Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Ron Conte rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), for example as it was interpreted by the Magisterium in the 16th century, the Church Fathers and the Medieval Popes

Michael Voris’ Grave Errors on Salvation

Voris’ latest Vortex rant is called: “The Church Is Necessary for Heaven”, and it repeats the ancient formula, “Outside the Church there is no salvation”. Those two assertions (in quotes) are true, if properly understood. And to obtain the proper understanding, we simply need to answer certain questions, which define the limits of the formula, correctly.
Lionel: Ron Conte rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), for example as it was interpreted by the Magisterium in the 16th century,the Church Fathers and  the Medieval Popes.
________________________
What are the Dimensions of the Church? Which persons on earth are within the Church, and which are outside the Church? We know that a baptized Catholic Christian is within the Church; baptism makes him or her a formal member. But if he is also unrepentant from actual mortal sin, he will lose his salvation and end up in Hell. So a person can be formally a member, and yet be in a sense outside the Ark of Salvation by the loss of the state of grace.
Lionel: Yes.
______________________
Conversely, anyone who is in the state of grace, by a non-formal baptism of desire or of blood, is a non-formal member of the Church. And if that person dies in the state of grace, they will have eternal life, probably after a time in Purgatory, where they will be instructed on the truths of Christ.
Lionel: Hypothetically. Not as a known fact in a particular case.
_________________________
Can a Protestant Christian be saved if he knows about the Catholic Church, and does not join? If the refusal to join is not an actual mortal sin, but is done with invincible ignorance, then the Protestant can be saved. He must also avoid all actual mortal sin, or repent with perfect contrition, so that he dies in the state of grace. But Protestants certainly can be saved. It is neither impossible, nor unlikely.
Lionel: As a possibility for God yes. As someone known to us, no.So this example is not an exception to the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.
____________________
Can a devout Jew be saved, if he knows about Christianity, and does not convert and be baptized? If the refusal to convert is not an actual mortal sin, but is done with invincible ignorance, then he can be saved. He must enter the state of grace by a baptism of desire or blood (ordinarily, by desire). And if he commits an actual mortal sin, he must repent with perfect contrition.
Lionel: Again a hypothetical case. Also a person cannot choose to enter into the state of grace with the baptism of desire. We cannot choose to have a baptism of desire. It can only be given to God to whom he chooses.
Also one cannot choose to be saved assuming that one has perfect contrition.
__________________________
[James]
{2:17} Thus even faith, if it does not have works, is dead, in and of itself.
{2:18} Now someone may say: “You have faith, and I have works.” Show me your faith without works! But I will show you my faith by means of works.

Faith alone does not save. A person must have the state of grace, which includes love, faith, and hope, in order to be saved. A living faith is supernatural faith enlivened by supernatural love and hope. Works do not save, but they show that a person has love, faith, and hope.
Works do not save, but the moral law requires us to love our neighbor, which includes the spiritual and corporeal works of mercy. Failure do to these works might constitute an actual mortal sin of omission. So works are, in a sense, necessary to salvation, as they are part of the mora law.
Does a devote Jew have supernatural faith? Yes. Their love for God and neighbor proves that they have supernatural love, and supernatural love is never present in the soul without supernatural faith and supernatural hope. Just as works can prove faith, works can prove love, which proves faith.
Jews do not have a merely natural faith. They have a supernatural faith, which is why Abraham is praised by the Christian Church for his great faith.
Lionel : Jews do not have the supernatural faith needed for salvation. They do not accept Jesus as the Messiah.They are not members of the Catholic Church, which is Jesus' Mystical Body.So according to the past Magisterium of the Church and Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) they are outside the Church ( Catechism of Pope Pius X) and so are not on the path to salvation.
Even Abraham had to wait for the coming of the Jewish Messiah and his Resurrection,  before he could go to Heaven.
_____________________
Can a devout Muslim be saved without converting to Christianity? Yes, under the same types of considerations. Here I’m excluding the extremists Muslims, who murder innocents and abuse women and children. Their evil works show their lack of supernatural love and their lack of the state of grace. But moderate peaceful Muslims prove their supernatural faith by means of their supernatural love of God and neighbor.
Lionel: In general, Muslims like Jews, do not have supernatural faith which includes a belief in Jesus as the Messiah and Saviour and faith and baptism in the Catholic Church( AG 7) which is needed for salvation.
________________________
As for other religions, some are so far from true religion that they are not much different from atheism. The ancient pagan religions were essentially no different from atheism, as they lacked any substantial truths about God.
Can an atheist be saved? Yes. For the true selfless love of neighbor always includes the love of God, at least implicitly. By loving his neighbor, the atheist loves God without realizing it, for his neighbor is made in God’s image. The atheist can enter the state of grace by an implicit baptism of desire, by the selfless love of God, and he can return to the state of grace, after actual mortal sin, by sorrow for sin out of love for his neighbor, who is harmed by that sin.
Lionel: In general the atheist needs to have faith and the baptism of water in the Catholic Church for salvation (AG 7, LG 14). If there is an atheist who is saved with the grace of implicit desire it would be an exception known only to God. There are no known exceptions for us human beings.
_____________________
Can a gay married person be saved? Can someone who is living as a trans person be saved? What about a Catholic who is divorced and remarried? Can persons who are living in a state of objective mortal sin be saved without repentance and conversion? If their sins do not have the full culpability of actual mortal sin, they may be saved. They still must enter the state of grace, and return to it if they commit actual mortal sin. But many gay persons, who are sexually active, might be in a state of invincible ignorance, and so they could be saved.
Lionel: In general those who are in mortal sin at the time of death are on the way to Hell. There are no known exceptions known to us. If someone is saved in invincible ignorance and is an exception to the norm, it would be unknown to us here on earth.
_________________________
Finally, what is someone is unrepentant from actual mortal sin? Can they be saved without conversion and repentance? No, but repentance can be implicit. A person who is in a state of actual mortal sin can repent by implicit perfect contrition, that is, they can repent and be forgiven, by love of God or neighbor, without conscious repentant from that specific mortal sin.
Lionel: Yes, hypothetically.We can speculate. But we do not know of any one in particular in this category who would be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So outside the Church there is no salvation is still the teaching of Vatican Council II when it is interpreted rationally.
___________________________
Example: A soldier commits an actual mortal sin. For a long time, he does not repent of that sin; he is in a state of unrepentant actual mortal sin. One day, he is with his comrades in arms, for whom he has some filial affection. An enemy throws a grenade in their midst. If the soldier decides, in full cooperation with grace, to give up his life to save the life of his fellow soldiers, by throwing himself on the grenade, his act of love of neighbor implicitly includes perfect contrition for all his sins — even though he does not call each sin to mind and does not explicitly repent from each one. He therefore dies in the state of grace and is saved.
Lionel: In a hypothetical case for us and a possibility for God.
___________________________
However, in all of the above examples of persons who are saved, they are saved by means of Christ and His Church, even though they do not realize it. They are saved by the Church, though they are not formally baptized into the Church and sometimes even outwardly reject Her.
Lionel: Hypothetically. But in reality all need faith and baptism for salvation, this is the norm.(Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II).
So even though all who are saved are saved by means of Christ and His Church, all still need to be members of the Catholic Church with faith and baptism for salvation.(AG 7).
_____________________
Why be Catholic then, if one can be saved without Catholicism? 
Lionel : We do not know of any one in particular this year who has been saved without faith and baptism in the Catholic Church. There are no practical exceptions to EENS this year. There were non known over the last 50 years. There are none mentioned in Vatican Council II or the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
_______________________
The surest path to Heaven is to be a believing and practicing Catholic. That path is level, well-lit, paved, straight, and easy to walk. The further way from Catholicism you go, the more difficult is the path to Heaven. An atheist can possibly be saved, but it is probable that the percentage of atheists who are saved is low, as they have little guidance as to how to walk the path of salvation. They are wandering alone through the woods at night, and we are following a well-lit paved road with a sure guide directing us.
Are few saved? See my post opposing the errors of Michael Voris on this point:

Lionel: According to Vatican Council II(AG 7) all need faith and the baptism of water for salvation. All. We know that most people die outside the Church and so are oriented to Hell.
Then there are also Catholics who die in mortal sin. They do not choose to go for Confession and have their sins absolved.They are lost too.
____________________________

I believe that most persons are saved by way of Purgatory. Relatively few persons, as a percentage, go directly to Heaven. Most need purification first in Purgatory. At Medjugorje, Mary said that most human persons go to Heaven by way of Purgatory, relatively few go directly to Heaven. That is what I believe. However, I still think that the number of human souls in Hell is large as a number, though it is a minority as a percentage.
Our Lord’s expression that few are saved is figurative, meaning that the path directly to Heaven is difficult; it is narrow in the sense of which behaviors please God. Few go directly to Heaven. And all who eventually arrive in Heaven are few in the sense of special; they are the elect. Jesus did not mean that God has failed to save most persons, despite His universal salvific will. If it were true that literally few are saved, it would seem as if God was unable or unwilling to save; it would seem as if the plan of salvation were broken. Instead, God succeeds in saving most human persons, despite the many failings of us poor fallen sinners.
Voris’ Errors
Michael Voris errs by refusing to admit that non-Christians are saved by implicit membership in the Church, through an implicit baptism of desire, refusing to admit that devout Jews and Muslims have supernatural faith, and refusing to admit that the number who are saved (even within Christianity) is large.
Lionel: We do not know of any one this year saved with implicit desire. We do not know of any such case over the last 100 years. So you can speculate, if you want to. However the Magisterium over the centuries accepted the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
So Michael Voris is not saying any thing new. He is traditional on EENS. However he could clarify that there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I in the present times.
______________________________
I should also point out that Mr. Voris realizes that his views on salvation are reprehensible, and so he mostly keeps them hidden. He uses vague expressions, which might be interpreted in different ways. He says that once you get to Heaven, everyone is Catholic. Okay, fine.
Lionel: So he is affirming the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) here.He does not know of any one saved with implicit desire this year. Possibilities of salvation are not actual people saved outside the Church, for us humans.
_____________________
 But do you think that Jews and Muslims, other believers and unbelievers can be saved without converting to Christianity — if they have sufficient accurate knowledge of Christianity and yet do not convert? Or might they still have invincible ignorance and an implicit baptism of desire?
Lionel: We can hope they are. We can speculate. We can pray. But there are no practical exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS. So Michael Voris has not erred.
_____________________
Love not Hate
The path of salvation is like the destination. Heaven is a place of love, so the way to get to Heaven is to love others. If you hate the Pope, the Bishops, liberals, gay and trans persons, Jews, Muslims, and so many other persons and groups, then you are not on the path of salvation.
Lionel: He does not hate them. He wants them to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and they do not do so.
I too do not condemn the popes and bishops but I would want them to correct their irrational reasoning which produces a non traditional conclusion and this could not be the Deposit of the Faith.It is innovation.
_____________________
If you believe that the Catholic Church is the sole Ark of Salvation, which it is, but you have nothing but contempt for the Pope and the Bishops, then how will you be saved by that Church, which you hate? Jesus taught us to love our enemies, and some Catholics cannot bring themselves to love even the Vicar of Christ and his fellow Shepherds.
Lionel: Michael Voris does not have contempt for the pope and the bishops. They are not his enemies.Please do not judge and condemn him.
______________________
And don’t tell me that you love the Church, while hating Her leaders. That’s like loving God and hating your neighbor.
Lionel: He does not hate them.
_______________________
[1 John]
{4:20} If anyone says that he loves God, but hates his brother, then he is a liar. For he who does not love his brother, whom he does see, in what way can he love God, whom he does not see?
{4:21} And this is the commandment that we have from God, that he who loves God must also love his brother.

The Church is founded on the Pope as the successor to Peter and the other Bishops as the successors to the Apostles. 
Lionel: The Apostles and the past popes and saints affirmed the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS. They did not assume that implicit cases of the baptism of desire were explicit exceptions to all needing to be formal members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.
___________________________
If you hate them, you hate the Church. There is no Church without the successors to Peter and the Apostles. If you call yourself Catholic and hate the Church leaders, you are not really Catholic. The Church is the Ship of Salvation, and those who hate the Pope and the Bishops are guilty of mutiny.
Lionel: It is also mutiny for example, to reject EENS as it was interpreted by the Magisterium, for example in the 16th century.-Lionel Andrades
by
Ronald L. Conte Jr.
Roman Catholic theologian

_______________________________

MAY 28, 2019



Theologian Ron Conte misinterprets the St.Benedict Center and Church Militant TV : there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire to create a new theology


Theologian Ron Conte misinterprets the St.Benedict Center and Church Militant TV : there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire to create a new theology

Heresies on Salvation at the Saint Benedict Center (Richmond NH)

...In defending the SBC, Michael Voris has deceitfully limited his explanations of their position to “Outside the Church, No Salvation”. He fails to indicate to his readers that they utterly reject the implicit baptism of desire.
Lionel: They do not reject implicit baptism of desire(BOD).They reject implicit baptism of desire being an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Fr. Leonard Feeney acknowledged the case of the catechumen, in his book, The Bread of Life.
_________________________
 And there seem to be two views at Catholicism.org, with some writers permitting very narrow forms of baptism of blood and explicit desire, and others excluding all but water baptism. Both positions are heretical. The former may be termed mitigated Feeneyism and the latter is historical Feeneyism.
Lionel: There is no mitigated or historical Feeneyism since there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire for us human beings. I mean this literally. I am not talking theology here.
Upon there being no literal cases of the BOD, is based my traditional theology on the BOD.
So as a Feeneyite I do not have to reject the baptism of desire, implicit or explicit.Since either way it is not visible or known to us in personal cases.
_______________________
By supporting the SBC and specifically defending their interpretation of EENS, Michael Voris and his staff at Church Militant have sided with schismatics and have taught heresy,
Lionel: They have affirmed traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). This would be EENS according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century, for example. So they are not saying any thing new on EENS.Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is a rational interpretation of the Council. The conclusion of this rational interpretation is in harmony with EENS ( 16th century).So they do not have to reject EENS or Vatican Council II.They do not have to be heretics or sedevacantists.
_____________________________
 in contradiction to the decision of the CDF on a grave matter of faith. They therefore incur the penalty of automatic excommunication along with the members of the SBC.
Lionel: The CDF interprets the baptism of desire and being invincible ignorance as referring to visible and personally known people in 2019. So the BOD and I.I are exceptions to EENS as it was known to the Magisterium of the 16th century.
But BOD and I.I are not personally known in particular cases. So they cannot be exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.The Holy Office 1949 made this same mistake.
So the CDF is interpreting LG 16( invincible ignorance) with an irrationality.The CDF is interpreting CCC 847-848( invincible ignorance) with the same irrationality.They then assume that  Vatican Council II (LG 16 etc) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(847-848) are exceptions to the centuries-old interpretation of EENS.
This is irrational. It is a rupture with the past popes and Church Councils and it is schismatic. It is also first class heresy since the Creeds are changed. The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is completely rejected with the CDF's interpretation of LG 16 and CCC 847-848.This is manifest and public heresy.
___________________
Canon 751: “Heresy is the obstinate denial or obstinate doubt after the reception of baptism of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith;
Lionel: The CDF persists in assuming invincible ignorance for example, refers to personally known people saved outside the Church.So they re-interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.This is heresy. They persist in it even after being informed.
The CDF assumes that unknown cases of being saved in invincible ignorance( LG 16, CCC-847-848) are known exceptions to the dogma EENS. So they reject the Athanasius Creed. This is first class heresy.
_________________________
 apostasy is the total repudiation of the Christian faith; schism is the refusal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him.”
Lionel: The present two popes also interpret magisterial documents like the CDF.
__________________________
Canon 1364, n. 1: “an apostate from the faith, a heretic, or a schismatic incurs a latae sententiae excommunication”
Lionel: This means the present two popes and the ecclesiastics at the CDF are automatically excommunicated.
They do not recant.
They do not state that there are no personally known cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance. 
They do not recant and say that there are no personally known cases of being saved, as referenced in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc.
________________________
Can. 915 “Those who have been excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion.”
Canon Law 1373: “A person who publicly incites among subjects animosities or hatred against the Apostolic See or an ordinary because of some act of power or ecclesiastical ministry or provokes subjects to disobey them is to be punished by an interdict or other just penalties.”
In addition, Church Militant and Michael Voris have many times spoken as if they were above the Popes and the Cardinals and Bishops, as if they had the role to judge and condemn their teachings, decisions on discipline, and even their very souls.
Lionel: In this case they are specific.They affirm EENS according to the Magisterium of the Church over the centuries.They do not reject BOD, BOB and I.I  nor Vatican Council II.They accept all the magisterial documents of the Catholic Church.
Meanwhile Ron Conte and the CDF reject traditional EENS and interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise and inference, to justify their rejection of traditional EENS. This is irrational, non traditional and heretical.
__________________________
 This behavior is schismatic as it is entirely incompatible with the submission that all Catholics owe to the Pope, to the Magisterium, and to the Bishops individually and especially as a body.
Lionel: When a pope says unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are known exceptions to EENS this is irrational and a rejection of the past Magisterium of the Chruch. This is schismatic and heretical and so Catholics are not obliged to follow.
When a pope says invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are visible exceptions to EENS ( 16th century) then they imply that LG 8 etc refer to visible people saved outside the Church.They would have to be visible to be exceptions.
 This is irrational. It is non traditional and heretical. Catholics are not obliged to accept this heresy.
The reasoning is also fundamentally false. For example if there is an orange in a box of apples then the orange is an exception there in that box. Since it is different. But the orange is also an exception since it exists there.So for there to be an exception the person or thing must exist in our reality.
If there are four tall boys standing at a street corner and a boy who is their friend and is short joins them there. He is an exception since he is physically different. But he is also an exception since he exists there at the corner at that time. If he was not there he would not be an exception.
___________________________
 Church Militant is a schismatic website that pretends to have the authority to decide all questions of doctrine and discipline definitively.
Lionel: Church Militant claims that they are faithful to the Magisterium of the Church.So they are not publically denying any teaching of the Church supported by the past Magisterium. 
If the present ecclesiastics at the Vatican teach heresy and error then this could not be the teaching of the Holy Spirit and so it is not Magisterial.
_____________________________
Note that Michael Voris complains that the diocese of NH will not respond to his inquiries and questions, while he himself does not respond to inquiries and questions from his critics.
Lionel: The theologian Ron Conte has not responded to my reports and comments over the last few years. He could begin by commenting on this blog post.
____________________

 He also refuses to clarify his own position on salvation for atheists, non-Christian believers, non-Catholic Christians, and unbaptized infants.


Lionel: Please see the response below.

by

Ronald L. Conte Jr.

Roman Catholic theologian








1

Questions for Michael Voris on EENS:

Questions for Michael Voris on EENS (Outside the Church, No Salvation)
1. Can atheists who have sufficient accurate knowledge about Christianity, are able to be baptized with water, but who decline baptism and belief in God, enter the state of grace by an implicit baptism of desire?
Lionel: If they could or could not 'enter the state of grace by an implicit baptism of desire?' this is speculation. What has this to do with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) ? Either way, they are not literal cases in our reality.They could only be known to God.
So why is this question asked with reference to EENS ? Does Conte assume that these are personally known people ?
______________________
2. Can atheists be saved without converting to belief in God?
Lionel : This would only be known to God in particular cases. How could Michael Voris know ?
_____________________
3. Can Jews or Muslims who have sufficient accurate knowledge about Christianity, are able to be baptized with water, but who decline baptism, enter the state of grace by an implicit baptism of desire?
 Lionel : This would only be known to God in particular cases. How could Michael Voris know, I repeat ?
______________________
4. Can Jews or Muslims, who have sufficient accurate knowledge about Christianity, be saved without converting to Christianity?
 Lionel : This would only be known to God in particular cases. How would Michael Voris know ? There can be no known exception to the dogma EENS for us human beings.
______________________
5. Can non-Catholic Christians, who have sufficient accurate knowledge about Catholicism, but decline to convert, die in the state of grace and be saved?
Lionel: Hypothetically we can only speculate. Finally only God can know. So this question is not relevant to the dogma EENS. Since for there to be an exception to EENS ( 16th century) there would have to be a concrete case, a real person saved outside the Church. There is no such person this year or since the time of Vatican Council II (1965).
_______________
6. Is an act of love sufficient for an adult to obtain sanctifying grace and to supply the lack of formal baptism with water?
Lionel : Please name the particular person you are referring to. Then ask Michael Voris his opinion.
 Obviously, there is not such person.
__________________
7. Is the implicit baptism of desire only available to persons who are unable to be baptized with water because of circumstances that make baptism by water impossible? [As Christine Niles asserts in “The Download – What the Hell?”
Lionel : How could Christine Niles know in a particular case?How can she speculate when this can only be known to God.
She can accept the baptism of desire hypothetically, knowing that hypothetical cases cannot be exceptions to EENS. 
Even Fr.Leonard Feeney knew that there were no literal cases of the baptism of desire.
Cushingites like Conte assume that the baptism of desire refer to concrete and personally known people saved outside the Church, even though no such people exists in our reality.They then create a heretical theology and expect all of us Catholics, to follow like sheep.
_____________________

8. Can persons who do not know the Church or who even outwardly reject Her, obtain salvation through divine grace, by virtue of Christ’s redeeming sacrifice, without external or formal membership in the Church?
Lionel: This is a reference to a hypothetical case. So one can speculate knowing that it is not a practical exception to Feeneyite EENS. 
_________________
9. What happens to the children of non-Christians who die without formal baptism with water?
Lionel: Those who die without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church go to Limbo, a place which is not Heaven and neither Hell.
_________________
10. What happens to children who die in the womb without formal baptism with water?
Lionel: They go to Limbo.
_______________________
11. Does God will that all human persons be saved, even though many are not saved?
Lionel: Yes God wills that all human people be saved.Jesus died for all. Salvation in potential is open to all. There is universal salvation in this sense. Salvation is open to all and to receive this salvation all need to enter the Catholic Church as members with faith and baptism(AG 7).There is no contradiction between universal salvation and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church(Dominus Iesus 20).
_________________
12. Since the time of Christ, is salvation granted only to those who explicitly believe in Christ?
Lionel : Yes according to the dogma EENS supported by Scripture (John 3:5, Mark 16:16). If there are exceptions it would only be known to God.-Lionel Andrades

________________________



The St.Benedict Center Fund can help the Church interpret the baptism of desire as not referring to literal cases, personally known people in 2019

The St.Benedict Center Fund can help the Church interpret the baptism of desire as not referring to literal cases, personally known people in 2019.

Catholic Missionary

MAY 22, 2019

St.Benedict Fund to defend the Feeneyite and not Cushingite interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS is $41,229.64 

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/stbenedict-fund-to-defend-feeneyite-and.html

MAY 24, 2019

The St.Benedict Center Fund can help make the Athanasius Creed accepted once again in the Catholic Church



 MAY 25, 2019

The St.Benedict Center Fund can help the Church interpret Vatican Council II rationally and non-heretically  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-stbenedict-center-fund-can-help_25.html

Francsicans at the Gregorian Pontifical University, Rome have to support mortal sins of faith, through theology, in order to become Catholic priests.

 Image result for Photo Franciscans studying at the Gregorian Pontifical Rome

Francsicans at the Gregorian Pontifical University, Rome have to support mortal sins of faith, through theology, in order to become Catholic priests.

Image result for Photo Franciscans studying at the Gregorian Pontifical Rome
Yesterday I met a few Franciscans who are studying theology at the Jesuit-Jewish Left Gregorian Pontifical University here.They are forced to study there if they want to become priests.There is no other choice. The other pontifical universities are also Cushingite and just as bad.
They will really have to follow Satan and proclaim these mortal sins of faith, using convoluted theology and bad reasoning, of which they are aware.

Image result for Photo Franciscans studying at the Gregorian Pontifical Rome
MORTAL SINS OF FAITH
1.Have you denied the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) ?
2.Have you changed the meaning of the Nicene Creed with allegedly known cases of the baptism of desire (BOD), baptism of blood (BOB), and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) ?
3.Have you rejected the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation?
4.Have you rejected the Catechism of Pope Pius X which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation and non Catholics are outside the Church?
5.Have you rejected the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX which says Protestants have to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation, there can only be an ecumenism of return ?
6.Have you rejected the Apostles Creed which says 'I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church ', which means the Church still teaches outside the Church there is no salvation ?
7.Have you rejected Vatican Council II which is in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),the past exclusive ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
8.Have you rejected the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994)which is in harmony with the past catechisms  and the strict interpretation of EENS according to the Magisterium of the 16th century ?
9.Have you rejected the interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 when it assumes unknown cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I are known exceptions to the dogma EENS ?
10.Have you rejected the common, wrong interpretation of Vatican Council II which assumes  invisible people mentioned in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are visible exceptions to EENS in 2019 ?
11.Have you proclaimed the necessity of believing in Jesus without the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church ?
12.Have you interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise ( invisible people are visible) and inference ( these visible people are examples of salvation outside the Church and exceptions to EENS) and then projected Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition( EENS, past ecclesiology, ecumenism of return etc) ?
-Lionel Andrades