Sunday, June 19, 2022

3° Giorno: Novena alla Regina della Pace per il 41° Anniversario- MEDJUGORJE.

Gesù con la Luce ricevuta da Te desideriamo illuminare i cuori affinché non ci siano più tenebre

Fr.Antonio Spadero sj, Director Civilta Cattolica, chooses to interpret the Council as a break with Tradition by using a False Premise : he could re-interpret Traditionis Custode rationally too

 

 

Sister Maria Philomena MICM, Director, St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom interprets Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise but Fr.Antonio Spadero sj, Director Civilta Cattolica, chooses to interpret the Council as a break with Tradition by using a False Premise.This is political. There is no denial from him. It was the same wth Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger who did not use the Rataional Premise to interpret Vatican Council. They also did not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that he could interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. Instead they excommuniated him.

Now Pope Francis has issued Traditionis Custode in which he interprets Vatican Council II with the same Irrational Premise creating a False Break with the theology of the pre-1962 Roman Missal. If Vatican Council II is interpreted with the Rational Premise, as does Sister Maria Philomena of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, then the interpretation of the Council changes in Traditionis Custode.

 Fr. Spadero and the Jesuits would be obliged to choose the Rational Premise.So bishops would only approve the Latin Mass for those priests and lay people who accept Vatican Council II and only interpret it with the Rational Premise in harmony with the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal over the centuries.This is the honest thing to do.

But there is no comment on Twitter from Fr. Anthony Spadero sj and the Jesuits at La Civilta Cattolica.

Why must Catholics interpret Vatican Council II with a False Premise when a Rational Premise is traditional and not a break with the past Magisterium. With the Rational Premise there is a continuity with the theology of the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q etc).

Why must they interpret Vatican Council II with a False and not Rational Premise, in Traditionis Custode ? The bishops must be honest.


When LG 8, LG14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only, always, then they are not objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or the Athanasius Creed or the rest of Tradition.

SSPX, FSSP MUST ONLY ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II, RATIONAL

So the Society of St. Pius X and the FSSP should be free to have the Latin Mass when they want - as long as they affirm Vatican Council II, interpreted with a Rational Premise. This should be the condition for all in the Church including Pope Francis. They must all be free to offer the Novus Ordo Mass or any other liturgy as long as they interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. There would be a continuity with the theology of the Roman Missal ( 1580). Even the post 1970 Missal must be adapted to Vatican Council II ( Rational).The Catholic Church should be clear on this issue and Fr. Spadero must clarify the position of La Civilita Cattolica.

The teaching of the Catholic faith has been constant and traditional when only a Rational Premise was used, for obvious reasons-it was rational! It was common sense.Fr. Spadero must affirm Vatican Council II interpreted, only, with a Rational Premise.He must correct the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which influenced many at Vatican Council II (1962-65).

Pope Francis is now imposing this same irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, upon the whole Church, through Traditionis Custode. 

The SSPX bishops are not told that they can affirm Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise and so there will be a continuity with the theology of the pre-1962 missal. 

NO DIALOGUE ON VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH CMRI

Also there is no dialogue with the sedevacantist community Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen (CMRI), which has hundreds of priests and nuns. Bishop Mark Pivarunas, the Superior General, does not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise.If the CMRI and Fr. Spadero agree to interpret the baptism of desire with the Rational Premise we can have unity on theology and doctrine in the Catholic Church.

-Lionel Andrades


JUNE 15, 2022





How can Lumen Gentium 16 an invisible person be a practical exception for EENS ? https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/06/how-can-lumen-gentium-16-invisible.html


JUNE 15, 2022







Pope Francis criticizes the traditionalists for not accepting Vatican Council II interpreted with the Red Column while he does not accept Vatican Council II, interpreted with the Rational Premise, the Blue Column.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/06/pope-francis-criticizes-traditionalists.html



 

MARCH 6, 2022








They cannot point out the same mistake in Traditionis Custode

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/06/repost-they-cannot-point-out-same.html











Dozens dead, millions stranded as floods hit Bangladesh, India