Friday, October 14, 2022

Church Militant TV produces another superficial and politically correct report on Vatican Council II: avoids discussing the Rational Premise

 Church Militant TV has produced another politically correct report on Vatican Council II which does not offend the liberals and the Left. CMTV does not discuss the issue of the Irrational and Rational Premise. More important it does not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and so support Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).-L.A

‘SPIRIT OF VATICAN II’

by Paul Murano  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  October 13, 2022    

The muted Council

We have part III of our series commemorating the 60th anniversary of Vatican II. We know the Council produced documents, but in the past half century, all we've heard about is the "spirit of Vatican II." With us now is Church Militant's Dr. Paul Murano to explain the difference.

Lionel: Paul Murano interprets Lumen Gentium 8,14,15 and 16 by confusing what is invisible as being visible and then projecting them as objective examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times(2022).He also interprets UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, like the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,Vatican.The CDF confuses these hypothetical cases as being objective exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.Murano, is a liberal on this issue, like Dr.Robert Fastiggi, a professor of theology at the Sacred Heart Major seminary, Detroit.There interpretation of Vatican Council II is political and not Catholic.It is unethical.

_________________

Since the Word and the Spirit can never contradict each other, it seems some people have used the Council disingenuously as a launching pad to promote modernism. In tonight's In-Depth Report, we look at whether this "spirit of Vatican II' actually corresponds to the Council itself.

Alice von Hildebrand, author, speaker and professor: "Stalin, soon after he came to power, ordered his cronies to invade Catholic seminaries with young men that had neither faith nor morals."

Lionel: The Hildebrands too interpreted Vatican Council II with the Irrational and not Rational Premise as did Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the popes from Paul VI.

__________________

Some 2,400 prelates gathered in Rome just 40 years after Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered the infiltration of Catholic seminaries. How many worked their way up the Church ladder to influence the Council is unknown. 

Tens of millions drowned under the red tide during that time, yet, the bishops did not condemn communism.

HistoryPod: "On the 23rd of June 1960, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved Enovid as the first combined oral contraceptive pill in the world."

And while the sexual revolution was gathering steam with the introduction of the pill, the prelates would not directly condemn contraception.

Lionel : Since the popes and the CDF interpreted Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise which was a break with Tradition, innovation in faith and morals was possible.

_________________

The Council did, however, reaffirm the primary end of marriage is the procreation and education of children. It also reiterated that one cannot use any unnatural means to space children: "Sons of the Church may not undertake methods of birth control which are found blameworthy by the teaching authority of the Church in its unfolding of the divine law.” 

But the bishops left the morality of the pill for Pope Paul VI to address after the Council.

They also shelved the possible declaration of Mary as Mediatrix of all grace.

Without formal declaration, the Council document Lumen Gentium called Mary our "mother" in "the order of grace," and recognized her under the titles of “Advocate," "Helper," "Benefactress" and "Mediatrix” who intercedes for us with "the gifts of eternal salvation."

Brother Casey Cole, OFM: "At the heart of Vatican II was nothing more than a deep desire to recapture the essential Tradition of the Church."

Lionel: At the heart of a group of modernists which included Rahner and Ratzinger, was a desire to create a break with Tradition, especially the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

____________________

While the Council was billed as pastoral rather than dogmatic, it did re-present much traditional teaching, although sometimes ambiguously.

Lionel: With the Rational Premise Vatican Council II would be dogmatic, supporting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed. But when it was interpreted with the Irrational Premise by Pope Paul VI and the cardinals and bishops, it rejected the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.Pope Paul VI also confirmed the change in theology and doctrine and called the Council a pastoral Council only. He did not explain the process, on how the dogma was rejected with the False Premise.Neither did the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith explain it to the people.Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that he could interpret the Council with the Rational Premise.Neither did they affirm the Council with the Rational Premise.

It was all kept secret. Archbishop Lefebvre was excommunicated because he did not accept the Council interpreted with the Irrational Premise.

Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated because he did not except the baptism of desire etc interpreted with the False Premise.

______________________

For example, the second paragraph in Vatican II's Dignitatis Humanae, on religious freedom, states: "We believe that one true religion subsists in the Catholic and Apostolic Church." The phrase also appears in Lumen Gentium.

Decades later, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) explained the phrase meant that Christ's Church is the Catholic Church, through which all graces flow. It added the grace of sacraments such as baptism and marriage, sanctifying non-Catholic Christians, flow from the bosom of Christ's One True Church.

Lionel: The CDF did not announce that Lumen Gentium 8 ( subsists it) did not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation. We cannot meet or see someone saved outside the Catholic Church, where the true Church exists.This is all theoretical and speculative. So Lumen Gentium would not really contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.

_____________________

What is not found in the 16 documents of the Second Vatican Council are "follow your conscience," "tolerate evil," "don't evangelize," and "all religions are equal."

Abp. Fulton J. Sheen: "All these are manifestations of a spirit of the diabolic."

While Vatican II could have covered more pressing topics or reaffirmed doctrine in simpler terms, everything it presented was a continuum with Sacred Tradition and the Church's constant Magisterium.

The iconic words attributed to Pope John XXIII in opening the assembly were: "Throw open the windows of the church and let the fresh air of the spirit blow through." 

Tragically, it wasn't long after its conclusion the pure air of the Holy Spirit was comingled with the foul "spirit of Vatican II."

This is modernism with alleged traditionalists rejecting Tradition to be politically correct with the Left. Mattei and Rorate Caeili are supporting the globalists in exchange for approval from the Left

 

From Rorate Caeili. Vatican Council II is interpreted with the Irrational Premise to create a calculated break with Tradition which is appreciated by the different liberal lobbies. So Rorate Caeli is not considered extremist by the Left.

60 Years of Vatican II – ‘THE COUNCIL AND THE ECLIPSE OF GOD’ by Don Pietro Leone – CHAPTER 10: ‘The Causes of Council Teaching’ (part 2): B. THEOLOGY

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2022/10/60-years-of-vatican-ii-council-and.html#more


from Rorate Caeili

To identify their formal principle, we turn to the condemnation of Modernism by Bl. Pius IX in the Syllabus Errorum, examining the Syllabus in the light of the penetrating analysis by Father Denis Fahey, who understands the work as a refutation of the Modernist deification of man. We observe at the outset that the essential distinction between this pronouncement of the Magisterium and the Council is that former decries the deification of man, while the latter promotes it.

Lionel: The former, pre-1949  Magisterium decried the deification of man while the popes from Pius XII supported innovation and liberalism in the Church when they approved a false premise to reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office. When Pope Pius XII and the popes who followed him, chose the Irrational and not Rational Premise, they were not Magisterial.How  can the Holy Spirit contradict the past Magisterium and that too with an objective mistake?

Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the Rational Premise supporting the past exclusivist ecclesiology and then there is no development of doctrine. Religious liberty, ecumenism and inter religious dialogue are no more an issue. The Council does not support the deification of man.

_________________

 

The Syllabus opens with a condemnation of pantheism (being the doctrine which identifies God with the world) and then of naturalism and rationalism. Father Fahey explains: ‘As nature becomes conscious of itself in the human reason, human reason takes the place of God and becomes the exclusive arbiter of truth and falsehood, of good and evil.’

Lionel :This is not an issue in Vatican Council II when the Council supports the past ecclesiocentrism.


The exclusivist ecclesiology is the basis for the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics and the non separation of Church and State.It is important to be a Catholic to save one's soul from going to Hell.So it is important that the Government is also Catholic.


The secular interpretation of Vatican Council II is made obsolete with the Rational Premise.Dignitatis Humane is interpreted traditionally.

_________________

 

 

Syllabus Errorum

 

The Syllabus next treats the Modernist rejection of Scholasticism, viewed as ‘a hindrance to the conquests of deified man’, and then the Modernist espousal of Ecumenism and Indifferentism. Since Modernism holds that all Christian confessions and all religions are products of man’s reason, it concludes that one is as good as another; and that Protestantism, ‘which is a form of Christianity re-modelled and brought up to date by man’s efforts, is just as pleasing in God’s sight as the Catholic Church instituted by Himself.’

Lionel: Yes Scholasticism could only be rejected by assuming there was known salvation outside the Church.Exceptions were created for Tradition which over the centuries had no exceptions. Exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus were brought out with alleged visible cases of non Catholics, who are saved in the present times, without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

With this irrational reasoning, practical exceptions were created for EENS, the ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church ( Syllabus of Errors) and outside the Church there is no salvation ( Syllabus of Errors).

This is how Roberto dei Mattei and Rorate Caeili interpret Vatican Council II. This is modernism.It is liberalism.It is a break with the ecclesiology of the Traditional Latin Mass of the Middle Ages. I interpret the Council with the Rational Premise and so there are no known non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times ( 2022).


Rorate Caeil which recently supported funeral Mass for non Catholics is politically correct with the liberals, like Pope Francis.They agree with me.

Even the CDF would admit that they are modernists with the use of the Irrational Premise,

Msttei and Rorate (F.G) are modernists who call themselves traditionalists, while rejecting Tradition.They support the one world religion-people, the globalists on Vatican Council II etc.Lionel Andrades.





OCTOBER 14, 2022

Roberto dei Mattei and Rorate Caeli do not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise since then it would be a threat to their media.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/10/roberto-dei-mattei-and-rorate-caeli-do.html



OCTOBER 14, 2022

From Rorate Caeili we have another edition of Vatican Council II with the False Premise. It has to be modernist. Obviously if the Premise is False the Inference and Conclusion has to be False.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/10/from-rorate-caeili-we-have-another.html

________________________________ 


OCTOBER 13, 2022



All the Church Militant TV reports on Vatican Council II this week are leftist propaganda

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/10/all-church-militant-tv-reports-on.html


 OCTOBER 11, 2022

Trent Horn's possibility known only to God(LG 15) cannot be a practical exception for the dogma EENS according to Brother Peter Dimond of the Most Holy Family Monastery,NY

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/10/trent-horn-refuted-by-bro-peter-dimond_11.html


Roberto dei Mattei and Rorate Caeli do not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise since then it would be a threat to their media.

Professor de Mattei describes the development

of Modernism in the Church prior to the Council itself.

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2022/10/60-years-of-vatican-ii-council-and.html#more


60 Years of Vatican II – ‘THE COUNCIL AND THE ECLIPSE OF GOD’ by Don Pietro Leone – CHAPTER 10: ‘The Causes of Council Teaching’ (part 2): B. THEOLOGY

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2022/10/60-years-of-vatican-ii-council-and.html#more




Roberto dei Mattei and Rorate Caeli do not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise since then it would be a threat to their media. They would be affirming Tradition, in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, with no known exceptions. 
They would be considered extremist by the Left.
So they deny Tradition and support the modernism of the liberals, the present two popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,Vatican.
They re-interpret Quanta Cura, Mystici Corporis and the Catechism of Pope Pius X by confusing invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.
1.So they will say that they accept the Syllabus of Errors but with practical exceptions. 
2.They accept the Athanasius Creed but with visible exceptions.
3.They acccept the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus but with Cushingism and not Feeneyism.
This is modernism. It is liberalism which dissents from the past Magisterium over the centuries before 1949.
I have mentioned this many times before but they could not care less.They have to preserve their liberal reputation with the important people.
1.I interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise, Inference and Conclusion. So there is a continuity with extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Cantate Domino, Council of Trent, which did not mention any exceptions. 
2.I accept the Catechism of the Pope Pius X but invincible ignorance(29Q) does not contradict outside the Church there is no salvation in that Catechism ( 24Q,27Q).For them there is confusion in this old catechism.
3.For me there is no change in the understanding of the Nicene Creed. For them there is.
 They are modernists and do not deny it. Since if they deny it, it would create political problems for their media.They do not want to even talk about it.They cannot even defend traditionalists. Since it would give away their political interpreration of Church Documents. It would show that they are not modernists like the popes and the CDF.
For them there is only Vatican Council II irrational.For me it is only Vatican Council II, rational.They are modernists in public. - Lionel Andrades


From Rorate Caeili we have another edition of Vatican Council II with the False Premise. It has to be modernist. Obviously if the Premise is False the Inference and Conclusion has to be False.

 From Rorate Caeili we have another edition of  Vatican Council II with the False Premise. It had to be modernist. Obviously if the Premise is False the Inference and Conclusion has to be False.Note Rorate and Don Leone are intentionally not interpreting the Council with the Rational Premise. If they do use the Rational Premise, they will be politically incorrect with the Jewish Left ( ADL etc) and the Vatican-Left.

They need the break with Tradition.They need it for their media.

They want to reject Tradition and yet call themselves traditionalists only because they attend Mass in Latin.- Lionel Andrades

60 Years of Vatican II – ‘THE COUNCIL AND THE ECLIPSE OF GOD’ by Don Pietro Leone – CHAPTER 10: ‘The Causes of Council Teaching’ (part 2): B. THEOLOGY

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2022/10/60-years-of-vatican-ii-council-and.html#more