Thursday, July 7, 2022

All the cardinals in the new conclave will be interpreting Vatican Council Ii with the False and not Rational Premise like the speakers in this video

Neither if these two speakers like Pope Francis are affirming the Council interpreted rationally


 

Pope Pius IX Did Not Teach Salvation Outside The Church

L'Ultima Confessione di un Massone

Suor Maria Cristiana: LA CLAUSURA - "una porta sul mondo"

Fr.Georges de Laire would be affirming extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) like the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire in the Diocese of Manchester, NH, USA, if he chose to interpret Magisterial Documents and Doctrines with a Rational Premise. He did not tell this to the media in particular the Catholic Herald, U.K

 

Fr.Georges de Laire would be affirming extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) like the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire in the Diocese of Manchester, NH, USA, if he chose to interpret Magisterial Documents and Doctrines with a Rational Premise. He did not tell this to the media in particular the Catholic Herald, U.K.



He criticized the St. Benedict Center in the Catholic Herald report. Also when Michael Voris was in New Hampshire he did not tell him that the diocese affirms the strict interpretation of EENS like the same Benedict Center, but for the False Premise.


This would be mean all the priests and religious communities and lay Catholics would have to consider Vatican Council II ( rational) as the norm approved by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. So all future priests would be Feeneyite on EENS, Vatican Council II etc.

For the CDF all future bishops would no more be liberal. There will no more be a progressivist theology. Since the continued use the False Premise would be dishonest.

Future priests and religious sisters, and even the bishop, can only interpret Vatican Council II rationally and ethically and so there is continuity with the Catholic Church of the past.



Archbishop Arthur Roche, like Fr. Georges de Laire is not affirming the dogma EENS in harmony with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. He is unethical and also his interpretation of Traditionis Custode is dishonest.




Archbishop Roche knows that the Catholic Church is still liberal in England unlike the Catholic Church in ancient Britain. When the primates choose Vatican Council II (Rational) they take the Church back to its exclusivist past in theology. There is no other ethical and rational choice.

Catholic schools must choose to interpret Magisterial Documents and Doctrines ethically and rationally. Archbishop Arthur Roche must do it in public and ask Fr. Georges de Laire and Archbishop Augustine di Noia to do the same.

The 120 members of the Conservative Party in England must appeal to Cardinal Vince Nicols to return to the conservative Catholic Church of the past by interpreting Vatican Council II only with a Rational Premise.

-Lionel Andrades

Grazie Signore per la Tua Chiesa, grazie per le vocazioni, grazie per Maria madre dei sacerdoti