Tuesday, February 16, 2021

The Council is the Magisterium of the Church when the Council is interpreted without the false premise and does not contradict the past Magisterium on EENS, Athanasius Creed etc. When the Council is interpreted with a false premise, as is the interpretation of the present two popes, it is human error and is not inspired by the Holy Spirit

Opposition to Francis rooted in opposition to Vatican II

by Michael Sean Winters  National Catholic Reporter

 



 At the end of January, Pope Francis delivered an important address to participants in a meeting of the National Catechetical Office of the Italian Bishops conference. It warrants attention from all the local churches because it shows, I think, why the opposition to Francis is rooted in the desire to put the Vatican II toothpaste back into a pre-conciliar tube.

Lionel : We can go back to pre-conciliar teachings especially th teachings on there being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.This is possible when Vatican Council II is interpreted without the common irrationality and does not contradict the past Magisterium.

Pope Francis, the Bologna School, the CDF,the National Catholic Reporter etc use the false premise which is the theological-support  in Vatican Council II, for their liberalism.

____________________________

In the address, the pope presented an understanding of catechesis that is so far from the dry appeals to chapter and verse that tend to characterize a certain kind of apologetical, conservative Christianity. "Thanks to the narration of catechesis, Sacred Scripture becomes the 'environment' in which we feel part of the same salvation history, encountering the first witnesses of faith," Francis said. "Catechesis is taking others by the hand and accompanying them in this history. It inspires up a journey, in which each person finds his or her own rhythm, because Christian life does not even out or standardize, but rather enhances the uniqueness of each child of God."

Lionel: Catechesis is teaching the doctrines of the Catholic Church.It is teaching the faith including the teaching that there is no salvation outside the Church.It means teaching Vatican Council II interpreted rationally so that there is no rupture with Catechesis today and the past.

___________________

Contrast that approach with this essay by then Archbishop, later Cardinal, Raymond Burke regarding Canon 915 and denying Communion to pro-choice politicians, posted at the EWTN online library. He writes that "the question regarding the objective state of Catholic politicians who knowingly and willingly hold opinions contrary to the natural moral law would hardly seem to change from place to place."

In Burke's world, it is easy to tell the sheep from the goats, there is no grey, no ambiguity, and no sense of the mysterious workings of grace that, sometimes, take a lifetime to come to fruition. Who needs pastors? Just distribute the catechism, which is apparently self-explanatory. Burke is not a Protestant preaching "Scripture alone," but a Catholic preaching "Catechism alone." Francis could not be more different.

The second section of the talk deals with the nature of receiving Vatican II, and it is a barnburner.

Lionel: Yes especially since the writer rejects Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise.He unethically like the pope uses an irrationality to create a false rupture with the doctrines taught in Catechesis over the centuries.

______________

 The Holy Father quoted his predecessor, St. Pope Paul VI, who in 1971 addressed the first International Catechetical Congress, saying: "It is a task that is constantly being reborn and constantly renewed for catechesis to understand these problems that arise from the heart of man, in order to lead them back to their hidden source: the gift of love that creates and saves." Francis adds, "Therefore, catechesis inspired by the Council is continually listening to the heart of man, always with an attentive ear, always seeking to renew itself."

Lionel:Inspired by the Council?! The Council is Feeneyite. It supports the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This has to show up in Catechesis.

___________________

Francis continues, and I cite this paragraph in its entirety:

This is magisterium: the Council is the magisterium of the Church. Either you are with the Church and therefore you follow the Council, and if you do not follow the Council or you interpret it in your own way, as you wish, you are not with the Church. We must be demanding and strict on this point. The Council should not be negotiated in order to have more of these... No, the Council is as it is. And this problem that we are experiencing, of selectivity with respect to the Council, has been repeated throughout history with other Councils.

Lionel: The Council is the Magisterium of the Church when the Council is intepreted without the false premise and does not contradict the past Magisterium on EENS, Athanasius Creed etc.

When the Council is interpreted with a false premise, as is the interpretation of the present two popes, it is human error and is not inspired by the Holy Spirit.

___________________ 

It is imperative that all of us, not only the catechists, think ecclesially, think with the church, and that means drinking deeply in the theological wells of Vatican II. There is no other path forward that keeps the church together and keeps it true to itself.

Lionel: The theological wells of Vatican Council II are linked to the pre Conciliar Church. There is no rupture.There is a hermeneutic of continuity when the Council is interpreted without confusing what is invisible as being visible, unseen as seen, subjective as objective, implicit as explicit.Presently this is a major error made by the popes, liberals and Lefebvrists.

___________________

In the immediate post-conciliar period in the U.S. it was the Catholic left that ran amok, exercising "selectivity with respect to the Council," and often being punished by ecclesiastical authority for it.

Lionel: They interpreted the Council with the false premise and then claimed that there was 'a new revelation' in the Church, there was 'a development of doctrine' and they justified their liberalism with this false interpretation. Now they have been exposed. They are no more in a position to quote the Council without faking it.

They can only quote Vatican Council II as being a rupture with Tradition when they confuse unknown cases of LG 8, LG 16 etc as being known examples of salvation outside the Church. This is irrational.

________________

Now, it is conservative Catholics who not only find themselves in dissent from the teachings of the council, but who openly disparage it or reject it outright.

Lionel: They reject Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise.With this ruse they create a false rupture with Tradition. This is unethical. Every good Catholic should reject this irrational interpretation of the Council promoted by Pope Francis and the National Catholic Reporter.Every good Catholic needs to be honest and not change doctrines with a lie.

____________________

 Last year, disgraced former nuncio Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò made it clear in an open letter that his difficulties were as much with Vatican II — he calls it at one point "the coup d'etat of Vatican II" — as with Francis. Viganò's rantings are published and celebrated on a variety of conservative media outlets from LifeSiteNews to EWTN, bypassing pastoral relationships and normal ecclesial channels of communication.

Lionel: Yes a small group of people used a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and create a false rupture with the past Magisterium.Then they projected this deception as being Magisterial.This is not the Magisterium. The Magisterium cannot make an objective and factual error.

There is some truth in what Archbishop Carlo Vigano said.He probably reads my blog.

_______________________

This we must remember: Behind the opposition to Francis is opposition to Vatican II.

Lionel : There is opposition only to Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise. Pope Francis' talk at the Catechetical Office(Jan 30,2021) indirectly expressed opposition to Vatican Council II, interpreted without the false premise.If he chose the rational interpretation of the Council how could he avoid being a traditionalist?

_____________________

 The church in Latin America from which the pope came has been the locus of the most fertile theology since the council. The bishops there have received the council in ways we in the north have not, and it is time for us to listen and to learn. They have never stopped posing the question: What does it mean to exercise a preferential option for the poor?    

Lionel : They do not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise.The Council is not in harmony with the teaching on their being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. Pope Francis did not  interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents rationally, as Cardinal Bergoglio in Argentina.

__________________

In the third and final section of his talk, the pope highlights the need for community. It is a beautiful reflection, and I encourage you to read it.

Lionel: There has to be community also with traditionalists and conservative Catholics.There has to be community with Catholics who are honest in their interpretation of Vatican Council II and express it in their catechesis.

________________

All three sections really point the way forward for Catholics: We need to continue the process of receiving Vatican II and find genuine renewal and reform in dialogical, synodal, faithful reflection upon those texts. 

Lionel: We cannot continue to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise, as this writer does even after being informed.We must not create a rupture with pre conciliar times, by using a false premise, and then call the objective error Magisterial.

________________

In church history class, they taught us that it takes about 100 years to receive a council, so we are only about halfway there. We have had some detours already. It is time to get back to work appropriating those magnificent texts and making them our own. 

Lionel: Yes. 

1.Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc are not practical exceptions to Ad Gentes 7.So Vatican Council II is in harmony with EENS, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius X etc.

2.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II  are always hypothetical.They always refer to heoretical cases. So they do not contradict 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This can be reflected in Catechesis which must proclaim exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

This is the Council. It is in harmony with the pre Conciliar Church, There is no rupture . This must be reflected in Catechesis. Lionel Andrades



FEBRUARY 16, 2021

Michael Sean Winters is unethical.He interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise even after knowing there is a rational alternative.It would make him a Feeneyite

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/michael-sean-winters-is-unethicalhe.html


Michael Sean Winters is unethical.He interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise even after knowing there is a rational alternative.It would make him a Feeneyite

 Michael Sean Winters in his report on Vatican Council II  decided to interpret the Council with the false premise and follow Pope Francis and Pope Benedict.

He knows that that the Council can be interpreted without the irrationality and the conclusion will be traditional. But he is not going to do it. He is going to go along with the deception.

This is unethical.Without the false premise he knows he will come across as a Feeneyite. In the past he would critize Fr. John Zuhlsdorf and accuse him of following Fr. Leonard Feeney.Fr. Z would deny it. Now without the false premise Winters emerges as a Feeneyite.He cannot accept it.-Lionel  Andrades

Opposition to Francis rooted in opposition to Vatican II

https://www.ncronline.org/news/opinion/distinctly-catholic/opposition-francis-rooted-opposition-vatican-ii

The books on Vatican Council II reviewed by the National Catholic Reporter (NCR) were all written with a false premise. So their conclusion was false. This is not denied by the NCR correspondents. The books written by Fr. James Wicks s.j , Paul Lakeland and Massimo Faggioli are in this category


 


 


The books on Vatican Council II reviewed by the National Catholic Reporter (NCR) were all written with a false premise.

 


So their conclusion was false. This is not denied by the NCR correspondents.

 


The books written by Fr. Jared Wicks s.j , Paul Lakeland and Massimo Faggioli are in this category. -Lionel Andrades

My communication with Massimo Faggioli, John Allen, Michael Sean Winters and Joshua McElwee indicate that the whole Catholic Church can break away from the 55 -plus- years interpretation of Vatican Council II. The Council is Feeneyite with Ad Gentes 7. LG 8, LG 16 etc are not practical exceptions

 My communication with Massimo Faggioli, John Allen, Michael Sean Winters and Joshua McElwee indicate that the whole Catholic Church can break away from the 55 -plus- years interpretation of Vatican Council II.

The Council is Feeneyite with Ad Gentes 7. LG 8, LG 16 etc are not practical exceptions.

The Council does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Since GS 22, NA 2, UR 3 etc refer to only hypothetical people. They are theoretical cases only.

We have to re-look at LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being only hypothetical cases. They are not examples of known people saved outside the Church. So they are not practical exceptions to Tradition( EENS, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc.



The liberal French bishops can find themselves affirming Tradition once they understand how the Council can be interpreted without the false premise. It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms and EENS.- Lionel Andrades



FEBRUARY 16, 2021

The French bishops have to be shown that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the false premise. They will all emerge Feeneyites and traditionalists. There is no other rational choice

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/the-french-bishops-have-to-be-shown.html


The French bishops have to be shown that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the false premise. They will all emerge Feeneyites and traditionalists. There is no other rational choice

 The French Bishop's Statement on Summorum Pontificum and the Traditional Latin Mass mentions  a ' mentality against Vatican Council II '( interpreted with the false premise) among priests who offer Mass in Latin.

Of course they reject this version of the Council with good reason.I support them.

However with the false premise, the liberalism of the French bishops is supported.So they reject Tradition. 

These bishops, aware of the liberal- conservative divide in the Church, want on controls 'on the other group', those who oppose Vatican Council II ( with the false premise).

This is the problem created by the 55 year old interpretation of the Council by the liberals and Lefebvrists.

But there has been a new development.

https://twitter.com/roratecaelifeed


There has been another interesting turn of events recently which has a bearing on the statement of the French bishops.

This is an interesting turn of events someone commented in a e-mail message to me today.

In my communication with Massimo Faggioli, John Allen of Crux, Michael Sean Winters and Joshua Elwee of the National Catholic Reporter, they all emerge Feeneyite and conservative.They are unable to contradict or reject Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise.

They understand what I have been writing and obviously they cannot say that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 , UR 3 etc refer to personally known, objective people in 2021. So they are forced to accept GS 22, NA 2 etc in Vatican Council II as being only hypothetical. 

When they are hypothetical, for these liberal writers, then there are no  practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.


Feeneyite Massimo Faggioli is supporting the Syllabus of Errors which he criticised a few years back ?!

Yes. He indicates that the progressivist-conservative divide ends in the Catholic Church when Vatican Council II is interpreted without the false premise.

Similarly the French bishops have to be shown that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the false premise. They will all emerge Feeneyites and traditionalists.

There is no other rational choice. 

So the priest who offers the Traditional Latin Mass and the Novus Ordo Mass will be affirming Tradition like the traditionalists today.-Lionel Andrades

Today a pope or bishop's conference or group of cardinals can choose to interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise, without confusing what is invisible as being visible and then Catechesis in the parishes will once again teach that there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church

 There is a foreign Catechesis, RCIA and Adult Formation program in the parishes in Italy since Pope Paul VI with a false premise interpreted Vatican Council II. He could have chosen the rational interpretation and then the Catechesis today could still affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

The error was already there in 1949 when Pope Pius XII did not correct the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office(CDF).

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith( Holy Office) made a mistake.It used a false premise when it assumed unknown cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance were personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church. There are no such people in our reality.

But today a pope or bishop's conference or group of cardinals can choose to interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise, without confusing what is invisible as being visible and then Catechesis in the parishes will once again teach that there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. - Lionel Andrades

The Vatican had been using a fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II all these years. Catholics in Italy do not know this.Without the false premise the Council supports St.John Bosco and St. Catherine of Siena on EENS

 The Vatican had been using a fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II all these years. Catholics in Italy do not know this.Without the false premise  the Council supports St.John Bosco and St. Catherine of Siena on extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

Most of the migrants to Italy are outside the Church.

Non Catholic spouses  in inter-faith marriages are outside the Church.

The Council, interpreted without the false premise, indicates they will be lost.

They will be 'cancelled' for all eternity, according to Vatican Council II ( without the false premise ). - Lionel Andrades

La storia di Isabella Ricci, che ha ricevuto la grazia della guarigione ...

Pope Francis wants the whole Church to interpret Vatican Council II with a fake premise otherwise the whole Church will become Feeneyite once again

 


Pope Francis wants the whole Church to interpret Vatican Council II with a fake premise otherwise the whole Church will become Feeneyite once again.- Lionel Andrades

When Massimo Faggioli who considered himself a specialist on Vatican Council II cannot reject Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise , it indicates that the progressivist-conservative division in the Church has taken a jolt.

 When Massimo Faggioli who considered himself a specialist on Vatican Council II cannot reject Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise , it indicates that the progressivist-conservative division in the Church has taken a jolt.Over time the whole Church will choose the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.

Those who do not accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, will be schismatic and heretical.They will be in schism with the past Magisterium and the present two popes. They will be accepting an innovation with the false premise.

Presently the two popes, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Vatican offices are choosing the schismatic interpretation of Vatican Council II.- Lionel Andrades

____________


 FEBRUARY 15, 2021

Massimo Faggioli, John Allen , Michael Sean Winters and Joshua Elwee have all become Feeneyites. They know that this is the result when they interpret Vatican Council II rationally, without the common false premise.

 Massimo Faggioli, John Allen , Michael Sean Winters and Joshua Elwee have all become Feeneyites. They know that this is the result when they interpret Vatican Council II rationally, without the common false premise.

Massimo Faggioli once described himself as a specialist on Vatican Council II. Theologically he specializes on Vatican Council II. 

The specialist on Vatican Council II is now intepreting the Council as a break with the 55 tear old interpretation of the Council. - Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/massimo-faggioli-john-allen-michael.html

_________________

FEBRUARY 14, 2021

Massimo Faggioli needs to clarify that Vatican Council II does not contradict Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc) for him any more

 Massimo Faggioli needs to clarify for all that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance refer to hypothetical and theoretical cases only in 1965-2021.

Similarly he needs to clarify that for him LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are also only hypothetical and  speculative cases in the present times. So there are no objective exceptions , mentioned in Vatican Council II, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Jesuits in the Middle Ages. There are no objective exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church to the Syllabus of Errors. 

So for him the Ccuncil does not contradict Tradition any more.

It does not contradict Feeneyite EENS of the St.Benedict Center, New Hampshire. It does not contradict EENS according to Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston whose excommunication was lifted by that great exponent of Vatican Council II, Pope Paul VI.The Jesuit priest only had to recite the Athanasius Creed, which says outside the Church there is no salvation.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/massimo-faggioli-needs-to-clarify-that.html



FEBRUARY 14, 2021



Massimo Faggioli knows that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with or without the false premise and the conclusion will be non traditional or traditional, in a rupture or in harmony, with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the Magisterium of the 16th century. So he now chooses to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. He is a full Professor of Theology and Religious Studies at Villanova University, USA and needs to inform them and the organisations he is associated with, of his new understanding of Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/massimo-faggioli-knows-that-vatican.html