Why
must the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom, in New Hampshire, USA interpret
Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) irrationally
only to please Fr. Georges de Laire, the Judicial Vicar and the Secretaries of
the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican who are unethical too.
If Fr.
Laire and Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez did not interpret Vatican Council
II and EENS irrationally they would be affirming the same doctrine as SAI.
A few
years have passed and Fr. Georges de Laire has not responded to questions. His
doctrine is political and not Catholic. Catholic theology has always been Feeneyite
and not Cushingite.He is a Cushingite like the rest in the diocese at NH and at the Vatican.
If Fr.
Laire and Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez did not interpret Vatican Council
II and EENS irrationally they would be affirming the same doctrine as SAI.
A few
years have passed and Fr. Georges de Laire has not responded to questions. His
doctrine is political not Catholic. Catholic theology has always been Feeneyite
and not Cushingite.
Fr.
Laire refused to be interviewed by Michael Voris in New Hampshire since the
Judicial Vicar was afraid of talking-theology. His position is political and
not Catholic. In an interview with the liberal Catholic Herald, U.K he refused
to answer questions on theology.
Michael
Voris after interviewing Brother Andre Marie micm, in NH went back to Detroit
and re-interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism and not Feeneyism. This
was also the policy of the Catholic Herald, U.K.
Even Fr.
Brian Harrison who would write on the subject of EENS has moved away from this
subject to avoid being Anti Semitic. John Henry Weston and Steve Jalsevac at
Life Site News are also keeping their distance from this subject.
Why
should children in the parishes of New Hampshire be taught to interpret Vatican
Council II and EENS irrationally? This should not be the teaching for those
about to receive the Sacrament of Confirmation in Manchester,
NH.
All the
Catholics in NH are being forced to accept irrational Cushingism to be in good
standing with Dr. Georges de Laire and Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez.
Children
must not be sent to the diocese for First Communion and Confirmation classes
when the teaching there is Cushingite and not Feeneyite.
Private
Citizens, individual Catholics in NH must appeal to Fr. Laire to affirm the
Catholic Faith in public and not impose his Cushingite version on religious
communities, Catholic educational institutions and Catholics in general in his
diocese.
Catholics
at large in NH must not be forced to accept Cushingism like the Curia in NH.
Legally
how can Fr. Laire interpret Church Documents irrationally, and not deny it and
then impose this in the diocese along with Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez? This
is not the norm for reasoning in NH.
If he
denies this charge and interprets Magisterial Documents rationally, then he
is a Feeneyite like the St. Benedict Center in NH.
- Lionel Andrades
Fr.Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA, must clarify for the people in NH if he interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism or Feeneyism and is this honest, Catholic and legal ?
Fr.Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA, must clarify for the people in NH if he interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism or Feeneyism and is this honest, Catholic and legal ?
Does he expect the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom, St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, to also interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism? Does he expect all the Catholic educational institutions and all the religious communities and organizations in New Hampshire, to be dishonest with Cushingism? How can he legally be a Cushingite?
Pope Francis, Cardinal-designate Victor Manuel Fernandez and Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, NH and the Judicial Vicr in NH, Fr. Georges de Laire, are also interpreting Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism.
There are also articles/ reports by Brother Andre Marie micm, on the website Catholicism.org in which he has interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally. Those reports are politically correct with the Left and the diocese.He also received his academic degree in theology, since he interpreted the Council irrationally and not rationally.He has also approved/recommended books on the Catholicism.org webiste, written by Roberto dei Mattei, Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton etc who interpreted the Council and other Magisterial Documents with irrational Cushingism. They were Cushingites.This is a common error in the Church. Cushingism has spread throughout the Church.
Brother Andre Marie micm and Brother Thomas Augustine micm, at the St. Benedict Centers in Richmond, NH and Still River, MA were respectively Cushingites on Vatican Council II and they were Feeneyites on EENS.
Also Brother Andre Marie’s Doctrinal Statement on the Catholicism.org website, in response to the Decree of Prohibitions of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF/DDF), Vatican on the website of the Diocese of Manchester,NH does not mention if the Cushingism of the CDF/DDF and the Diocese of Manchester, is Magisterial or not.Is Pope Francis, the CDF and Bishop Peter Libasci Magisterial with public Cushingism?
The St. Benedict Center NH conferences have been held with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. Also there have been reviews and reports in general on different subjects in which the writers/commentators have interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally and they have been posted on the Catholicism.org website, with no mention of the error.
It would seem as if Fr. Leonard Feeney and Fr. Francis micm, the Superior of the St. Benedict Center in NH, were only interpreting Vatican Council II, irrationally.There are no comments by Fr. Leonard Feeney and Brother Francis micm, on Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.
Brother Andre Marie micm, needs to issue a clarification/correction on the website of Catholicism.org and then point out the same errors on the website of the Diocese of Manchester, NH.
At Boston College and throughout New England in USA, they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally i.e. LG 8,14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. In other words, they refer to physically visible cases; known people saved outside the Catholic Church in the present times. Only in this way they could be practical exceptions for EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc. But we know that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, etc refer to only hypothetical cases for us. So they are not exceptions for an ecumenism of return to the Church, of the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
Vatican Council II (LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3 etc) does not contradict the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q-outside the Church no salvation).
The Council is not a break with Tradition for me. We have a choice in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. We can interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc, as referring to invisible or visible cases in 1965-2023.
Fr. John Hardon sj., Fr. William Most, Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Ludwig Ott were interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally i.e. LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc referred to physically visible cases. This was the objetive mistake of also the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.-Lionel Andrades
In principle a pope has to be a Feeneyite and not a Cushingite.A Cushingite cannot be a pope. Since Cushingism produces the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. It produces heresy and schism. Presently the whole Church is infected with Cushingism. Cushingites accept Magisterial Documents but always interpret them irrationally.
In principle a pope has to be a Feeneyite and not a Cushingite.A Cushingite cannot be a pope. Since Cushingism produces the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. It produces heresy and schism.
Presently the whole Church is infected with Cushingism. Cushingites accept Magisterial Documents but always interpret them irrationally. Pope Pius XII was a Cushingite in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office. Pope Francis is a Cushingite in Traditionis Custode and Amoris Laetitia. Also Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was a Cushingite on Vatican Council II.
Sister Marie Philomena micm, Director of the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom in New Hampshire is a Feeneyite on Vatican Council II.
You cannot be a Cushingite and be a Catholic.If a pope, cardinal or bishop forces you to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism, refuse to do so.
- Lionel Andrades
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1991106437591715&set=ecnf.100064429129977https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/08/in-principle-pope-has-to-be-feeneyite.html
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/
Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
Posts
