How can they be popes or Catholic ?

 

Louis Verrecchio, Ann Barnhardt  and Alex Bugnolo  interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds  and Catechisms with the common fake premise to create a fake rupture with Tradition and Pope Francis is doing the same.They say Pope Francis is not the pope and that Pope Benedict is still the pope.

But Pope Benedict is doing the same. How can a pope who rejects the Athanasius Creed still be a pope ?

The popes could be asking in turn, how can Verrecchio, Barnhardt and Bugnolo still be Catholic ? -Lionel Andrades

Lionel Andrades

Promotore dell'interpretazione di Lionel Andrades del Concilio Vaticano II. Per lui il Concilio è dogmatico e non solo pastorale.

Scrittore sulla scoperta delle due interpretazioni del Concilio Vaticano II, l'una razionale e l'altra irrazionale, si interpreta l'una con la falsa premessa e l'altra senza. Uno è Magistrale e l'altro, quello comune, è non Magistrale.

Lo stesso vale per i Credo ei Catechismi.
Ci possono essere due interpretazioni.
Perché i cattolici dovrebbero scegliere una versione irrazionale che è eretica, non tradizionale e scismatica, quando c'è un'opzione razionale che è tradizionale?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

AUGUST 4, 2021

Poland and Hungary need to adopt the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/poland-and-hungary-need-to-adopt-lionel.html

________________

The Latin laity in Dijon, attend Mass in Latin with Magisterial documents no more being the same as in the Middle Ages or the time of the Church Fathers. How can the irrational premise used to re-interpret Church documents be Magisterial for the laity in Dijon and the FSSP in other parts of France

 

The diocesan priests at Dijon, France who offer Mass in Latin, replacing the FSSP priests interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and the Catechisms with a fake premise, to create a false rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the Syllabus of Errors as is also  expressed by Bishop Roland Minnerath and Pope Francis.

Even here in Rome diocesan priests offer the Latin Mass with the new ecclesiology, created with the false premise.It is approved by the Vatican and the Vicariate.

This cannot be ‘the Mass of the centuries’.

The Latin laity in Dijon, attend Mass in Latin with Magisterial documents no more being  the same as in the Middle Ages or the time of the Church Fathers.

How can the irrational premise used to re-interpret Church documents  be Magisterial for the laity in Dijon and the FSSP in other parts of France..-Lionel Andrades

Lionel Andrades

Promotore dell'interpretazione di Lionel Andrades del Concilio Vaticano II. Per lui il Concilio è dogmatico e non solo pastorale.

Scrittore sulla scoperta delle due interpretazioni del Concilio Vaticano II, l'una razionale e l'altra irrazionale, si interpreta l'una con la falsa premessa e l'altra senza. Uno è Magistrale e l'altro, quello comune, è non Magistrale.

Lo stesso vale per i Credo ei Catechismi.
Ci possono essere due interpretazioni.
Perché i cattolici dovrebbero scegliere una versione irrazionale che è eretica, non tradizionale e scismatica, quando c'è un'opzione razionale che è tradizionale?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

AUGUST 4, 2021

Poland and Hungary need to adopt the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/poland-and-hungary-need-to-adopt-lionel.html

________________

Roberto dei Mattei, Donal Anthony Foley and Eric Sammons are still interpreting Vatican Council II, extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Creeds and Catechisms with a false premise. There is no denial from them.They want to be politically correct with the Left.And yet they are concerned about the authenticity of Medugorje without putting their own doctrinal house in order

Roberto dei Mattei, Donal Anthony Foley and Eric Sammons are still interpreting Vatican Council II, extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Creeds and Catechisms with a false premise. There is no denial from them.They want to be politically correct with the Left.And yet they are concerned about the authenticity of Medugorje without putting their own doctrinal house in order.

Donal Foley interprets the Creeds and Magisterial documents with a false premise and does not deny it.Since his traditionalist readers and sponsors,do the same.The Franciscan Parish Priest, does the same at Medugorje.The late Heinrich Hoser projected Medugorje as Christocentric and not ecclesiocentric. So he remained politically correct and they spared Medugorje.The visionaries have to do the same.-Lionel Andrades

Lionel Andrades

Promotore dell'interpretazione di Lionel Andrades del Concilio Vaticano II. Per lui il Concilio è dogmatico e non solo pastorale.

Scrittore sulla scoperta delle due interpretazioni del Concilio Vaticano II, l'una razionale e l'altra irrazionale, si interpreta l'una con la falsa premessa e l'altra senza. Uno è Magistrale e l'altro, quello comune, è non Magistrale.

Lo stesso vale per i Credo ei Catechismi.
Ci possono essere due interpretazioni.
Perché i cattolici dovrebbero scegliere una versione irrazionale che è eretica, non tradizionale e scismatica, quando c'è un'opzione razionale che è tradizionale?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

AUGUST 4, 2021

Poland and Hungary need to adopt the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/poland-and-hungary-need-to-adopt-lionel.html

________________

Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and the traditionalists consider it Magisterial

 

Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and the traditionalists consider it Magisterial.A pope who interprets the Creeds and Catechisms with a false premise, even after being informed is automatically excommunicated.

How can Pope Francis be the pope when he interprets Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms with a fake premise to produce a false rupture with Catholic Tradition.

He is disqualified Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and the traditionalists consider it Magisterial.A pope who interprets the Creeds and Catechisms with a false premise, even after being informed is automatically excommunicated.

How can Pope Francis be the pope when he interprets Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms with a fake premise to produce a false rupture with Catholic Tradition. pope until he corrects the error.
It would be the same for Pope Benedict.
Do we have a pope ? Yes and both are automatically excommunicated.They are a scandal.
Since they interpret the Council II with an irrationality to create a break with Tradition they don’t beleive in mortal sin.They don’t believe that they are in mortal sins of faith.
I interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise and so there is no rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition.
I am a Catholic in harmony with Tradition. I am a Catholic in harmony with the past Magisterium and the Athanasius Creed.

I follow the Bible, Sacred Tradition and the past popes, irrespective of the objective error of the present popes which are political.

I am not a member of Una Voce International or the Latin Mass Societies, which also use the fake premise, like the popes and the Left, to change the interpretation of Magisterial documents.I am not a traditionalist like Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr.Taylor Marhall.Neither am I a progressivist like Cardinal Walter Kasper, Cardinal Cupich and Bishop Robert Barron who share the same fake premise as the conservatives, Michael Voris,Scott Hahn, Robert Fastiggi, Ralph Martin and the apologists at Catholic Answers and EWTN.How can the popes, cardinals and bishops who change the interpretation of the Nicene,Apostles and Athanasius Creed ,with the use of the false premise, be allowed to offer Holy Mass ?
I write this not for the sake of criticism but so that they correct the error.

How can we have a pope who does not have the Catholic faith, who does not believe in the teachings of the Church ? The same could be asked of the cardinals and bishops. They want to interpret de fide teachings with a fake premise, change doctrine and do not deny it. Cardinal Burke, Cardinal Erdo and Cardinal Brandmuller are also in this category.

These cardinals were silent when Pope Francis was not Magisterial on Vatican Council II on the flight from Abu Dhabi.But conservative Catholics were quiet since they do not want to interpret the Council without the same false premise as the pope.
The Acies Ordinata and Coetus International also did not mention that at the Amazon Synod everyone was using a fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II and create a false rupture with Tradition
The SSPX too will not use the rational premise to interpret Vatican Council.In this way they avoid being Feeneyite on EENS.
Now in Traditionis Custode, Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with the same fake premise. In future he will do the same.
The issue is not the Latin Mass but Church doctrine-specifically the common false premise.Why must Catholics interpret Vatican Council II like the followers of Archbishop Lefebvre, Archbishop Thuc , Fr. Leonard Feeney and the liberal ecclesiastics ?

ANDREA GRILLO

When Andrea Grillo a professor of Sacramental Theology and Philosophy of Religion at the Pontifical University St. Anselm in Rome, along with 180 signatories, wrote an open letter ( March 27, 2020) about a year before Traditionis Custode, critical of the Latin Mass, no one mentioned that they were interpreting Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus with the false premise.

There are no objective cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance in the present times confirmed Prof. Stefano Visintin osb, the former Italian Benedictine Vice Rector and Dean of Theology at St. Anselm University,Rome. For him, a physicist and theologian, there would be no objective exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to EENS according to St. Benedict and the past Benedictines.

He has been banished from Rome.-Lionel Andrades

Lionel Andrades

Promotore dell'interpretazione di Lionel Andrades del Concilio Vaticano II. Per lui il Concilio è dogmatico e non solo pastorale.

Scrittore sulla scoperta delle due interpretazioni del Concilio Vaticano II, l'una razionale e l'altra irrazionale, si interpreta l'una con la falsa premessa e l'altra senza. Uno è Magistrale e l'altro, quello comune, è non Magistrale.

Lo stesso vale per i Credo ei Catechismi.
Ci possono essere due interpretazioni.
Perché i cattolici dovrebbero scegliere una versione irrazionale che è eretica, non tradizionale e scismatica, quando c'è un'opzione razionale che è tradizionale?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

AUGUST 4, 2021

Poland and Hungary need to adopt the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/poland-and-hungary-need-to-adopt-lionel.html

________________