Amoris Laetitia was inspired by Vatican Council II interpreted with the Irrational Premise. We now know that the Council can be interpreted with a Rational Premise. So Amoris is obsolete.

 Amoris Laetitia was inspired by Vatican Council II interpreted with the Irrational Premise. We now know that the Council can be interpreted with a Rational Premise. So Amoris is obsolete.

MAINLINE CHURCH TRADITIONAL IN FUTURE

When Vatican Council II is interpreted with a Rational Premise the Novus Ordo, mainline Catholic Church will become traditionalist overnight. There will be no other choice. Then Amoris Laetitia can be reviewed.

There is no denial from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF). They made a mistake and so did the sedevacantist bishops Donald Sanborn and Mark Pivarunas. Both the present two popes also used the Irrational and not Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II etc.

The sedevacantist and SSPX bishops have been using an Irrational and not Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II creating a False Break with Tradition. There is no denial. They do not want to admit it in public or talk about it.

The sedevacantists have not interpreted Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise otherwise they would have to affirm Feeneyite EENS. The Council is ecclesiocentric. The False Premise creates the hermeneutic of rupture with the Athanasius Creed etc. This is schism with the past Magisterium.

BEING SAVED WITH THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE ARE ALWAYS INVISIBLE

BOD (Lumen Gentium 14) and I.I (Lumen Gentium 16) always refer to invisible and not physically visible cases and so could not be practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake.

The laity at the mainline Catholic Church will be going back to Tradition when they interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. They will have no choice but to come back to Tradition. The False Premise is unethical.

Dr. Taylor Marshall interprets Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Catechisms etc) with a False Premise, including Vatican Council II. It is the same with bishops Donald Sanborn and Mark Pivarunas and the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA. This was the original mistake of Archbishops Marcel Lefebvre and Pierre Thuc.

Peter and Michael Dimond of the Most Holy Family Monastery interpret Vatican Council II with the same False Premise (invisible cases are visible in the present times) and so create a Fake Break with Tradition, including Feeneyite EENS.

There is a Feeneyite and Cushingite EENS, there is EENS with no exceptions of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance (Feeneyite) and EENS with practical exceptions of BOD and I.I (Cushingite).

CARDINAL LUIZ LADARIA DID NOT TELL BISHOP BERNARD FELLAY.

 Cardinal Ratzinger as Prefect of the CDF did not tell Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop Bernard Fellay that if they all interpreted Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise the Council would be traditional. It would be the end of liberalism in the Church which he always supported. Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell Archbishop Lefebvre the truth about Vatican Council II.

CUSHINGISM CREATES THE HERMENEUTIC OF RUPTURE AND FEENEYISM CONTINUITY

Lefebvre was a Cushingite like Cardinal Ratzinger and Pope Paul VI. Cushingism creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. Feeneyism maintains the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.

LAITY IN MAINLINE CHURCH CAN COME BACK TO THE ROMAN MISSAL AT THE NOVUS ORDO MASS

All the SSPX bishops do not want to affirm Vatican Council II (Rational) since they then would have to affirm EENS (Feeneyite) instead of their present EENS (Cushingite). Archbishop Lefebvre chose EENS and VCII (Cushingite). Cushingism causes the break with Tradition. So it is important that the laity in the mainline Church interpret Vatican Council II (Rational) in harmony with EENS (Feeneyite).Then they will come back to the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal.

Archbishop Lefebvre used the False and not Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II as did Pope Paul VI and the other bishops did the same without correcting the error. Neither did Cardinal Ratzinger or Cardinal Luiz Ladaria inform the SSPX bishops about their mistake. Since the CDF and Cardinal Ratzinger do not want to affirm the Athanasius Creed for political reasons.

FR. LEONARD FEENEY RECITED THE ATHANASIUS CREED WHICH SAYS OUTSIDE THE CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION.

The excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney was lifted after he recited the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation. His funeral was held in a Catholic Church with also a bishop present.

When Vatican Council II is interpreted with a Rational Premise then there are no practical exceptions in the Council, for Feeneyite EENS or the Athanasius Creed. It is now unethical for the bishops and cardinals to continue to use the False Premise. The bishops are approved by the Left since they employ the Irrational Premise (LG 16 refers to a physically visible case in 2022) to interpret Vatican Council II.

DOMINUS IESUS WAS WRITTEN WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II INTERPRETED IRRATIONALLY.

Cardinal Ratzinger pleased the Left when he interpreted the Creeds, Catechisms, EENS and Vatican Council II with a False and not Rational Premise. Even Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus were put together with Vatican Council II (Irrational).

In future the laity in Chicago and Savannah, USA can become traditional when they know about Vatican Council II interpreted without the False Premise. They can avoid it. There will be an option in the interpretation of Traditionis Custode.

IT IS MODERNISM WHEN CARDINALS BURKE AND KASPER CHOOSE THE FALSE PREMISE

Irrespective of who uses it, the False Premise creates heresy and schism. It is modernism even when cardinals Leo Burke and Walter Kasper use it. The False Premise is like a theological epidemic in the Catholic Church. It is there from the pope to the parish priest.   -Lionel Andrades

The issue is Vatican Council II. Everyone is being forced to accept Vatican Council II (Irrational). People must object. Vatican Council II (Rational) is in harmony with 16^th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the exclusivist theology of the Roman Missal (1580).

Catholics in Chicago must ask Cardinal Blaise Cupich to interpret Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise. They must refuse to interpret the Council with an Irrational Premise. Traditionis Custode must be interpreted rationally.

Similarly in Germany, the bishops must interpret Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise. The German Ministry of Education must not allow the German bishops to use the Irrational Premise and teach it to students. This is unethical and not Catholic.

No Catholic saint is a heretical if he mentions the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. Hypothetical cases cannot be practical exceptions for the traditional strict interpretation of EENS. So BOD and I.I do not contradict the dogma EENS.

Those who say that BOD and I.I are exceptions for EENS imply that there are visible cases of BOD. So their premise, visible cases of invisible BOD would be wrong.

The Catholic universities get their liberalism fro the false interpretation of Vatican Council II with an Irrational Premise. They are forced to do this by the Left. Scott Hahn and the other professors of theology in the Department of Theology at the University of Steubenville, Ohio, USA has no denial.

A mortal sin is a mortal sin says Pope John Paul II in the encyclical on morals, Veritatis Splendor. A couple in public adultery or divorce is in mortal sin and on the way to Hell. If there are mitigating factors which prevent them from going to Hell they would only be known to God.

The norm for salvation is faith and baptism and living a virtuous life. The norm is not adultery and concubinage.When an unmarried couple live together it is also a scandal. Divorce and re-marriage are mortal sins. Vatican Council II (Rational) does not contradict the old faith and morals of the Church.

We can wait for the future when the main line Novus Ordo Church chooses to interpret Vatican Council II only rationally. Then they all will have to come back to Tradition, to the Roman Missal.

I agree with the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA on EENS. I also agree with them when they say that the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are not exceptions. I keep saying like Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire.

I was in two seminaries in Rome. For me Vatican Council II would not be an exception for Feeneyite EENS, the dogma EENS. They would interpret EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed with exceptions. They were Cushingite and I was Feeneyite.Cushingism changes the interpretation of the Creeds.

I held the strict interpretation of EENS like the saints but the Legion of Christ seminary in Rome (PIMME) projected Vatican Council II (Irrational) as having exceptions for EENS. It was the same problem with the British seminary in Rome (Beda College) in 2002-2003.

Pope Benedict even today is not announcing that LG 8, 15 and 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only and so the Council does not contradict traditional mission, faith and morals and the Roman Missal.

We can accept the BOD and I.I as existing only in our mind, a thought. There are no objective cases. Outside the Church there is no salvation says the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846.

St. Robert Bellarmine affirmed Feeneyite EENS and not Cushingite EENS. Bishop Donald Sanborn and the Lefebvrists affirm Cushingite EENS and so change the salvation dogma. They create exceptions by using the False Premise (Cushingism) to interpret BOD and I.I.

So if Feeneyites are considered heretics then so are St. Robert Bellarmine, St. Francis Xavier, St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Augustine, St. Anthony Mary Claret, St. Maximillian Kolbe…They were all affirming the strict interpretation of EENS with hypothetical baptism of desire etc.

Now when the Archdiocese of Washington, USA want to apply Traditionis Custode it is flawed when they choose Vatican Council II interpreted with an Irrational Premise which creates alleged practical exceptions for EENS (Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors ( Feeneyite).With the False Premise used in public, a false rupture is created with the theology of the pre-1962  Roman Missal. Catholics have an obligation in Washington, Savvanh and Chicago to interpret Vatican Council II rationally.

Feeneyism is the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church. It is EENS as held by the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16^th century. It is not contradicted by Vatican Council II (Rational). Since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases only.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

Messaggi di Gesù alla mistica ungherese suor Maria Natalia Magdolna: per essere gradito al Signore

Signore Ti preghiamo di donarci la Luce della Fede e della Fiducia e rafforzaci nella Speranza