Tradition. With the rational premise it will not oppose Tradition like today. So then Vatican Council II will be considered heretical and gnostic.In future the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) could be labelled a gnostic organisation and legally not Catholic.They could be excommunicated.

Public signs of ‘the true Church’ will be prohibited.Bishop Robert Barron’s Word on Fire and the National Catholic Reporter, etc   interpret Vatican Council II with a fake premise.They will  be permitted.-Lionel Andrades




 À LA CONFÉRENCE DE PRESSE DE PLACUIT DEO (2018), LE CARDINAL LADARIA A ÉTÉ CRITIQUE DU NÉO-GNOSTISME ET DE L'HÉRÉSIE DU PÉLAGIANISME. CEUX QUI AFFIRMENT L'ORTHODOXIE CATHOLIQUE. CEUX QUI AFFIRMENT L'ORTHODOXIE CATHOLIQUE SERONT GNOSTIQUES

Lors de la conférence de presse de Placuit Deo (2018), le cardinal Ladaria a critiqué l'hérésie du néo-gnosticisme et du pélagianisme. Nous savons maintenant qu'il faisait référence à l'orthodoxie catholique. Ceux qui affirment l'orthodoxie catholique seraient gnostiques. À gauche. Lors de la conférence, lorsqu'on lui a demandé de donner des exemples précis d'hérésie à l'époque actuelle, il ne l'a pas fait.

Ainsi, les péchés mortels de la foi seront officiellement excommuniés par la Congrégation pour la Doctrine de la Foi (CDF).Il sera appliqué comme nouvelle doctrine catholique.La CDF travaillera pour Satan au lieu de Dieu.

L'Église a fait marche arrière sur la foi et la morale.

La déclaration critique du CDF sur les unions homosexuelles était de l'orthodoxie, cela pourrait être du gnosticisme à l'avenir, après la retraite du cardinal Ladaria.

Au XVIe siècle, le gnosticisme faisait référence à l'hérésie qui rejetait l'orthodoxie catholique. Maintenant c'est le contraire.

Depuis 1965, nous avons une version politique du Concile du Vatican. Sa conclusion serait gnostique pour le Magistère du XVIe siècle et les missionnaires de cette époque.

À l'avenir, lorsque le Concile Vatican II sera interprété sans la fausse prémisse, l'inférence et la conclusion non traditionnelle, il soutiendra la Tradition. Avec la prémisse rationnelle elle ne s'opposera pas à la Tradition comme aujourd'hui. Ainsi, le Concile Vatican II sera considéré comme hérétique et gnostique. À l'avenir, la Fraternité Saint-Pie X (FSSPX) pourrait être qualifiée d'organisation gnostique et légalement non catholique. Ils pourraient être excommuniés.

Les signes publics de «la vraie Église» seront interdits. Word on Fire de l'évêque Robert Barron et le National Catholic Reporter, etc. interprètent le Concile Vatican II avec une fausse prémisse. Ils seront autorisés.-Lionel Andrades


AUF DER PRESSEKONFERENZ PLACUIT DEO (2018) WAR KARDINAL LADARIA KRITISCH DER NEO-GNOTIZISMUS UND DER PELAGIANISMUS-KÄTZUNG. JENE, DIE KATHOLISCHE ORTHODOXIE BESTÄTIGEN. JENE, DIE KATHOLISCHE ORTHODOXIE BESTÄTIGEN, WÜRDEN GNOSTISCH SEIN

 

Auf der Pressekonferenz von Placuit Deo (2018) kritisierte Kardinal Ladaria die Neognostik und die Pelagianismus-Häresie. Jetzt wissen wir, dass er sich auf die katholische Orthodoxie bezog. Diejenigen, die die katholische Orthodoxie bejahen, wären gnostisch Links. Auf der Konferenz, als er gebeten wurde, konkrete Beispiele für Häresie in der heutigen Zeit zu nennen, wollte er dies nicht tun.

So werden Todsünden des Glaubens offiziell von der Kongregation für die Glaubenslehre (CDF) exkommuniziert und als neue katholische Lehre durchgesetzt.Die CDF wird für Satan statt für Gott arbeiten.

Die Kirche ist in Bezug auf Glauben und Moral ins Gegenteil verkehrt.

Die kritische Stellungnahme der CDF zu homosexuellen Vereinigungen war Orthodoxie. Es könnte in Zukunft Gnostizismus sein, nachdem Kardinal Ladaria in den Ruhestand gegangen ist.

Im 16. Jahrhundert bezog sich der Gnostizismus auf Häresie, die die katholische Orthodoxie ablehnte. Jetzt ist es umgekehrt.

Seit 1965 haben wir eine politische Version des Vatikanischen Konzils. Seine Schlussfolgerung wäre für das Lehramt des 16. Jahrhunderts und die Missionare dieser Zeit gnostisch.

Wenn das Zweite Vatikanische Konzil in Zukunft ohne die falsche Prämisse, Schlussfolgerung und nicht traditionelle Schlussfolgerung interpretiert wird, wird es die Tradition unterstützen. Mit der rationalen Prämisse wird sie der Tradition nicht wie heute entgegentreten. Dann wird das Zweite Vatikanische Konzil als ketzerisch und gnostisch betrachtet. Künftig könnte die Gesellschaft St. Pius X. (SSPX) als gnostische Organisation und rechtlich nicht katholisch bezeichnet werden. Sie könnten exkommuniziert werden.

Öffentliche Zeichen der "wahren Kirche" werden verboten. Bischof Robert Barrons Word on Fire und der National Catholic Reporter usw. interpretieren das II. Vatikanische Konzil mit einer falschen Prämisse. Sie werden zugelassen.-Lionel Andrades


EN LA CONFERENCIA DE PRENSA DE PLACUIT DEO (2018) EL CARDENAL LADARIA FUE CRÍTICO DE LA HEREJÍA DEL NEO GNOSTICISMO Y DEL PELAGIANISMO, AHORA SABEMOS QUE SE REFERÍA A LA ORTODOXIA CATÓLICA. LOS QUE AFIRMAN LA ORTODOXIA CATÓLICA. AQUELLOS QUE AFIRMAN LA ORTODOXIA CATÓLICA SERÍAN GNÓSTICOS

 

En la rueda de prensa de Placuit Deo (2018) el cardenal Ladaria se mostró crítico con la herejía del neognosticismo y el pelagianismo; ahora sabemos que se refería a la ortodoxia católica; los que afirman la ortodoxia católica serían gnósticos; es similar al odio político de los políticos. Izquierda: En la conferencia, cuando se le pidió que diera ejemplos específicos de herejía en los tiempos actuales, no quiso hacerlo.

Así que los pecados mortales de fe serán oficialmente excomulgados por la Congregación para la Doctrina de la Fe (CDF). Se hará cumplir como nueva doctrina católica. La CDF trabajará para Satanás en lugar de Dios.

La Iglesia ha dado marcha atrás en cuanto a fe y moral.

La declaración crítica de la CDF sobre las uniones homosexuales fue ortodoxia. Podría ser gnosticismo en el futuro, después de que el cardenal Ladaria se retire.

En el siglo XVI, el gnosticismo se refería a la herejía que rechazaba la ortodoxia católica. Ahora es todo lo contrario.

Desde 1965 tenemos una versión política del Concilio Vaticano. Esta conclusión sería gnóstica para el Magisterio del siglo XVI y los misioneros de esa época.

En el futuro, cuando el Concilio Vaticano II se interprete sin la premisa falsa, la inferencia y la conclusión no tradicional, apoyará la Tradición. Con la premisa racional no se opondrá a la Tradición como hoy. Entonces el Concilio Vaticano II será considerado herético y gnóstico. En el futuro, la Sociedad de San Pío X (FSSPX) podría ser etiquetada como una organización gnóstica y legalmente no católica, y podrían ser excomulgados.

Los carteles públicos de 'la verdadera Iglesia' serán prohibidos por el obispo Robert Barron Word on Fire y el National Catholic Reporter, etc., interpretarán el Concilio Vaticano II con una premisa falsa, serán permitidos.-Lionel Andrades




 AUGUST 21, 2021

At the Placuit Deo press conference (2018) Cardinal Ladaria was critical of neo Gnosticism and Pelagianism heresy.Now we know that he was referring to Catholic orthodoxy.Those who affirm Catholic orthodoxy would be gnostic similar to the political hate of the political Left.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/at-placuit-deo-press-conference-2018.html


 


At the Placuit Deo press conference (2018) Cardinal Ladaria was critical of neo Gnosticism and the Pelagianism heresy.Now we know that he was referring to Catholic orthodoxy.Those who affirm Catholic orthodoxy would be gnostic similar to the political hate of the political Left.

 


At the Placuit Deo press conference (2018) Cardinal Ladaria was critical of neo Gnosticism and Pelagianism heresy.Now we know that he was referring to Catholic orthodoxy.Those who affirm Catholic orthodoxy would be gnostic similar to the political hate of the political Left.

At the conference when he was asked to given specific examples of heresy in the present times, he would not do so.

So mortal sins of faith will officially be excommunicated by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).It will be enforced as Catholic doctrine.So the CDF will work for Satan instead of God.

The Church has gone into reverse on faith and morals.

The CDF’s critical statement on homosexual unions, was orthodoxy, and it could be gnosticism in future, after Cardinal Ladaria retires.

In the 16th century gnosticism referred to heresy whch rejected Catholic orthodoxy. Now it is the opposite.

Since 1965 wer have a political version of Vatican Council II whose conclusion would be gnostic for the 16th century Magisterium and missionaries of that time.In future when Vatican Council II is interpreted without the fake premise, inference and non traditional conclusion, supporting Tradition, and not opposing it like today, Vatican Council II will be considered heretical and gnostic.

In future the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) could be labelled a gnostic organisation and legally not Catholic.They could be excommunicated.

Public signs of ‘the true Church’ will be prohibited.Bishop Robert Barron’s Word on Fire and the National Catholic Reporter, Commonweal, Tablet and Crux, interpret Vatican Council II with a fake premise.So they will get a pass.-Lionel Andrades


AUGUST 17, 2021

Pope Francis wants inculturation with Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise to create ideology supported by the Left : Vatican Council II interpreted with the rational premise would affirm Tradition and this would be 'nostalgia' for him : Message to Latin American Conference on Religious Life


When Pope Francis and the Confederation of Latin American and Caribbean Religious (CLAR) commonly interpret Vatican Council with a false premise, inference and non traditional conclusion it supports the Leftist ideology. It is ideological.

So presently there is inculturation in the Latin American and Caribbean countries,like also those in Asia and elsewhere, but with the ideological interpretation of Vatican Council II.

If there was Holy Mass in the vernacular in these countries and if they interpreted Vatican Council II with the rational premise there would be harmony with the traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.This would be opposed by the Left and Pope Francis would consider Vatican Council II ideological.He would consider it nostalgia.

He only wants an inculturazation with the leftist ideology.So the false premise is indispensable.

If the FSSP and SSPX go back to Tradition while putting aside Vatican Council II, interpreted with the false premise,this produces the wrong ideology for Pope Francis. It is not that of the ADL and those who are working for a universal religion with the Anti Christ present .This is the political ideology, all bishops will have to support, to approve Mass in any rite, vernacular or Latin.

If the FSSP and the SSPX begin to offer Mass in the vernacular and interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise, they could show Pope Francis that the political ideology, either way, does not depend upon the liturgy.The new doctrines are created when Vatican Council II is intentionally interpreted without the rational premise, by the present two popes, the cardinals and the bishops.-Lionel Andrades

 

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/248689/pope-francis-nostalgia-is-the-siren-song-of-religious-life
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/pope-francis-wants-inculturation-with.html

FRANCIS COMPLAINS OF LITURGICAL ‘IDEOLOGY’

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/francis-criticizes-liturgical-ideology