Monday, October 11, 2021

National Catholic Reporter continues to interpret EENS and Vatican Council II with the False Premise like Bishop Peter Libasci and Fr. Georges de Laire

Church Militant founder may face legal reckoning for defamation

Apr 30, 2021

CNS-Voris c.jpg

One of the U.S. Catholic Church's most infamous agitators, known for aggressive smear campaigns against church leaders and organizations, may soon face a reckoning in court as a result of a rare lawsuit against his operations.

Gary Michael Voris, the founder of the ... Church Militant, is ... sued by a New Hampshire priest for defamation. A U.S. District Court judge rejected Voris' attempt last month to have the lawsuit dismissed.

In February, Fr. Georges de Laire, judicial vicar and the vicar for canonical affairs for the Diocese of Manchester, brought suit against both Voris and his media enterprise following a series of videos and articles against de Laire dating back to January 2019.

According to the original complaint, Voris and Church Militant in "knowing and reckless disregard of the truth embarked on a campaign of defamation against Father de Laire, intended to besmirch Father de Laire's reputation and destroy his standing in the community of his congregation in New Hampshire, and in the Catholic Church at large, in the United States and in Rome."

One of the priest's attorneys, Suzanne Elovecky, told NCR the decision to bring suit was not an easy one, but one ultimately made "for the sake of accountability and truth telling, which Fr. de Laire viewed as important for him and the community at large."...

The group was formed after its founder, former Jesuit priest Leonard Feeney, was excommunicated by the Vatican in 1953 for his belief that only those baptized in the Catholic Church could receive salvation. The group as it operates today has since been labeled a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center for preaching "anti-Semitic hatred."

Lionel: The group, the St.Benedict Center, is affirming Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus rationally while Fr. Georges de Laire uses a Fake Premise to change the interpretation of these Church documents to create a false break with Tradition. This is unethical and dishonest. His professional ability could be questioned. How can a Judicial Vicar claim that there are physically visible cases of the baptism of desire etc in New Hampshire in the present times and so he does not affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus like Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center in the diocese of Manchester, USA ?

________________

The diocese had forbidden the community of the St. Benedict Center in Richmond, New Hampshire, to present themselves as an official Catholic institution, while at the same time allowing a priest to provide ministry to the group. According to the Diocese of Manchester's website, the group "manipulated" this "to imply support or recognition by the Church."

Lionel: Bishop Peter Libasci and Fr. Georges de Laire are not interpreting Vatican Council II and the EENS with the Rational Premise.If they used the Rational Premise they would have to affirm the same interpretation of EENS as Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center.

Now the Manchester diocese Curia is dishonest.

They are using a harsh Decree of Prohibitions, to coerce the Catholics in New Hampshire( not only those at the St. Benedict Center) to cheat and use the common False Premise.

The Catholics who suffer in the diocese could ask for relief and compensation.

_________________

Church Militant has also been banned from presenting itself as a Catholic entity. Under its previous iteration, the organization, which operates in the Detroit suburbs, used to be known as Real Catholic TV. In December 2011, the Detroit Archdiocese said "it does not regard them as being authorized to use the word 'Catholic' to identify or promote their public activities."

Holly Fournier, a spokeswoman for the Detroit Archdiocese, told NCR that the 2011 ban remains in effect.

"Church Militant is not affiliated with, endorsed, or recommended by the Archdiocese of Detroit; it is not recognized as a Church apostolate," she wrote in a statement.

It fell to de Laire as judicial vicar to reinforce a Vatican decree that the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary could not present themselves as Catholic. According to the lawsuit, this resulted in "several articles [at Church Militant] not only criticizing the Diocese's decision to issue the Decree, but defaming Father de Laire, personally."

Lionel: The issue is credibility. How can someone pose as a Judicial Vicar and then even after being informed, use a False Premise to interpret even the Creeds and Catechisms. This is not Catholic. Such a person, who does not apologise and correct his ways is not professionally competent to handle marriage and other cases in the Church. His professional credibility would be poor.

_____________

Voris, who, according to the lawsuit, was an ally of the organization, charged that de Laire was "emotionally unstable" and seeking promotion as a Catholic bishop or a Vatican appointment, allegations the lawsuit rejects. In December 2019, de Laire wrote to Voris threatening legal action, and in a January 2020 letter, Church Militant stood by their original claims against the priest.

Voris sought to have the lawsuit dismissed over jurisdiction issues because Church Militant did not have "sufficient contacts with New Hampshire." A judge rejected that defense, noting the priest "felt the effects of the alleged defamation in New Hampshire."

gavel by Bill Oxford on unsplash c.jpeg

Attorneys for de Laire told NCR the lawsuit now enters into the discovery phase of litigation and that it would likely take "a year or longer" for the case to go to trial...

Priests have, historically, "turned the other cheek," said Cafardi, noting that there's nothing in canon law that would prevent such a suit.

Lionel : Canon Law does not permit a pope, cardinal, bishop or judicial vicar to deceptively use a False Premise to change the meaning of the Creeds and the Catechisms. Now the diocese is trying to force Catholics to accept all this heresy and schism or they will be declared 'legally not Catholic'. Even St.Thomas Aquinas and G.K Chesterton would come under this category.-Lionel Andrades

https://www.ncronline.org/news/media/church-militant-founder-may-face-legal-reckoning-defamation

OCTOBER 11, 2021

Bishop Peter Libasci and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj.,want the Sisters to state that they can see or meet non Catholics in the present times, who are saved with the baptism of desire etc.The Sisters don’t know of any such case and so the Decree remains.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/10/bishop-peter-libasci-and-cardinal-luiz.html

OCTOBER 10, 2021

Bishop Peter Libasci and Fr. Georges de Laire need to settle a secular issue
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/10/bishop-peter-libasci-and-fr-georges-de.html

"Basterebbe buttar via un po' di EGOISMO e diventerebbe molto più bello ...

"Fate lavorare i vostri Angeli Custodi..." Suor Emmanuel da Medjugorje

Bishop Peter Libasci and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj.,want the Sisters to state that they can see or meet non Catholics in the present times, who are saved with the baptism of desire etc.The Sisters don’t know of any such case and so the Decree remains.

The religious sisters at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA should demand that Bishop Peter Libasci ,Bishop of Manchester, USA, the diocese where they are situated, clarify that there are no physically visible people, non Catholics, saved with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I), and without the baptism of water, in the diocese in 2021.Since their parent, was one of the three professors whom Boston College expelled, for not claiming that he could see practical cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I.So he held the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, like his daughters,today.

Fr. Leonard Feeney too was expelled by Boston College and also from the Jesuit community.He was excommunicated. Since he would not say that there were physically visible people whom he knew, who were saved with the baptism of desire etc.The excommunication was finally lifted by Pope Paul VI, after the invisible-visible mix up was adopted by Vatican Council II. The priest was not asked to recant. Pope Paul VI may have realized what had happened and preferred to keep things under wraps.So no one asked him to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS rationally without the False Premise which had created a New Theology in the Catholic Church.

Now the Diocese of Manchester has placed a Decree of Prohibitions against the Sisters and their community, the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Bishop Peter Libasci and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj.,want the Sisters to state that they can see or meet non Catholics in the present times, who are saved with the baptism of desire etc.The Sisters don’t know of any such case and so the Decree remains.

Meanwhile Bishop Libasci is not announcing the names of those whom he knows in the diocese who have been saved outside the Church with the BOD etc and without the baptism of water.

He is also not announcing the time since when Fr. Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar, Diocese of Manchester, had the ability to see people in Manchester saved with the baptism of desire etc.The Sisters know that normally, in New Hampshire,people do not claim to have this ability.

This is all embarrassing for every one in the diocese.Since common sense tells us that if any is saved with BOD, BOB and I.I it can only be known to God.How can the Curia in the diocese suggest that they can physically see or meet , cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I ?

But for Mary Ellen Mohan, the Director of Education and Catechesis, in the diocese, and a member of the Curia, invisible people are visible.So she does not affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.

The Sisters and lay people, dissenters, have been deprived of their Blessed Sacrament at the chapel at the St. Benedict Center, Richmond,NH.Even the lay people suffer in silence and with patience, without asking for judicial relief and compensation.

Bishop Libasci uses the False Premise (invisible people are visible in 2021), coerces them to do the same with a harsh Decree of Prohibitions. Meanwhile with the False Premise he does not have to affirm thier strict interpretation of EENS and has changed the understanding of the First Commandment and the Creeds, which really is first class heresy.-Lionel Andrades

MARCH 21, 2013

The denial of this doctrine of the necessity of belonging to the Church for salvation that is the cause of all the other evils in the Church

It is the denial of this doctrine of the necessity of belonging to the Church for salvation that is the cause of all the other evils in the Church and, consequently, the world today...- Sr.Marie Therese M.I.C.M., Prioress

Convent Corner Triage

http://www.scribd.com/doc/130369740/Mancipia-March-April-2013