Monday, March 7, 2022
I am interpreting Magisterial Documents rationally, with the Rational Premise (LG 16 refers to invisible cases only) so there is no possible liberalism. There is no development of doctrine since there are no exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed etc
I interpret the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO) rationally. The second part does not contradict the first part which supports
traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no exceptions.
How can unknown cases of the baptism of desire and
being saved with invincible ignorance be known exceptions of salvation outside
the Church and practical exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus?
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
interprets the LOHO irrationally. The second part contradicts the first part;
the introductory part. Unknown cases of the baptism of desire and being saved
in invincible ignorance are practical and known exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
I am interpreting Magisterial Documents rationally,
with the Rational Premise (LG 16 refers to invisible cases only) so there is no
possible liberalism. There is no development of doctrine since there are no
exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed etc.-Lionel Andrades
Pope Francis is offering the Novus Ordo Mass in heresy and schism, as does Pope Benedict , when they employ the Fake Premise to change theology and so also doctrine.There is no denial from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. The CDF agrees with me.They all can correct the error with the Rational Premise.
Pope Francis is offering the Novus Ordo
Mass in heresy and schism, as does Pope Benedict , when they employ the Fake
Premise to change theology and so also doctrine.There is no denial from the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. The CDF agrees with me.They all can correct the error with the Rational Premise.
The Fake Premise produces exceptions for
the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed, Catechism of Pope Pius X etc,
irrespective of who uses it. Traditionis Custode wants all Catholics to
interpret Vatican Council II as a break and not continuity with Tradition,by using the False and not Rational Premise.
CDF AGREES WITH ME
With the False Premise they create fake
exceptions for the Athanasius Creed. This is heresy.
With the Fake Premise they create fake
exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Cantate Domino, Council
of Florence 1441).This is heresy.
With the Fake Premise they change the
interpretation of the Nicene Creed (" I believe in three or more baptisms for the
forgiveness of sins and they exclude the baptism of water to be practical
exceptions for traditional exclusivist extra ecclesiam nulla salus").The baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance are interpreted as visible examples of salvation outside the Church. Then it is inferred that there are practical exceptions for the Nicene Creed, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins'.
With the Fake Premise they create
exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX (ecumenism of return
etc).This is heresy.
With the Fake Premise they interpret
Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition (EENS) and avoid the Rational
Premise which would make the Council be in harmony with Tradition( Syllabus of
Errors, Athanasius Creed etc).
All this contradicts the past Magisterium since the Patristic period. It is also official schism.-Lionel Andrades
Massimo Faggioli notices?
Massimo Faggioli seems to have finally realized that
Pope Benedict made a mistake with his interpretation of Vatican Council II and
his New Theology is now straw. It’s foundation was a False Premise.
It reminds me of the fake scientific proof, upon which
Teilhard de Chardin erected this theology, supporting re-incarnation.-Lionel Andrades
Catholics school children in Italy are not taught to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise in harmony with Catholic Tradition.
Catholic school children at Religion Classes in Italy are not taught the truth, they are not told that there is exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church according to Vatican Council II (rational).They are not taught to affirm the Syllabus of Errors (rational), with no known exceptions for an ecumenism of return and the dogma outside the Church no salvation. Their religion teachers could have degrees in theology and philosophy based upon Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Catechisms etc) interpreted irrationally. So they reject the Athanasius Creed which says all need Catholic faith for salvation(to avoid Hell). The Athanasius Creed is only contradicted by Vatican Council II when it is interpreted with a False Premise (visible cases of LG 16 etc in the present times).This is politically correct with the Left and is approved by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Vatican.The school children are not taught to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise in harmony with Catholic Tradition.-Lionel Andrades
Is this what the protestors still want ?
A regular demonstration outside the Nuncio’s office in Paris, demanding the Latin Mass, is being held by those who interpret Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise, just like the Nuncio and the SSPX.
The Fake Premise is approved by the Left and the Vatican. It makes everyone politically correct and the interpretation of the Council is not Catholic but political.
So there is the liberal New Theology at the Latin Mass and with the False Premise there is a New Ecclesiology at the Latin Mass.
With their being alleged exceptions outside the Church, which are visible and known, there is the New Ecumenism and New Soteriology( concept of salvation). The old theology is replaced with the new one which supports heresy and schism.
Is this what the protestors still want ? -Lionel Andrades
http://blog.messainlatino.it/2022/02/per-la-liberta-della-messa-tradizionale_0106629709.html
Posts
