I get no response when I e-mail Fr. George de Laire, the Judicial Vicar
of the Diocese of Manchester, New Hampshire, USA.
I am asking him if he used the Fake Premise to interpret the baptism of
desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and invincible ignorance (I.I) and so
produced exceptions for Feeneyite extra
ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). He must answer yes.
I am asking him if he used the False Premise to avoid Feeneyite EENS. He
would have to answer yes.
I am asking him if he is Feeneyite on BOD, BOB and I.I but for the the
False Premise. If he interpreted BOD,BOB amd I.I rationally, like Brother Andre
Marie micm, then he would be a Feeneyite too. He would have to answer Yes.
I am asking him if the False Premise is deception. He would have to
answer yes.
I am also asking if he would use the Rational Premise to the interpret
the BOD, BOB and I.I and then he would affirm Feeneyite EENS. There would be no
other choice.
I am also asking him if he issued the Decree of Prohibition against the St.
Benedict Center since he believes they
are Feeneyite on EENS . He would answer yes.
These are a few questions and comments I have. There is no response from
the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith or the Diocese of Manchester,
NH.
So the St. Benedict Center must use a Fake Premise to interpret Vatican
Council II and EENS to avoid the Decree of Prohibition? It is the same for all
the religious communities and Catholics in New Hampshire.
They all have to lie. They would have to officially deceive. They would have
to reject Tradition.
Why has the diocese closed the chapel of the St.Benedict Center in
Richmond, NH and the chapels are open
for Fr. Laire ? Why is he allowed to handle marriage cases in the Diocese
Tribunal, canonically, this should not be permitted. -Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 4, 2023
If Cardinal Luiz Ladaria did not use the Fake Premise then he would be affirming Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) like the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire against whom he has issued a Decree of Prohibitions, for affirming traditional EENS.
NOVEMBER 7, 2021
I have often written about Fr. Georges de Laire's priorities and values
The Catholics Church’s religious
beliefs are criticized in a report
supporting Fr. Georges de Laire.1
It is not being recognised that
it is Vatican Council II ( Ad
Gentes 7) which says all need
faith and the baptism of water for salvation and
so outside the Church there is no salvation (CCC
846) and this is not the private views of the St.
Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA which is
being slandered.
Hypothetical cases of Lumen Gentium 16 ( LG 16)
etc in Vatican Council II are not practical
exceptions for AG 7.
So the St. Benedict Center is following Vatican
Council II and other Magisterial Documents ( extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Athanasius Creed etc).
But Fr. Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar of the
Diocese of Manchester, USA interprets LG 16 as
being an exception to AG 7 and the past
ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church. This is
irrational.
How can he support this irrationality and judge
marriage cases in the diocese tribunal ? He is
unethical and dishonest to project non existing
cases of being saved in invincible ignorance as
being objective examples of salvation outside the
Catholic Church.
This is a reflection of his priorities and values.I
have written to Michael Voris and Christine Niles
often about this over the past few years.
Then because Brother Andre Marie MICM does not repeat this subterfuge Fr.Georges de Laire has placed severe prohibitions upon the religious community in New Hampshire.This is politically motivated and not Catholic.How can he remain a priest ?This is coercion and it would be illegal in some countries.
Fr.Georges de Laire will not respond to the many reports on this blog.Neither will the Chancellor Meredith Cook esq.,or the Director of Education and Catechesis, Mary Ellen Mohan.
Fr. Georges de Laire has not denied that he considers unknown cases of the baptism of desire as being known and objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church and so for him, the baptism of desire is a practical exception to the traditional exclusivist interpretation of salvation held by Brother Andre Marie MIM, Prior, at the SBC.
He has not denied that all the religious communities in New Hampshire must acccept his irrationality or be hit with a harsh Decree of Prohibitions.
This is an attack on Catholic religious beliefs held by Catholics in New Hampshire and it serves the political Left which supports Satanic values which lead to the fires of Hell.
He has not denied that he uses the Fake Premise
to interpret EENS and Vatican Council II
otherwise he would be affirming the same strict
interpretation of EENS and rational
interpretation of Vatican Council II as the Slaves
of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, SBC,N.H and
would be considered a Feeneyite.-Lionel Andrades
1
https://www.unionleader.com/news/courts/nh-priests-defamation-case-against-website-proceeds/article_346d659a-2795-53d7-a3d9-c77e68809623.html
____________________
NOVEMBER 6, 2021
For Judge Joseph A. Diclerico Jr. there would be no literal cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I in New Hampshire in 2021 : but for Fr. Georges de Laire there are
NOVEMBER 6, 2021
When Michael Voris was in New Hampshire too Fr.Georges de Laire declined to give him an interview. He wanted to maintain the political Left interpretation of EENS and Vatican Council II even though he knew it was dishonest and unethical.
NOVEMBER 5, 2021
Repost : Judge Joseph A. Diclerico Jr., in New Hampshire, has to be asked if he considers invisible people as visible in 2021.Is this a premise in any discussion, secular or religious ? Since this is the present reasoning of Fr.Georges de Laire.
NOVEMBER 5, 2021
Repost : Bishop Peter Libasci and Fr. Georges de Laire are avoiding a Decree of Prohibitions against them by using a Fake Premise
NOVEMBER 5, 2021
Without the False Premise Fr. Georges de Laire has the same understanding of extra ecclesiam nulla salus as Brother Andre Marie MICM
From the Catholic Herald U.K (2019)
When I asked him about the penalties, Fr Georges de Laire, the vicar for canonical affairs for the Manchester diocese, said that he “met with the [current] Undersecretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith [Fr Matteo Visioli] this past May, and upon that conversation the Congregation made recommendations to us for steps that should be imposed upon the Saint Benedict Center and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. These are included in the precepts imposed on Monday, January 7...”
Yet one must note that Bishop Peter Libasci of Manchester has arranged for a Latin Mass to be celebrated at a diocesan parish near the Saint Benedict Center while the January 7 prohibitions remain in effect. The CDF (or at least Manchester) is taking great pains to make clear that this dispute is about the dogma of extra Ecclesiam nulla salus and not about the status of traditionalists in the Church more broadly. Bishop Libasci himself is considered broadly conservative and has made generous provisions for the traditionalist Priestly Fraternity of St Peter (FSSP) to operate within the diocese...- Michael Warren Davis 1
1
Why is the Vatican taking action against the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary?
https://catholicherald.co.uk/why-is-the-vatican-taking-action-against-the-slaves-of-the-immaculate-heart-of-mary/
NOVEMBER 3, 2021
Fr. Georges de Laire, could also affirm the traditional strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the 16th century missionaries and Magisterium and confirm that he no more uses the False Premise.
With the Rational Premise Vatican Council II is dogmatic, ecclesiocentric and traditional. It is in harmony with the old theology of the Catholic Church as at the time of the Catholic Austro-Hungarian empire.
The Vatican and Fr. Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar in the Diocese of Manchester, USA,should not dishonestly expect the Catholic religious community Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire and Brother Andre Marie MICm, Prior, to choose a False Premise to re-interpret the Creeds, Catechisms etc and create a break with Tradition.
Fr.Georges de Laire cannot claim that invisible people in New Hampshire are visible examples of salvation outside the Church and objective exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus and then expect the St. Benedict Center to accept the False Premise, for canonical recognition, like the other religious communities in New Hampshire (Carmelites, Franciscans etc).
United States District Court Judge Joseph DiClerico in New Hamphire too should not be forced if he is a Catholic ( or not a Catholic) to use a False Premise to interpret the Catholic Creeds , Vatican Council II, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and then project this innovation as the teachings of the Catholic Church..
If Fr. De Laire persists with this irrationality he should not be allowed to handle marriage cases at the diocesan tribunal.
Fr. Georges de Laire, could also affirm the traditional strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the 16th century missionaries and Magisterium and confirm that he no more uses the False Premise.
Judge Joseph DiClerico could be asked to inform Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, to no more coerce the St.Benedict Center with a Decree of Prohibitions. Also the diocese could compensate the religious community and lay persons affected.-Lionel Andrades
______________________________________________
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/11/i-have-often-written-about-fr-georges.html
Posts
