The ecclesiology of the Working Paper of the Amazon Synod is heretical.Liturgically it could create an opening for the abomination of desolation to be brought to the altar .
1 . Amazonian diversity, which is above all religious diversity, evokes
a new Pentecost (IL 30): respect for this diversity means to recognize
that there are other paths to salvation, without reserving salvation
exclusively to the Catholic faith. Non-Catholic Christian groups teach
other modalities of being Church, without censures, without dogmatism,
without ritual disciplines and ecclesial forms (IL 138); the
Catholic Church ought to integrate these modalities. Reserving salvation
exclusively to the Creed is destructive of the Creed (IL 39).
2. The teaching of Pan-Amazonian theology, which takes special
account of myths, rituals, and celebrations of indigenous cultures, is
required in all educational institutions (IL 98 c 3). Non-Christian
rites and celebrations are proposed as “essential for integral
salvation” (IL 87) and we are asked to “adapt the Eucharistic rite to
their cultures” (IL 126 d). On rituals: IL 87, 126.
3. Among the various Loci Theologici (that is, among the various
sources of theology, such as Sacred Scripture, the Councils, the Fathers
of the Church) there is included the territory [of the Amazon] and the
cry of its peoples. (IL 18, 19, 94, 98 c 3, 98 d 2, 144).
4. It is suggested that ordination be conferred on older persons who
have families and to confer “official ministries” on women. There is
thus proposed a new vision of Holy Orders which does not come from
Revelation, but from the cultural usages of the Amazonian people (which
provide for a rotating system of authority, among other things).
Therefore, there ought to be separation made between the priesthood and
the munus regendi (IL 129 a 2, 129 a 3, 129 c 2).
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bishops-priests-challenge-amazon-synod-working-doc-for-contradicting-catholic-faith
The defenders of the Synod will have to cite Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise and then refer to 'the spirit of Vatican Council ' which emerges from this irrational interpretation.
Exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church has always been rejected by Pope Francis and Pope Benedict, when they assume there are known non Catholics, saved outside the Church,without 'faith and baptism'.
Upon this irrationality they created the false New Theology.
Without this irrationality they would have to say all non Catholic in the Amazon are oriented to Hell without faith and baptism(AG 7).So the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the false premise is obligatory for them to reject exclusive salvation.
1 . Amazonian diversity, which is above all religious diversity, evokes a new Pentecost (IL 30): respect for this diversity means to recognize that there are other paths to salvation, without reserving salvation exclusively to the Catholic faith. Non-Catholic Christian groups teach other modalities of being Church, without censures, without dogmatism, without ritual disciplines and ecclesial forms (IL 138); the Catholic Church ought to integrate these modalities. Reserving salvation exclusively to the Creed is destructive of the Creed (IL 39).
The norm for salvation is 'faith and baptism'.Biblically the norm is not the unknown and hypothetical cases.
Similarly the norm for going to Hell are homosexual acts and the lifestyle. It is not the pope saying he cannot judge the norm since there could be known exceptions for him.
Likewise the norm for going to Hell is getting a quick divorce. It is not a priest saying he can know when manifest mortal sin is not a mortal sin.-Lionel AndradesAbomination of desolation
The abomination of desolation, abomination that makes desolate, or desolating sacrilege (Hebrew: Hebrew: הַשִּׁקּוּץ מְשׁוֹמֵֽם, ha-shikkuts meshomem)[1] is a term found in the Book of Daniel which means literally "an abomination that desolates" or "an abomination that *depopulates".[2]
Etymology
The word "abomination" is described as a "detestable act" or "detestable thing"[3] and in both biblical and rabbinic Hebrew, is a familiar term for an idol,[4]
or pertains to idolatrous worship, and therefore may well have the same
application in Daniel, which should accordingly be rendered, in
agreement with Ezra 9:1-4 "motionless abomination" or, also, "appalling abomination".[5] Some scholars—Hoffmann, Nestle, Bevan, and others—suggest that as a designation for Jupiter it is simply an intentional perversion of his usual appellation "Baal Shamem" ("lord of heaven"). This is quite plausible,[6] as attested by the perversion of Beelzebub into "Βεελζεβούλ" (Greek version) in Mark 3:22,
as well as the express injunction found in Tosef., 'Ab. Zarah, vi.
(vii) and Babli 'Ab. Zarah, 46a that the names of idols may be
pronounced only in a distorted or abbreviated form.
Therefore when you see the abomination of desolation which was spoken of
through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let the reader
understand),—Matthew 24:15
Posts
