There still is no Latin Mass in my parish and the seminary and old church of the Franciscans of the Immaculate of Fr. Stefano Manelli f.i remains closed and vacant at Boccea, Rome. Pope Francis has to permit academic activity as before.
Fr.Gianfranco Ghirlanda sj is the new Commissar for the F.F.I community.
Vatican Council II (Irrational) is made with the False Premise to produce Fake Exceptions (LG 16 etc interpreted irrationally) for the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed. This cannot be magisterial. There cannot be a new revelation in the Church based upon a Fake Premise.
The Franciscans of the Immaculate must not be forced to accept the
dishonest interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
They would then be supporting heresy and schism with the past Magisterium on de
fide teachings (Nicene Creed etc). This is a mortal sin of faith.
The present interpretation of Vatican Council II approved by Pope Francis
for the Ecclesia Dei communities is a mortal sin of faith.
The secular organizations, judiciary,
ecumenical and inter-faith religious dialogue groups, must also be informed
that the Catholic Church no more supports the interpretation of Vatican Council
II with a Fake Premise, False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion, which
was common since 1965.Pope Paul VI did not choose the Rational Premise.
FR.ALFONSO BRUNO F.I MUST INFORM SECULAR ORGANISATIONS
The Franciscans of the Immaculate group (
Fr. Alfonso Bruno f.i) which has split from the main community and offers Holy
Mass in Italian and the vernacular, must also inform secular organizations that
they interpret Vatican Council II only with the Rational Premise and that this
is the honest and ethical thing to do.
1.It means that they interpret LG 8, LG
14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as referring to
hypothetical cases only in 2022.
2. So LG 8 etc are not objective people
in 2022 known to be saved without faith and the baptism of water.
3. So it cannot be inferred that LG 8,
LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are physically visible examples of
salvation outside the Church. It cannot be inferred that they contradict the
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX (an ecumenism of return) and the Athanasius
Creed (all need to be members of the Catholic Church for everlasting life in
Heaven).
So Vatican Council II can no more be
projected as a rupture with Tradition, in particular, the past exclusivist
ecclesiology of the Church.
People now this. So he cannot continue to use the False Premise (LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 etc. refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2022) and False Inference (they are visible and known examples of salvation outside the Church and practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and Non Traditional Conclusion (Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition). People now know the truth about Vatican Council II (Rational).So whether he accepts or rejects Catholic Tradition, depends upon philosophy and theology and not rubrics of the Mass.
ONLY THE RATIONAL PREMISE IS HONEST AND ETHICAL
It would be ethical to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, only. With the rational interpretation, both groups of the FFI would be conservative and orthodox on the salvation issue in particular and ecclesiology in general. There would be unity in theology and doctrine, for both groups. Since there would no more be exceptions in the text of the Council for Tradition (Syllabus, EENS, Athanasius Creed, Catechism of Pope Pius X etc).
So whether they like it or not, with Vatican Council II (Rational) they are back to the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. This would be the teaching at their seminaries and the model for new vocations to the religious life. Their theology would be the same among the two groups, and there would be no break between faith and reason, like in the present times. There will no more be division in the Church, no ‘development of doctrine’ pegged upon a Fake Premise.
UNITY BETWEEN THE TWO GROUPS
Irrespective if the two communities
offer Holy Mass in Latin only or Latin and Italian, there will not be schism
with the 12th century Magisterium. This unity would be the
theological basis for proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King in all
politics, the necessity of the non separation of Church and State and the
return to Traditional Mission, based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic
Church- all, important for saving souls from the fires of Hell.
THE LAITY WOULD OBJECT IF THERE IS DISHONESTY
The laity would also object if the
Franciscans interpret Vatican Council II with a False Premise and pretend that
there is a New Theology, New Ecclesiology, New Ecumenism, New Evangelization
and New Canon Law etc. This would be dishonesty.
The baptism of desire, baptism of blood
and invincible ignorance can only be interpreted rationally. So they are not
practical exceptions for 16th century EENS.
The Catechism of Pope Pius X can only be interpreted rationally. So 29Q (invincible ignorance) is not a practical exception for 24Q and 27Q (outside the Church there is no salvation). We have unity with the Council of Trent.
POPE FRANCIS MUST BE ASKED TO INTERPRET MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS RATIONALLY.
Pope Francis must be asked to affirm
the Syllabus of Errors, Catechism of Pope Pius X, Vatican Council II and the
Catechism of the Catholic Church, all interpreted rationally only. He must then ask the
Catholic Bishops Conference and National Catechetical Center in Italy to do the
same.This is the honest thing to do. Then there will be consistency in what is taught at the Franciscans of
the Immaculate seminary in Rome and the pontifical universities and seminaries
in Italy.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
