Monday, November 7, 2022
Ross Douthat and Amy Welborn have interpreted Vatican Council with Cushingism. I choose Feeneyism.It is rational and traditional.
Ross Douthat and Amy Welborn in reports on Vatican Council II have interpreted the Council with Cushingism.I choose Feeneyism.It is rational and traditional.
THEY DID NOT TELL LEFEBVRE
No one told Archbishop Lefebvre about this.The CDF didn’t do it.If he interpreted Lumen Gentium (8,14 and 16) as being only hypothetical always, it would not be a practical exception for Feeneyite EENs.
RATZINGER AND RAHNER AVOIDED THE RATIONAL PREMISE
How could this be done by Cardinal Ratzinger? It would end his New Theology.It is based upon LG 8,14,16 etc being visible people. They are physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church.So not everyone needs to be a Catholic was the non traditional conclusion.
PIUS XII AND CARDINAL CUSHING CHOSE THE IRRATIONAL PREMISE
The Letter confused invisible cases of the BOD and I.I as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.The Archbishop of Boston Richard Cushing placed restrictions on the St. Benedict Center and Fr. Leonard Feeney. Cushing wrote praising Pope Pius XII. He was made a cardinal.He interpreted the Council irrationally. He chose the bad option.Now Pope Francis in Traditionis Custode wants the Church to interpret Vatican Council II with the wrong premise.
TRADITIONIS CUSTODE CHOSE THE IRRATIONAL PREMISE
How can Pope Francis and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria be inspired by the Holy Spirit when they interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church with a False and not Rational Premise?. 1
Pope Benedict was not Magisterial when he asked the Society of St.Pius X to accept Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise, for canonical recognition.
THOUSANDS OF BOOKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II ARE WRITTEN WITH THE ERROR
Rahner and Ratzinger were not Magisterial when they accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) that used the False Premise.The LOHO interpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance irrationally.LOHO confused what is invisible as being visible. Hundreds of thousands of books on Vatican Council II are now obsolete.
TWO ITC PAPERS HAVE THE SAME MISTAKE
It was the same with two theological papers of the International Theological Commission Christianity and the World Religions(1996) and The Hope of Salvation of Infants who die without baptism(2006).They were published with the False Premise and contradict the Athanasius Creed which does not mention any exceptions for exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
Governments and their Ministry of Education must interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. – Lionel Andrades
1
A recent stage of this dynamic was constituted by Vatican Council II where the Catholic episcopate came together to listen and to discern the path for the Church indicated by the Holy Spirit. To doubt the Council is to doubt the intentions of those very Fathers who exercised their collegial power in a solemn manner cum Petro et sub Petro in an ecumenical council, and, in the final analysis, to doubt the Holy Spirit himself who guides the Church.- Letter of Pope Francis which accompanies Traditionis Custode(Emphasis added) https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/letters/2021/documents/20210716-lettera-vescovi-liturgia.html
Posts
