-Lionel Andrades
Saturday, July 6, 2019
Earthquake examination of conscience for Ann Barnhardt
Sins against Faith:
Wilful doubt of any article of faith; deliberate ignorance of the truths of faith which ought to be known; neglect of instructing oneself in the faith according to one’s state in life; rash credulity (e.g. giving credence to private revelation too easily or believing in a private revelations which has been condemned by the lawful Church authorities); apostasy; heresy; indifferentism (to believe that one religion is as good as another, and that all religions are equally true and pleasing to God, or that one is free to accept or reject any or all religions); reading or circulating books or writings against the Catholic belief or practice in such wise as to jeopardize one’s faith; to remain silent when asked about one’s faith; engaging in schismatic or heretical worship; joining or supporting masonic groups or other forbidden societies.-Ann Barnhardt
Lionel:
1. Ann has rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with visible and personally known exceptions of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).She supports a Cushingite instead of a Feeneyite EENS.Cushingism is irrational. EENS is a de fide teaching and to reject an 'infallible teaching' is a mortal sin of faith.
2.
GOOD BYE ATHANASIUS CREED
With BOD, BOB and I.I being exceptions to EENS for her, she infers that these are personally known people saved outside the Church in the present times. This is wrong invisible people could not be objective and practical exceptions to EENS.
GOOD BYE ATHANASIUS CREED
With BOD, BOB and I.I being exceptions to EENS for her, she infers that these are personally known people saved outside the Church in the present times. This is wrong invisible people could not be objective and practical exceptions to EENS.
So with her irrational interpretation of BOD,BOB and I.I she rejects the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation. To reject a Creed is first class heresy.Again we have a mortal sin of faith.
3.
CATECHISMS CONTRADICT EACH OTHER, SYLLABUS OF ERRORS OBSOLETE
CATECHISMS CONTRADICT EACH OTHER, SYLLABUS OF ERRORS OBSOLETE
Since hypothetical cases of BOD(LG 14), LG 16( invincible ignorance), LG 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth) etc refer to non hypothetical and objective examples of salvation outside the Church, Ann projects Vatican Council II as a rupture with the Athanasius Creed , the Catechisms on outside the Church there is no salvation, the Syllabus of Errors etc.This is heretical.lt is a rejection of the Catholic faith.
4.
NEW UNDERSTANDING OF THE NICENE AND APOSTLES CREED AND PROFESSION OF FAITH
It is a mortal sin of faith when Roberto dei Mattei, John Lamont, Joseph Shaw, Thomas Pink and John Rao do not proclaim the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), change the the Nicene and Apostles Creed and do not interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Tradition because of alleged invisible people being visible in the present times(1965-2019).
NEW UNDERSTANDING OF THE NICENE AND APOSTLES CREED AND PROFESSION OF FAITH
It is a mortal sin of faith when Roberto dei Mattei, John Lamont, Joseph Shaw, Thomas Pink and John Rao do not proclaim the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), change the the Nicene and Apostles Creed and do not interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Tradition because of alleged invisible people being visible in the present times(1965-2019).
This is the sin of disbelief. Incredulity.It is the same error made by Ann Barnhardt.
-Lionel Andrades
LINKS FROM THE RIGHT HAND BAR.CLICK TO ACCESS
_______________________
MAY 30, 2019
A pope who says hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are objective exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) , the past exclusivist ecclesiology , an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed etc is heretical
MAY 25, 2019
A possibility in Vatican Council II cannot be put forward as an exception to EENS. This was the error Pope Francis made on the plane when returning from Abu Dhabi
A possibility in Vatican Council II cannot be put forward as an exception to EENS. This was the error Pope Francis made on the plane when returning from Abu Dhabi
MAY 24, 2019
Bishop Schneider did not announce that the interpretation of Vatican Council II by Pope Francis on the flight from Abu Dhabi was heretical
MAY 24, 2019
Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria supported a theology of religions ! This is heresy
MAY 22, 2019
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has accepted the new moral theology and so he cannot call a holder or supporter of heresy, a heretic
MAY 22, 2019The Baptism of desire is not an exception to EENS since it does not exist in our reality. This was known to the popes and saints. So the Feeneyite affirms the baptism of desire, he does not reject it. Hypothetical cases cannot be objective exceptions to EENS https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-baptism-of-desire-is-not-exception.html
MAY 30, 2019UR 3 does not contradict the passage from Mystici Corporis which you have quoted. Would you like to comment ? If UR 3 is not an exception to EENS then there is no Vatican Council II revolution in the text of the Council ? https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/ur-3-does-not-contradict-passage-from.html
MAY 22, 2019The Baptism of desire is not an exception to EENS since it does not exist in our reality. This was known to the popes and saints. So the Feeneyite affirms the baptism of desire, he does not reject it. Hypothetical cases cannot be objective exceptions to EENS https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-baptism-of-desire-is-not-exception.html
MAY 30, 2019UR 3 does not contradict the passage from Mystici Corporis which you have quoted. Would you like to comment ? If UR 3 is not an exception to EENS then there is no Vatican Council II revolution in the text of the Council ? https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/ur-3-does-not-contradict-passage-from.html
MAY 20, 2019
St. Ambrose could not state it 'as a fact' that it happened since if it would happen it could only be known to God as a fact. This is the nature of the baptism of desire.It simply does not exist in our reality
MAY 18, 2019
If the pope can change his mind on Medugorje he can also announce the obvious- he could say that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to personally unknown and invisible people
________________________________________________________________________________
MAY 27, 2019An examination of conscience https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/an-examination-of-conscience.html
MAY 26, 2019Mortal sins of faith https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/mortal-sins-of-faith.html
MAY 13, 2019 Presently with irrational reasoning, which they can identify and correct, we have two popes and cardinals Baldiserri and Battista supporting mortal sins of faith https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/presently-with-irrational-reasoning.html
MAY 12, 2019Cardinal Lorenzo Baldiserri calls heresy and mortal sins of faith magisterial https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/cardinal-lorenzo-baldiserri-calls.html
MAY 11, 2019For discerning Catholics this is all deception and it cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit the interpretation of the two popes is based upon a factual error. It violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.This cannot be the Magisterium https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/for-discerning-catholics-this-is-all.html
MAY 11, 2019
Mortal sins of faith need to be confessed in the Sacrament of Reconciliaition like mortal sins of morals https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/mortal-sins-of-faith-need-to-be.html
_________________________________________
I do not use an irrational inference, a false premise, so there is no discontinuity between Vatican II and Tradition
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/search/label/What%20I%20believe
The Magisterium made a mistake at Vatican Council II when it accomodated the Marchetti 1949 error http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/the-magisterium-made-mistake-at-vatican.html
Vatican Council in general is being interpreted with an irrationality.Catholics do not know that there is a choice.Eliminate the premise and the Council dramatically changes http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/vatican-council-in-general-it-is-being.html
Priestly Fraternity of St.Peter (FSSP) has changed Church teachings on family catechesis, religious education, salvation, mortal sin, ecclesiology... http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/priestly-fraternity-of-stpeter-fssp-has.html
How can everyone be wrong and only you be correct http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/how-can-everyone-be-wrong-and-only-you.html
Two standards on doctrine http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/two-standards-on-doctrine.html
The 'mainstream' Church has to begin the reconciliation process with doctrinal truth.They have to admit that there are no exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma EENS, on March 19,2015http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/the-mainstream-church-has-to-begin.html
If the Holy See chooses to interpret Vatican Council without the false premise there can be a reconciliation.The announcement has first to be made by the Holy See. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/if-holy-see-chooses-to-interpret.html
MAY 30, 2019 UR 3 does not contradict the passage from Mystici Corporis which you have quoted. Would you like to comment ? If UR 3 is not an exception to EENS then there is no Vatican Council II revolution in the text of the Council ?
If the Magisterium accepts that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without Marchetti's irrational premise and conclusion then the Church comes back to Tradition, as Bishop Williamson sought http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/if-magisterium-accepts-that-vatican.html
When the laity are aware of the false premise, they will not fall for this ruse http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/when-laity-are-aware-of-false-premise.html
Bishop Fellay uses a false premise when he assumes LG 8 refers to visible in the flesh cases : Doctrine has not changed unless you use a false premise http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/bishop-fellay-uses-false-premise-when.html
St. Ambrose could not state it 'as a fact' that it happened since if it would happen it could only be known to God as a fact. This is the nature of the baptism of desire.It simply does not exist in our reality
Mortal sins of faith need to be confessed in the Sacrament of Reconciliaition like mortal sins of morals https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/mortal-sins-of-faith-need-to-be.html
The 'mainstream' Church has to begin the reconciliation process with doctrinal truth.They have to admit that there are no exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma EENS, on March 19,2015http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/the-mainstream-church-has-to-begin.html
MAY 18, 2019
If the pope can change his mind on Medugorje he can also announce the obvious- he could say that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to personally unknown and invisible people
________________________________________________________________________________
MAY 27, 2019An examination of conscience https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/an-examination-of-conscience.html
MAY 26, 2019Mortal sins of faith https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/mortal-sins-of-faith.html
MAY 13, 2019 Presently with irrational reasoning, which they can identify and correct, we have two popes and cardinals Baldiserri and Battista supporting mortal sins of faith https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/presently-with-irrational-reasoning.html
MAY 12, 2019Cardinal Lorenzo Baldiserri calls heresy and mortal sins of faith magisterial https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/cardinal-lorenzo-baldiserri-calls.html
MAY 11, 2019For discerning Catholics this is all deception and it cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit the interpretation of the two popes is based upon a factual error. It violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.This cannot be the Magisterium https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/for-discerning-catholics-this-is-all.html
MAY 11, 2019
_________________________________________
I do not use an irrational inference, a false premise, so there is no discontinuity between Vatican II and Tradition
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/search/label/What%20I%20believe
The Magisterium made a mistake at Vatican Council II when it accomodated the Marchetti 1949 error http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/the-magisterium-made-mistake-at-vatican.html
Vatican Council in general is being interpreted with an irrationality.Catholics do not know that there is a choice.Eliminate the premise and the Council dramatically changes http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/vatican-council-in-general-it-is-being.html
Priestly Fraternity of St.Peter (FSSP) has changed Church teachings on family catechesis, religious education, salvation, mortal sin, ecclesiology... http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/priestly-fraternity-of-stpeter-fssp-has.html
How can everyone be wrong and only you be correct http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/how-can-everyone-be-wrong-and-only-you.html
Two standards on doctrine http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/two-standards-on-doctrine.html
The 'mainstream' Church has to begin the reconciliation process with doctrinal truth.They have to admit that there are no exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma EENS, on March 19,2015http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/the-mainstream-church-has-to-begin.html
If the Holy See chooses to interpret Vatican Council without the false premise there can be a reconciliation.The announcement has first to be made by the Holy See. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/if-holy-see-chooses-to-interpret.html
MAY 30, 2019 UR 3 does not contradict the passage from Mystici Corporis which you have quoted. Would you like to comment ? If UR 3 is not an exception to EENS then there is no Vatican Council II revolution in the text of the Council ?
If the Magisterium accepts that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without Marchetti's irrational premise and conclusion then the Church comes back to Tradition, as Bishop Williamson sought http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/if-magisterium-accepts-that-vatican.html
When the laity are aware of the false premise, they will not fall for this ruse http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/when-laity-are-aware-of-false-premise.html
Bishop Fellay uses a false premise when he assumes LG 8 refers to visible in the flesh cases : Doctrine has not changed unless you use a false premise http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/bishop-fellay-uses-false-premise-when.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
