With these Five Points the religious formation of Franciscans, Dominicans, Jesuits, Carmelites, Salesians and other communities change

 With these Five Points the religious formation of Franciscans, Dominicans, Jesuits, Carmelites, Salesians and other communities change. -Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 16, 2020

Religious formation in the Catholic Church has changed with these Five Points

 Religious formation in the Catholic Church has changed with these Five Points. -Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 14, 2020

Five points that change our interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents

 

NEW INFORMATION

We  have new information.

1.The hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition depends upon the false premise and not Vatican Council II itself. This must be understood by all. It is  a common mistake.If you refer to the New Theology you also have to refer to the irrational premise.For example when Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a visible case it is a false premise.We know that LG 16 is really always hypothetical and invisible for all at all times.So when LG 16 refers to someone saved outside the Church( a false premise) it is made an objective exception to EENS and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. But LG 16 is never objective for us human beings.It is objective only for God.

2.Irrespective if you are a conservative or liberal Catholic, if you use the false premise there is a rupture with Tradition. So the hermeneutic of rupture is not created by the liberals.This is  important to nore. It does not depend upon a person's philosophical or theological view. Cardinal Ratzinger interpreted LG 16 as an exception to the strict interpretation of EENS, but so did Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Cardinal Walter Kasper.

3.If you are a liberal Catholic and do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you emerge  a conservative or traditionalist Catholic. Since Vatican Council II emerges in harmony with the stict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It is the false premise which creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.It decides if Vatican Council II is traditional or non traditional.

4. If you are an SSPX  traditionalist and you do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you emerge a Feeneyite and not a Cushingite. Presently the SSPX and other traditionalists interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and so are Cushingites.

For Fr. Leonard Feeney, extra ecclesiam nulla salus had no exceptions. For Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) were exceptions to EENS.It was only with the false premise that BOD, BOB and I.I became exceptions to EENS for them.

5. So irrespective of the Rite of the Mass, Latin, Novus Ordo or Byzantine, if you interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise you are Traditional. The Council does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of the Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q), the dogma EENS according to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine and the Athanasius Creed.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/five-points-that-change-our.html

_______________________

DECEMBER 15, 2020

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is not asking Catholics to interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise -and neither are Pope Benedict and Pope Francis

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-congregation-for-doctrine-of-faith.html

DECEMBER 15, 2020

With the FIVE POINTS the Franciscans, Jesuits, Domincans, Carmelites and the other religious communities can change their religious formation of postulants and novices

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/with-five-points-franciscans-jesuits.html

 DECEMBER 15, 2020

Tables are turned. It is the SSPX today which can ask Pope Benedict to affirm Vatican Council II , without the false premise and let there be a hermeneutic of continuity with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine and the Athanasius Creed . This is a 'doctrinal'issue

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/tables-are-turned-it-is-sspx-today.html

DECEMBER 15, 2020

How can a priest who follows Pope Benedict's false New Theology, based upon a false premise offer Holy Mass ? The New Theology creates a rupture with the past Magisterium on de fide teachings of the Church

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/how-can-priest-who-follows-pope.html

DECEMBER 15, 2020

 I interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise unlike the Prefects of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.For me LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 , UR 3 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. This is common sense.They cannot be practical exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the Athanasius Creed,the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc. Similarly for me the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance (I.I)  are not exceptions to EENS.

Where are the BOD, BOB and I.I cases in real life for them to be exceptions to EENS ? - Lionel Andrades

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican needs to inform Cardinal Braz de Avez and the religious communities that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II - with and without the false premise,and they should choose the rational option

 The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican needs to inform Cardinal Braz de Avez and the religious communities that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II - with and without the false premise,and they should choose the rational option.

Similarly they need to inform the Congregation for Catholic Education , Vatican  and the Pontifical Universities, to stop interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise and choose the rational option. -Lionel Andrades

The Dominicans and Benedictines at Oxford University need to stop churning out theologies created with Pope Benedict's false New Theology and fake premise

 The Dominicans and Benedictines at Oxford University need to stop churning out theologies created with Pope Benedict's false New Theology and fake premise. -Lionel Andrades

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith must clarify the Five Points for young people with a vocation to the religous life and for Vocation Directors and Novice Masters

 The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith must clarify the Five Points for young people with a vocation to the religous life and for Vocation Directors and Novice Masters. -Lionel Andrades

We  have new information in the Church.

1.The hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition depends upon the false premise and not Vatican Council II itself. This must be understood by all. It is  a common mistake.If you refer to the New Theology you also have to refer to the irrational premise.For example when Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a visible case it is a false premise.We know that LG 16 is really always hypothetical and invisible for all at all times.So when LG 16 refers to someone saved outside the Church( a false premise) it is made an objective exception to EENS and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. But LG 16 is never objective for us human beings.It is objective only for God.

2.Irrespective if you are a conservative or liberal Catholic, if you use the false premise there is a rupture with Tradition. So the hermeneutic of rupture is not created by the liberals.This is  important to nore. It does not depend upon a person's philosophical or theological view. Cardinal Ratzinger interpreted LG 16 as an exception to the strict interpretation of EENS, but so did Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Cardinal Walter Kasper.

3.If you are a liberal Catholic and do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you emerge  a conservative or traditionalist Catholic. Since Vatican Council II emerges in harmony with the stict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It is the false premise which creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.It decides if Vatican Council II is traditional or non traditional.

4. If you are an SSPX  traditionalist and you do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you emerge a Feeneyite and not a Cushingite. Presently the SSPX and other traditionalists interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and so are Cushingites.

For Fr. Leonard Feeney, extra ecclesiam nulla salus had no exceptions. For Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) were exceptions to EENS.It was only with the false premise that BOD, BOB and I.I became exceptions to EENS for them.

5. So irrespective of the Rite of the Mass, Latin, Novus Ordo or Byzantine, if you interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise you are Traditional. The Council does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of the Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q), the dogma EENS according to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine and the Athanasius Creed.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/five-points-that-change-our.html

Jesuit Pope Francis needs to end the slander of the Jesuit from Boston. Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct and Boston College, the Jesuit Provincial in the USA and Cardinal Richard Cushing made an objective error- supported by Pope Pius XII and his cardinals

 Jesuit Pope Francis needs to end the slander of the Jesuit from Boston. Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct and Boston College, the Jesuit Provincial in the USA and Cardinal Richard Cushing made an objective error- supported by Pope Pius XII and his cardinals. -Lionel Andrades

The World's #1 Most Impressive Eucharistic Miracle: Sokółka - Fr. Mark Goring

The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, at the St.Benedict Centers in New England, USA must not be forced by Cardinal Sean O'Malley, Archbishop of Boston and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, to re-interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with a false premise.

 The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, at the St.Benedict Centers in New England, USA must not be forced by Cardinal Sean O'Malley, Archbishop of Boston and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, to re-interpret  Vatican Council II and EENS with a false premise. They should be free to interpret Vatican Council II, EENS and other Magisterial documents, without the false premise and inference. -Lionel Andrades 

REAL TO REEL -- EUCHARISTIC MIRACLES EXHIBIT organised by Carlo Acutis who died before it was exhibited

The Poor Clares of Arundel - Light For The World (album visualiser)

Pope Benedict has said that Europe must remember its Christian roots but Europe's Christian roots were Catholic. Peter Seewalds new biography shows that Pope Benedict lost his Catholic Faith and the Catholic theological roots

 Pope Benedict has said that Europe must remember its Christian roots but Europe's Christian roots were Catholic. Peter Seewalds new biography shows that Pope Benedict lost his Catholic Faith and the Catholic theological roots. He often says that Europe must come back to God but does not say that Europe must come back to the Catholic Church.He cannot say this since he rejected exclusive salvation with his false premise and New Theology.-Lionel Andrades 

Pope urges Czechs to rediscover Christian roots 

https://br.reuters.com/article/idINIndia-42726720090926

________________________________

DECEMBER 14, 2020

With the knowledge of these FIVE POINTS we can undo Cardinal Ratzinger's influence at Vatican Council II and when he did not choose to interpret the Council after 1965, in continuity with Tradition

 December 11, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – A new authoritative biography of Pope Benedict XVI written by Peter Seewald describes in detail the important role then-Professor Joseph Ratzinger played before and during the Second Vatican Council. His influence helped to bring about a revolutionary change of the Council's direction, tone, and topics.- Maike Hickson, New biography describes great influence of Joseph Ratzinger in the revolutionary upheaval of Vatican II

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/new-biography-describes-great-influence-of-joseph-ratzinger-in-the-revolutionary-upheaval-of-vatican-ii

With the knowledge of these FIVE POINTS 1 we can undo Cardinal Ratzinger's influence at Vatican Council II, and when he did not choose to interpret the Council after 1965, in continuity with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades

1

DECEMBER 14, 2020

Five points that change our interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/five-points-that-change-our.html

_______________________

 DECEMBER 13, 2020

If the Lefebvrists continue to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise, and not without it, the Council will continue to be a break with Tradition and this will not be the fault of Pope Benedict

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/if-lefebvrists-continue-to-interpret.html

New biography describes great influence of Joseph Ratzinger in the revolutionary upheaval of Vatican II

Ratzinger's influence helped to bring about a revolutionary change of the Council's direction, tone, and topics.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/new-biography-describes-great-influence-of-joseph-ratzinger-in-the-revolutionary-upheaval-of-vatican-ii

The SSPX can now ask Pope Francis to affirm Vatican Council II just as he had asked it of them, for canonical recognition.With the Five Points ask him to affirm the Council with the hermeneutic of continuity with EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages

 The SSPX can now ask Pope Francis to affirm Vatican Council II  just as he had asked it of them, for canonical recognition.With the Five Points ask him to affirm the Council with the hermeneutic of continuity  with EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages. The Council with the hermeneutic of continuity would be in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q) and the Athanasius Creed.The main issue is Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premist. -Lionel Andrades

 DECEMBER 16, 2020

Religious formation in the Catholic Church has changed with these Five Points

 Religious formation in the Catholic Church has changed with these Five Points. -Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 14, 2020

Five points that change our interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents

 

NEW INFORMATION

We  have new information.

1.The hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition depends upon the false premise and not Vatican Council II itself. This must be understood by all. It is  a common mistake.If you refer to the New Theology you also have to refer to the irrational premise.For example when Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a visible case it is a false premise.We know that LG 16 is really always hypothetical and invisible for all at all times.So when LG 16 refers to someone saved outside the Church( a false premise) it is made an objective exception to EENS and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. But LG 16 is never objective for us human beings.It is objective only for God.

2.Irrespective if you are a conservative or liberal Catholic, if you use the false premise there is a rupture with Tradition. So the hermeneutic of rupture is not created by the liberals.This is  important to nore. It does not depend upon a person's philosophical or theological view. Cardinal Ratzinger interpreted LG 16 as an exception to the strict interpretation of EENS, but so did Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Cardinal Walter Kasper.

3.If you are a liberal Catholic and do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you emerge  a conservative or traditionalist Catholic. Since Vatican Council II emerges in harmony with the stict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It is the false premise which creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.It decides if Vatican Council II is traditional or non traditional.

4. If you are an SSPX  traditionalist and you do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you emerge a Feeneyite and not a Cushingite. Presently the SSPX and other traditionalists interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and so are Cushingites.

For Fr. Leonard Feeney, extra ecclesiam nulla salus had no exceptions. For Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) were exceptions to EENS.It was only with the false premise that BOD, BOB and I.I became exceptions to EENS for them.

5. So irrespective of the Rite of the Mass, Latin, Novus Ordo or Byzantine, if you interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise you are Traditional. The Council does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of the Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q), the dogma EENS according to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine and the Athanasius Creed.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/five-points-that-change-our.html

_______________________

DECEMBER 15, 2020

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is not asking Catholics to interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise -and neither are Pope Benedict and Pope Francis

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-congregation-for-doctrine-of-faith.html

DECEMBER 15, 2020

With the FIVE POINTS the Franciscans, Jesuits, Domincans, Carmelites and the other religious communities can change their religious formation of postulants and novices

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/with-five-points-franciscans-jesuits.html

 DECEMBER 15, 2020

Tables are turned. It is the SSPX today which can ask Pope Benedict to affirm Vatican Council II , without the false premise and let there be a hermeneutic of continuity with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine and the Athanasius Creed . This is a 'doctrinal'issue

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/tables-are-turned-it-is-sspx-today.html

DECEMBER 15, 2020

How can a priest who follows Pope Benedict's false New Theology, based upon a false premise offer Holy Mass ? The New Theology creates a rupture with the past Magisterium on de fide teachings of the Church

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/how-can-priest-who-follows-pope.html

DECEMBER 15, 2020

 I interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise unlike the Prefects of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.For me LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 , UR 3 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. This is common sense.They cannot be practical exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the Athanasius Creed,the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc. Similarly for me the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance (I.I)  are not exceptions to EENS.

Where are the BOD, BOB and I.I cases in real life for them to be exceptions to EENS ? - Lionel Andrades

Ti adoriamo Signore Gesù, noi crediamo e sappiamo che Tu sei presente qui

Chi viene qui è perchè Lei ha bisogno di quella persona e farà di tutto ...

Perchè è importante fare un Pellegrinaggio? Tu hai un Cammino?

Peter Seewalds new biography indicates Pope Benedict used a false premise to reject Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), change the Nicene Creed, reject the Athanasius Creed, reject the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, reject the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q, 27Q) and irrationally reinterpret the Council of Trent and Vatican Council II.So in general the Deposit of the Faith is rejected.De fide teachings which are obligatory to believe in are put aside

 Peter Seewalds new biography indicates Pope Benedict used a false premise to reject Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), change the Nicene Creed, reject the Athanasius Creed, reject the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, reject the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q, 27Q) and irrationally reinterpret  the Council of Trent and Vatican Council II.So in general the Deposit of the Faith is rejected.De fide teachings which are obligatory to believe in are put aside. This is not magisterial and is in conflict with the past Magisterium. To change or reject the Creed is first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths. According to the past Magisterium Pope Benedict would not be magisterial and would be excommunicated. This is a scandal and he would not be allowed to offer Holy Mass.

According to St. Alphonsus Liguori's moral teachings ( which Pope Benedict has rejectedd with the false premise in morals and faith) for a Catholic to go up to him to receive the Eucharist during Mass would be a sin. 

St. Alphonsus, father of Moral Theology, wrote that if a priest is in public mortal sin, do not go up to receive the Eucharist, until the scandal has ended.

He said that the only time it would be acceptable to receive the Eucharist at Mass from him, was when there is no other way to fulfill the Sunday obligation. 

Since you know he is in mortal sin and you go up to receive the Eucharist from him, he writes. You are cooperating in his sin and telling him even though you know he is on the way to Hell that all is well. This is not an act of charity.( Teologia Moralis, Bk.3, n.47).-Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 13, 2020

If the Lefebvrists continue to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise, and not without it, the Council will continue to be a break with Tradition and this will not be the fault of Pope Benedict

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/if-lefebvrists-continue-to-interpret.html

DECEMBER 15, 2020

Peter Seewald missed out the most important point. Cardinal Ratzinger used a false premise to create a new Theology

 Peter Seewald missed out the most important point. Cardinal Ratzinger used a false premise to create a new Theology. - Lionel Andrades

December 11, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – A new authoritative biography of Pope Benedict XVI written by Peter Seewald describes in detail the important role then-Professor Joseph Ratzinger played before and during the Second Vatican Council. His influence helped to bring about a revolutionary change of the Council's direction, tone, and topics.- Maike Hickson, New biography describes great influence of Joseph Ratzinger in the revolutionary upheaval of Vatican II

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/new-biography-describes-great-influence-of-joseph-ratzinger-in-the-revolutionary-upheaval-of-vatican-ii

With the knowledge of these FIVE POINTS 1 we can undo Cardinal Ratzinger's influence at Vatican Council II, and when he did not choose to interpret the Council after 1965, in continuity with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades

1

DECEMBER 14, 2020

Five points that change our interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/five-points-that-change-our.html

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/peter-seewald-missed-out-most-important.html

_______________________

DECEMBER 14, 2020

With the knowledge of these FIVE POINTS we can undo Cardinal Ratzinger's influence at Vatican Council II and when he did not choose to interpret the Council after 1965, in continuity with Tradition

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/with-knowledge-of-these-five-points-we.html

_________________________

DECEMBER 14, 2020

Five points that change our interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents

 

NEW INFORMATION

We  have new information.

1.The hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition depends upon the false premise and not Vatican Council II itself. This must be understood by all. It is  a common mistake.If you refer to the New Theology you also have to refer to the irrational premise.For example when Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a visible case it is a false premise.We know that LG 16 is really always hypothetical and invisible for all at all times.So when LG 16 refers to someone saved outside the Church( a false premise) it is made an objective exception to EENS and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. But LG 16 is never objective for us human beings.It is objective only for God.

2.Irrespective if you are a conservative or liberal Catholic, if you use the false premise there is a rupture with Tradition. So the hermeneutic of rupture is not created by the liberals.This is  important to nore. It does not depend upon a person's philosophical or theological view. Cardinal Ratzinger interpreted LG 16 as an exception to the strict interpretation of EENS, but so did Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Cardinal Walter Kasper.

3.If you are a liberal Catholic and do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you emerge  a conservative or traditionalist Catholic. Since Vatican Council II emerges in harmony with the stict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It is the false premise which creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.It decides if Vatican Council II is traditional or non traditional.

4. If you are an SSPX  traditionalist and you do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you emerge a Feeneyite and not a Cushingite. Presently the SSPX and other traditionalists interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and so are Cushingites.

For Fr. Leonard Feeney, extra ecclesiam nulla salus had no exceptions. For Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) were exceptions to EENS.It was only with the false premise that BOD, BOB and I.I became exceptions to EENS for them.

5. So irrespective of the Rite of the Mass, Latin, Novus Ordo or Byzantine, if you interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise you are Traditional. The Council does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of the Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q), the dogma EENS according to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine and the Athanasius Creed.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/five-points-that-change-our.html

Religious formation in the Catholic Church has changed with these Five Points

 Religious formation in the Catholic Church has changed with these Five Points. -Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 14, 2020

Five points that change our interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents

 

NEW INFORMATION

We  have new information.

1.The hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition depends upon the false premise and not Vatican Council II itself. This must be understood by all. It is  a common mistake.If you refer to the New Theology you also have to refer to the irrational premise.For example when Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a visible case it is a false premise.We know that LG 16 is really always hypothetical and invisible for all at all times.So when LG 16 refers to someone saved outside the Church( a false premise) it is made an objective exception to EENS and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. But LG 16 is never objective for us human beings.It is objective only for God.

2.Irrespective if you are a conservative or liberal Catholic, if you use the false premise there is a rupture with Tradition. So the hermeneutic of rupture is not created by the liberals.This is  important to nore. It does not depend upon a person's philosophical or theological view. Cardinal Ratzinger interpreted LG 16 as an exception to the strict interpretation of EENS, but so did Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Cardinal Walter Kasper.

3.If you are a liberal Catholic and do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you emerge  a conservative or traditionalist Catholic. Since Vatican Council II emerges in harmony with the stict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It is the false premise which creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.It decides if Vatican Council II is traditional or non traditional.

4. If you are an SSPX  traditionalist and you do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you emerge a Feeneyite and not a Cushingite. Presently the SSPX and other traditionalists interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and so are Cushingites.

For Fr. Leonard Feeney, extra ecclesiam nulla salus had no exceptions. For Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) were exceptions to EENS.It was only with the false premise that BOD, BOB and I.I became exceptions to EENS for them.

5. So irrespective of the Rite of the Mass, Latin, Novus Ordo or Byzantine, if you interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise you are Traditional. The Council does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of the Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q), the dogma EENS according to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine and the Athanasius Creed.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/five-points-that-change-our.html

_______________________

DECEMBER 15, 2020

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is not asking Catholics to interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise -and neither are Pope Benedict and Pope Francis

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-congregation-for-doctrine-of-faith.html

DECEMBER 15, 2020

With the FIVE POINTS the Franciscans, Jesuits, Domincans, Carmelites and the other religious communities can change their religious formation of postulants and novices

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/with-five-points-franciscans-jesuits.html

 DECEMBER 15, 2020

Tables are turned. It is the SSPX today which can ask Pope Benedict to affirm Vatican Council II , without the false premise and let there be a hermeneutic of continuity with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine and the Athanasius Creed . This is a 'doctrinal'issue

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/tables-are-turned-it-is-sspx-today.html

DECEMBER 15, 2020

The Catholic Bishops Conference in Poland has to be informed that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II - with and without the false premise- and they should choose the rational one

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-catholic-bishops-conference-in.html

 DECEMBER 15, 2020

Pope Benedict still does not admit that he wanted the SSPX to accept false doctrine in exchange for canonical recognition

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/pope-benedict-still-does-not-admit-that_15.html

, DECEMBER 15, 2020

When Ignatius publishes Pope Benedict's books its not just publishing the book of a 'progressivist'. It is unethical to publish the book of someone who has used a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II . He used a false premise to create a rupture with Tradition and de fide teachings of the Church. This is dishonest

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/when-ignatius-publishes-pope-benedicts.html

DECEMBER 15, 2020

 John Henry Weston, Roberto dei Mattei and Michael Matt violate the first Two Points of the following Five Points . So they interpret Vatican Council II like the liberals to create a break with Tradition https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/john-henry-weston-roberto-dei-matti-and.html

 DECEMBER 15, 2020

Peter Seewald's new biography of Pope Benedict indicates how Pope Benedict was faking it in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus . He had switched from traditional Feeneyite exclusivist theology to the new Cushingite theology, which projected non existing people as being objective exceptions to Tradition https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/peter-seewalds-new-biography-of-pope.html