Amazing Ave Maria (public piano, Schubert) @ station Nijmegen, the Nethe...

At the Thomas More College of Liberal Arts they do not affirm orthodoxy and deny teaching heresy : they follow present day ecclesiastics in a rupture with the past Magisterium

No one at the Thomas More College(TMC) of Liberal Arts says they affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

No one at the TMC denies that they assume invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to EENS.

No one says in the Nicene Creed, their understanding is that there is one known baptism, the baptism of water for the forgiveness of sins and not three known baptisms.

They do not deny that they believe there are three or more known baptisms, desire, blood, ignorance etc, and they all exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.

They do not say that they affirm the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.

They do not deny that presently they reject the Athanasius Creed  with visible for them exceptions of BOD, BOB and I.I.

They do not say that 'the Holy Spirit', in the 'the Holy Catholic Church'(Apostles Creed), teaches that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation.

Neither do they deny that they teach the opposite i.e there is known salvation outside the Church.Outside the Church there is salvation.

They do not, like me, say that they affirm the Catechisms in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS and the past ecclesiology.

Neither do they deny that they affirm all the Catechisms as a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology and EENS.So there is a rupture with the missionaries of the 16th century on EENS, as Pope Benedict pointed out in March 2016 (Avvenire).For him too the Catechisms and Vatican Council II are a rupture with EENS.

Unlike me they do not affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS, by not using the false premise and inference to create a non traditional conclusion.

They do not deny that they affirm Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS and the past ecclesiology. They use a false premise and inference to create a hermeneutic of rupture with the past.

They do not state that the Catechism of Pope Pius X(invincible ignorance) is is in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors ( ecumenism of return).

They  do not deny that the Catechism of Pope Pius X is in a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors fpr them.It is also a rupture with Pope Benedict, Cardinal Muller and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria and the others employed at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.

Similarly they do not affirm the Catechism of Trent, which refers to the 'the desire thereof' (baptism of desire) in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors ( no salvation outside the Church) and the past ecclesiology.

Neither do not they state that the Catechism of the Council of Trent(baptism of desire) is not a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors on no salvation outside the Church.

They say that they follow the Magisterium of the Catholic Church but it is clear here that they reject the past Magisterium of the Church. They also interpret magisterial documents contradicting each other.

They follow the present ecclesiastics at the Vatican and Boston, who are in schism with the popes of the past.They interpret Church documents with a false premise and inference to create a rupture with the past Magisterium. TMC follows them to receive recognition and accreditation.

-Lionel Andrades 

DECEMBER 11, 2018

No clarification or denial from Thomas More College of Liberal Arts : public heresy and sacrilege

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/no-clarification-or-denial-from-thomas.html

 DECEMBER 10, 2018

Mass offered by the Dominican priest Fr.Thomas Crean at the TMC chapel may be valid but it is in scandal. There is an impediment which is not denied by the TMC faculty  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/so-mass-offered-by-dominican-priest.html

 DECEMBER 8, 2018

Thomas More College of Liberal Arts rejects Catholic Tradition by irrationally interpreting Vatican Council II. This has the approval of the two popes, the political Left and the college accreditors :I support Tradition by re-interpreting Vatican Council II rationally.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/thomas-more-college-of-liberal-arts.html

 DECEMBER 9, 2018

Thomas More College of Liberal Arts (TMC) is unaware of the mistake in Vatican Council II: Church documents and saints contradict themselves for the faculty  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/thomas-more-college-of-liberal-arts-tmc.html

______________________________
______________________________

Faculty divided

The Thomas More College of Liberal Arts maintains a Center for Faith & Culture in Oxford, including the editorial offices of theology journal Second Spring and Second Spring Catechesis.Oxford is leftists.Their theology is pro-Masonic.
 The director and associate director, Stratford and Léonie Caldecott, are both graduates of Hertford College, Oxford, and Stratford is a G.K. Chesterton Fellow at St Benet’s Hall, the Benedictine house at the University.
 

So William and Amy Fahey at TMC would have to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of errors etc).

For me Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Tradition as it would be for the traditionalist and Chairman of the Latin Mass Society, Joseph Shaw. He teaches philosophy at Benet Hall, Oxford and not TMC.

So like Shaw, William and Amy Fahey would be attending Holy Mass, with a new ecclesiology which is a rupture with the theology of the Tridentine Rite Mass in the 16th century.

So Phil Lawler would affirm the strict interpretation of EENS and the Faheys would reject it.

So for the Faheys the baptism of desire etc would refer to known non Catholics saved outside the Church and so would be practical exceptions to EENS. While this would not be the case for Phil Lawler.

This is a faculty which is divided on doctrine and theology. Some of them are using a false premise and inference to create a hermeneutic of rupture with the past, which pleases the Left. They continue with this even after being informed. So it would be deception.

For me, unlike them, there is no change in the Nicene Creed. I can affirm the Athanasius Creed while they cannot.The Athanasius Creed is in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors, while they cannot support the Syllabus on an ecumenism of return and no known salvation outside the Church for non Christians.

THEOLOGY RUPTURE WITH CATHOLIC WRITERS

So their theology is also a rupture with the saints and past Catholics writers. 

Like there are mortal sins in morals there are also mortal sins of faith.When Catholics to have different interpretations on EENS, Nicene Creeds and Vatican Council II indicates the faith is being rejected.To attend Holy Mass with a mortal sin of faith is a sacrilege. Similarly Fr. Thomas Crean op would be offering Mass at TMC for the faculty and students, while in personal sacrilege.-Lionel Andrades

December 12, 2018

Phil Lawler contradicts William and Amy Fahey on the faculty of Thomas More College of Liberal Arts :Nicene Creed changed  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/phil-lawler-contradicts-william-and-amy.html