When Pope Francis calls for accepting unknown cases of LG (, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as being known exceptions to 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) it is a new Gospel which he promotes. When the pope calls for accepting unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance as being personally known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as interpreted by Fr. Leonard Feeney, it is a new Gospel which he teaches.

When Pope Francis calls for accepting unknown cases of LG (, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as being known exceptions to 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) it is a new Gospel which he promotes.

When the pope calls for accepting unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance as being personally known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as interpreted by Fr. Leonard Feeney, it is a new Gospel which he teaches.

He creates a rupture with the popes, Church Councils and saints before Pius XII.

When he interprets hypothetical cases mentioned in magisterial documents as being objective exceptions in the present times, to the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return, it is a new Gospel which he teaches. This is not the work of the Holy Spirit. Since the Holy Spirit cannot violate the Principle of Non Contradiction and make an objective and factual error.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith persists in the error even after being informed. This could indicate that that they know that their  theology and doctrines are false but their motivation is ideological.-Lionel Andrades

JULY 13, 2019

Pope Francis has made an objective error in the interpretation of magisterial documents. An Archbishop , many priests and lay Catholics agree with me. There is no denial or defence from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Since they know I am correct

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/pope-francis-has-made-objective-error.html

JULY 12, 2019

Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II, Catechisms,Dominus Iesus and Letter of the Holy Office 1949 irrationally to avoid the Anti-Semitism charge. He does not want to be a martyr like the first 100 popes

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/pope-francis-interprets-vatican-council.html

JULY 12, 2019

Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II, Catechisms,Dominus Iesus and Letter of the Holy Office 1949 irrationally to avoid the Anti-Semitism charge. He does not want to be a martyr like the first 100 popes

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/pope-francis-interprets-vatican-council.html

John Henry Weston,William Kilpatrick refuse to discuss this issue

William Kilpatrick continues to write on Islamism while avoiding the issue of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible igorance(I.I) not being exceptions to 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

John Henry Weston, Editor in Chief and co founder of LifeSites News , who has stopped producing videos on the pope being in heresy, refuses to address this issue.

For both of them BOD, BOB and I.I and in Vatican Council II,  LG 8 etc are examples of known salvation outside the Church, in the present times. So they become exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. So it is not possible for them to say that all Muslims, and other non Catholics, in the present times are oriented to Hell with no known exceptions.

So the Church's teaching on Islamism has been changed for them. It is not the same as in the 16th century.They are liberal and irrational on this issue.-Lionel Andrades

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/italian-schoolkids-cant-sing-silent-night-because-it-might-offend-muslims

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/when-islam-smashed-christendoms-army-on-the-4th-of-july

Death and the Journey Into Hell (3rd Edition)

Documentary: Protestantism's Big Justification Lie

 

https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/justification-bible-faith-alone-refuted/#.XSmpGz8zbcc

Bishop Steven J.Lopes interprets unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance as being known exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, or EENS, as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century. He will not recant.He expects Fr. Vaughn Treco to interpret Vatican Council II in the same irrational way, to create a rupture with de fide teachings of the Church.

 

 

He wants the priest to affirm heresy and irrationality just as he does  and so was allowed to complete his doctorate in theology and study at the Pontifical Gregorian University.

If Bishop Lopes did not recant traditional teachings of the Church on faith and morals, he would not be allowed to receive a theological degree or be an assistant to the Cardinal-Prefect of the CDF who also supported heresy for ideological reasons.

Bishop Steven J.Lopes interprets unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) as being known exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, or EENS, as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century.

He will not recant.He expects Fr. Vaughn Treco to interpret Vatican Council II in the same irrational way, to create a rupture with de fide teachings of the Church.He wants Fr. Vaughn Treco to recant by rejecting de fide teachings of the Church like outside the Church there is no salvation.

He wants Fr. Treco to recant the traditional and rational interpretation of BOD, BOD,BOB and I.I  and EENS.

He wants the priest to recant the traditional interpretation of the Nicene Creed.

He wants the priest to recant by rejecting  the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.

He wants the priest to affirm heresy and irrationality just as he does  and so was allowed to complete his doctorate in theology and study at the Pontifical Gregorian University, administered by the Jewish and Jesuit-Left.

If Bishop Lopes did not recant traditional teachings of the Church on faith and morals, he would not be allowed to receive a theological degree or be an assistant to the Cardinal-Prefect of the CDF who also supported heresy for ideological reasons.

Fr. Vaughn Treco also interprets Vatican Council II and magisterial documents with the same irrationality as Bishop Steven J.Lopes but he rejects the conclusion.

It is the same with the SSPX.They interpret Vatican Council II irrationally,blame the Council and then reject the conclusion of their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.

-Lionel Andrades

Gloria TV assumes invincible ignorance imentioned in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Catechism of Pope Pius X is an objective exception to the 16th century interpretation of outside the Church there is no salvation

W obronie Tradycji Kościoła

Jul 10

Why is(sic) Fr. Vaughn Treco does not criticize Pius X?

Pius X:

12 Q. Who are infidels?

A. Infidels are those who have not been baptised and do not believe in Jesus Christ, because they either believe in and worship false gods as idolaters do, or though admitting one true God, they do not believe in the Messiah, neither as already come in the Person of Jesus Christ, nor as to come; for instance, Mohammedans and the like.

Source of text: CATECHISM OF SAINT PIUS X: The Ninth Article of the Creed, Those Outside the Communion of Saints, 12 Q. Who are infidels?; www.ewtn.com/library/CATECHSM/PIUSXCAT.HTM

The Catechism of Cardinal Gasparri (developed on the order of Saint Pius X) teaches:

We and you too, know well that those who bour(sic) under invincible ignorance of our holy religion, keep the precepts of the law of nature graven by God in all men’s hearts, who are prepared to obey God, and who lead an honourable and upright life, are able, by the powerful workings of God’s light and grace, to attain eternal life. For God, who sees distinctly, who searches into and knows the mind, spirit, habits and thoughts of all men, would never of His supreme goodness and mercy permit anyone to be punished eternally unless he had incurred the guilt of voluntary sin (Acta Pii IX, I, iii, 613.)

Source of tekst: The Catechism of Cardinal Gasparri (Question 162); archive.org/…/Gasparri%20-%20…

Lionel: This is a reference to a hypothetical case. It can only be an imaginary and speculative case for us human beings. So the popes knew that invincible ignorance was not an objective exception, or even relevant to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

The liberal theologians during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII made this error. They mixed up what was hypothetical as being objective. Pope Pius XII kept silent. 

His Mystici Corporis can be interpreted with or without this error.

______________________________

Pius XI:

72. But in this battle joined by the powers of darkness against the very idea of Divinity, it is Our fond hope that, besides the host which glories in the name of Christ, all those - and they comprise the overwhelming majority of mankind, - who still believe in God and pay Him homagemay take a decisive part.

Source of text: Encyclical "Divini Redemtoris" 72; w2.vatican.va/…/hf_p-xi_enc_193…

Pius XII:

16. Nor can We pass over in silence the profound impression of heartfelt gratitude made on Us by the good wishes of those who, though not belonging to the visible body of the Catholic Church, have given noble and sincere expression to their appreciation of all that unites them to Us in love for the Person of Christ or in belief in God. We wish to express Our gratitude to them all. We entrust them one and all to the protection and to the guidance of the Lord and We assure them solemnly that one thought only fills Our mind: to imitate the example of the Good Shepherd in order to bring true happiness to all men: "that they may have life, and may have it more abundantly" (Saint John x. 10).

Source of text: Encykclical "Summi Pontificatus" 16;w2.vatican.va/…/hf_p-xii_enc_20…

It is worth recalling tha Pius XII excommunicated the Jesuit Father Leonard Feeneyteolog, who claimed that the principle that there is no salvation outside the Church should be understood in a very strict manner, ie all those who do not formally belong to the Church will be condemned (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Feeney).
 Lionel : Correct. The Holy Office (CDF) at that time assume unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) as known exceptions to the traditional interpretation of EENS. We now know that the CDF made an objective error.

The same error was repeated at Vatican Council II. Some of the influential Council Fathers interpret BOD, BOB and I.I as being exceptions to EENS. Until today the CDF assumes unknown cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16m, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are personally known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.The traditionalists associated with Archbishop Lefebvre also use the same faulty reasoning to create a rupture with Tradition and then wrongly blame Vatican Council II. The Council can be interpreted without this error.
-Lionel Andrades

German bishops interpret unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as being known exceptions to the 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as being exceptions to the 16th century EENS and no one is correcting them.Even Cardinal Brandmuller makes the same mistake.This is heresy.

 

The German bishops interpret unknown cases of the  baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as being known exceptions to the 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as being exceptions to the 16th century EENS and no one is correcting them.Even Cardinal Brandmuller makes the same mistake.This is heresy.

The new Superior General of the SSPX has said that the German bishops indicate what is wrong with the Church today but he himself interprets Vatican Council II and the Catechisms , like the German bishops.-Lionel Andrades

Pope Francis has made an objective error in the interpretation of magisterial documents. An Archbishop , many priests and lay Catholics agree with me. There is no denial or defence from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Since they know I am correct.

 

Pope Francis has made an objective error in the interpretation of magisterial documents . An Archbishop , many priests and lay Catholics agree with me.

There is no denial or defence from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Since they know I am correct.

They chose to ignore me. Basically, what I keep repeating is that unknown and invisible cases  are not personally known and physically visile examples of salvation outside the Church.

There are 'zero cases' agrees the apologist John Martignoni.

We do not personally know any of these 'expenses' says Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson. Pope Francis and the CDF could also say the same. But they will not say it isn public.

-Lionel Andrades

July 12, 2019

Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II, Catechisms,Dominus Iesus and Letter of the Holy Office 1949 irrationally to avoid the Anti-Semitism charge. He does not want to be a martyr like the first 100 popes   https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/pope-francis-interprets-vatican-council.html

 

July 12, 2019

Pope Francis considers the Apostolic interpretation and that of the Church Fathers and Medieval Fathers on extra ecclesiam nulla salus as ideological 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/pope-francis-condemns-catholic-fanatics_12.html

 

July 12, 2019

Pope Francis is saying St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Augustine and St. Ignatius of Loyola are ideological and his ideological innovation is the new doctrine in the Catholic Church 

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/pope-francis-condemns-catholic-fanatics.html

 

 

 

Sr. Mary Ephrem's Vision Of Hell

Sr. Mary Ephrem's Vision Of Hell

The evening of the 24th of Feb. 1958, as I was composing myself to sleep I underwent a strange and horrifying experience. As I was not

yet asleep I do not think it could have been a dream. It can suddenly without sign or warning and as such left an indelible impression on my mind and heart.

I found myself on a lonely road, one of course, I had never seen or been on at any time. Before me was a large structure somethin similar to a giagantic cathedral or castle. It was huge, somber and forbiding. I was obliged to walk toward it though something inside me held back in a kind of dread.Then at my side on the right I felt the strong presence of St. Michael. He did not speak. We continued on our journey and at last came to what appeared to be the front enterance to the strange building.

 https://torchbearerforthequeen.blogspot.com/

Eucharistic boat procession will travel 38 miles in Bayou waters :Pope grants plenary indulgence

 

 

 

 

 https://spiritdailyblog.com/news/pope-grants-plenary-indulgence-to-annual-eucharistic-boat-procession-in-bayou-waters

https://aleteia.org/2019/07/12/eucharistic-boat-procession-will-travel-38-miles-in-bayou-waters/