Chief Justices in Boston are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise. -Lionel Andrades
Wednesday, October 14, 2020
The Archdiocese of Boston needs to apologize for the excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney and the persecution of the St. Benedict Center. Invisible cases of the baptism of desire never ever were objective and practical exceptions to EENS
The Archdiocese of Boston needs to apologize for the excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney and the persecution of the St. Benedict Center. Invisible cases of the baptism of desire never ever were objective and practical exceptions to EENS. -Lionel Andrades
The whole Archdiocese of Boston today is interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise. This includes the faculty at Boston College. Boston College once expelled Fr. Leonard Feeney and Catholic professors for not using the false premise in the intepretation of EENS. They were supposed to say : unknown cases of the baptism of desire were known and practical exceptions to EENS
The whole Archdiocese of Boston today is interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise. This includes the faculty at Boston College.
Boston College once expelled Fr. Leonard Feeney and Catholic professors for not using the false premise in the intepretation of EENS. They were supposed to say : unknown cases of the baptism of desire were known and practical exceptions to EENS.-Lionel Andrades
Cardinal Sean O' Malley, Archbishop of Boston interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise to create an artifical rupture with Feeneyite EENS.This is unethical and dishonest.The Catholic judges in the secular courts in Boston do the same. The FSSP priests in Boston offer the Latin Mass with the same error.One of the American FSSP priests was in Rome and would not affirm Feeneyite EENS.He received a Cushingite, degree in Doctoral Theology from the Angelicum University, Rome. He was fascinated with the vestments of the Latin Mass over the centuries -but not the theology
Cardinal Sean O' Malley, Archbishop of Boston interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise to create an artifical rupture with Feeneyite EENS.This is unethical and dishonest.The Catholic judges in the secular courts in Boston do the same.
The FSSP priests in Boston offer the Latin Mass with the same error.One of the American FSSP priests was in Rome and would not affirm Feeneyite EENS.He received a Cushingite, degree in Doctoral Theology from the Angelicum University, Rome.
He was fascinated with the vestments of the Latin Mass over the centuries -but not the theology. -Lionel Andrades
Amy Barrett is a Cushingite progressivist Catholic. So she is approved by the USCCB bishops. If she did not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise they would not approve her. If she interpreted Vatican Council II rationally she could not be a professor of law at the Catholic, University of Notre Dame, USA.
Fr.Anthony Pillari may say that the baptism of desire(BOD) is a part of the baptism of water.However BOD is still an exception to Feeneyite EENS for him. So it excludes the baptism of water. If it did not exclude the baptism of water it would not be an exception. He would then be a Feeneyite.But he is not a Feeneyite. If it is a part of the baptism of water it still is hypothetical.It is theoretial.It exists only in the mind. It is not a practical exception to EENS
Fr.Anthony Pillari may say that the baptism of desire(BOD) is a part of the baptism of water.However BOD is still an exception to Feeneyite EENS for him. So it excludes the baptism of water. If it did not exclude the baptism of water it would not be an exception. He would then be a Feeneyite.But he is not a Feeneyite.
If it is a part of the baptism of water it still is hypothetical.It is theoretial.It exists only in the mind. It is not a practical exception to EENS.. -Lionel Andrades
Cushingite traditionalists interpret the Baltimore Catechism with a false premise
Cushingite traditionalists interpret the Baltimore Catechism with a false premise.- Lionel Andrades
Voice of the Family is Cushingite. They are handicapped at the onset.Their leaders cannot say that when they meet a non Catholic that they know that he or she is oriented to Hell. Instead, like the liberals , they will say, 'We do not know', 'We cannot judge'. For Feeneyites the norm for salvation is faith and baptism (AG 7) and there are no objective exceptions.This is the teaching of the Holy Spirit over the centuries. So when we meet a non Catholic we know what the Church teaches.This is what the Church teaches also today when Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents are interpreted rationally
Voice of the Family is Cushingite. They are handicapped at the onset.Their leaders cannot say that when they meet a non Catholic that they know that he or she is oriented to Hell. Instead, like the liberals , they will say, 'We do not know', 'We cannot judge'.
For Feeneyites the norm for salvation is faith and baptism (AG 7) and there are no objective exceptions.This is the teaching of the Holy Spirit over the centuries. So when we meet a non Catholic we know what the Church teaches.This is what the Church teaches also today when Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents are interpreted rationally. -Lionel Andrades
Bishop Athanasius Schneider, has recommended the Voice of the Family Catholic catechism course, without explaining that all the Catechisms, like Vatican Council II, can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism, without the false premise or with it, and the conclusion would be traditional or non traditional, orthodox or heterodox
Bishop Athanasius Schneider, has recommended the Voice of the Family Catholic catechism course, without explaining that all the Catechisms, like Vatican Council II, can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism, without the false premise or with it, and the conclusion would be traditional or non traditional, orthodox or heterodox.
Bishop Schneider and Fr. Anthony Pillari interpret the Catechisms and Vatican Council II with the false premise so their conclusion is non traditional. They place the blame on Vatican Council II and not their confusion between speculative and practical theology. -Lionel Andrades
.
Fr.Anthony Pillari interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errrors of Pope Pius IX etc) and so he has to go back to the Baltimore Catechism and avoid the Catechism of the Catholic Church.If he did not use the false premise to interpert Vatican Council II , the Council would not be a break with Tradition.He could also interpret the Baltimore Catechsm, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Catechism of Pope Pius X, as being in harmony with Vatican Council II
Fr.Anthony Pillari interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errrors of Pope Pius IX etc) and so he has to go back to the Baltimore Catechism and avoid the Catechism of the Catholic Church.If he did not use the false premise to interpert Vatican Council II , the Council would not be a break with Tradition.He could also interpret the Baltimore Catechsm,the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Catechism of Pope Pius X, as being in harmony with Vatican Council II. -Lionel Andrades
Fr.Anthony Pillari interprets the baptism of desire (BOD) as referring to a visible non Catholic saved outside the Catholic Church, so BOD in the Baltimore Catechism, the Catechism of the Council of Trent and the Catechisms which pre-date Baltimore are interpreted as a rupture with Feeneyite EENS. This is irrational and an error. He would confuse speculative BOD as being a practical exception to EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc. This is the error of the Cushingites.The Lefebvrist Cushingite John Henry Weston also makes this mistake
Fr.Anthony Pillari interprets the baptism of desire (BOD) as referring to a visible non Catholic saved outside the Catholic Church, so BOD in the Baltimore Catechism, the Catechism of the Council of Trent and the Catechisms which pre-date Baltimore are interpreted as a rupture with Feeneyite EENS.
This is irrational and an error. He would confuse speculative BOD as being a practical exception to EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc. This is the error of the Cushingites.The Lefebvrist Cushingite John Henry Weston also makes this mistake. .-Lionel Andrades
OCTOBER 13, 2020
Fr.Anthony Pillari 's course does not say that when I meet a non Catholic I know that he or she is oriented to Hell. Since the person does not have faith and baptism( non Christian) or Catholic faith( non Catholic Christians) or the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. There are exceptions of the baptism of desire(BOD) for Fr. Pillari. So when he meets a non Catholic, the person can be an exception to exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. This is the liberal approach of Cardinal Richard Cushing, Pope Paul VI and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. They would read the Baltimore Catechism with Cushingism and not Feeneyism
Fr.Anthony Pillari 's course does not say that when I meet a non Catholic I know that he or she is oriented to Hell. Since the person does not have faith and baptism( non Christian) or Catholic faith( non Catholic Christians) or the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. There are exceptions of the baptism of desire(BOD) for Fr. Pillari.
So when he meets a non Catholic, the person can be an exception to exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
This is the liberal approach of Cardinal Richard Cushing, Pope Paul VI and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. They would read the Baltimore Catechism with Cushingism and not Feeneyism. -Lionel Andrades
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/voice-of-the-family-launch-new-free-online-catholic-catechism-course
OCTOBER 13, 2020
All the speakers in the video below interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with a false premise rejecting exclusive salvation and so creating heresy.Here they are accusing Pope Francis of heresy. Since he rejected exclusive salvation at the Amazon Synod by interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise, like they do.
The Lefebvrist Cushingites ( see below ) interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise, like the liberals, so big funds come their way.If they interpreted Vatican Council II without the false premise, they would be affirming Feeneyite EENS. There would be opposition and obstacles , for their conferences like this one.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
