Kasper and Bequart choose the same irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II

 
Cardinal Walter Kasper has criticized the Synod. But Sister Nathalie Bequart has defended the Synod. She said the Synod is theologically based upon Vatican Council II. Of course, she means Vatican Council II, irrational and not rational.

Cardinal Kasper has always interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally.

He chose this irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II to publically justify Amoris Laetitia. He said if Vatican Council II (irrational and not rational) could change the ecclesiology of the Church then why could not the Eucharist be given to the divorced and remarried?

Caption: All this is based upon the fake interpretation of Vatican Council II. It is dishonesty.

With Vatican Council II (rational) there could not be an Abu Dhabi Declaration or a New Ecumenism for Pope Francis and Cardinal Kasper.

Caption: How can there be reconciliation with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally?. There is deception.
With Vatican Council II (rational) the German bishops cannot justify their Synod. They need the Boston Heresy to produce exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

       Caption : This is possible only with the fake interpretation of Vatican Council II.

The German liberals say that if the Church has changed its position on EENS with Vatican Council II (interpreted irrationally) then why cannot there be innovation in faith and morals?

                                       Caption: Walking together unethically. 

 Vatican Council II (irrational) is ‘a revolution’ in the Church says Reuters. It is ‘a new revelation’ for Pope Francis.

Caption: How can Vatican Council II be orthodox when it is not interpreted rationally ? An orthodox Vatican Council II would say that all need faith the baptism of water for salvation. There can only be an ecumenism of return.

Cardinal Arthur Roche calls it ‘the new magisterium’ of the Church. So the 1962 Missal is obsolete for him.

We know that the 1962 Missal supports the dogma EENS with no exceptions. It is in harmony with Vatican Council II (rational). The SSPX , for example, could affirm Vatican Council II (rational) and also use the 1962 Missal.

 But Cardinal Roche and the Liturgy Department of the University of St. Anselm, Rome cannot use the 1962 Missal.Since EENS is contradicted with the irrational interpretation of LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 2, NA 2, and GS 22 etc.

 They are unethical. This is not Catholic. We cannot have a new Missal based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. There cannot be a New Magisterium based upon Vatican Council II, interpreted with a fake premise and inference. 

The German Synods are flawed. This is known to the theologians at the University of Munich. They can only ethically interpret Vatican Council II rationally.-Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 4, 2022

Archbishop Arthur Roche, Andrea Grillo, Dr. Peter Kwasniewski and Dr.Joseph Shaw use the same False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a false break with Tradition, supporting the common liberalism

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/02/archbishop-arthur-roche-andrea-grillodr.html