There should be signatories to an Open Letter announcing that they interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism and not Cushingism.They must then ask the present two popes to do the same.

It is a mortal sin of faith to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so make the Council a rupture with the Creeds and the past Catechisms and so they reject the Athanasius Creed, EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, the past Church Councils and popes on salvation theology.The pope has to say that EENS today is no more like it was for the missionaries (and Magisterium) of the 16th century.

There should be signatories to an Open Letter announcing that they interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism and not Cushingism.They must then ask the present two popes to do the same.

-Lionel Andrades

The Left is pleased when the SSPX criticizes Vatican Council II. Since then the SSPX is saying that there is only Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) and there is no Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) known to them. But let the SSPX affirm Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) and EENS( Feeneyite) and see the differennt reaction world wide.

When Lumen Gentium 16(invincible ignorance) is not an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), we have a different interpretation of Vatican Council II.We do not reject the Council.It's still there.But our premise is different and so the conclusion is in harmony with EENS and the rest of Tradition.

When LG 16 refers to only hypothetical cases I call it Feeneyism.When it is wrongly assumed to be objective cases I call it Cushingism.

Cushingism makes the Council a rupture with Tradition.

David Martin has written a long article which is posted on The Eponymous Flower.It is on Vatican Council II and his reasoning is Cushingite.

He simply has to switch to Feeneyism and his conclusion  would be different.

Even though the liberals were active at Vatican Council II and they reasoned-Cushingite, we simply interpret the Council with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical and we are back to the Old Theology.It's simple.

The liberals could only create the New Theology by assuming hypothetical cases are not hypothetical. So today they are in a weak position theologically( based upon an irrationality) and doctrinally ( new doctrines created with a false premise).We have found their weak point, their Achilles heel.We know what makes the Council a rupture with the past  and how to avoid the error.

David Martin has not responded.In the comments section of the blog The Eponymous Flower, I wrote that Unitatitis Redintigratio 3 was not an exception for me, to the passage cited from Mysitici Corporis, which affirms Feeneyite EENS.No comment from him.

Similarly Ron Conte has also used Cushingite reasoning on his blog, to wrongly interpret Vatican Council II and EENS.He has not responded.

Similarly Jimmy Akins has used Cushingite reasoning to interpret Vatican Council II  and EENS . He has not responded to my e-mails and blog posts.He is not yet ready to switch to Feeneyism.

Louie Verrecchio , Fr. Brian Harrison, Prof. Joseph Shaw do not interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.They do not respond to what I have written.There is no comment.

Dr. John Rao, Prof. Thomas Pink, theologian John Lamont  will be speaking  at another traditionalist  summer conference soon, and they will interpret Vatican Council II and EENS  with Cushingism .Their concludion has to be irrational and modernistic.They do not respond to what I write.There is no comment from them.Since they do not want to affirm Feeneyite EENS and be politically incorrect with the Left and Satan.

So they stay with the error and blame Vatican Council II, not making the distinction between Vatican Council II Cushingite and Feeneyite.

They expediently point to the the present two popes and the ecclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) who are also Cushingites. So why should they stand out and be different  and be persecuted, within and outside the Church.

Blame the Council  and do not talk about Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) is their now, old attitude.

Soon Michael Matt will criticize Vatican Council II. Inspite of so many reports on the Internet he will not respond to what I have written.Next month he will do the same.

Rorate Caeli will do the same.They will ignore what I write.

The Left is pleased when the SSPX criticizes Vatican Council II. Since then the SSPX is saying that there is only Vatican Council II( Cushingite) and there is no Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) known to them. But let the SSPX affirm Vatican Council II and EENS, Feeneyite and see the different reaction world wide.

Vatican Council II is not the issue. The issue really is , do you interpret Vatican Council II with  Feeneyism or  Cushingism. -Lionel Andrades

 

Catholic leaders who say hell is empty are basically calling Jesus ‘liar’

 

May 30, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – To suggest that hell is empty amounts to calling Jesus a liar, LifeSiteNews co-founder and editor-in-chief John-Henry Westen told a recent gathering of Catholic pro-life and family advocates in Rome. That hell contains human souls who have rejected God is established by the Lord in scripture and held by the Catholic faith since its beginning.

“Jesus himself says to us, “Broad is the road that leads to destruction and many there are that go there,” said Westen. “And he said, “Narrow is the road that leads to life and few there are that find it.” (Matthew 7:13-14)

Westen was answering a question at the Rome Life Forum — held earlier this month — about the Superior General of the Jesuit order having said the devil does not exist as well as reports of Pope Francis denying the existence of hell in favor of the annihilation of “lost souls.”

Continued 

 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/catholic-leaders-who-say-hell-is-empty-are-basically-calling-jesus-liar

Italy’s Matteo Salvini returning to European Union’s ‘Christian roots’: Cdl Mueller

ROME, May 30, 2019 (LifeSiteNews.com) — Italy’s rising political star, Matteo Salvini, has been refused audiences with Pope Francis and has been denounced as not being Christian by the pope’s allies for opposing free immigration to Italy. Paradoxically, he is also blasted by the Francis regime for using Christian symbolism during his rallies. However, Cardinal Gerhard Müller, Pope Francis former doctrine chief, says the Church should engage with Salvini and those who reject free immigration and believes that the politician is returning to the “Christian roots” of the European Union in his use of religious symbols.

In an interview published yesterday following the landslide victory of Salvini’s party in E.U. parliamentary elections, Müller denounced the attacks against Salvini by Pope Francis’s partisans as “amateurish” and inappropriate.

“An ecclesiastical authority cannot speak about theological issues in an amateurish way,” said Müller to Italy’s Corriere della sera newspaper. “And above all he must not meddle in politics when there is a democratically legitimated parliament and government, as in Italy. It would be better to talk to Salvini, discuss, or correct it when necessary.”

Continued

 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/italys-matteo-salvini-returning-to-european-unions-christian-roots-cdl-mueller

Pontifical university bans top scholar who accused Pope Francis of heresy in open letter

 

Pontifical university bans top scholar who accused Pope Francis of heresy in open letter

ROME, May 29, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – One of the English-speaking world’s greatest living scholars of Classical philosophy was told he has been barred from all Pontifical Universities after he signed an Open Letter along with a number of prominent clergymen and scholars accusing Pope Francis of committing heresy. 

Professor John Rist, 83, who converted to Catholicism from agnosticism in 1980, told LifeSiteNews that he had been refused entry into the Augustinian Patristic Institute in Rome where he had previously been doing academic work after a short absence. 

A Pontifical university is an ecclesiastical school which has been established or approved by the Holy See. 

Continued

 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pontifical-university-bans-top-scholar-who-accused-pope-francis-of-heresy-in-open-letter

A pope who says hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are objective exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) , the past exclusivist ecclesiology , an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed etc is heretical.

A pope who says hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are objective exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) , the past exclusivist ecclesiology , an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed  etc is heretical.

For me as a Catholic, the present two popes and the ecclesiastics of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) are heretics.They need to recant.They do not deny what I keep writing. 

They do not announce :-

1.Invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are not visible exceptions to EENS.

2.Invisible and hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not objective exceptions to the dogma EENS, the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors.

Instead the present popes are politically correct with the Left and Satan.Vatican Council II(Cushingite) is heretical. Cushingism results in modernism. Cushingism causes the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was correct. Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) was heretical.So the Left wanted him excommunicated.

Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct. There are not literal cases of the baptism of desire etc for them to be exceptions to EENS.The Left wanted him excommunicated.

Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) is not a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc). Cardinal Ratzinger did not affirm this. So the Left did not oppose him.

Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is not a rupture with EENS and the past ecclesiology. Since the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) does not affirm this , in  potential, they can still  receive canonical status by accepting the official Vatican Council II ( Cushingite).

Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) and EENS ( Feeneyite) are not a rupture with magisterial documents for Brother Andre Marie MICM,Prior at the St. Benedict Center, N.H.Since he affirms both, he may not be legally recognized as a Catholic, by the Left and the Vatican.

-Lionel Andrades

MAY 25, 2019

A possibility in Vatican Council II cannot be put forward as an exception to EENS. This was the error Pope Francis made on the plane when returning from Abu Dhabi

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/a-possibility-in-vatican-council-ii.html

MAY 30, 2019

UR 3 does not contradict the passage from Mystici Corporis which you have quoted. Would you like to comment ? If UR 3 is not an exception to EENS then there is no Vatican Council II revolution in the text of the Council ?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/ur-3-does-not-contradict-passage-from.html

MAY 27, 2019

An examination of conscience

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/an-examination-of-conscience.html

 MAY 26, 2019

Mortal sins of faith

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/mortal-sins-of-faith.html

MAY 24, 2019

Bishop Schneider did not announce that the interpretation of Vatican Council II by Pope Francis on the flight from Abu Dhabi was heretical

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/bishop-schneider-did-not-announce-that.html

MAY 24, 2019

Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria supported a theology of religions ! This is heresy

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/pope-benedict-and-cardinal-luiz-ladaria.html

 MAY 22, 2019

Bishop Athanasius Schneider has accepted the new moral theology and so he cannot call a holder or supporter of heresy, a heretic

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/bishop-athanasius-schneider-has.html

MAY 22, 2019

The Baptism of desire is not an exception to EENS since it does not exist in our reality. This was known to the popes and saints. So the Feeneyite affirms the baptism of desire, he does not reject it. Hypothetical cases cannot be objective exceptions to EENS

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-baptism-of-desire-is-not-exception.html

MAY 21, 2019

Bishop Athanasius Schneider is a theological liberal on faith and morals. He applies the New Theology to faith and morals.He overlooks manifest heresy on faith-issues which can be read on line and he also overlooks mortal sin manifested in repeated pastoral expression which was documented in the Open Letter to the Bishops by some 19 original signatories

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/bishop-athanasius-schneider-is.html
 

 

 MAY 20, 2019

Europe's Christian political parties still do not affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King and the separation of Satanic secularism and state

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/europe-elects-far-right-parties-unite.html

 MAY 20, 2019

St. Ambrose could not state it 'as a fact' that it happened since if it would happen it could only be known to God as a fact. This is the nature of the baptism of desire.It simply does not exist in our reality

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/boniface-ambrose-could-not-state-it-as.html

MAY 18, 2019

If the pope can change his mind on Medugorje he can also announce the obvious- he could say that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to personally unknown and invisible people

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/if-pope-can-change-his-mind-on.html

________________________________________________________________________________




  

UR 3 does not contradict the passage from Mystici Corporis which you have quoted. Would you like to comment ? If UR 3 is not an exception to EENS then there is no Vatican Council II revolution in the text of the Council ?

Comment from the blog The Eponymous Flower,

"The Vatican II Revolution Reexamined"

David Martin,

UR 3 does not contradict the passage from Mystici Corporis which you have quoted. Would you like to comment ? 

If UR 3 is not an exception to EENS then there is no Vatican Council II revolution in the text of the Council ?

-Lionel

The differences that exist in varying degrees between them [separated brethren] and the Catholic Church … do indeed create many obstacles … But even in spite of them it remains true that all who have been justified by faith in Baptism are members of Christ's body. [UR-3]

This contradicts the encyclical letter of Pope Pius XII which dogmatically defined that only those who profess the One True Faith are included as members of Christ’s Church.

Only those are to be included as members of the Church who have been baptized and profess the true faith, and who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or been excluded by legitimate authority for grave faults committed. (Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, 1943)

-Lionel Andrades
https://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-vatican-ii-revolution-reexamined_27.html