Cardinal Sean O’Malley and all the
auxiliary bishops in Boston would be Feeneyite on extra ecclesiam nulla salus if they did not interpret Vatican
Council II irrationally. For it is by interpreting LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA
2, GS 22 etc as being invisible people in 2023 that exceptions are produced for
Feeneyite EENS. Invisible cases must not be visible examples of salvation
outside the Church. But we know that LG 8 etc can only be visible for us human beings.
So they are never practical exceptions for EENS. The 1949 Letter of the Holy
Office made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case. The 1949 Letter to the
Archbishop of Boston confused invisible cases of the baptism of desire and
being saved in invisible ignorance, as being visible exceptions for EENS
according to the Fourth Lateran Council( 1215) and the Council of Florence
(1442).This was an objective error.
So at all Catholic schools in Boston, Catholics should be taught to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and
affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
In the pews in Boston, Catholics are not
united on the Creeds. Since with the irrational and rational interpretation of
Vatican Council II there are two interpretations of the Nicene Creed, two
interpretations of the Athanasius Creed etc.-
Lionel Andrades
Posts
