Monday, April 17, 2023
Sister Catherine Droste op, the American Dean of Theology at the Angelicum, Rome does not want to be Anti Semitic on Vatican Council II
Sister Catherine
Droste, the American Dean of Theology at the Angelicum, Rome does not want to
be Anti Semitic on Vatican Council II
She does not want to be Anti Semitic on Vatican Council II and break away from the Dominicans. If she interprets the Council ethically she could lose her post on the faculty of the University of St. Thomas Aquinas. Then she could be expelled by the Dominicans in the USA.She knows this.
So she will not allow Catholics to study theology at the Angelicum, who interpret Vatican Council II, with LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, being only hypothetical cases always. This would mean there are no practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) mentioned in Vatican Council II. She would be affirming Lumen Gentium 14 and Ad Gentes 7 according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) of Pope Honorius III at the time St. Dominic Guzman, the founder the Dominican Order of Preachers. Then LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2 GS 22 etc would not contradict the Fourth Lateran Council of Pope Honorius III.This would be a different Vatican Council II.
Neither would LG 8, 14, 16 etc, contradict Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentes 14. For there to be an exception for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church, visible and real people must exist. They are needed. Invisible people who are not there on earth cannot be objective examples of salvation.
If there is a box or apples and there is one orange in that box then that orange is an exception, not only because it is different but because it is there in that box. If it was not in that box it could not be considered an exception.An exception has to be there.
Possibilities of salvation outside the Church, speculative cases, exist only in our mind. They are not practical exceptions for the Fourth Lateran Council on EENS. This Council did not mention any exceptions.
So if Sister Catherine Droste reasoned rationally and honestly her ecclesiology would be the same at St.Dominic Guzman and the founders of her community. But then, the Dominicans in the USA would not want her. They would prefer that she return to the lay state.Then she could speak freely on Vatican Council II (rational). They would prefer she leave instead of the whole community being restricted financially or closed down. This would happen if they do not continue to be dishonest on Vatican Council II, EENS, the Creeds and Catechisms.Catherine Droste could then stay in Rome as a lay woman ut she would not be allowed to teach theology at the Angelicum. - Lionel Andrades
Sister Catherine Joseph Droste, O.P. is a Dominican Sister of the Congregation of St. Cecilia in Nashville, Tennessee. She is the Dean of Theology here at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum) where she also teaches theology. Sister’s theological degrees (STB, STL & STD in dogmatic theology) are from the Angelicum. Her other degrees include a Bachelor of Arts in history from Christendom College, a Masters in history from Middle Tennessee State University, and a Masters in Educational Administration from Marymount University in Washington, D.C..
https://angelicum.it/thomistic-institute/event/acquiring-the-true-virtue-of-temperance/?lang=en
JANUARY 30, 2023
La prova
JANUARY 23, 2023
The Proof
JANUARY 29, 2023
Modello A e Modello B - Concilio Vaticano II
JANUARY 30, 2023
Lettera del Sant'Uffizio 1949 di cardinale Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani con commenti (Repost)
JANUARY 30, 2023
Leggere la Letterra del Sant' Ufficio del 1949 con l'approccio Feeneyismo e Cushingismo o I passaggi rossi non sono eccezioni ai passaggi blu o I passaggi in rosso sono eccezioni ai passaggi in blu ( Repost)
JANUARY 30, 2023
E se non ci sono casi oggettivi come ci può essere un'eccezione?
JANUARY 30, 2023
It is important for the Italian Ministry of Interior and that of External Affairs to coordinate with the Vatican Secretary of State and confirm that Vatican Council II is only to be interpreted rationally and honestly
AUGUST 5, 2019
Then would you say that Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office 1949 was wrong in the Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO), since LOHO assumed BOD, BOB and I.I were exceptions to Feeneyite EENS and criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center in the text of the Letter?https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/then-would-you-say-that-fr-leonard.html
MARCH 24, 2018
Bishop Fellay no more has to reject Vatican Council II and the popes since John XXIII : the Council is traditional without the LOHO reasoning
DECEMBER 28, 2018
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which has an irrational premise and inference and contradicts the Principle of Non Contradiction is referenced in Vatican Council II, Lumen Gentium 16 : Warren Goddard observes
MARCH 21, 2018
Like Vatican Council II, the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 can be interpreted with the for and against EENS method or the for and neutral to EENS method , with or without the Ladaria Error, with or without the false premise and the conclusion will be different.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/03/like-vatican-council-ii-letter-of-holy.html
JANUARY 30, 2023
'Quindi, per ottenere la salvezza eterna, non è sempre necessario che egli sia incorporato alla Chiesa di fatto come un membro'.Questo e eresia! Contradice il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) dice opposto
NOVEMBER 15, 2016
Questa Lettera e molto importante. Perche la stessa errore che e qui e anche in Concilio Vaticano II.
JULY 18, 2014
Dobbiamo ricordare che noi esseri umani non possiamo vedere i morti che ora sono in paradiso o all'inferno
JANUARY 28, 2019
In Magisterial documents the red is not an exception to the blue, the red does not contradict the blue : with the blue there is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition (16th- century extra ecclesium nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, past exclusivist ecclesiology etc)
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/in-magisterial-documents-red-is-not.htmlJANUARY 29, 2023Canon Law does not permit the President and Secretary of the Italian bishops conference to deny the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX in the name of the Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/01/canon-law-does-not-permit-president-and.htmlJANUARY 29, 2023Before the next Conclave of Cardinals to elect a pope the Vatican Tribunal must clarify that only those cardinals will be allowed to vote, who interpret Vatican Council II rationally, in harmony with Tradition. This is ethical and Catholic https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/01/before-next-conclave-of-cardinals-to.htmlMAY 17, 2021 NOVEMBER 8, 2019
________________________
_______________________________
OCTOBER 22, 2017 Membership in the Catholic Church is the only way to go to Heaven. There is only one way to go to Heaven https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/10/membership-in-catholic-church-is-only.htmlA clarification needs to be issued by the Vatican https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/a-clarification-need-to-be-issued-by.htmlSEPTEMBER 22, 2019 Cardinals and bishops at the Synods, under the influence of Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. They assumed hypothetical and unknown cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc were objective examples of salvation outside the Church. So for them, like it was for Cardinal Ratzinger, the Syllabus of Errors had become obsolete. This is official modernism. The Oath Against Modernism is violated. Also the Oath of Office for religious and bishops, has become modernistic with the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/cardinals-and-bishops-and-cardinals-at.html
Posts
