Manchester, N.H., Feb 4, 2021 / 09:01 pm MT (CNA).- The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has declined to consider an appeal by the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary located in New Hampshire against prohibitions placed on them by the Diocese of Manchester.
The group, located in Richmond, N.H., about 60 miles southwest of Manchester, has roots in an order originally founded by Fr. Leonard Feeney.
The Diocese of Manchester had placed the group under precepts of prohibition, effective Jan. 7, 2019, because of obstinacy in their theological position regarding the principle that there is no salvation outside the Church. They were prohibited from referring to themselves as an association of the faithful in the Church and having sacraments celebrated at their property, among other things.
The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart appealed the prohibitions to the CDF, but “Rome chose not to consider the appeal,” Fr. Georges de Laire, judicial vicar of the Diocese of Manchester, said, according to the New Hampshire Union Leader.
“The decision from CDF says that it was rejected because it fell outside the statute of limitations,” Fr. de Laire said.
He told the Union Leader that the diocese is “now engaged in an effort to dialogue” with the group and to encourage them to observe the prohibitions, and that the diocese has a “complicated relationship” with the Slaves.
Bishop Peter Libasci of Manchester “remains hopeful that a solution can be identified,” Fr. de Laire said. “The bishop is committed to the Slaves and their supporters, as they are members of the Church and he owes them ministry.”
That membership in the Church is necessary for all men for salvation is a truth of revelation; however, actual membership can, in special circumstances, be replaced by a desire, even implicit, for this membership.
(Lionel: Yes hypothetically, speculatively and this is not a practical exception to the dogma EENS).
The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in Richmond are not affiliated in any way with the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary located in Still River, Mass. That community, also rooted in an order first founded by Fr. Feeney, was refounded in 1976, and was regularized by the Bishop of Worcester in 2002.
In October 2016 the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith wrote to Brother Andre Marie, leader of the group based in Richmond, that the position he retains - that articles from the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Dominus Iesus on the principle ‘outside the Church there is no salvation’ have been given different readings that are contrary to one another, and it is permissible to hold the position that these articles contradict previous Church teaching - is unacceptable.
(Lionel: The CDF interpretation of EENS with the false premise contradicts the past Magisterium of the Church. It contradicts EENS for example according to the missionaries in the 15th century.)
On that basis, and that the Slaves had persisted in their obstinacy and that scandal had continued, the Manchester diocese placed the prohibitions on the group which were to take effect in January 2019. The decree of prohibitions bears the signatures of Fr. de Laire and of Diane Quinlan, the diocesan chancellor.
The decree stated that only the Anointing of the Sick for a person in danger of physical death by an approved priest would be allowed at the group’s property, and that no priest would validly hear Confession and impart Absolution at the property except for a penitent in imminent danger of physical death.
It added that documents signed by the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart in April and July 2009, after which the then-bishop had provided for a priest to say Mass at their property, were null and void.
(Lionel: They affirmed the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation. The CDF and the Diocese of Manchester officials cannot affirm the Athanasius Creed since there are alleged practical exceptions to EENS).
______________________
Cardinal Raymond Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider have not commented on the Catholic News Agency report.
Hypothetically Brother Andre Marie does not reject invincible ignorance but the CNA report suggests that being saved in invincible ignorance is not only a hypothetical case but is actually an objective exception to EENS. Being saved in invincible ignorance is objective for the CNA otherwise how could it be an exception to Feeneyite EENS.
This is irrational and deceptive and it is the official policy of Pope Francis, Pope Benedict and the CDF.It is supported by Cardinal Raymond Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider to protect their personal interests..-Lionel Andrades
https://catholicism.org/doctrinal-belief.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/brother-andre-marie-micm-cou
___________________________________
Catholic News Agency report on St. Benedict Center confusing
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/catholic-news-agency-report-on-st.html
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/
https://www.presserat.de/en.html
Pope Benedict needs to apologize for projecting LG 16, GS 22 etc as being practical exceptions to the past ecclesiology of the Church.He has made this error in his articles and books and two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican, which he approved as the cardinal-prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.JANUARY 28, 2020
The publishers of Pope Benedict's books in German must note that he used a false premise and inference to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition and this is not only bad philosophy and bad theology it is unethical and dishonest.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-publishers-of-pope-benedicts-books.html
JANUARY 27, 2020 
The former Archbishop of Munich's books published by Ignatius Press have an in- principle error.The German Joseph Ratzinger's books were written with an irrational premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition on Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Nicene Creed and other magisterial documents.There should be an apology from Pope Benedict and Ignatius Press.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-former-archbishop-of-munichs-books.html
JANUARY 28, 2020
Deutsche Presserat needs to inform newspapers and publishers that there is a rational and honest interpretation of Vatican Council II it is ethical.It does not create an artificial and calculated rupture with Catholic Tradition,pleasing to one lobby
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/deutsche-presserat-needs-to-inform.html
___________________
SUNDAY, JANUARY 26, 2020
The German Press must note that all the books they have on Vatican Council II, in their personal and public library, are written with a false premise and inference.So the Council can be re interpreted without this error and there is no rupture with Catholic Tradition. So the Associated Press, Reuters,Deutsche Presse-Agentur, Catholic News Agency (KNA - Katholische Nachrichten-Agentur), Protestant Press Service (Evangelischer Pressedienst, epd) reports in Germany , all have this error.They interpret Vatican Council II by confusing what is hypothetical as being objective, implicit as explicit. This is unethical when it is done knowingly.
So the Press conferences with spokespersons from the Federal Government and the Ministries,held three times a week by the Federal Press Conference Association (BPK – Bundespressekonferenz),need to clarify the German Governments understanding with the Catholic Church and correct their past reports on Vatican Council II.
The German Press Council( Deutsche Presserat ) must ensure that journalists observe the truth about Vatican Council II and not intentionally interpret the Council as a break with the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). Similarly the Union of German Journalists (Deutsche Journalistinnen- und Journalisten-Union, dju) and the German Journalists’ Association (Deutscher Journalisten-Verband, DJV) and Association of the Foreign Press in Germany (Verein der Ausländischen Presse in Deutschland e.V., VAP) must officially clarify their position on this issue.
Vatican Council II(AG 7) supports the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Council of Florence 1441). There are no objective exceptions in the present times (1965-2020) mentioned in the text of the Council.
The news agency reports of the past need to be corrected officially by Cardinal Reinhardt Marx, Archbishop of Munich and President of the German Bishops Conference.
The Associated Press and Reuters for example had been reporting Vatican Council II as a revolution in the Church with the teaching on exclusive salvation being made obsolete. This was wrong and has to be corrected.-Lionel Andrades
TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, 2020
The German Press Council( Deutsche Presserat )is the body responsible for enforcing a self-regulation of the press in Germany. Through addressing complaints about press behaviour, they monitor compliance with ethical rules for the daily work of journalists laid down in the German Press Code.
The Press Council is responsible for preserving the reputation of the German press, while protecting its freedom. Furthermore, the Press Council champions the unimpeded access by journalists to news sources and ensures self-regulation with regard to editorial data protection and financial market reporting.1
The German Press Council needs to check reports in the daily newspapers in Germany which interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to createa a break with the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church. This is unethical.
The German Catholic saints held the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and there were no known exceptions. But hypothetical cases mentioned in Vatican Council II ( LG 16, GS 22 etc ) were exceptions to EENS for Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict.
It is unethical for German newspapers to project Vatican Council II as a break with the past and not a continuation of the past ecclesiology, upon which was based the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics , with the non separation of Church and State.
Deutsche Presserat needs to inform newspapers and publishers that there is a rational and honest interpretation of Vatican Council II it is ethical.It does not create an artificial and calculated rupture with Catholic Tradition,pleasing to one lobby.-Lionel Andrades
1
https://www.presserat.de/en.html
JANUARY 26, 2020
News agency reports of the past on Vatican Council II need to be corrected officially by Cardinal Reinhardt Marx and German News Agencies and also the Federal Press Conference Association (BPK-Bundespressekonferenz) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/news-agency-reports-of-past-on-vatican.html
What is being taught by the Faculty of Religious Education and the Faculty of Theology at the Catholic University of Eichstatt-Ingolstadt in Bavaria, is really deception and politically Left subterfuge.This is not Catholic- teaching.
Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Bavaria under Cardinal Reinhardt Marx, interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a false rupture with EENS, an ecumenism of return and the past ecclesiology.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/catholic-university-of-eichstatt.html
JANUARY 22, 2020
Posts
