Saturday, August 6, 2022
Fr. Georges de Laire Judicial Vicar in the Diocese of Manchester, USA still unethically chooses a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and EENS : this is political and not Catholic
Mark Hayward, in The New Hampshire Union Leader, Manchester, USA has a report (June 2022)1 in which he calls the St. Benedict Center(SBC), Richmond, New Hampshire, ‘ a sect’. The report does not state that the SBC affirms all the teachings of the Church.It interprets Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise.So Vatican Council II (rational) is in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiamnullasalus (EENS).It is Archbishop Augustine Di Noia, Assistant Secretary, CDF and Fr. Georges de Laire Judicial Vicar of the Diocese of Manchester,NH, who choose the False Premise.In this way they avoid being called Feeneyite.This is unethical. It is dishonest.
Mark Hayward has written another report titled New Hampshire priest adds Wisconsin canon lawyer to his defamation suit ( July 5, 2022). It says:
The articles in question deal with the St. Benedict Center, a Catholic-oriented sect based in Richmond that has run afoul of the Catholic hierarchy.
De Laire has represented the Manchester Diocese in efforts to distance the church leaders from the St. Benedict Center.
The Diocese has faulted the sect for anti-Semitic statements and its doctrines, including claims that only Catholics can go to heaven. The doctrinal dispute has gone all the way to the Vatican, and the organization has no recognition in the church, according to the Manchester Diocese.
The St. Benedict Center denies that they
are a sect. Pope Francis is their pope and they accept Vatican Council and the
Catechism of the Catholic Church. They deny that they are anti-Semitic.The diocese had provided them a regular priest for their chapel and recognized
Brother Andre Marie MICM as Prior of the religious community in New Hampshire.
This was the status quo for years. They were also approved by the previous
bishop in Manchester.
The reports by Mark Hayward for the New Hampshire Union
Leader, Manchester, including those by Damien Fischer do not say that Fr. Georges de Laire interprets Vatican Council II, the doctrines of baptism of desire and being saved in
invincible ignorance and the Creeds and Catechisms, with a False Premise. This
is unethical. It is being continued even after the Curia in the Diocese of Manchester
has been informed. The St. Benedict Center avoids the False Premise.
This was brought to the attention of Mark Hayward and Damien Fischer after their last reports in the New Hampshire Union Leader, Manchester.
They ignored this point.
Also the report by the Catholic New Agency against the St. Benedict Center ignored this point.
Fr. Georges de Laire chooses the False Premise, to interpret Church documents.In this way he is dishonestly politically correct with the Left.In this way he also avoids being called a Feeneyite on EENS like the St. Benedict Center. If he did not use this subterfuge the Decree of Prohibitions which he placed upon the SBC would also apply to him.
He has no right to be a Judicial Vicar until he ends the scandal:This was pointed out months back.. This is not being reported by the CNA and the Union Leader in New Hampshire.Copies of these blog posts had been sent to Mark Hayward and the CNA.
COERCION
Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester and his Curia along with Fr. De Laire are dishonest when they choose a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council.Then along with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, they coerce the St.Benedict Center to do the same, with a Decree of Prohibitions. The community in New Hampshire refuse to do this. Now the media are calling them a sect. -Lionel Andrades
1
Judge poised to add confidential source/author to priest’s defamation suit (June 8,2022) Mark Hayward, The New Hampshire Union Leader, Manchester
2
New Hampshire priest adds Wisconsin canon lawyer to his defamation suit
https://www.unionleader.com/news/courts/new-hampshire-priest-adds-wisconsin-canon-lawyer-to-his-defamation-suit/article_88a8f362-ba43-5a45-8baf-5260f0b353b1.html
Secular Reports and those from Catholic news outlets do not say that the Judicial Vicar in New Hampshire would be affirming Feeneyite EENS without the False Premise which he uses to interpret Vatican Council II and so escapes the Decree of Prohibitions he places upon Catholics
JULY 19, 2022
Reports do not say that the Judicial Vicar in New Hampshire would be affirming Feeneyite EENS without the False Premise which he uses to interpret Vatican Council II and so escapes the Decree of Prohibitions he places upon Catholics
REPORTS DO NOT SAY THAT THE JUDICIAL VICAR IN NEW HAMPSHIRE WOULD BE AFFIRMING FEENEYITE EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS (EENS) WITHOUT THE FALSE PREMISE HE USES TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II : ESCAPES DECREE OF PROHIBITIONS.
Mark Hayward, in The New Hampshire Union Leader, Manchester, USA has a report (June 2022)1 in which he calls the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire, ‘ a sect’. The report does not state that the SBC affirms all the teachings of the Church.It interprets Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise.So Vatican Council II (rational) is in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiamnullasalus (EENS).It is Archbishop Augustine Di Noia, Assistant Secretary, CDF and Fr. Georges de Laire Judicial Vicar of the Diocese of Manchester,NH, who choose the False Premise.In this way they avoid being called Feeneyite.This is unethical. It is dishonest.
If Fr. De Lairehad chosen the Rational Premise.to interpret Vatican Council II,the Decree of Prohibitions, which he issued, against Brother Andre Marie MICM, would also apply to him.
The Catholic News Agency (CNA) also had a report titled Vatican upholds prohibitions placed on Feeneyite group ( Feb.4,2021).The CAN report did not state that Fr.Georges de Laire and the CDF do not use a Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II, as does Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior of the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire.
Also Christopher White in the National Catholic Reporter (NCR) report, Church Militant Founder may face legal reckoning for defamation (April 30,2021) does not state that Fr. Georges de Laire and theCDF ecclesiastics did not use the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II as does Brother Andre Marie MICM.
The report also did not state that if all the Catholic religious communities in New Hampshire would interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise they would be affirming EENS like Brother Andre Marie. Since there would not be any practical exception for EENS mentioned in the Council-text. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22, NA 22 etc. in Vatican Council II, would be only theoretical and speculative cases, when interpreted rationally. So they would not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation (invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire being hypothetical only).
Without the False Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, Fr. Georges de Laire would be interpreting EENS like the SBC.Laire and Di Noia placed prohibitions, against the religious community in New Hampshire for saying in Heaven there are only Catholics (Ad Gentes 7, CCC 846 etc).
So the CDF and Fr.George de Laire interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with an Irrational Premise and have placed restrictions on the St. Benedict Center, NH for interpreting EENS and VC II with the Rational Premise- and avoid restrictions on the Curia in New Hampshire.
I repeat that in the NCR report by Christopher White it was not mentioned that without the False Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, Fr. Georges de Laire would be interpreting EENS like the SBC in NH.
Similarly in the interview given by Fr.Georges de Laire to Michael Warren Davis for the Catholic Herald, U.K, Laire did not say ( or know) that without the False Premise he would be affirming Feeneyite EENS like the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, NH. This point was not mentioned by the Catholic Herald U.K.
The use of the Fake Premise to interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance is unethical. It was an objective mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston. It was referenced in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Catholics today can interpret Vatican Council II not like the political Left but the past Magisterium which only used the Rational Premise.
For years Reuters, Associated Press, Crux etc have been churning out Fake News on Vatican Council II. They have been interpreting the Council with an Irrational and not Rational Premise for political-Left reasons and then refer to ‘the reforms’ and ‘revolution’ of the Council.-Lionel Andrades
1
Judge poised to add confidential source/author to priest’s defamation suit (June 8,2022) Mark Hayward, The New Hampshire Union Leader, Manchester
JULY 19, 2022
Posts
