Church Militant TV seems to desert St. Benedict Center

Church Militant TV had posted Jim Russell's report 'Fr. Feeney's Doctrines' based upon the New Theology, Cushingite Theology. Upon Cushingite Theology the prohibitions on the St. Benedict Center have been placed by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Bishop Peter Libasci, bishop of the Diocese of Manchester, USA.

Church Militant TV(CMTV) has also stopped the announcements calling for donations for the St. Benedict Center Legal Fund.

It seems as if CMTV has been shown the familiar Anti Semitism card.

So the CMTV message to the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, is accept heresy and sacrilege or be closed down by the Left, while the Vatican will declare them as legally not being Catholic.

The Diocese of Manchester want to suppress and destroy the St. Benedict Center says  C.J Doyle in an interview on Close to Home 1. The SBC have to inform the Internal Revenue Service and the New Hampshire Secretary of State that they are not Catholic.

Recently even the blogger David Domet  had to accept heresy and compromise to keep his blog Vox Cantoris and protect his job in Canada.He had to end the discussion on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.2

He needs to re-read his past blog posts when he felt brave and said 'let it come'.

John Henry Weston's Catholic Edition on LifeSites News does not have a single report on this issue. Instead as Editor in Chief of LifeSites News, he interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingite theology.Then with a straight face every Tuesday he comments on the heresies of Pope Francis.

The St. Benedict Centers are traditionalists and are not being defended by LifeSites and other traditionalists who also use Cushingite theology to remain politically correct with the Left.

They over look the heretical doctrines created by Cushingite Theology, used also the staple theology of the  SSPX , the Lepanto Institute and Human Life International, when they interpret Vatican Council II and EENS.

They do not inform Catholics that without the Cushingite theology, Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, would also be saying like the St. Benedict Center and Michael Voris that there are only Catholics in Heaven.It is only due to ignorance that Catholics do not know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyite theology and so would be in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors, the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and the Athanasius Creed.

Mary Ellen Mahon Cabinet Secretary for Catholic Formation and  Director of Pastoral Ministry,Diocese of Manchester, USA  says that the St. Benedict Center in the diocese cannot be considered Catholic. She does does not tell Catholics in the diocese of Manchester that they can all interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church without Cushingism.Then all those who attend Mass in English in Manchester, USA would be saying that outside the Church there is no salvation and in Heaven there are only Catholics.3

So she hides this information from Catholics.This is not reported by LifeSites News.

-Lionel Andrades

1

Close To Home #516 CJ Doyle https://www.wccatv.com/video/close-to-home/CLOSETOHOME516

2

MARCH 23, 2019

Canadian blogger restrictedhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/03/canadian-blogger-restricted.html

3

APRIL 26, 2019

Mary Ellen Mahon does not tell Catholics in the diocese of Manchester that they can all interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church without Cushingism : but then they would all not be Catholic for her

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/04/mary-ellen-mahon-does-not-tell.html

This pontificate has shown us that a pope can make a doctrinal error on faith ( exclusive salvation negated with Cushingism) and morals ( Amoris Laetitia- Eucharist can be given to the divorced and remarried).

When the popes and the cardinals teach heresy and error it has to be corrected.
TWO ERRORS 

1.The popes since Pius XII assumed there was known, practical, literal, seen-in-the-flesh salvation outside the Catholic Church i.e without faith and the baptism of water( Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II).

2.So they concluded that not everyone needs to enter the Church for salvation. The baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance were some of the exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc were made obsolete.

So now when Catholics correct these two points they naturally and effortlessly go back to the Old Theology. The Syllabus of Errors and Athanasius Creed are no more obsolete.

These two errors of the popes were not identified and corrected when Michael Voris recently visited the St. Benedict Center(SBC) in New Hampshire.

These two errors constitute what is called the New Theology and what I call Cushingite Theology.

The underlying theology of Vatican Council II, Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Balamand Declaration, Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans etc is Cushingite.We have to re-read these Church documents without the error and then we return to the Old Theology, which I call Feeneyism.

With Feeneyism, the Old Theology, there are no exceptions to Michael Voris and Brother Andre Marie saying there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church and all need faith and baptism for salvation (AG 7). All.

There are no exceptions in Vatican Council II to the Catechism of Pope Pius X which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell ( for salvation).

So this distinction was not made.Both Brother Andre Marie and Michael Voris were trying to be faithful to Cushngite theology and its new doctrines.They were not calling the new doctrines heresy but were trying to adapt to them. They needed to correct the error in the two ( red) points above.

The prohibitions on the SBC are based upon the New Theology while the two popes and the ecclesiastics at the Vatican, will not interpret Vatican Council II, with Feeneyism.For ideological reasons they cannot do so.

 But CMTV and SBC can go ahead and interpret Vatican Council II, with Feeneyism.Their conclusion would be non heretical and traditional.

Cushingites at the CDF cannot be magisterial. They assume BOD, BOB and I.I  are literal cases in 2019. The Holy Spirit cannot teach this. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake.

At the Plaquet Deo Press Conference last year Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Prefect,CDF told a correspondent of the Associated Press that LG 8 was an exception to EENS i.e the Church no more had an exclusiveness and superiority in salvation.It was as if Cardinal Ladaria knew of someone  in Rome saved outside the Church.

Was this a mistake for CMTV and SBC? They do not discuss this point  when they refer to Plaquet Deo in the interview of Brother Andre Marie by Michael Voris.

This pontificate has shown us that a pope can make a doctrinal error  on faith ( exclusive salvation negated with Cushingism) and morals ( Amoris Laetitia- Eucharist can be given to the divorced and remarried).The SBC and CMTV cannot present doctrinal beliefs adapted to the error.-Lionel Andrades

Important points were left out in Michael Voris' interview of Brother Andre Marie MICM

BR. ANDRE MARIE OF ST. BENEDICT’S CENTER

Interviewshttps://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/intv-br.-andre-marie-of-st.-benedicts-centerhttps://fundingmorality.com/project/view/saint-benedict.html

Important points were left out in Michael Voris' interview of Brother Andre Marie MICM

Without making a Feeneyite-Cushingite distinction the St. Benedict Center and conservative Catholics in general will be at the receiving end. The liberal exclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and the Vatican will take advantage of their ignorance.Brother Andre Marie and Michael Voris say there are only Catholics in Heaven.Outside the Church there is no salvation.Even  baptized Protestants in general need to enter the Catholic Church to avoid Hell ( for salvation).But the CDF Secretaries have negated this in public. The correspondence has been placed on the website of the Diocese of Manchester, USA.

The Secretaries at the CDF, Archbishops Morandi and Augustine di Noia have said that CCC 847-848 are exceptions to EENS. 

There was no reference to this point in the exclusive interview of Brother Andre Marie by Michael Voris. Important points were not covered.May be it was beyond the scope of what Michael initially planned.

Why did they not mention this objection from the CDF ?
One reason could be that it is not understood that the CDF like the cardinals and bishops are Cushingite.With Cushingism the St.Benedict Center would be proven wrong.
But with Feeneyism there is a rational and traditional answer for the SBC and the CDF would be proved wrong.

The CDF cannot fool all the people all the time.

1.If invincible ignorance ( CCC 847-848. LG 16 etc) refers to physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church then it is an exception to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This is Cushingism.

2.When invincible ignorance refers to physically invisible non Catholics saved outside the Church then it is not an exception to traditional EENS. This is Feeneyism, for me.

So the CDF had to be shown, at least through the interview, that CCC 847-848 and LG 16 are not exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.

This is an important point which was not brought out in Michael Voris' interview.

When Brother Andre Marie corresponded with the CDF he mentions invincible ignorance as not referring to personally known people.

This is a big breakthrough.It shows he understands.He is not rejecting invincible ignorance as a possibility known only to God.He is saying that invincible ignorance cannot be an exception to EENS.Since there are no personally known cases.This point had to be elaborated. It is a Feeneyite point.

It also changes the interpretation of Vatican Council II, which is Feeneyite.

We have found the missing link.We now know precisely what causes the hermeneutic of rupture with EENS, the Athanasius Creed, ecumenism of return, Syllabus of Errors and past ecclesiology.
We simply avoid the Cushingite error by referring to the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) as invisible and hypothetical only.They cannot be anything else.This was how the Church Fathers and the Medieval popes interpreted it.It is common sense.
So when the Cushingites at the CDF and the Diocese of Manchester, USA, or Boston, say there are exceptions to EENS, it had to be shown that there are no practical exceptions.This may be was beyond the planned scope of the interview.
It has to be shown in a literal sense, and not theologically,that there are no exceptions to EENS.
When this is done, how will Archbishop Augustine di Noia respond ?Will he say that the SBC must accept CCC 847-848 as exceptions to EENS since he can personally see people in Heaven saved outside the Church? Will he say that he can judge how Jesus will judge  someone  whom he knows, who is outside the Church and will die with or without mortal sin ?
Die Noia does not know.He cannot judge. He cannot point out an exception to EENS.

This is a point the SBC must cover in Doctrinal Beliefs public. The present online citations will be interpreted with Cushingism by the CDF, the SSPX and the traditionalists. Does Brother Andre Marie interpret them with Feeneyism?
The Profession of Faith for Easter in the churches in New Hampshire could have been interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.
With Cushingism the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed are made obsolete with Feeneyism they are not rejected.
In the interview the impression was created that Michael Voris and Brother Andre Marie affirm all the teachings of the Catholic Church interpreted with Cushingism by the present two popes and the CDF.So they are surprised at the prohibitions placed on the SBC by Bishop Libasci, bishop of Manchester.
Bishop Libasci wants the SBC to say that outside the Catholic Church there is salvation and BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc in Vatican Council II are exceptions.In other words there are personally known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church, for them to be exceptions.This is an irrational position of the diocese which was not brought out in the interview.
Possibilities in the past cannot be exceptions to EENS in 2019. Hypothetical cases in 2019 cannot be objective exceptions to all needing to enter the Church this year.We do not know of a Good Thief who will be saved outside the Church in the present times. No one saw St. Emerentiana in Heaven without the baptism of water. A St. Emerentiana of the past cannot be an exception to the teaching on no salvation outside the Church, in the present times.St. Ambrose speculated that his friend the Emperor Valentinan was in Heaven with or without the baptism of water. Personally he could not know.
Yet this is the false philosophical reasoning the CDF and Bishop Libasci are left with when they pursue bad theology.
Bishop Libasci's philosophy ( invisible non Catholics are visible) and theology( outside the Church there is known salvation) is irrational and un-tenable.This is the point that Michael Voris and Brother Andre Marie need to blow up in the future.
They need to show that the red passages, for them in Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents, are not exceptions to the blue passages. 1 So the CDF has made an objective mistake and upon this mistake Bishop Libasci has placed his prohibitions against the SBC.

 CMTV after the interview  posted an article by Jim Russell, 'Fr. Feeney's strange doctrines'. Russell assumes that 'the red passages are exceptions to the blue passages'.This Cushingite theology supports the CDF and the prohibitions placed upon the SBC.-Lionel Andrades



1

APRIL 26, 2019

The St.Benedict Center can affirm all Magisterial documents including EENS ( extra ecclesiam nulla salus) with ' the red not being an exception to the blue'

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-stbenedict-center-can-affirm-all.html

DECEMBER 21, 2017

It does not have to be either the baptism of desire or extra ecclesiam nulla salus : Just one Religious Superior is needed to understand and affirm this and we will have changed the Church

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/it-does-not-have-to-be-either-baptism_92.html

DECEMBER 21, 2017

It does not have to be either the baptism of desire or extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Understand this line and then change your interpretation of Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/it-does-not-have-to-be-either-baptism_21.html

__________________________________________

 I interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus like Fr.Michael Muller and Fr. Leonard Feeney since physically I cannot see, know or meet any exception to the dogma.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/i-interpret-extra-ecclesiam-nulla-salus.html

Cardinal Ottaviani did not know http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/11/cardinal-ottaviani-did-not-know.html

 SSPX District Superior Italy makes the same factual error as Muller, Ladaria, Di Noi, Pozzo, Kaspar and Koch

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/sspx-district-superior-italy-makes-same.html#links

MISSING LINK

We have found the missing link.LG 16 can be considered explicit or implicit, visible or invisble. It is irrational to consider LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc as referring to explicit cases.This is not common sense.It is rational instead to consider them as implicit, hypothetical and invisible for us.

So if the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate priests, who offer only the Traditional Latin Mass, affirm LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc as being invisible for us, there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the old ecclesiology, usually associated with the Latin Mass.There would be nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the Feeneyite version of EENS. So they would be affirming Vatican Council II ( as sought by the Commissar) and also the pre-1808 ecclesiology.

 It's as simple as that!

So the old doctrinal option, rejected by the contemporary Magisterium because of the Magisterial heresy,is available again for them, when they reason out correctly.The ecclesiology does not depend on the Latin Mass.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/10/when-will-fr-sabino-ardito-sdb-make.html

The two hermeneutics depend on the use or omission of the irrational premise from Marchetti's letterhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/the-two-hermenutics-depend-on-use-or.html 

SSPX show the Vatican the Marchetti error carried over into Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus and other magisterial documents

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/sspx-show-vatican-marchetti-error.html

Archbishop Gerhard Muller was using the false premise : here is the proof!  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/06/archbishop-gerhard-muller-was-using.html 
January 13, 2015
Cardinal Muller's doctrinal error placed on the Vatican website! http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/cardinal-mullers-doctrinal-error-placed.html
________________________________