Concerning the March 25, 2022, Consecration of Russia
MAR 21, 2022 BROTHER ANDRÉ MARIE
https://catholicism.org/ad-rem-no-413.html
Friday, March 25, 2022
For the Easter Triduum in Rome the FSSP has to simply interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise, unlike Cardinal Donatis and the Rome Vicariate, and they are then back to the old exclusivist theology of the Roman Missal (1580).
For the Easter Triduum in Rome the
FSSP has to simply interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise,
unlike Cardinal Donatis and the Rome Vicariate, and they are then back to the old
exclusivist theology of the Roman Missal (1580). –Lionel
Andrades
Young German Catholics need to produce a video showing the difference between the Fake Premise, False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion and the Rational Premise, Rational Inference and Traditional Conclusion.
The young German
Catholics are probably going back to Tradition by rejecting Vatican Council II
interpreted with a Fake Premise. They now need to interpret Vatican Council II
with the Rational Premise and ask Bishop George Batzing, Chairman of the German
Catholics Bishops Conference.
In their next video they
could explain the difference between the Fake Premise, False Inference and Non
Traditional Conclusion and the Rational Premise, Rational Inference and
Traditional Conclusion.
Then they could show how
Cardinal Marx and Bishop Batzing continue to use the Fake Premise to create
exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius X and the rest of Tradition.
So there is no
continuity with the past Tradition, the past Magisterium, which did not use the
False Premise to interpret the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed and the
dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Then they could show the
video to the media and the bishops in Germany.
They can then have all
those books and theological journals on Vatican Council II (Irrational) thrown
out. -Lionel Andrades
MARCH 24, 2022
#InDefenseOfOurChurch: Ein Statement für die Tradition : this young group of German Catholic traditionalists could check the error of Bishop Georg Batzing and the German Minsitry of Education
MARCH 24, 2022
If the young group of German traditionalists can get past the hurdle among the Lefebvrists, they could check the objective error made by Bishop Georg Batzing, Chairman of the German Bishops Conference
The German Education Ministry is teaching Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise instead of the Rational Premise. Those young Germans who produced that video could check it out.
So if the young group of German traditionalists can get past the hurdle among the Lefebvrists, they could check the objective error made by Bishop Georg Batzing, Chairman of the German Bishops Conference. -Lionel Andrades
MARCH 22, 2022
The German Federal Ministry of Information and the Education Ministry must ask Bishop Georg Batzing to correct the error. The Vatican diplomat in Germany must do the same. Pope Francis and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria must correct the mistake. The Roman Catholic Federal Minister of Education in Germany must interpret Vatican Council II only with the Rational Premise.
Bishop Georg Batzing, Chairman of the German Bishops Conference can take, the German Church back to the original teachings of the Church.
1. He must not use a Fake Premise to interpret Church Documents (Vatican Council II etc.
2. He must interpret Church Documents (Vatican Council II, Creeds, Catechisms etc) with a Rational Premise. This is Catholic and it is being honest.
I interpret Church Documents with the Rational Premise.So there are no practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius X, the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), for me.
Now Vatican Council II is being interpreted with a Fake Premise by the German Bishops Conference and the German Synodal Way.
The Fake Premise is used by the German government, Lutheran, ecumenical and inter-faith organizations.
Bishop Georg Batzing uses the Fake Premise (invisible people are visible) instead of the Rational Premise (invisible people are invisible in 2022). He then chooses the False Inference ( invisible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church as referred to in LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are physically visible in 1965-2022). He does not choose the Rational Inference( invisible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church, without faith and the baptism of water, are always invisible for us in these present times)
So with the Fake Premise the non-traditional conclusion is outside the Church there is known salvation and there are exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors etc. This is not the orthodox, and traditional conclusion of outside the Church there is no known salvation, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical and invisible cases only. So there are no practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors, the Creeds and Catechisms and the dogma EENS in the present times. There is no break with Tradition.
The German Federal Ministry of Information and the Education Ministry must ask Bishop Georg Batzing to correct the error. The Vatican diplomat in Germany must do the same. Pope Francis and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria must correct the mistake.
The Roman Catholic Federal Minister of Education in Germany must interpret Vatican Council II only with the Rational Premise.This is being ethical and Catholic. -Lionel Andrades
MARCH 21, 2022
Bishop Georg Batzing, Chairman of the German Bishops Conference can no more interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise
MARCH 21, 2022
Bettina Stark-Watzinger is the Roman Catholic Federal Minister of Education in Germany : she could check the mistakes on Vatican Council II being taught at the schools, colleges and universities
MARCH 16, 2022
The German Ministry of Education must interpret Vatican Council II rationally and ask the German Bishops Conference to do the same.
MARCH 13, 2022
The information the German Synodal Way gives out on Vatican Council II is not correct. They are presenting the Council with a lie in official heresy and schism which is approved by the present two popes : the German government and secular and Protestant organizations accept the fake interpretation of Vatican Council II in the area of public spending, educational scholarships, general employment and inter-faith meetings.
The information the German Synodal Way gives out on Vatican Council II is not correct. They are presenting the Council with a lie in official heresy and schism which is approved by the present two popes.
Heresy and schism were mortal sins for the Catholic Church in Germany before the 1940ìs. Now with the False Premise, creating a new fake theology there is no doctrinal unity in the Catholic Church on the First Commandment. ‘I am the Lord your God, thou shalt have no other God but me’. There is also no more unity on the Nicene Creed and the Athanasius Creed.
For the German Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX were made obsolete with the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II with a False Premise.
So the German Synodal Way does not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus since there are alleged exceptions in Vatican Council II, when it is interpreted irrationally by the German cardinals and bishops.
This is also the irrational interpretation of German Head of States, Chancellors and Government offices.
Now the German government and German secular and Protestant organizations accept the German Catholic cardinals and bishops’ fake interpretation of Vatican Council II in the area of public spending, educational scholarships, general employment and inter-faith meetings.
-Lionel Andrades
MARCH 12, 2022
Is the German Synodal Way legal?
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/03/is-german-synodal-way-legal_12.html
1 Athanasius Creed
2.Nicene Creed
Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )
E-mail: lionelandrades10@
___________________
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
