Friday, October 4, 2019

John Henry Weston and Matthew Hoffman miss an important point on the Amazon Synod


Image

John Henry Weston and Matthew Hoffman miss an important point on the Amazon Synod.The Synod will interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so exclusive salvation and the old ecclesiology has to be rejected.

1. Amazonian diversity, which is above all religious diversity, evokes a new Pentecost (IL 30): respect for this diversity means to recognize that there are other paths to salvation, without reserving salvation exclusively to the Catholic faith. Non-Catholic Christian groups teach other modalities of being Church, without censures, without dogmatism, without ritual disciplines and ecclesial forms (IL 138); the Catholic Church ought to integrate these modalities. Reserving salvation exclusively to the Creed is destructive of the Creed (IL 39).
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bishops-priests-challenge-amazon-synod-working-doc-for-contradicting-catholic-faith


This is an indication that Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents were interpreted with irrational Cushingism, to create a rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).
I have mentioned many times that Lumen Gentium does not contradict the old ecclesiology of the Church, unless one uses Cushingism as a philosophy and theology.
No one acknowledges or disputes this point.
-Lionel Andrades

<iframe width="949" height="534" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/IZgLgyKIgvM" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) had to address the issue of Cushingism and Feeneyism in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and Dominus Iesus

Image
The Oct. 1 statement issued by an annonymous  group  the Coetus Internationalis Patrum(CIP) Working Group (International Group of Fathers) cited Dominus Iesus against the Working Paper of the Amazon Synod- but Dominus Iesus is Cushingite and not Feeneyite.Cardinal Ratzinger was a Cushingite who rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.The CIP has cited Dominus Iesus 14 and 16.
1. Amazonian diversity, which is above all religious diversity, evokes a new Pentecost (IL 30): respect for this diversity means to recognize that there are other paths to salvation, without reserving salvation exclusively to the Catholic faith. Non-Catholic Christian groups teach other modalities of being Church, without censures, without dogmatism, without ritual disciplines and ecclesial forms (IL 138); the Catholic Church ought to integrate these modalities. Reserving salvation exclusively to the Creed is destructive of the Creed (IL 39).
Against this, among other texts: Dominus Iesus 14 and 16.
This is meaningless for a Cushingite. Even Cardinal Ratzinger and the liberals would cite Dominus Iesus 14 and 16 to support the above point.
For him Dominus Iesus is Christological.Since with Cushingism he has rejected exclusive salvation in the Church.There is no ecclesiocentric ecclesiology for him. He admits it clearly in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission.
So Dominus Iesus 16 on the Church does not say that every one needs to enter the Church for salvation( to avoid Hell). Since there are exceptions to the past ecclesiology, he would say all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church. So non Catholics could be saved in their religions, the New Theology would suggest, without knowing and believing in Jesus.So Cardinal Ratzinger would support the point above of the Working Paper, while citing Dominus Iesus 14 and 16.
The Coetus Internationalis Patrum(CIP) needed to clarify that they interpret Dominus Iesus and Vatican Council II with Feeneyism and not Cushingism.The Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) was Cushingite.Even at the time of the Baltimore Catechism the Americanists were Cushingite.They wanted to do away with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The pope at that time had to correct them.
The CIP needed  to announce that Lumen Gentium, Nostra Aetate and Unitatitis Redintigratio etc no where in its entire text contradicts the past exclusivist ecclesiology, and an ecumenism of return of the Syllabus of Errors.
Without Cushingism, the present two popes and the cardinals and bishops, cannot cite Vatican Council II to contradict   exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
So in defending Tradition, the focus must be shifted to Cushingism and Feeneyism; the Council interpreted with the false premise or without the false invisible-people-are-visible premise.
Why must Catholics in general, the two popes must be asked, have to interpret Magisterial documents with hypothetical cases not being hypothetical?
Why should students at the pontifical universities have to study pastoral theology and ecclesiology with this irrationality? Should they not be free to interpret hypothetical and theoretical cases(LG 8 etc) as not being objective exceptions to the past exclusive ecclesiology in 2019?
Why must Catholics in general interpret Lumen Gentium, as an exception, to the old ecclesiology of the Church?
Why ?
There is no rational reason. This is really the irrational official position of Cardinal Luiz Ladaria and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF). For him  Lumen Gentium (LG 8, LG 14, LG 16) contradicts the past ecclesiology, even though they are only hypothetical cases.They are not real and known non Catholics, saved outside the Church. 
Whatever are the arguments on Fr. Leonard Feeney  or the Letter of the Holy Office 1949,Lumen Gentium  does not contradict the past ecclesiology and the Syllabus of Errors for me.
We are not obliged to interpret Vatican Council II  with Cushingism just because Popes Paul VI made a mistake.
This is the central pioint the CIP must address.The cardinals and bishops at the Amazon Synod, like Pope Francis, will interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism.-Lionel Andrades

OCTOBER 4, 2019

The Amazon Synod Working Paper contradicts Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/i-have-written-that-amazon-synod.html

 OCTOBER 4, 2019

The popes from Paul VI to Francis made an objective and factual mistake on Vatican Council II and so the Amazon Synod Working Paper rejects exclusive salvation.They have interpreted the Council with the false premise
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-popes-from-paul-vi-to-francis-made.html

 OCTOBER 3, 2019

There is nothing controversial to proclaim.This is the new concept of mission approved by Pope Francis and Pope Benedict. Similarly in Rome, itself, the priest at Mass has nothing controversial to say since he interprets Vatican Council II with an irrational reasoning.There is no more exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/there-is-nothing-controversial-to.html


OCTOBER 2, 2019



The ecclesiology of the Working Paper of the Amazon Synod is heretical.Liturgically it could create an opening for the abomination of desolation to be brought to the altar

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-ecclesiology-of-working-paper-of.html

 OCTOBER 1, 2019


Amazon Synod Instrumentum Laboris contradicts Vatican Council II and Creeds : it is first class heresy and a schism with the popes before Pius XII



Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Adorazione Eucaristica - Medjugorje 01 ottobre 2019

Posted by at No comments:

Il Rosario ha un Corpo e un' Anima

Posted by at No comments:

Brexit: EU ‘unconvinced’ at Boris Johnson’s proposals - BBC News

Posted by at No comments:

The Amazon Synod Working Paper contradicts Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church

 Image
I have written that the Amazon Synod Working Paper contradicts Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Vatican Council II says all need faith and baptism for salvation(Ad Gentes 7). Ad Gentes 7 is supported by the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors, the Catechism of Pope Pius X, the Catechism of the Catholic Church(845,846,1257) etc.
The Working Paper does not state that all need to members of the Catholic Church for salvation, with 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).
1. Amazonian diversity, which is above all religious diversity, evokes a new Pentecost (IL 30): respect for this diversity means to recognize that there are other paths to salvation, without reserving salvation exclusively to the Catholic faith. Non-Catholic Christian groups teach other modalities of being Church, without censures, without dogmatism, without ritual disciplines and ecclesial forms (IL 138); the Catholic Church ought to integrate these modalities. Reserving salvation exclusively to the Creed is destructive of the Creed (IL 39).
 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bishops-priests-challenge-amazon-synod-working-doc-for-contradicting-catholic-faith
So the Council in Ad Gentes 7, which is cited in the Catechism of the Catholic Church(846-Outside the Church No Salvastion) supports  traditional exclusive salvation and the Working Paper does not this.
So the Synod will be rejecting the Athanasius Creed ,changing the understanding of the Nicene and Apostles Creed and also the dogma EENS.This is heresy.
It will be rejecting a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Vatican Council II is interpreted as a rupture with Tradition( when it is not) and all this will be a schismatic rupture with the popes on EENS, the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, the Creeds and Catechisms.The interpretation will be made with a false premise and inference.
This is not the Catholc faith but general apostasy.
So I repeat, Vatican Council II contradicts the Working Paper of the Amazon Synod.-Lionel Andrades

UNE 20, 2018


When we delete the Cushingite passages in Ad Gentes 7 we are left with only the Feeneyite passages,the traditional motivation for Catholic Mission

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/when-we-delete-cushingite-passages-in.html



JUNE 18, 2018


There is a mistake in Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II : it comes from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/there-is-mistake-in-ad-gentes-7vatican.html


__________________________________________________

June 21, 2018

 

 


Here is Vatican Council II ( Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14 and Unitatis Reintigratio 3) interpreted with Feeneyism : the Cushingite passages are removed or highlighted

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/here-is-vatican-council-ii-ad-gentes-7.html

  

 AD GENTES 7 (UN-EDITED)

7. This missionary activity derives its reason from the will of God, "who wishes all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, Himself a man, Jesus Christ, who gave Himself as a ransom for all" (1 Tim. 2:45), "neither is there salvation in any other" (Acts 4:12). Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."(17) Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6), yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel. And hence missionary activity today as always retains its power and necessity.
By means of this activity, the Mystical Body of Christ unceasingly gathers and directs its forces toward its own growth (cf. Eph. 4:11-16). The members of the Church are impelled to carry on such missionary activity by reason of the love with which they love God and by which they desire to share with all men the spiritual goods of both its life and the life to come.
Finally, by means of this missionary activity, God is fully glorified, provided that men fully and consciously accept His work of salvation, which He has accomplished in Christ. In this way and by this means, the plan of God is fulfilled - that plan to which Christ conformed with loving obedience for the glory of the Father who sent Him,(18) that the whole human race might form one people of God and be built up into one temple of the Holy Spirit which, being the expression of brotherly harmony, corresponds with the inmost wishes of all men. And so at last, there will be realized the plan of our Creator who formed man to His own image and likeness, when all who share one human nature, regenerated in Christ through the Holy Spirit and beholding the glory of God, will be able to say with one accord: "Our Father."(19)


AD GENTES 7 (FEENEYITE)

 Therefore, all must be converted to Him... and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door....
-Ad Gentes 7
____________________________


LUMEN GENTIUM 14, VATICAN COUNCIL II (UN-EDITED)
14. This Sacred Council wishes to turn its attention firstly to the Catholic faithful. Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ, present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of faith and baptism(124) and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church, for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church. Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.
They are fully incorporated in the society of the Church who, possessing the Spirit of Christ accept her entire system and all the means of salvation given to her, and are united with her as part of her visible bodily structure and through her with Christ, who rules her through the Supreme Pontiff and the bishops. The bonds which bind men to the Church in a visible way are profession of faith, the sacraments, and ecclesiastical government and communion. He is not saved, however, who, though part of the body of the Church, does not persevere in charity. He remains indeed in the bosom of the Church, but, as it were, only in a "bodily" manner and not "in his heart."(12*) All the Church's children should remember that their exalted status is to be attributed not to their own merits but to the special grace of Christ. If they fail moreover to respond to that grace in thought, word and deed, not only shall they not be saved but they will be the more severely judged.(13*)
Catechumens who, moved by the Holy Spirit, seek with explicit intention to be incorporated into the Church are by that very intention joined with her. With love and solicitude Mother Church already embraces them as her own.-lLumen Gentium 14


LUMEN GENTIUM 14, VATICAN COUNCIL II (FEENEYITE)
14. This Sacred Council wishes to turn its attention firstly to the Catholic faithful. Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ, present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of faith and baptism and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church, for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church...
They are fully incorporated in the society of the Church who, possessing the Spirit of Christ accept her entire system and all the means of salvation given to her, and are united with her as part of her visible bodily structure and through her with Christ, who rules her through the Supreme Pontiff and the bishops. The bonds which bind men to the Church in a visible way are profession of faith, the sacraments, and ecclesiastical government and communion...Lumen Gentium 14
__________________________


April 11, 2015


Ad Gentes 7 can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism 

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/04/ad-gentes-7-can-be-interpreted-with.html 


December 2, 2014


Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body -Vatican Council II

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2014/12/therefore-all-must-be-converted-to-him.html

 

 

August 4, 2014





Papa Francesco ha approvato Concilio Vaticano II che dire in Ad Gentes 7 che tutti bisogna fede e battesimo per andare in cielo e evitare l’inferno

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2014/08/papa-francesco-ha-approvato-concilio.html

 

May 12, 2013





Richard Cushing Error in Ad Gentes 7 and Nostra Aetate 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2013/05/richard-cushing-error-in-ad-gentes-7.html

 

VATICAN COUNCIL II WITHOUT THE RICHARD CUSHING ERROR DOES NOT CONTRADICT THE SYLLABUS OR ERRORS OR PASCENDI
ROME HAS TO CONVERT WHEN THE SSPX ANNOUNCES RICHARD CUSHING WAS IN HERESY

NO MATTER HOW YOU INTERPRET DIGNITATIS HUMANAE IF VATICAN COUNCIL II AFFIRMS EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS RELIGIOUS LIBERTY IS TRADITIONAL
FR.NICHOLAS PFLUGER PLEASE ANNOUNCE THAT THE RICHARD CUSHING HERESY IS UNACCEPTABLE

SSPX - ARCHBISHOP RICHARD CUSHING WAS IN HERESY AND NOT FR.LEONARD FEENEY
THE BOSTON HERESY OF THE ARCHBISHOP INFLUENCED VATICAN COUNCIL II AND THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
DID CARDINAL RATZINGER ASSUME THAT THOSE SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE ARE KNOWN TO US SO THE CATECHISM SAYS GOD IS NOT LIMITED TO THE SACRAMENTS?
CHRISTOPHER FERRARA WITHOUT THE BOSTON HERESY OF THE ARCHBISHOP VATICAN COUNCIL II IS A TRADITONALIST COUNCIL
THE SSPX NEEDS TO ADDRESS THE AMBIGUITY IN THE LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE 1949
YOUTUBE BISHOP RICHARD WILLIAMSON MAKES A DOCTRINAL ERROR

BISHOP GERHARD MULLER MADE TWO FUNDAMENTAL MISTAKES ON VATICAN COUNCIL II: HE ASSUMED LG 16 CONTRADICTS EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS AND HE DID NOT KNOW AG 7 SUPPORTS THE DOGMA
BISHOP GERHARD MULLER NEEDS TO ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II WHICH INDICATES ALL LUTHERANS NEED TO CONVERT FOR SALVATION

 

 

 

October 31, 2012





Ralph Martin assumes that we can see the dead saved in invincible ignorance and a good conscience

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2012/10/ralph-martinn-assumes-that-we-can-see.html 

 

 


Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

The popes from Paul VI to Francis made an objective and factual mistake on Vatican Council II and so the Amazon Synod Working Paper rejects exclusive salvation.They have interpreted the Council with the false premise


 Image

The popes from Paul VI to Francis  made an objective and factual mistake on Vatican Council II and so the Amazon Synod  Working Paper rejects exclusive salvation.This mistake is also made by traditionalist and conservative Catholics, also the sedevacantists.The mistake can be corrected.
It is a fact of life that we cannot see or meet non Catholics saved outside the Church  and now in Heaven, as referenced in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc. So it was wrong for the popes and most Catholics to picture these unknown cases as personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church.Then it was wrong to  conclude that these are examples of salvation outside the Church.Unknown and invisible people were considered known examples of salvation outside the Church.So they were seen as practical exceptions  to all needing to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation; with faith and baptism(AG 7, LG 14).
So this was an objective mistake from Pope Paul VI to Pope Francis when they interpreted the Council with the false premise.The mistake is there in the Amazon Synod Working Paper.
 1. Amazonian diversity, which is above all religious diversity, evokes a new Pentecost (IL 30): respect for this diversity means to recognize that there are other paths to salvation, without reserving salvation exclusively to the Catholic faith. Non-Catholic Christian groups teach other modalities of being Church, without censures, without dogmatism, without ritual disciplines and ecclesial forms (IL 138); the Catholic Church ought to integrate these modalities. Reserving salvation exclusively to the Creed is destructive of the Creed (IL 39).
 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bishops-priests-challenge-amazon-synod-working-doc-for-contradicting-catholic-faith

Pope Francis can correct Pope Paul VI's mistake. He can announce that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc cannot be exceptions to the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.The Working Paper of the Amazon has a mistake.
-Lionel Andrades




October 1, 2019

Amazon Synod Instrumentum Laboris contradicts Vatican Council II and Creeds : it is first class heresy and a schism with the popes before Pius XII 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/amazon-synod-instrumentum-laboris.html

Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

See victim's brother hug convicted ex-cop Amber Guyger

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)