Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke has said that
Traditionis Custode has doctrinal errors. He mentioned this in report posted on
the National Catholic Register. Condensed versions were re-posted by Dr. Joseph
Shaw on Gloria TV and other media.
Traditionis Custode and the FSSP communiqué
would recommend the Missal of Pope Paul VI and later editions, which were based
upon Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise and not the rational option.
Pope Paul VI did not choose to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational
Premise in harmony with Tradition (Syllabus of Errors etc).
The Roman Missal from 1570 is based upon
the interpretation of Magisterial Documents with a Rational Premise and so
there is a harmony with Tradition.
The Missal of Pope Paul VI is based upon
the False Premise and so depends upon a New Theology. The New Theology says
outside the Church there is known salvation. It confused invisible cases as
being visible.
The Roman Missal was based upon the old
theology of the Catholic Church which was exclusivist.
Since there is known salvation outside
the Church the theology of the Catholic Church is no more exclusivist. So there
are new doctrines on salvation, mission, ecclesiology etc and this is supported
by Traditionis Custode, which indicates that the Council must be interpreted
with the False Premise at the Latin Mass.
FSSP priests who offer the Latin Mass with
the New Theology and New Ecclesiology created by the False Premise reject the
Athanasius Creed which says all need to
be members of the Church for salvation and does not mention any exceptions.
The FSSP priests reject the Syllabus of Errors on an ecumenism of return to the Church. The Syllabus does not mention any exceptions. The exceptions for the FSSP come with the False Premise and so they support the New Ecumenism.
They also interpret the baptism of
desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, irrationally
to produce a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. The result is doctrinal
chaos, heresy and public schism with the past Magisterium.It is official and is supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.It is approved by the political Left for the Catholic Church.
How can the FSSP support the Missal of Pope
Paul VI when he interpreted Vatican Council II with the False Premise and not
the Rational Premise? He had a choice. He chose a break with the Syllabus of
Errors etc.
The FSSP and Ecclesia Dei communities must use the Roman Missal (1570 and
later) since over the centuries they did not use a False Premise to interpret
Magisterial Documents.For example, they did not project the baptism of desire, as a visible case and then suggest that the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus was obsolete, as happened in 1949 with the CDF Letter of the Holy Office during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII.
The Missal of Pope Paul VI and later editions
could be accepted if they were in a continuation with the Roman Missal- but they
are not. This is acknowledged by Pope Francis.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Missal
The FSSP accepts and interprets Vatican
Council II as a break with Tradition and so do the liberals and the present two
popes. With the False Premise there is a rejection of the past Mission based
upon ecclesiocentrism, the past ecumenism of return and the proclamation of the
Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics.This is a false new Church with new doctrines and a new theology, which depends upon an irrationality, which is officially approved. -Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 23, 2022
The Fraternity of St. Peter will have to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise instead of the Rational Premise to create a fake break with Tradition ( Syllabus of Errors, EENS etc).
In the course of the audience, the Pope made it clear that institutes such as the Fraternity of St. Peter are not affected by the general provisions of the Motu Proprio Traditionis Custodes, since the use of the ancient liturgical books was at the origin of their existence and is provided for in their constitutions.
The Holy Father subsequently sent a decree signed by him and dated February 11, the day the Fraternity was solemnly consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, confirming for the members of the Fraternity the right to use the liturgical books in force in 1962, namely: the Missal, the Ritual, the Pontifical and the Roman Breviary.
https://www.fssp.org/en/official-communique-of-the-priestly-fraternity-of-st-peter/
The Fraternity of St. Peter will have to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise instead of the Rational Premise to create a fake break with Tradition ( Syllabus of Errors, EENS etc).
Like the other Ecclesial Dei communities they will have to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise as is suggested by Traditionis Custode.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
