Saturday, March 19, 2022

Is the consecration of a pope in public mortal sin valid?

 

The popes, cardinals and bishops in mortal sin have first to end the scandal, seek absolution in the Confessional and affirm the Catholic faith in public  before they consecrate Russia and Ukraine on March 25, 2022.



Presently, all use the common false premise to reject the original interpretation of the Creeds, Catechisms, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.

In the name of the fake interpretation of Vatican Council II with a False Premise, they have allowed the Eucharist to be given to the divorced and remarried (Amoris Laetitia).

CONSECRATION IN MORTAL SIN

So before the consecration, they must announce that they will interpret Vatican Council II and all Magisterial Documents with a Rational Premise and so affirm the Nicene Creed and the Syllabus of Errors.

They would then no more be supporting  mortal sins of faith but instead the traditional de fide teachings of the Church.

They would not be automatically excommunicated and since they would not be using the False Premise to create first class heresy and schism, with the past Magisterium.

They would have to admit that Pope Paul VI used a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and ignored the rational choice he had. Also Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus are Cushingite and not Feeneyite and are written with the same error.

Pope Pius XII overlooked the mistake in the Letter of the Holy 1949 as did the subsequent prefects of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Is the consecration of a pope in public mortal sin valid?

Before the March 25 consecration the two popes must announce that Lumen Gentium 8, Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16, Unitatis Reditigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2, Gaudium et Specs 22 etc in Vatican Council II, refer to only hypothetical cases. They are not practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors. So the two popes would be saying that they affirm the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the 16th century Magisterium.

Practically, it would mean, for example, that  all vocations to the religious life could do the same.   -Lionel Andrades

 MAY 7, 2016


Pope Francis uses an irrational premise to draw a non traditional and heretical conclusion on Methodists and salvation

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/05/pope-francis-uses-irrational-premise-to.html


MARCH 31, 2016


Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with an irrationality as do the traditionalists: the result is heresy

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/pope-francis-interprets-vatican-council.html


'Successor of St.Peter' interprets Vatican Council II with irrationality : magisterium still makes a factual error

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/successor-of-stpeter-interprets-vatican.html

Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with the irrational premise which comes from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/pope-francis-interprets-vatican-council.html


The ecclesiology of Pope Francis and Cardinal Kaspar is based on the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/the-ecclesiology-of-pope-francis-and.html


From Pope Paul VI to Pope Francis... : Can popes reject an ex cathedra teaching and offer Holy Mass ? Yes, defacto this is what is being done

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/from-pope-paul-vi-to-pope-francis-can.html

Pope Francis, Cardinal Muller and Cardinal Ladaria are refusing to interpret Vatican Council II without the irrationality

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/pope-francis-cardinal-muller-and.html


From Pope Pius XII to Pope Francis they all have been using an irrational premise in the interpretation of magisterial texts

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/12/from-pope-pius-xii-to-pope-francis-they.html

Pope Francis presents Protestant kerygma contradicts Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/01/pope-francis-presents-protestant.html

Pope omits doctrine which is the basis for religious liberty

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/11/pope-francis-spoke-on-necessity-of.html

Pope Francis like the sedevacantists uses Marchetti's irrational premise and inference. He accepts the Council with this error
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/06/pope-francis-like-sedevantists-uses.html

Pope Francis wants the Franciscans of the Immaculate to accept Vatican Council II with theIRRATIONAL RED column

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/pope-francis-wants-franciscans-of.html

No one denies that the pope has made a Cushingite error

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/10/no-one-denies-that-pope-has-made.html

Pope Francis' error has made salvation theology over the last 60 -plus years obsolete





What a long line of religious formators who will teach heresy like our pope
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/11/what-long-line-of-religious-formators.html


Magisterial Heresy -2



The Magisterial Heresy - 3

Pope Francis is contradicting Pope John Paul II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/09/pope-francis-in-contradicting-pope-john.html
-Lionel Andrades
_______________________________



MARCH 18, 2022

The theology taught at Confirmation and Holy Communion classes is political. Parents are not aware of it.

 


                                                                                                                                                  -Lionel Andrades

 

 

AT HOLY COMMUNION AND CONFIRMATION CLASSES THE CHILDREN ARE TAUGHT TO REJECT THE ATHANASIUS CREED, CHANGE THE INTERPRETATION OF THE NICENE CREED AND INTERPRET THE APOSTLES CREED ALSO WITH A FALSE PREMISE.THE SAME ERROR IS EXTENDED TO THE FIRST COMMANDMENT.



1 Athanasius Creed









2.Nicene Creed








3.Apostles Creed







_____________________________________



MAY 1, 2021

Pope Francis and Cardinal Comastri when speaking about the First Commandment could not say that there was true worship in only the Catholic Church : Now they even reject the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation

 Pope Francis and Cardinal Comastri when speaking about the First Commandment could not say that there was true worship in only the Catholic Church. Since they both use the false premise to interpret the baptism of desire(BOD), the baptism of blood (BOB)and invincible ignorance(I.I) with the irrational premise. They assume that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in the present times.So for them there is known salvation outside the Church. For them there are practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). So non Catholics are saved outside the Church even as non Christians or non believers in God.

If they used the rational premise ( blue passages ) then outside the Church there would be no known salvation and so then they would have to say that there is true worship in only the Catholic Church and that this is the only one true Church or Christ(UR 2) and the Catholics are the new people of God ( NA 4).Now they even reject the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation. -Lionel Andrades


 SEPTEMBER 7, 2020

Pope Francis uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and this contradicts the First Commandment.TV 2000 did not bring up this point in a recent interview on the Creed. He interprets the Creed with the irrational premise.

 Pope says 'holier than thou' believers unwilling to help others, "get hands  dirty" only "superficial" Christians - Novena

Pope Francis uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and this contradicts the First Commandment.TV 2000 did not bring up this point in a recent interview on the Creed. He interprets the Creed with the irrational premise.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/09/pope-francis-uses-false-premise-to.html


SEPTEMBER 5, 2020

Cardinal Comastri interprets BOD, BOB and I.I with a false premise and so there are exceptions to EENS for him, there are also exceptions to traditional salvation and the First Commandment. So he cannot say that Catholics only worshop the true God: he limits himself to the worldly gods of sex and money

  

Cardinal Comastri  interprets the baptism of desire(BOD), the baptism of blood (BOB) and invincible ignorance ( I.I) with a false premise and so there are exceptions to EENS for him, there are also exceptions to traditional salvation and the First Commandment. So he cannot say that Catholics only worshop the true God.He limits himself in the video to the worldly gods of sex and money. -Lionel Andrades

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2020

Cardinal Angelo Comastri like Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger in explaining the First Commandment could not say that in the Catholic Church there is true worship

 Cardinal Angelo Comastri like Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger  in explaining the First Commandment could not say  that in the Catholic Church there is true worship and the other religions are not paths to salvation. Since for them hypothetical cases of Lumen Gentium 16  etc are real exceptions to exclusivist  salvation in the Catholic Church. -Lionel Andrades

Come sarebbe più bello il Mondo se seguissimo questa saggia segnaletica che Dio ci ha dato (Youtube)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PC6AICaoapY




BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE

Fake premise

The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically visible cases in 1949-2021.

Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.They are examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

Fake conclusion
So they contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Pope Pius XII and the Holy Office(CDF) made an objective mistake.

BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE

Rational Premise

The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically invisible cases in 1949-2021
They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.They are not examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

Rational Conclusion
They do not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.They do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.
__________


VATICAN COUNCIL II

Fake premise

Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14(Baptism of Desire), Lumen Gentium 16 (Invincible ignorance) etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.

Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Pope Paul VI and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, made an objective error.

VATICAN COUNCIL II

Rational Premise
 Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium  14 and Lumen Gentium 16  in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.

Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-L.A
_____________________

NOVEMBER 17, 2020

For Pope Francis outside the Church there is salvation so there is also true worship in other religions. It's the same for Pope Benedict

 For Pope Francis outside the Church there is salvation so there is also true worship in other religions. It's the same for Pope Benedict. 

Q. 1140. What is the first Commandment?

A. The first Commandment is: I am the Lord thy God: thou shalt not have strange gods before me.- Baltimore Catechism


THE FIRST COMMANDMENT

I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself a graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them or serve them.

It is written: "You shall worship the Lord your God and him only shall you serve."- Catechism of the Catholic  Church

So the First Commandment which says? I am the Lord thy God and thou shalt have no other gods beside me, has been changed.

Since even the monotheist and pagan religions which do not believe in Christ have true worship, for the present two popes.Since outside the Church there is salvation for them instead of outside the Church there is no salvation.

 For me there is true worship in only the Catbholic Church and outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation and no true worship.-Lionel Andrades




, NOVEMBER 17, 2020

Pope Francis and Pope Benedict along with the Vatican dicasteries and Congregations, interpret the Creeds irrationally, non traditionally, heretically and schismatically

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/11/pope-francis-and-pope-benedict-along.html

TUESDAY, JUNE 29, 2021

In Dijon, France Catholics do not have unity on the First Commandment, the Creeds, Catechisms, Extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II and Bishop Roland Minnerath is allowed to offer Holy Mass. The laity could ask the bishop and the fssp priests, religious communities and parishiones, to interpret Vatican Council Ii and Magisterial documents without the fake premise and instead to use the rational premise

 

                                                    https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/laity-protest-latin-mass-hating-archbishop

In Dijon, France the Catholics do not have unity on the First Commandment, the Creed and Catechisms and Bishop Roland Minnerath is allowed to offer Holy Mass.The laity could ask the bishop and the FSSP priests and parishioners, to interpret Vatican Council II without the fake premise, and use the rational premise, instead.It is then tht Holy Mass can be offered with no scandal.Now with the fake premise they create a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no known exceptions), the Athanasius Creed ( with no exceptions), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( with no exceptions) and the Catechism of Pope Pius X( with no exceptions to 24Q and 27Q).
Bishop Minnerath, the FSSP priests and the parishioners accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) which says every one does not need to be a formal member of the Catholic Church for salvation.Since for the LOHO invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance (I.I), are physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church.They become objective exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),for them.This is irrational. It is false reasoning.How can the LOHO, and Bishop Minnerath, reject centuries of teaching on ecclesiocentrism by projecting hypothetical and speculative cases of BOD and I.I as being practical exceptions to EENS in the present times(1949-2021).They say every one does not need to enter the Church formally because of imaginative and theoretical exceptions, which cannot exist in reality for them.Where were the known people saved outside the Church in 1949 or later? There were none in Rome or Boston.This was a mistake of the cardinals who approved the LOHO. It was also a mistake of the Archdiocese of Boston.
LOHO then refers to ‘ a necessity of means’ as if the baptism of water is not always necessary for salvation, practically.We cannot give any one the baptism of desire and we do not know of any one who will be saved with the baptism of desire.So ow can the baptism of water, practically, be relative and conditional to being saved with the baptism of desire?

The LOHO is heretical and schismatic and Bishop Minnerath the FSSP priests and the Carmelites and other religious communities, accept it and offer Holy Mass, in this condition.With the false reasoning; the false premise of the LOHO they create a break with the ecclesiology of the Church of the 16th century when the Traditional Latin Mass was offered. So the Latin Mass today in Dijon does not have the same theology as the Mass over the centuries, since the false premise of LOHO is used to interpret Vatican Council II , the Creeds, Catechisms,the First Commandment etc and reject the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.This is first class heresy in Dijon at every Mass in all rites.
The laity could hold placards outside the Church asking the bishops and priests to reject the irrationality of the LOHO and affirm Magisterial documents without the false premise.Then there is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.There is a continuity with Tradition even for those who attend Mass in French.
They could also appeal to the cardinals and bishops in France to reject the false reasoning of the LOHO and declare it a heretical document which is not part of the Deposit of the Faith.
LOHO brings division into the Catholic Church and is a break with the traditional teachings of the Church Fathers and St.Peter and St. Paul on outside the Church there is no salvation.
Based on the false reasoning of LOHO Bishop Minnerath wrote his books and articles, wrongly re-interpreting Vatican Council II and the Syllabus of Errors with the common false premise.The laity must bring this deception and irregularity to the attention of the Administration in Dijon.  - Lionel Andrades

_____________________________________

NOVEMBER 24, 2021

In my parish at First Holy Communion classes the children need to be told that every one needs to be a member of the Catholic Church, with faith and the baptism of water(AG 7) and live the traditional teachings of the Church to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.

 

In my parish at First Holy Communion classes the children need to be told that every one needs to be a member of the Catholic Church, with faith and the baptism of water (AG 7) and live the traditional teachings of the Church to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.In Heaven there are only Catholics who are there with faith and the baptism of water (AG 7).Other religions are not paths to salvation(AG 7/LG 14). They may have good things which are a preparation for entering the Catholic Church.Other religions instead have deficiences, errors and superstition ( Dominus Iesus, Pope John Paul II) and their members are oriented to the Catholic Church for salvation ( CDF, Dupuis 2001).

 We Catholics follow the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacon, Yahweh, fulfilled in Jesus Christ,  the Messiah promised by the Jewish prophets. Jesus is the Son of God one in substance with the Father and Spirit, in the Holy Trinity. With  his Death and Resurrection he made an eternal covenant, as a Saviour from Hell, for all those who believe in Him and live His teachings in the Catholic Church.

Catholics are the new people of God, the new Chosen People, the Elect ( Nostra Aetate 4,Vatican Council II). They are the fulfillment of the covenants God made with the Jewish people, of the old Testament.There is now true worship in only the Catholic Church.The present day Jews did not accept the Messiah and they reject Him in his First Coming.They are not the same as the past Jews who were waiting for the Messiah.

The Catholic Church is the continuation of the Jewish religion. It was only after the Death and Resurection of Jesus that the Jewish Patriarchs could enter  Heaven.

The Catholic Church is Jesus’ Mystical Body, the Pearl of Great Price, the Treasure which a man found in the field and sold every thing to have it.It is the Kingdom of God on earth.

Catholics now have the Sacrifice in an un-bloody way, at every Holy Mass. They have the temple ( the church) for the sacrifice.They have the Ark of the Covenant in the tabernacle. They  have the promised Jewish Messiah.They  have the Tradition, the continuation of the Jewish religion.They have the one and only Sacrifice offered by the Messiah.They have the Sacred Scriptures in the Bible which is a continuation of the Pentateuch and the Old Testament.

Since most people are outside the Catholic Church in  which there is true worship, they are oriented to the fires of Hell.They die without Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7).

When we meet a non Catholic we know that he is oriented to the fires of Hell unless he converts into the Catholic Church with faith and the baptism of water ( CDF, Dupuis, 2001).He needs to become a member of the Catholic Church.The  Church is necessary for salvation (LG 14/AG 7).

Jesus said that those who do not believe will be condemned ( Mark 16:16) and that those who deny Him he will deny before the Father on the day of Judgement (Matthew 10:33).This is how God the Father wants it.

God the Father wants all to be united in the Catholic Church,the Church is like the Ark of Noah that saves in the flood (CCC 845). We cannot separate Jesus from the Catholic Church and we cannot separate the Kingdom of God from the Catholic Church.

Salvation in potential, as a possibility, is open for all. Jesus died for all but to receive this salvation all need to accept Him in the Catholic Church. They need to believe in the Eucharist and receive the Sacraments.Salvation is restricted practically to those who believe in Jesus, live His teachings in the Catholic Church and die without mortal sins on their soul.Theoretically salvation is open for all practically Catholics have to avoid mortal sins or seek their absolution in the Sacrament of Confession, to obtain Sanctifying Grace necessary for salvation.

Outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation 

is the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church 

expressed in Vatican Council II, the Catechism of 

the Catholic Church, the Nicene and Athanasius 

Creed, the First Commandment for Catholics and 

many Magisterial Documents.-Lionel Andrades


NOVEMBER 23, 2021

At First Holy Communion classes they could teach children that every one needs to enter the Catholic Church to avoid Hell

 


www.smnazaret.it/category/catechismo/

NOVEMBER 22, 2021

In my parish at Holy Communion classes they have changed the understanding of the Nicene Creed and First Commandment and our Profession of Faith is different. The Comitato dell Immaculata of Fr. Stefano Manelli F.I oversee the old vacant church and semimary building in the pasrish

 In my parish Santa Maria di Nazareth, Casalotti, Boccea, Rome, the Holy Communion classes have begun.The children are taught to confuse being saved in invincible ignorance outside the Catholic Church, as referring to known people , physically visible cases in the present times.In this way they don't have to say that there is exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church, as it was taught to children during the times of Apostles and Church Fathers, St. Francis of Assisi, St. Catherine of Siena and St.Maximilian Kolbe.The children are taught that there are exceptions and not that every one needs to enter accept Jesus and enter the Catholic Church, with no known exceptions to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.

Even the priests and catechists in the parish are not ready to affirm the Athanasius Creed and it must be the same with the bishop and his Curia.

So the Nicene Creed is changed too with the same false premise with which they reject the Athanasius Creed and extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

So the Profession of Faith at Holy Mass in Italian is different.Since the Nicene Creed has two interpretations, one rational and the other irrational.

There is confusion on the First Commandment, for Catholics.

The Comitato dell Immaculata of Fr. Stefano Manelli F.I, over sees the old vacant church and seminary building in the parish.They are not intervening. -Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/11/in-may-parish-at-holy-communion-classes.html

______________________

Known baptism of desire is the unofficial teaching in the Catholic Church

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/08/known-baptism-of-desire-is-unofficial.html

Jesuits in first class heresy 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/07/jesuits-in-first-class-heresy.html#links


If LG 16 is 'invisible' then doctrinally Pope Francis is outside the Church http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/04/if-lg-16-is-invisible-then-doctrinally.html

If LG 16 is 'invisible' : Koch,Ladaria and Di Noia could be outside the Church and the SSPX in

An unbelieving pope further clamps down on Fr. Stefano Manelli F.I

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/11/an-unbelieving-pope-further-clamps-down.html
-Lionel Andrades

https://ethikapolitika.org/2016/03/29/any-plowman-can-interpret-pascendi-the-remnants-call-for-schism/