Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Dr. Taylor Marshall are interpreting Vatican
Council II with the False and not Rational Premise and so they are supporting a
break with the past Magisterium on EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the
Athanasius Creed.
This is heresy and schism with the past
Magisterium by these two traditionalists. Traditionalists opposing Tradition.
When the False Premise is used then the
Creeds are misinterpreted and this is a mortal sin of faith at the Latin Mass,
for them. It would also be a mortal sin, at the Novus Ordo Mass.
I don't think that the Novus Ordo Mass should be abolished.Neither should Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise be abolished.-Lionel Andrades
MARCH 29, 2022
Bishop Barron presents Larry Chapp without mentioning that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with a Rational Premise and the Council will be Traditional supporting the past exclusivist ecclesiology
MARCH 28, 2022
The first commandment of God is: I am the Lord thy God; thou shalt not have strange gods before Me.
MARCH 27, 2022
'The Red is not an Exception to the Blue' changes everything in our interpretation of Vatican Council II
MARCH 27, 2022
A video needs to be produced showing the difference in the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the 1) Fake Premise, False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion and 2) with the Rational Premise, Rational Inference and Traditional Conclusion. The graphics are available on this blog.
___________________________________________
____________________________
MARCH 12, 2022
Is the German Synodal Way legal?
OCTOBER 1, 2021
With the irrational premise of the Red Right Hand Side Column, the Athanasius Creed is changed : Popes, Cardinals and Bishops use the irrational column
OCTOBER 1, 2021
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall chose the Blue Left Hand Side Rational Column to interpret the Baptism of Desire (LG 14). The Ecclesia Dei communities can also interpret Vatican Council II rationally ( Graphics )
WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF
VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
___________________
WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS
OF VATICAN COUNCIL II :
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
___________________
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
Posts
