No denial from Father Georges de Laire : he affirms heresy in public and this is a scandal. The Holy Mass he offers is a sacrilege

Father Georges de Laire, appointed by Bp. Peter Libasci as judicial vicar and vicar for canonical affairs,  Diocese of Manchester,USA has not responded to the blog posts on Eucharist and Mission,  e-mailed to him and other Chancery offices in the diocese.1

The Judicial Vicar for canonical affairs who has placed severe restrictions on the Catholic community in New Hampshire,based on the new theology, needs to clarify for all Catholics :-

1 Invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are not physically visible exceptions to the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus or Vatican Council II and neither to Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation ?

2.Invisible and unknown cases  referenced in  LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 NA 2, GS 22 etc of Vatican Council II, are not personally known cases in 2019 and so practical exceptions to the dogma EENS as it is known to the St. Benedict Center and and also to the popes and saints over the centuries ?

The St.Benedict Center has doctrinally clarified their position on this subject.

Canon 751 of the Code of Canon Law states: "Heresy is the obstinate denial or obstinate doubt after the reception of baptism of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith."

1. The two Secretaries of the CDF, Archbishop Giacomo Morandi and Joseph Augustine Di Noia, like the Prefect of the CDF, Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj and Pope Benedict XVI, interpret the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) as personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church.This is irrational but it is obligatory for all religious communities in the Diocese of Manchester.

2.Then they interpret LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as personally known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church. This too is irrational and it is obligatory for men and women religious in the diocese.

3.Then with this irrationality they change the understanding of the Nicene and Apostles Creed.They reject the Athanasius Creed.

This is first class heresy.It has to be affirmed by all. It is heresy also for Father Georges de Laire and he does not deny it or clarify his doctrinal and theological position and that of the diocese.

4.He interprets the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)  with visible exceptions of BOD, BOB and I.I like the error made in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO).

LOHO mixed up invisible cases as being visible and what is implicit as being explicit.The religious communities have to do the same.They must repeat the confusion.This heresy also for Father Georges de Laire.

5.Then the ecclesiastics interpret Vatican Council II also as a rupture with EENS since LG 8, LG 16 etc refer to personally known non Catholics, saved outside the Church.So they infer that there is salvation outside the Church.There is known salvation with visible people since only in this way can there be exceptions to EENS.This is compulsory otherwise the religious communties would be saying that in Heaven there are only Catholics.Father Georges de Laire would be saying the same. He would be saying like the St.Benedict Center that there are only Catholics in Heaven. The alternative is heresy, which he does not deny.

6.The two Secretaries of the CDF interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church with the same irrationality. So the Catechism(1994) and Vatican Council II become a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and EENS.Every religious and lay person in the diocese has to do this.This is heresy and it is not denied by Father Georges de Laire.

7.If they do not use the irrationality then Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are in harmony with EENS and the past ecclesiology.There is a hermeneutic of continuity.So they intentionally ignore this rational interpretation even after being informed.This too is heresy.It is with all this obligatory heresy that religious in the diocese have to offer/ attend Holy Mass.It is with this  heresy which is not  denied by Father Georges de Laire, he offers Holy Mass sacrilegiously..

8.Since BOD,BOB and I.I refer to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church, the Catechism of Pope Pius X when it mentions invincible ignorance, is interpreted by the CDF, as known people. So it contradicts the same Catechism  which says everyone needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation.

There is no contradiction for me since I avoid the irrationality.

However religious in the diocese have to affirm this contradiction to remain in the diocese, legally , as Catholics. This is also a condition for the St. Benedict Center, which formerly was recognized as a lay community in the diocese.They now have their status changed by the CDF and Bishop Libasci.So the the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradicts itself for Father Georges de Laire.This is an irrational and heretical interpretation and is not part of the Deposit of the Faith.

9.The Catechism of Pope Pius X ( invincible ignorance) contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX( EENS,ecumenism of return etc).All this has to be accepted by the St.Benedict Center to have their status restored.It also has to be affirmed by all religious communities even though it is irrational and not Catholic in any sense.

There is no contradiction for me since I avoid the irrational premise and inference of the CDF and the Curia of the Diocese of Manchester.The Catechism of Pope Pius X ( invincible ignorance) contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX( EENS,ecumenism of return etc) for Father Georges de Laire.There  has been no denial from him. This is another heretical interpretation of Magisterial documents.If he denied all this then he would have to affirm exclusive salvation. So he keeps silent.

10.This is all heresy . It is schism with the past popes on EENS.This is a scandal. To offer Holy Mass in this condition is a sacrilege.But it is obligatory for all in the diocese including Father Georges de Laire.

-Lionel Andrades

1
JANUARY 13, 2019

Diocesan of Manchester needs to clarify its doctrinal position for Catholics

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/diocesan-of-manchester-needs-to-clarify.html

JANUARY 17, 2019

All religious communities in the Diocese of Manchester, are obligated by the CDF and Bishop Libasci to affirm irrationality, heresy and sacrilege to be legally 'Catholic' and not have sanctions against them

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/all-religious-communities-in-diocese-of.html

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/vicar-of-manchester-changes-dogma-into-heresy

__________________________________

Letter Explaining Saint Benedict Center’s Doctrinal Stance

https://catholicism.org/letter-explaining-saint-benedict-centers-doctrinal-stance.html

JANUARY 13, 2019

Bishop Peter Libasci assumes invisible people are visible : claims that legally this is being 'Catholic'    

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/bishop-peter-libasci-assumes-invisible.html

 JANUARY 12, 2019

There are only Catholics in Heaven according to Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7) and they are there with faith and baptism

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/there-are-only-catholics-in-heaven.html

JANUARY 12, 2019

Brother Andre Marie MICM brings de-railed Catholic theology back on line

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/brother-andre-marie-micm-brings-de.html

JANUARY 11, 2019

New CDF Sec.wants to create schism : supports heresy and sacrilege

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/new-cdf-secwants-to-create-schism.html

 JANUARY 11, 2019

Athanasius Creed not accepted for a Profession of Faith in the Diocese of Manchester

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/athansius-creed-not-accepted-for.html

JANUARY 11, 2019

CDF, Diocese of Manchester deception is not Catholic : nor ethical or honest even by secular standards

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/cdfdiocese-of-manchester-deception-is.html

JANUARY 11, 2019

The CDF wants Catholic religious communities and lay movements to accept heresy and sacrilege otherwise canonical prohibitions will be placed upon them

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-cdf-wants-catholic-religious.html

JANUARY 11, 2019

Theological Teaching of the St.Benedict Center unacceptable to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/theological-teaching-of-stbenedict.html

 JANUARY 11, 2019

Traditionalist cites Vatican Council II in support of Tradition - the Restoration has begun

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/traditionalist-cites-vatican-council-ii.html

 JANUARY 10, 2019

Brother Andre Marie MICM affirms extra ecclesiam nulla salus based on Vatican Council II : query from the CDF

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/broandre-marie-affirms-extra-ecclesiam.html

 JANUARY 11, 2019

Repost : The Badge

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/repost-badge.html

JANUARY 11, 2019

Repost : Happy and Holy New Year - proclaiming the Faith ! ( Graphics )

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/repost-happy-and-holy-new-year.html

_____________________________________________________

• St.Benedict Center Status Change (31)

Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : CDF, Diocese of Manchester irrational and heretical

The St.Benedict Center affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and teaches like the popes of the past that there are only Catholics in Heaven. This is in harmony with Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(CCC).They also cite Dominus Iesus and other Magisterial documents which can be read in a Letter on Doctrine on their website.

VATICAN COUNCIL II

Vatican Council II affirms the strict interpretation of EENS with Ad Gentes 7 which can be read in the passage in blue while the passage in red is not an objective exception to the passage in blue. It refers always to a hypothetical and theoretical case.

Hypothetical cases cannot be known Catholics saved outside the Church in 2019.

Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."(17) Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6)...-Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II. -Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II

CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

The Catechism of the Catholic Church(CCC) also affirms the strict interpretation of EENS in CCC n. 846.

 

 
"Outside the Church there is no salvation"
846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body: 

 

Even with this re-formulation the Catechism of the Catholic Church N.846 does not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

So even though all salvation comes from Christ through the Church which is his Body  all need faith and baptism for salvation(Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II). All.

 We personally cannot know of any exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). We personally cannot judge if someone will be saved in invincible ignorance outside the Church. This would only be known to God if it happens.

So the following passage in CCC 846 and also Lumen Gentium 14 is not an exception to the strict interpretation of EENS. It is irrelevant to the dogma EENS as it was interpreted for example, by the Magisterium of the 16th century.

 Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.

Here is the passage from Vatican Council II( AG 7) which is also  cited in CCC 846.1    So Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are Feeneyite.They affirm the strict and traditional interpretation of EENS defined by three Church Councils in the Extraordinary Magisterium.Pope Pius XII called it an 'infallible teaching'(Letter of the Holy Office 1949).  

For the St.Benedict Center the passages in red refer to hypothetical cases, theoretical possibilities known only to God. So they are not objective. Nor are they practical exceptions to EENS.

For the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Bishop Peter Libasci, Bishop of Manchester, USA, and his Curia, the passages in red, refer to known and visible non Catholics, seen in the flesh by us human beings. So they become practical exceptions  to EENS.

So the conclusion of both groups is different since their premise is different.

The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the Saint Benedict Center are rational and have a hermeneutic of continuity.

The CDF and the Diocese of Manchester are irrational and have created a hermeneutic of rupture with the past( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).

The Saint Benedict Center is orthodox while the CDF and Bishop Peter Libasci and his curia are heretical and offer Holy Mass in this sacrilegrous condition.

It is also unethical and dishonest according to secular standards to project unknown people as being known exceptions to EENS and then legally claiming that the St. Benedict Center are not 'Catholic' since they do not accept this deception, which is continued even after ecclesiastics have been informed.-Lionel Andrades                                      

1

Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.

-Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II

Domani è il 177 ° anniversario delle apparizioni della Madonna ad Alphonse Ratisbonne nella Basilica di Santa Andrea delle Fratte a Roma.

 

Domani è il 177 ° anniversario delle apparizioni della Madonna ad Alphonse Ratisbonne nella Basilica di Santa Andrea delle Fratte a Roma. Ora è un santuario mariano.

Alle 8.30 ci sarà la Santa Messa in italiano offerta da mons. Marco Frisina, il direttore del coro della diocesi di Roma. Alle 10.30 ci sarà la Santa Messa offerta da p. Francesco Trebionda, il parroco. Le messe saranno trasmesse in tutta Italia.
Alphonse Ratisbonne parlava spesso dell'importanza della conversione nella Chiesa Cattolica, per la salvezza di tutte le persone. Un finanziere ebreo, lasciò la sua famiglia divenne un prete cattolico e fondò anche comunità religiose missionarie in Medio Oriente, per convertire ebrei e musulmani .
Ma domani il parroco parlerà di conversione nel senso secolare, politicamente corretto. I preti Minimi parlano di conversione del cuore e conversione personale verso Dio.
I Padri Minimi citeranno spesso il Concilio Vaticano II, ma non diranno mai che il Concilio, come Ratisbonne, dice che tutti hanno bisogno di fede e battesimo per la salvezza (Ad Gentes 7, Concilio Vaticano II ). Tutti.
Allo stesso modo il Catechismo della Chiesa Cattolica (CCC) sostiene la rigorosa interpretazione del dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) nel  CCC n.846 ma non è proclamato nella Chiesa. Non è insegnato nelle classi di Catechismo o in parte del religioso formazione dei seminaristi di Minimi.
Alphonse Ratisbonne ha rinunciato la sua ricchezza e quindi non ha dovuto proteggerlo quando proclamava il Vangelo.La Madonna gli diede una visione dell'importanza della fede e del battesimo nella Chiesa Cattolica per evitare i fuochi dell'inferno. Sapeva che la famiglia in cui era cresciuto, tranne il fratello Teodoro, che divenne anche sacerdote nella Chiesa Cattolica , erano tutti persi per sempre.
Questa non è la fede cattolica che verrà predicata domani dai cardinali Angelo Bagnasco e Ennio Antonelli.
All'altare del miracolo, in questo santuario, Ratisbonne, ha visto la Chiesa Cattolica come l'Arca di Noè, che salva tutti i popoli nel diluvio. In qualche modo è comune alla visione di Nostra Signora del Protestante, Bruno Cornacchiola alle Tre Fontane, a Roma.
La Madonna li ha fatti missionari. Non ha detto a Ratisbonne e al Coracchiola che era giusto rimanere ebrei o protestanti per evitare l'inferno.
Non ha detto che dovevano semplicemente credere in Gesù e poter stare fuori dalla Chiesa.
Ma domani in omelie preparate con cura, nessuno si rivolgerà a tutti i non cattolici per entrare nella sola Chiesa di Gesù, per evitare i fuochi dell'inferno.
Nessuno dirà che è  la Chiesa Cattolica o l'inferno.
Ci saranno presentazioni sentimentali e pie su Alphonse Ratisbonne, che la Congregazione per la Dottrina della Fede (CDF), Vaticano, reinterpreta con 'una versione sviluppata'  che è approvata da Sinistra e Satana.
In futuro la CDF, come nel caso del St. Benedict Center, nel New Hampshire, USA, potrebbe decretare che Alphonse Ratisbonne non è legalmente cattolico, poiché credeva, come la Madonna, che ci fossero solo cattolici in Paradiso.-Lionel Andrades 

January 19, 2019

Tomorrow is the 177th anniversary of Our Lady's apparitions to Alphonse Ratisbonne    https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/tomorrow-is-177th-anniversary-of-our.html

Tomorrow is the 177th anniversary of Our Lady's apparitions to Alphonse Ratisbonne

 

Tomorrow is the 177th anniversary of Our Lady's apparitions to Alphonse Ratisbonne in the Basilica of Santa Andrea delle Fratte, Rome.It is now a Marian Sanctuary.

At 8.30 a.m there will be Holy Mass in Italian offered by Mons. Marco Frisina, the Director of the Choir of the Diocese of Rome. At 10.30 a.m there will be Holy Mass offered by Fr. Francesco Trebionda, the Parish Priest.Both Masses will be telecast throughout Italy.

Alphonse Ratisbonne would often speak about the importance of conversion into the Catholic Church, for the salvation of all people.A Jewish financier , he left his family became a Catholic priest and founded too missionary religious communities in the Middle East, to convert Jews and Muslims.

But the Parish Priest tomorrow will speak of conversion in the secular, politically correct  sense. The Minim priests talk of a conversion of the heart and a personal conversion towards God.

The Minim Fathers will cite Vatican Council II often but never say that the Council, like Ratisbonne, says all need faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7). All.

Similarly the Catechism of the Catholic Church(CCC) supports the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in CCC n.846 but it is not proclaimed in the church.It is not taught in Catechism classes or part of the religious formation of the Minim seminarians.

Alphonse Ratisbonne gave up his wealth and so did not have to protect it when proclaiming the Gospel.

Our Lady gave him an insight on the importance of faith and baptism in the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell.He knew that the family in which he grew up, except for his brother Theodore who also became a priest , in the Catholic Church, were all lost.

This is not the Catholic faith which will be preached tomorrow by cardinals Angelo Bagnasco and Ennio Antonelli.

At the Altar of the Miracle in this sanctuary, Ratisbonne, saw the Catholic Church as the Ark of Noah , that saves all people in the flood. In some ways it is common to the vision of Our Lady to the Protestant, Bruno Cornacchiola at Tre Fontane, Rome.

Our Lady made them missionaries.She did not tell Ratisbonne and Coracchiola that it was okay to remain a Jew or Protestant to avoid Hell.

She didn't say that they just had to believe in Jesus and could stay outside the Church.

But tomorrow in carefully prepared homilies,  no one will appeal to all non Catholics to enter the only Church of Jesus, to avoid the fires of Hell.

No one will say that it is either the Catholic Church or Hell.

There will be sentimental, pious presentations on Alphonse Ratisbonne, whom the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican, re-interprets with ' a developed' and 'nuanced version' of EENS, which is approved by the Left and Satan.

In future the CDF, as in the case of the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire,USA, may decree that Alphonse Ratisbonne is not legally a Catholic, since he believed, like Our Lady, that there are only Catholics in Heaven.-Lionel Andrades 

January 19, 2019

Tomorrow is the 177th anniversary of Our Lady's apparitions to Alphonse Ratisbonne 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/tomorrow-is-177th-anniversary-of-our.html