According to Canon Law, the Parish Priest and Religious Superiors must be Catholic. They must affirm Catholic teachings in public : Sant Andrea delle Fratte, Rome

 

At the basilica of Sant Andrea delle Fratte, Rome, the Minim Fathers and Sisters, do not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla nulla salus, like Alphonse Ratisbonne and St. Maximilian Kolbe. They also do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally.

According to Canon Law, the Parish Priest and Religious Superiors must be Catholic. They must affirm Catholic teachings in public.- Lionel Andrades

https://www.madonnadelmiracolo.it/

Nella basilica di Sant'Andrea delle Fratte, a Roma, i Padri e le Sorelle Minime, non affermano il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla nulla salus, come Alphonse Ratisbonne e San Massimiliano Kolbe. Inoltre non interpretano razionalmente il Concilio Vaticano II.

 Secondo il Diritto Canonico, il Parroco ei Superiori Religiosi devono essere Cattolici. Devono affermare pubblicamente gli insegnamenti Cattolici.

A pope who changes the interpretation of the Creeds in the name of Vatican Council II which he does not interpret rationally is in mortal sin ?

 

 A pope who changes the interpretation of the Creeds in the name of Vatican Council II which he does not interpret rationally is in mortal sin ? The Creeds are de fide teachings which we Catholics must obey without changing their understanding. - Lionel Andrades

Pope Francis is in heresy. He must affirm the Catholic Faith in public.Vatican Council II is the issue.The Council can be interpreted rationally. It then does not contradict Tradition.

 

Pope Francis is in heresy. He must affirm the Catholic  Faith in public.Vatican Council II is the issue.The Council can be interpreted rationally. It then does not contradict Tradition. - Lionel Andrades

Testimonianze miracolose durante un viaggio a Medjugorje

Testimonianze di pellegrini Medjugorje

Fr. Frank Pavone

Fr. Frank Pavone,  Fr. Alexander M.Minutella and Fr. Vaughn Treco could claim that Pope Francis is automatically excommunicated , since he is changing the interpretation of the Creeds with a False Premise, rejecting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with a re-interpretation of the baptism of desire etc and knowingly interprets Vatican Council II irrationally  and not rationally. In this way he creates a false break with Tradition. 

Pope Francis does not affirm the Catechism of Pope Pius X. He does this in the name of the Vatican Council II interpreted with the Fake Premise. The pope then re-interprets the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 1257, 845,846) with the same False Premise to produce a rupture with the older Catechisms. This is doctrinal and theological chaos.

- Lionel Andrades

Testimonianza di Paolo e Rosetta | La mia Conversione a Medjugorje : 40 volta a Medugorje

SSPX center stacked with books which interpret Vatican Council II irrationally

 

At the SSPX center in Albano, Italy they are stacked with books which interpret Vatican Council II with an irrationality – and they believe this is the only interpretation possible. It is the only interpretation they know. It is also the liberal and not traditional one.

It would be the same at the offices and libraries of Cardinal Semararo, the former bishop of Albano, who interprets the Council in the same way as the traditionalists at Albano. He is now Secretary to the group of cardinals to advise him, and they all interpret Vatican Council irrationally to produce a false break with Tradition.- Lionel Andrades

Anna Maria Brancatelli Sicilia, Italia | 85 volta a Medugorje

This is not tradition at the Latin Mass.

 

Last Sunday morning at the  11 a.m  Latin Mass at the SSPX St. Catherine of Siena chapel in Rome, the priest and the young people there, were interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally. This is the norm at all the SSPX centers in Italy.

When they re-interpret the Council irrationally is it not a mortal sin itself? Since with the Irrational Premise, not only is the Council radically changed, but also the Creeds and Catechisms.

The Catechism of Pope Pius X will contradict itself. The Catechism of the Council of Trent will be confusing on the issue of the baptism of desire (“the desire thereof”). The SSPX version of the Syllabus of Errors (Cushingite and not Feeneyite) will be contradicted by the Athanasius Creed etc.

All this happens with the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and accepting the irrational 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston.

This is not tradition at the Latin Mass. -Lionel Andrades

The liberal- traditional division in the Catholic Church caused by Vatican Council II (irrational) is now finished.

 

The liberal- traditional division in the Catholic Church caused by Vatican Council II (irrational) is now finished. We can interpret the Council rationally and there no more is liberalism. In future everyone will only be able to interpret the Council in harmony with Tradition.

Pope Benedict’s liberal theology was only possible with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. - Lionel Andrades

Powerful Testimony Medjugorje by An Incredible Man from the UK | " Come to Medugorje and see it for your self " Our Catholic Faith is a God Mine.

How can Pope Francis interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and still be pope? There is no clarification from the Congregation for the Doctrine.

 

A pope cannot be a pope when he is in public mortal sin. It is the same for a lay Catholic. In mortal sin he is not in communion with Jesus and His Church. Pope Francis does not affirm the Syllabus of Errors, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Catechism of Trent and Pius X. This is a mortal sin of faith.

The Creeds and Catechisms, which I affirm are not contradicted, for me, by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. Pope Francis even interprets Vatican Council II with an Irrational Premise to produce a nontraditional and heretical conclusion.This is schism with the past Magisterium.

I avoid this schism with the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II. How can Pope Francis interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and still be pope? There is no clarification for the Congregation for the Doctrine. - Lionel Andrades

All the popes from Pius XII have been interpreting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus irrationally.

 

All the popes from Pius XII have been interpreting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus irrationally. May be some time in the future ‘the dogma of the faith’ will not be lost in Portugal.

Portugal will be an exception.

The dogma of the faith- extra ecclesiam nulla salus, is lost in the United States and Europe. - Lionel Andrades

http://www.catholictradition.org/Mary/fatima34a.htm

https://www.traditioninaction.org/Questions/F017_PortugalFaith.html

When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally then Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Murray and Kung are obsolete.Pope Paul VI is obsolete

 

When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally then Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Murray and Kung are obsolete.Pope Paul VI is obsolete. -Lionel Andrades

A whole train of popes were politically correct and did not choose to interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus, rationally

 

A whole train of popes were politically correct and did not choose to interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus, rationally.

- Lionel Andrades

Medjugorje | Helen from Lebanon | Mary teaches us to go in Simplicity to Christ : " Our Lord is everywhere but there is something special about this place " : "I felt a calling to religious life and to personal conversion"

How can we have a pope who interprets Vatican Council II irrationally even after being informed ?

 

How can we have a pope who interprets Vatican Council II irrationally even after being informed ?- Lionel Andrades

So why does Pope Francis not affirm the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be Catholic for salvation.This Creed is not contradicted by Vatican Council II ( rational ).

 

Fr.Stefano Visintin OSB, a physicist and abbot of a Benedictine monastery in Italy says there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. This is a common observation even among lay people.

The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are “zero cases “in our reality said the apologist John Martignoni.

So we know that LG 8, LG14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II always refer to invisible cases in 2023.This is irrespective if you are a liberal, sedevacantist, the traditional or nontraditional.

Since there are no exceptions for the dogma EENS mentioned in Vatican Council II why does Pope Francis not affirm EENS?

There are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II for also the Athanasius Creed. So why does Pope Francis not affirm the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be Catholic for salvation.This Creed is not contradicted by Vatican Council II ( rational ). - Lionel Andrades

Testimony by A Woman - Mother of 12 children who saw Our Lady in Medjugorje : " If you do not believe, pray and you will believe"

Testimony Medjugorje | Agnes from Pakistan | Our Lady consoled me after death of my husband and Son

Medjugorje Testimony by Louise from Ireland | After A Miscarriage Our Lady consoled me : This is her 15th or 16th visit.. "This is happening lives here. It is amazing. Come here!!'"

How to get from the Blue Crosses to the beautiful Chapel of the Oasis of Peace Medjugorje

According to Canon Law, all cardinals, bishops, rectors, parish priests and religious superiors have to be Catholic and they must affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church. : We now know how to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. It does not contradict Tradition.

 

According to Canon Law, all cardinals, bishops, rectors, parish priests and religious superiors have to be Catholic and they must affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church. They can no more reject de fide teachings of the Church by saying that they are contradicted by Vatican Council II (irrational).

We now know how to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. It is the same Vatican Council II before us but we  interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 , UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc  in Vatican Council II, as being only hypothetical and theoretical cases. In real life we do not know anyone being saved outside the Church as such. We cannot

 For Pope Francis, the cardinals and bishops, and the rest of the Church, LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed are made obsolete. Tradition is obsolete.

But for me, and also an archbishop, many priests and many lay Catholics, LG 8 etc are always hypothetical and speculative. So they do not contradict the Syllabus of Errors. The Council is not a break with Tradition.

They can affirm Vatican Council II with LG 8,14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, being hypothetical and theoretical along with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed. It is no more either Vatican Council II or extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They are compatible.

So how can we have a pope who does not affirm the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition along with  Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, traditionally and honestly ? - Lionel Andrades

Medjugorje. Exclusif, les 1ers témoins racontent: voyants, P. Jozo, Sr Emmanuel.1993. Abonnez vous!...

URGENT CALL | Latest Message of Our Lady in Medjugorje of January 25, 2023

Vatican Council II interpreted rationally is in harmony with Tradition for me, why is not so also for Pope Francis?

 

Is it not obligatory for Pope Francis to affirm the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, defined by three Church Councils? 

It is obligatory!

Since LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are always theoretical and invisible cases. So they are not examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in 2023.They are not physically visible people saved outside the Church in 1965-2023.

They are “zero cases” says the apologist John Martignoni. They cannot be exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, wrote Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson when I asked him about it on his blog.

So Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium 8 etc being only hypothetical does not contradict Tradition (Syllabus of Errors, EENS etc).

Vatican Council II interpreted rationally is in harmony with Tradition for me, why is not so also for Pope Francis? - Lionel Andrades

How can there be a pope who does not interpret the Creeds traditionally?

 

How can there be a pope who does not interpret the Creeds traditionally? He does not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and neither the Catechisms of Pius X and of Trent – all of which are not contradicted by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally i.e. with the rational premise, inference and traditional conclusion. -Lionel Andrades