Thursday, September 29, 2022
Sunday, September 25, 2022
Bishop Schneider was using the Blue Chart !
SEPTEMBER 25, 2022
Bishop Athanasius Schneider at Kazakhstan said there is salvation in only Jesus in the Catholic Church.He was using the Blue Chart
Bishop Athanasius Schneider at Kazakhstan said there is salvation in only Jesus in the Catholic Church.
So he is affirming the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with no exceptions. He is also affirming Vatican Council II, Ad Gentes 7, with no known exceptions.
In an interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall he has said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire in the present times. Taylor Marshall agreed with him. He said there are no explicit cases of St. Thomas Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire.
So for Bishop Athanasius Schneider Lumen Gentium 14(baptism of desire) is a hypothetical and speculative case only. It is not a practical exception for the dogma EENS. Similarly there are no objective cases in 2022 of LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc. These are invisible cases. So Bishop Schneider chooses the Blue chart, the rational chart, the premise is rational. Invisible cases are assumed to be invisible.
For him Vatican Council II does not have any explicit exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church. So he has said that there is salvation in only Jesus in the Catholic Church. He affirmed the exclusive salvation of the Church in the Patristic period and the Middle Ages and later.-Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 25, 2022
Bishop Athanasius Schneider at Kazakhstan said there is salvation in only Jesus in the Catholic Church.He was using the Blue Chart
Bishop Athanasius Schneider at Kazakhstan
said there is salvation in only Jesus in the Catholic Church.
So he is affirming the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with no exceptions. He is also affirming Vatican
Council II, Ad Gentes 7, with no known exceptions.
In an interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall he
has said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire in the
present times. Taylor Marshall agreed with him. He said there are no explicit
cases of St. Thomas Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire.
So for Bishop Athanasius Schneider Lumen
Gentium 14(baptism of desire) is a hypothetical and speculative case only. It
is not a practical exception for the dogma EENS. Similarly there are no
objective cases in 2022 of LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc. These are
invisible cases. So Bishop Schneider chooses the Blue chart, the rational
chart, the premise is rational. Invisible cases are assumed to be invisible.
For him Vatican Council II does not have
any explicit exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.
So he has said that there is salvation in only Jesus in the Catholic Church. He
affirmed the exclusive salvation of the Church in the Patristic period and the
Middle Ages and later.-Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 25, 2022
Pope Francis and Pope Benedict use the Red Chart and Bishop Athanasius Schneider chooses the Blue Chart ( Video clip) : the Red Chart is irrational, non traditional and heretical. The Blue chart is orthodox
Saturday, September 17, 2022
Bishop Athanasius Schneider , the SSPX, SBC, CMRI, MHT Seminary and MHFM are supported by Vatican Council II ( Rational )
When Bishop Athanasius Schneider says that Jesus in the Catholic Church is the only way to salvation, it must be noted that he is supported by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally; with the Rational Premise.The Council is being interpreted with ‘the red hypothetical passages not being exceptions to the blue orthodox passages’ which support extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
When VC2 is interpreted
with Feeneyism and not Cushingism then the Council supports the old theology
and the old ecclesiology.
The Council when
interpreted with the Rational and not Irrational Premise and Inference, endorse
the traditional theology of the SSPX, CMRI, MHT seminary,MHFM and the SBC. The
Council is exclusivist in its ecclesiology and takes the Church back to the past
ecclesiocentrism.
So Bishop Schnedier was
supported by the Blue Column, in the two Columns, Red and Blue.The Red Column
with the False Premise would of course be a break with the past
ecclesiocentric. The bishop understands this.He has said in an interview with
Dr.Taylor Marshall that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire(LG
14).Marshall confirmed that there are no explicit cases of Aquinas’ implicit
baptism of desire.
When we choose to interpret Vatican Council II with the Blue and not Red chart( see video clips on Twitter) then the Council supports the traditionalists and not the liberals.There is only one rational and ethical choice before Catholics.
Pope Francis and the
cardinals cannot continue to interpret Traditionis Custode with the Irrational
Premise to create a False Rupture with the Roman Missal ( 1580). The only
rational and honest alternative they have in the interpretation of the Council(Rational
Premise) supports the ecclesiocentrism of the pre-1962 Missal. The new Missal
has to be adapted to the old theology which avoided the False Premise.It was upon
the False Premise that the New Theology was formed. It is the same for the New Ecumeism, New Evangelisation
and New Ecclesiology.
The mistake comes from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII and the popes who followed.
So we have to reject the
second part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston. The
second part of the Letter 1949 interpreted the baptism of desire and being
saved in invincible ignorance as being alleged practical exceptions for
Feeneyite EENS.
So the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II by Reuters, Assoicated Press, EWTN and the National Catholic Reporter is now obsolete. Catholics have a rational choice. It is traditional and supports the traditionalists and not the present two popes.
When the charts and graphics are demonstrated it can clearly be seen that the popes, cardinals and bishops are in heresy and schism when they choose the common irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and EENS etc.-Lionel Andrades
14. This Sacred Council wishes to turn its attention firstly to the Catholic faithful. Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ, present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of faith and baptism(124) and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church, for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church. Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.
They are fully incorporated in the society of the Church who, possessing the Spirit of Christ accept her entire system and all the means of salvation given to her, and are united with her as part of her visible bodily structure and through her with Christ, who rules her through the Supreme Pontiff and the bishops. The bonds which bind men to the Church in a visible way are profession of faith, the sacraments, and ecclesiastical government and communion. He is not saved, however, who, though part of the body of the Church, does not persevere in charity. He remains indeed in the bosom of the Church, but, as it were, only in a "bodily" manner and not "in his heart."(12*) All the Church's children should remember that their exalted status is to be attributed not to their own merits but to the special grace of Christ. If they fail moreover to respond to that grace in thought, word and deed, not only shall they not be saved but they will be the more severely judged.(13*)
Catechumens who, moved by the Holy Spirit, seek with explicit intention to be incorporated into the Church are by that very intention joined with her. With love and solicitude Mother Church already embraces them as her own.- Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II
Religious freedom, in turn, which men demand as necessary to fulfill their duty to worship God, has to do with immunity from coercion in civil society. Therefore it leaves untouched traditional Catholic doctrine on the moral duty of men and societies toward the true religion and toward the one Church of Christ.-Dignitatis Humane 1, Vatican Council II
"Outside the Church there is no salvation" 846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:
- Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.
- Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.
-Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848
DOMINUS IESUS
________________________________
Now, among those things which the Church has always preached and will never cease to preach is contained also that infallible statement by which we are taught that there
is no salvation outside the Church.
which is the Church, and to remain united to Christ and to His Vicar, through whom He Himself in a visible manner governs the Church on earth...
Therefore, no one will be saved who, knowing the Church to have been divinely established by Christ, nevertheless refuses to submit to the Church or withholds obedience from the Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ on earth.
Not only did the Savior command that all nations should enter the Church, but He also decreed the Church to be a means of salvation without which no one can enter the kingdom of eternal glory.
In His infinite mercy God has willed that the effects, necessary for one to be saved, of those helps to salvation which are directed toward man's final end, not by intrinsic
necessity, but only by divine institution, can also be obtained in certain circumstances when those helps are used only in desire and longing. This we see clearly stated in the Sacred Council of Trent, both in reference to the sacrament of regeneration and in reference to the sacrament of penance (, nn. 797, 807).
However, this desire need not always be explicit, as it is in catechumens; but when a person is involved in invincible ignorance God accepts also an implicit desire, so called because it is included in that good disposition of soul whereby a person wishes his will to be conformed to the will of God.
FEBRUARY 5, 2020
FALSE PREMISE, INFERENCE AND CONCLUSION (GRAPHICS)
-Lionel Andrades
NOVEMBER 2, 2016
When an irrational premise is used I refer to it as Cushingism. When there is a rational premise, I refer to it as Feeneyism.
When an irrational premise is used I refer to it as Cushingism.
When there is a rational premise, I refer to it as Feeneyism.Lionel Andrades
__________________________________________
Posts
