Repost : Everybody was repeating everyone else's false interpretation of Vatican Council II (Grafics)

MARCH 11, 2019

Everybody was repeating everyone else's false interpretation of Vatican Council II (Grafics)

MARCH 3, 2019

Who would have thought that the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) which was so sure of itself on tradition, would fall and fail on Catholic doctrine and theology

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/03/who-would-have-thought-that-society-of.html

Who would have thought that the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) which was so sure of itself on tradition,  would fall and fail on Catholic doctrine and theology. They obviously were  not following Catholic tradition on faith, salvation, ecclesiology, Creeds, mission etc.They would go back to Tradition and affirm traditional teachings but would negate it with the New Theology.

It was there before their eyes but they did not see it.Everybody was repeating everyone else's false interpretation of Vatican Council II.Vatican Council II supported the Church's old understanding on it having an exclusiveness and superiority in salvation but the SSPX did not know. Since they interpreted the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance as an exception to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).


 They also interpreted LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc as a rupture with the dogma EENS since they mistook hypothetical cases as being known non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times. Invisible people were made visible examples of salvation outside the Church. So the Church, theologically, no more had exclusive salvation,even though they would say outside the Church there is no salvation.
-Lionel Andrades

Repost : You cannot judge a priest by the Mass he offers

MARCH 16, 2019

You cannot judge a priest by the Mass he offers

It is important for Catholics not to judge a priest according to the Holy Mass he offers, the  Traditional Latin Mass(TLM) or Novus Ordo Mass.

Since the priests of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX)  offer the Latin Mass believing Protestants  do not need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation while there are priests who offer Holy Mass in Italian in Rome, who say they need to convert  into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider offers the Latin Mass ( which is not the same as the TLM) and he will not affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) while a Dominican priest, a confessor at the Basilica of St.Mary Majors, Rome had to leave the city, after he supported in public the old ecclesiology in harmony with Vatican Council II.

In England members of the Latin Mass Society attend Holy Mass offered by bishops who are ultra liberals while I know an Italian priest who offered the Novus Ordo Mass in Rome who could not be incardinated here, since he believed there was no salvation outside the Catholic Church and non Catholics are oriented to Hell.He said this publicly.

So when Fr. John Zuhlsdorf and Rorate Caeli  project the Latin Mass ( not the TLM, I repeat) asthe Mass as compared to the  Novus Ordo Mass , don't be fooled .

Remember if you go for Mass in English offered by a Paulist Father in Rome he has rejected EENS, interpreted Vatican Council II with invisible non Catholics allegedly being visible exceptions to EENS, changed the understanding of the Nicene Creed and the Apostles Creed and rejected the Athanasius Creed.This is all heresy and a mortal sin of faith.The Paulists  do not deny it. If they denied it they would be saying that they affirm Feeneyite EENS and this would get them into trouble with the Jewish Left.But aside from these liberals, even at the FSSP church in Rome, Santissima Trinita dei Pellegrini,Fr.Joseph Kramer, FSSP, the former Rector, will not affirm EENS, does not interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Tradition, projects the Creeds as a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and sees the old catechisms contradicting each other.In this way he remains an FSSP priest in Rome.It would be the same for the other FSSPX priests here.They do not deny it too.

So the Paulist Father, the FSSP and others, are promoting heresy with politically correct new doctrines and theology, independent of the liturgy and the Mass.

We   cannot say a priest is a traditionalist just because he offers Holy Mass in Latin or another priest is a liberal since offers Holy Mass in Italian or English.

One way to tell the difference; to bring out the difference,is to ask the priest if the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to physically visible or invisible cases in 2019? Are they exceptions to the dogma EENS or are they not exceptions?

If they say that BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS then he refers to physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I.

This means Vatican Council II ( LG 8, LG 16, UR 3 etc) would be a rupture with EENS.

It means this is a new version of EENS.Since BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known people saved outside the Church.So he cannot say all Jews, Muslims and Protestants in 2019 need to convert into the Catholic Church to be saved and there are no exceptions.

So the Catechism of Pope Pius X would have to contradict itself and other Catechisms.The Syllabus of Errors becomes obsolete.Etc, etc.

If the priest, however says BOD, BOB and I.I refer to personally unknown and physically invisible people in 2019, then you know that he is supporting the old ecclesiology, irrespective if the Mass is in English or Latin.

So when he offers Holy Mass with the false premise ( invisible non Catholics are visible examples of salvation outside the Church) ask him why does he do this.Is it done in ignorance or is he afraid of something?

Put this question also to Cardinal Raymond Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider. It applies to them too.

-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/03/you-cannot-judge-priest-by-mass-he.html

The Catholic Church is the sole means of salvation. It is a divine institution - Michael Matt

Aborted babies are still being used in today’s vaccine production: Expert

https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/news/aborted-babies-are-still-being-used-in-todays-vaccine-production-expert/?utm_source=Slider&utm_medium=S-img&utm_campaign=Slider#.XJIqXdJKjcc

Aborted babies are still used in vaccines: Expert

Ave Maria Natureza ( Instrumental )

Feast of St. Joseph : Catholic Faith not being proclaimed in Rome-central out of fear of non Catholics

Mons.Gianricco Ruzza,Auxiliary Bishop ifor Cantral Rome and Secretary General of the Rome Vicariate presided at Mass in Italian at the church San Giuseppe a Capo le Casa, Rome yesterday on the feast of St. Joseph.

At the conclusion of the Mass the bishop introduced the new young community of religious sisters from Brazil who are strong on evangelisation and Eucharistic Adoration.He said that this is 'the new reality' in the Church.

The new reality in the Church is that neither the sisters, nor the priests present, nor Bishop Ruzza, proclaim the Catholic Faith as I do,in central Rome.

For me, in Heaven there are only Catholics according to Vatican Council II(AG 7,LG 14) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(846).This is magisterial according to Church documents. But they do not proclaim it.Since it will bring persecution.

For me all non Catholics are oriented to Hell unless they accept Jesus in the Catholic Church( Vatican Council II, AG 7, LG 14).The bishop, priests and new community are afraid to say this.

For me non Catholic religions are false paths to salvation.Their members sacrilegeously receive the Eucharist at churches in Rome. 

I proclaim the Faith.

So I am aware of attempts to intimidate me.

I am saying that the Catholic Church teaches in Vatican Council II and the pre-Vatican Council text that all Muslims and Mohammad are lost.This is not just a personal view. This is the teaching of the Catholic Church when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally. However many find it offensive, as if, I am attacking their religion.

So Bishop Ruzza will not proclaim this teaching in evangelisation in general  or catechesis for children. Neither will this be said by  Mons.Natale Loda the Rector at San Giuseppe a Capo le Casa.Nor will be it proclaimed by  Fr. Francesco Trebisonda,Parish Priest, Basilica San Andrea delle Fratte, the church nearby.He was present at  Mass yesterday.Both priests are afraid to say that Vatican Council II says most people die outside the Church since they die without faith and the baptism of water(AG 7, LG 14).They  will not proclaim this in public.It is not part of catechesis. It is not part of the evangelisation of the new Brazilian community there.

They are all afraid.

They are afraid of the non Catholics in Rome.

There have been attempts to intimidate them.

I do not use the telephone.Otherwise I would constantly get threats.

For one week the church San Giuseppe a Capo le Casa was mysteriously closed in January. Another church nearby was also shut for a day or two.Bishop Ruzza would know about it.

Things seem normal now.

I proclaim the Fath when I say that the Church teaches in Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, that all Muslims and other non Catholics need to convert to avoid the fires of Hell.I proclaim the Catholic Faith and can provide references for my Catholic beliefs. I am not intentionaly attacking any community or religion.

It's the members of the other communities which stalk and apply Sharia law in Rome-central.

The Catholic religious are told not to talk to me or else...Those parishioners who give me money for coffee or transport are warned.

Why ? Since they consider this an attack on their religion and they are implementing the teachings of their religion , with intimidation, in central Rome.

The Catholic religious appeal to the new mafias for tolerance. They call upon secular values. But they themselves will not cite Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 which say all need faith and baptism for salvation. They will not point out that Lumen Gentium 8 and Lumen Gentium 16 refer to hypothetical cases only in 2019. So they are not exceptions to AG 7 and LG 14 and the centuries-old interpretation of outside the Church there is no salvation.

They will not proclaim the Faith. They will not evangelize with spirit and truth. Since they do not want to be transferred or physically assaulted.

Instead they will use a false new theology. They will say that LG 8, LG 16 etc are exceptions to the dogma EENS. In other words LG 8 etc refer to personally known people saved outside the Church.This is irrational. Since if any one is saved outside the Church, the person would be in Heaven and known only to God. So there can be no known exceptions to Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, for us human beings.Vatican Council II like the old catechisms tells us that the founder of Islamism is lost and so are his followers.

Jesus is the only way, truth and life and the only Saviour of the world. Those who do not accept him as their Saviour in the Catholic Church, His Mystical Body are lost forever through all eternity.

Last Sunday the churches were instructed to pray for those who died in  New Zealand.But Catholics do not pray for non Catholics who do not choose to be with Jesus and Our Lady after death.Also those who die without faith and baptism (AG 7, LG 14) will find the Catholic prayers for them useless. 

In evangelisation it is not enough to say that Jesus died for all and salvation is open for all in potential.It also must be said that to receive this salvation all need to enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism( Dominus Iesus 20 etc).

All need to enter the Catholic Church for salvation was the teaching of the missionaries in the 16th century.It is the same teaching of Vatican Council II,  when it is interpreted with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical.Theoretical cases (LG 8, UR 3 etc) cannot be objective examples of salvation.There are no personally known people saved outside the Church.But out of fear this is not being proclaimed in Rome-central.

-Lionel Andrades 

The Marylike Standards in Dress

The Marylike Standards in Dress

 

For more information on Catholic modesty please visit Catholicmodesty.com 

1. "Marylike" means modesty without compromise -- "like Mary," Christ's pure and spotless Mother.

2. Marylike dresses have sleeves extending at least to the elbows; and skirts reaching well below the knees.

3. Marylike dresses require full coverage for the bodice, chest, shoulders, and back; except for a cut-out about the neck not exceeding "two fingers breadth under the pit of the throat" and a similar breadth under the back of the neck.

4. Marylike dresses do not admit as modest coverage transparent fabrics -- laces, nets, organdy, nylons, etc. -- unless sufficient backing is added. However, their moderate use as trimmings is acceptable.

5. Marylike dresses avoid the improper use of flesh-colored fabrics.

6. Marylike dresses conceal rather than reveal the figure of the wearer; they do not emphasize, unduly, parts of the body.

7. Marylike dresses provide full coverage, even after jacket, cape or stole are removed.

8. Marylike fashions are designed to conceal as much of the body as possible, rather than reveal. This would automatically eliminate such fashions as slacks, jeans, shorts, culottes, tight sweaters, sheer blouses, and sleeveless dresses; etc. The Marylike standards are a guide to instill a "sense of modesty." A girl or woman who follows these, and looks up to Mary as her ideal and model, will have no problem with modesty in dress. She will not be an occasion of sin[....].

Keep this guide with you when buying clothes. Make sure that you purchase or make only garments which meet the Marylike Standards.
 

''Be Marylike by being modest -- be modest by being Marylike."

 http://op54rosary.ning.com/page/marylike-modesty

St. Padre Pio on Modesty

Certain Fashions Offend Our Lord Very Much !

  

http://op54rosary.ning.com/page/marylike-modesty