Friday, July 29, 2022

We have two interpretations of Vatican Council II : Bishop Louis Tylka in the diocese of Peoria , Illinois chooses the irrational premise to create a false break with Catholic Tradition.This is not Catholic

Bishop Louis Tylka of the diocese of Peoria, Illinois chooses not a rational premise but an irrational premise, to interpret Vatican Council II, and create a false break with Catholic Tradition. This is unethical.This is heresy. It is also not Catholic.

Yet it is the bishop who is telling the organisers of the March for Catholics that they are not Catholic.

Attorney Patricia M. Gibbon informed Joe Rigi, President Our Warpath and the organisers of the March for Catholics Sept 29-30 that they will not be allowed to enter the cathedral. The diocese does not consider them Catholics.

THE CURIA IN PEORIA MUST BE SHOWN THAT THEY ARE NOT CATHOLIC WHEN THEY CHOOSE THE FALSE PREMISE TO INTERPRET THE CREEDS, CATECHISM, EENS AND VATICAN COUNCIL II.

Step 1: The bishop, this attorney and the people must know what is the False Premise. those who participate in the March must also know this . This is the First Step.

Step 2: The bishop and his attorney must be informed that they should interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise only.This is irrespective of what they think about this or that.The Irrational Premise is unethical for a bishop and an attorney.

Step 3: Ask the non Catholic media to also interpret Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise. This is irrespective if they are Catholic or non Catholic.

Step 4 : Tell the attorney, that it is unethical to be a certified attorney and use a False Premise, to interpret the Council.Also get this message across to other professionals,school teachers etc.

Step 5: Form a Vatican Councl II ( Rational) group which will check the use of Vatican Council ( Irrational) in the diocese at talks, books and articles authored, Confirmation and First Communion classes etc.

The bishop must be shown that according to secular law he is not allowed to choose the False Premise. -Lionel Andrades

Diocese Bans March For Catholics From Praying The Rosary

https://www.ourwarpath.com/single-post/diocese-bans-march-for-catholics-from-praying-the-rosary

__________________

JULY 19, 2022

What is the False Premise ? Could you spell it out.

The False Premise is the action and result of confusing what is invisible as being visible, unknown as being known. So with reference to Vatican Council II, if LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc refer to visible non Catholics saved outside the Church in 2022 then this is the False Premise. With the False Premise comes the False Inference.

So the False Premise is confusing hypothetical and invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being objective and personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church in 1965-2022, without faith and baptism . They are saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16) etc.

FALSE INFERENCE

So the premise decides the inference. If LG 16 etc refer to visible and known people saved outside the Catholic Church without faith and the baptism of water then Cardinal Ratzinger could infer that there are practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nullas salus.It is obsolete

FALSE CONCLUSION

So with the False Inference comes the False Conclusion. When LG 16 etc are practical exceptions for EENS etc then it could be concluded that Vatican Council II is a break with the past ecclesiology and the rest of Tradition.There is a break with the past Magisterium.

So the Conclusion is False since invisible people cannot be visible exceptions for EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed. This Creed says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.We cannot see people in Heaven and on earth at the same time.

So with the False Premise we have the False Conclusion which says Vatican Council II is a break with the Syllabus of Errors etc. It is False since LG 16 etc can only be invisible and theoretical for us human beings. If someone was saved as such it would be known only to God.