Saturday, June 22, 2019
Popes and saints over the centuries before Pius XII used Feeneyism and not Cushingism as a theology.Feeneyism is Catholic orthodoxy on salvation.It is rational and not split with Tradition
MAY 28, 2019
Ron Conte rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), for example as it was interpreted by the Magisterium in the 16th century, the Church Fathers and the Medieval Popes https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/ron-conte-rejects-dogma-extra-ecclesiam.html
Ron Conte rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), for example as it was interpreted by the Magisterium in the 16th century, the Church Fathers and the Medieval Popes https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/ron-conte-rejects-dogma-extra-ecclesiam.html
MAY 28, 2019
Theologian Ron Conte misinterprets the St.Benedict Center and Church Militant TV : there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire to create a new theology https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/theologian-ron-conte-misinterprets.html
MAY 28, 2019
The St.Benedict Center Fund can help the Church interpret the baptism of desire as not referring to literal cases, personally known people in 2019
MAY 22, 2019
MAY 24, 2019
The St.Benedict Center Fund can help make the Athanasius Creed accepted once again in the Catholic Church
MAY 25, 2019
The St.Benedict Center Fund can help the Church interpret Vatican Council II rationally and non-heretically http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-stbenedict-center-fund-can-help_25.html
___________________________________________________
The Saint Benedict Center of Richmond, NH, — hereafter SBC — runs Catholicism.org. That site is not to be confused with the orthodox website Catholicism.io. SBC teaches the error of Feeneyism. The schismatic religious order at SBC is the “Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary”. They are not an approved religious order in the Catholic Church. This article lists the heresies found at Catholicism.org 1
Lionel: Feeneyism is the interpretation of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance as referring to hypothetical and non objective cases in the present times. So BOD, BOB and I.I, not being real and personally known people, do not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). They are not exceptions.This was how BOD, BOB and I.I were interpreted by the popes and saints over the centuries before Pope Pius XII.So Feeneyism is Catholic orthodoxy on salvation. It is also rational and not a split with Tradition ( exclusive ecclesiology, ecumenism of return , Syllabus of Errors etc).Ron Conte's Cushingite interpretation of magisterial documents creates an artificial and superficial rupture with Tradition( EENS etc).
_____________________________
R.Conte refuses to respond to reports on this blog which specifically mention his errors. He interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism i.e he uses the false premise and inference. So the baptism of desire would refer to literal cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church.
I mentioned this error of his in blog posts which I e-mailed him last month.
I do not expect him to respond since he has made an objective error and would have to admit it.
I have also answered his questions for Michael Voris and e-mailed the answer to him.There is no comment from him.
Cushingism is modernism, it is the cause of the hermeneutic of rupture when interpreting Vatican Council II and EENS.Cushingism is an innovation in the Church.
-Lionel Andrades
1
__________________________________
JUNE 20, 2019
Media begins propaganda against SBC : Diocese of Manchester Curia Member and Catechists affirm Feeneyite theologyhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/media-begins-prooaganda-against-sbc.html
JUNE 19, 2019
Brother Andre Marie MICM has the same theological position as the Director of Education and Catechists in the Diocese of Manchester, USA
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/brother-andre-marie-micm-has-same.htm
l
JUNE 19, 2019
Brother Andre Marie MICM has the same theological position as the Director of Education and Catechists in the Diocese of Manchester, USA
JUNE 20, 2019
Feeneyites do not deny the baptism of desire, they say that it is hypothetical and so it is not an objective exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). Fr. Leonard Feeney said that there was no literal case of the baptism of desire. Even the liberals and traditionalists admit that there is no case of the BOD in 2019. If there existed someone saved outside the Church with BOD, it could only be known to God
JUNE 19, 2019
Michael Matt in a rupture with the popes before Pius XII
JANUARY 16, 2019
Why should the St. Benedict Center be obedient to public heresy,schism and sacrilege from the CDF and the Diocese of Manchester ? https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/why-should-st-benedict-center-be.html
JUNE 18, 2019
Repost : Diocesan of Manchester needs to clarify its doctrinal position for Catholics
JANUARY 13, 2019
Bishop Peter Libasci assumes invisible people are visible : claims that legally this is being 'Catholic'
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/bishop-peter-libasci-assumes-invisible.html
JANUARY 12, 2019
There are only Catholics in Heaven according to Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7) and they are there with faith and baptism
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/there-are-only-catholics-in-heaven.html
JANUARY 11, 2019
New CDF Sec.wants to create schism : supports heresy and sacrilege
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/new-cdf-secwants-to-create-schism.html
JANUARY 11, 2019
Athanasius Creed not accepted for a Profession of Faith in the Diocese of Manchester
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/athansius-creed-not-accepted-for.html
JANUARY 11, 2019
CDF, Diocese of Manchester deception is not Catholic : nor ethical or honest even by secular standards
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/cdfdiocese-of-manchester-deception-is.html
JANUARY 11, 2019
The CDF wants Catholic religious communities and lay movements to accept heresy and sacrilege otherwise canonical prohibitions will be placed upon them
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-cdf-wants-catholic-religious.html
JANUARY 10, 2019
Brother Andre Marie MICM affirms extra ecclesiam nulla salus based on Vatican Council II : query from the CDF
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/broandre-marie-affirms-extra-ecclesiam.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/diocesan-of-manchester-needs-to-clarify.html
Saint Benedict Center Needs your Help: Its Survival is in Jeopardy - Brother Andre Marie MICM
Funding Morality
https://fundingmorality.com/project/view/saint-benedict.html
https://fundingmorality.com/project/view/saint-benedict.html
As some of you already know, on January 7th of of this year, the Diocese of Manchester issued a public decree regarding the Saint Benedict Center community of Richmond, New Hampshire. The draconian decree consists of fifteen “precepts and obligations” imposed upon the members of the Saint Benedict Center.
In no small terms, the demands imposed upon the Saint Benedict Center place its survival and all its good works in grave existential jeopardy.
Since January 7th, the Most Holy Mass has been forbidden to be offered on the Center’s premises by any priest, even one with habitual faculties. Per the decree’s requirements, the Blessed Sacrament has been removed from the tabernacle. Additionally, a painful goodbye was said to the wonderful man who, with Bishop Libasci’s prior permission, dutifully served as our resident priest and confessor during the preceding several months, the Reverend John Earl.
The Diocese’s prohibition of the celebration of any Sacraments on our premises has been devastating to all who revere the daily celebration of the Sacraments and the Church’s liturgy as among the most cherished things in life. This is true not only of our Brothers and Sisters, but also of our dedicated and supportive lay faithful, including large families who regularly attended Mass here on Sundays and weekdays.
Our community life has been all but destroyed.
Our community life has been all but destroyed.
In addition to the imposition of the draconian Precept, it has to be said that a campaign was immediately deployed against us by some in the Press who apparently long for the day when our little community is snuffed out of existence.
Our community for decades has been known for assisting in making known the dogma of the Church, “Extra ecclesiam nulla salus,” “Outside the Church there is no salvation.” This teaching of the Church is neither easily understood nor accepted by a number of souls who find it harsh and lacking in “mercy.” To the contrary: All too many in this day and age “reduce[s] to a meaningless formula the necessity of belonging to the true Church in order to gain eternal salvation,” as Pope Ven. Pius XII taught decades ago in Humani Generis.
In order to make even more clear its complete conformity with the magisterial teaching of the Catholic Church, the Saint Benedict Center has uploaded to its website a Statement of Doctrinal Beliefs. This document was carefully written in consultation with theological and canonical experts to ensure that the Center remains in full compliance with the demands of the official doctrine and the law of the Church.
While none at the Center ever presume to speak in the name, or with the authority, of the Church, the lay faithful of the Center at the same time do not hesitate to work hard to exercise their right to make known to all men and women the salvific necessity of Christ and His One True Church as taught repeatedly over the centuries by her Magisterium (cf. can. 211 CIC).
The Precept issued this past January was a bolt out of the blue. It does not at all reflect the high level of cooperation the members of the Center exercised with ecclesiastical authorities during the preceding decade. For reasons that those members have yet to understand, Saint Benedict Center now finds itself suffering under a draconian Precept that it respectfully asserts was erroneously and unjustly imposed.
According to the canon law of the Church, the decree of January 7th is not a “definitive” decree or “adjudged matter.” Upon notice of the decree being given, fourteen members of Saint Benedict Center directly adversely affected by the Precept duly presented hierarchical recourse before the Bishop and then the competent dicasteries of the Holy See in Rome. As a result, the fourteen recurrents now eagerly await from the Holy See a just outcome of the canonical process seeking redress and succor. As the wheels of justice turn slowly in Rome, readers need to know that the nature of these canonical proceedings require some time to pass before a just and definitive resolution may be obtained.
To defend their rights and the truth of the matter, the members of the Saint Benedict Center have engaged the services of expert canon lawyers who have been diligently working on the case. In addition, they have retained expert civil attorneys, since it unfortunately appears necessary to defend the Center’s good name and interests in the forum of the civil courts.
The Brothers and Sisters of the Saint Benedict Center know that they are in God’s good hands. They are completely resigned to serving His Holy Will. At the same time, in the midst of the increasing confusion all around us, a canonical process serves to clarify legitimate rights and obligations on the part of all parties while a civil process seeks to guarantee the free exercise of rights guaranteed under the American Constitution and state statute.
The Saint Benedict Center community, both consecrated members and lay faithful at large, have suffered and continue to suffer a great deal during this ordeal in ways that are too numerous to detail. We ask for the fervent prayers of our many good friends and benefactors, that we may be able to shoulder this heavy Cross for the greater good and exaltation of Holy Mother Church and the salvation of souls.
We ask all of our friends to pray especially to Saint Joseph, Protector of the Universal Church, Patron of the Diocese of Manchester, our good heavenly Patron, and the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Intemerata, who was so fearless in the face of so much suffering and adversity.
The Saint Benedict Center now finds itself hard pressed to keep up with significant financial burdens necessary to defend its rights, its charism, and even its good name and those of its members in the canonical and civil fora. The retention of expert canon and civil lawyers and the costs needed to overcome this plight are very expensive.
A group of devoted supporters called “the Friends of Saint Benedict Center” has formed to raise badly needed funds. Any and all contributions made via the crowdfunding platform called “Funding Morality”are tax-deductible to the extent provided for by federal law.
For any help that you or those you know can offer to support us through these tribulations, we are most grateful.
Asking for your fervent prayers to the Blessed Virgin Mary and her chaste spouse St. Joseph, Patron of the Church Universal outside of which there is no salvation,
Most devotedly yours in the Hearts of Jesus and Mary,
Brother André Marie, M.I.C.M.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Fr. Georges de Laire, support irrationality( i.e hypothetical cases are physically visible exceptions to EENS) to create a rupture with the past exclusive ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return,traditional mission, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. This is a mortal sin of faith.The CDF is trying to stoke a schism for the SPLC, ADL and Satan.
Fr.Georges de Laire, ,Vicar for Canon Affairs in the Diocese of Manchester, USA has said in the Catholic Herald, UK, that he met with the Under Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), last month, and that the Prohibitions against the St. Benedict Center would continue.It means he does not accept the Doctrinal Statement of the SBC posted on their website.The issue he said is extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
It means the CDF and Bishop Libasci want the SBC, and all religious communities in the diocese, to state that they accept :-
TWO QUESTIONS
TWO QUESTIONS
1.Unknown and invisible cases in 2019 of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known and physically visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.So as Pope Benedict said in March 2016 (Avvenire) that EENS today is no more like it was like for the missionaries in the 16th century.There was a development with Vatican Council II ( interpreted irrationally).
2.Vatican Council II contradicts EENS since unknown cases of non Catholics allegedly saved outside the Church in 2019, as mentioned in LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are practical and literal exceptions to EENS.
This is the irrational way in which th SBC has to accept EENS and Vatican Council II , to be considered a Catholic in good standing with the Church.
So the SBC have to state that Fr. Leonard Feeney was not orthodox and rational but instead the Holy Office(CDF) in 1949 was correct on theology and doctrine.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and Fr. Georges de Laire, are supporting irrationality( i.e hypothetical cases are physically visible exceptions to EENS) to create a rupture with the past exclusive ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return,traditional mission, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors.1 This is a mortal sin of faith.The CDF is trying to stoke a schism for the SPLC, ADL and Satan.
The St. Benedict Center(SBC) have simply to put two questions to the cardinals and bishops, and the average Catholic,and the response will be that there are no personally known and physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church over the last 50 years.There are none this year.
The CDF needs to apologize for the excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney and Bishop Marcel Lefebvre.Since BOD, BOB and I.I cannot be exceptions to EENS,they do not exist in our reality. Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office(CDF) wrong.
1
Pope Pius VI and Pope Benedict/Cardinal Ratzinger did not correct the error.However today a correction can made in public.The CDF made a factual error in the case of Fr.Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and Fr. Georges de Laire, are supporting irrationality( i.e hypothetical cases are physically visible exceptions to EENS) to create a rupture with the past exclusive ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return,traditional mission, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors.1 This is a mortal sin of faith.The CDF is trying to stoke a schism for the SPLC, ADL and Satan.
The St. Benedict Center(SBC) have simply to put two questions to the cardinals and bishops, and the average Catholic,and the response will be that there are no personally known and physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church over the last 50 years.There are none this year.
The CDF needs to apologize for the excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney and Bishop Marcel Lefebvre.Since BOD, BOB and I.I cannot be exceptions to EENS,they do not exist in our reality. Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office(CDF) wrong.
Also Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc , interpreted as being exceptions to EENS, is irrational and heretical.So Archbishop Lefebvre was correct in rejecting this interpretation of the Council, which was approved by the CDF and the Left.
Pope Pius VI and Pope Benedict/Cardinal Ratzinger did not correct the error.However today a correction can made in public.The CDF made a factual error in the case of Fr.Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.
-Lionel Andrades
1
Pope Pius VI and Pope Benedict/Cardinal Ratzinger did not correct the error.However today a correction can made in public.The CDF made a factual error in the case of Fr.Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
