Wednesday, November 13, 2019

SACRILEGE

Image result for sacrilege photo

NOVEMBER 13, 2019

Repost : Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with an irrationality as do the traditionalists: the result is heresy


NOVEMBER 13, 2019

Repost : Heresy is caused by directly not accepting a teaching of the Church which it is necessary to accept. However heresy is also caused if you mix up what is defacto as being dejure ( in principle), is you confuse what is hypothetical as being objective.


  

NOVEMBER 13, 2019

Repost : Pope continues with heretical statements : reinterprets the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with an irrationality : To offer Holy Mass in public heresy, public mortal sin is a Sacrilege

heretical.html

NOVEMBER 13, 2019

Repost : A pope who says hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are objective exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) , the past exclusivist ecclesiology , an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed etc is heretical : Public heresy is a mortal sin. Offering Holy Mass with Heresy becomes a Sacrilege


NOVEMBER 13, 2019

Repost : What about the dogma on salvation which has 'evolved' for Fr.Zuhlsdorf ?


 

NOVEMBER 13, 2019

Repost : Why cannot a priest affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church even if it means not being incardinated or receiving the mandatum to teach fake theology ? Since even if the Mass is illicit it would not be heretical and sacrilegious


NOVEMBER 13, 2019

Repost : Fr.Dwight Longeneck would agree with me.The Mass he offers is heretical and sacrilegeous like the one Prof. Peter Kwasniewski attends in Latin : they don't want a hermeneutic of continuity with the past ( EENS, ecumenism of return)

Image result for sacrilege photo

DECEMBER 11, 2018



No clarification or denial from Thomas More College of Liberal Arts : public heresy and sacrilege


ERRORS OF THE TMC(POINTS IN RED)
1.With this irrational reasoning they have changed the interpretation of EENS, which is no more strict and BOD-free, like it was know to the Magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century.There is an innovation.
2.They have changed the understanding of the Creeds too.
3. They have chosen an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
4.They have interpreted the Catechism as a rupture with the old Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.The catechisms contradict themselves. They also contradict a rational interpretation of EENS and Vatican Council II.
This is all heresy and it is public.To reject the original meaning of the Nicene, Apostles and Athanasius Creed, and that too with an irrational premise and inference, is first class.
Offering Holy Mass without ending this public scandal would be a sacrilege.
There is no denial from the faculty who have been informed.
If they say that this is what the present two popes and the cardinals, including Cardinal Sean o Malley, Archbishop fo Boston teaches, then they must acknowledge that it is irrational, heretical, non traditional and not part of the Deposit of the Faith.
They must reject the error as Catholics.They could help clarify their doctrinal and theological position with these following points.
 CLARIFY DOCTRINAL POSITION (POINTS IN BLUE)
1.They affirm EENS with BOD, BOB and I.I referring to hypothetical cases only and not being objective exceptions to EENS in 2018.
2.They affirm all the Creeds with BOD, BOB and I.I not being exceptions.
3.They affirm Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc not being exceptions to EENS as it was interpreted by the Magisterium in the 16th century, guided by the Holy Spirit.
4.They affirm all the Catechisms in harmony with traditional EENS.
5.So they acknowledge that the ecclesiology of the Church before and after Vatican Council II is the same.There can only be an ecumenism of return, since there is no known salvation outside the Church to contradict Feeneyite EENS.
6.They acknowledge that the International Theological Commission(ITC),Vatican, made an objective mistake in two papers, 'Christianity and the World Eeligions' and 'The Hope of Salvation of Infants who die without being baptised'.
7.So the TMC acknowledge that the present popes and the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith have made an objective error in the interpretation of the BOD, BOB and I.I with reference to EENS.
8.The TMC acknowledge that Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith made an objective error at the Placuet Deo Press Conference (March1, 2018) when he indicated to the lady journalist from the Associated Press, in answer to a question, that Lumen Gentium 8 (elements of sanctification and truth) referred t known non Catholics saved outside the Church.Also that there were personally known non Catholics saved outside the visible boundaries of the Church where the Catholic Church allegedly subsists.So the old teaching on the Church having a superiority and exclusiveness in salvation was now obsolete  and discarded.
9.The TMC acknowledges that Pope Benedict also made an error in March 2016( Avvenire) when he said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century since there was a development( a disconnect) made by Vatican Council II.This was an irrational interpretation of the Council.
Similarly in doctrinal talks with the Vatican, Pope Benedict, Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay were using the irrational premise to interpret magisterial documents, including Vatican Council II.

10.The TMC acknowledges that to change the interpretation of the Creeds, EENS, Vatican Council II and the Catechisms by useing an irrational premise and inference with reference to BOD, BOB and I.I is heresy. It is now public heresy.It is a mortal sin of faith. It would be a scandal to offer/attend Holy Mass,in this condition. Absolution in the Sacrament of Reconciliation is needed and the scandal has to be ended in public.

VATICAN COUNCIL II MUST NO MORE BE A RUPTURE WITH EENS
For the TMC, Vatican Council II must no more be a rupture with EENS as interpreted in the 16th century.They must interpret Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of continuity with the strict interpretation of EENS.
The faculty needs to announce that they do not teach the errors mentioned above ( points in red) and instead teach orthodoxy on Catholic doctrine (points in blue) even when this is not the teaching of the present ecclesiastics and the two popes at the Vatican, who have made an objective mistake. They violated the Principle of Non Contradiction and so cannot be magisterial on this issue.This error is not the teaching of the Holy Spirit.
For harmony between faith and reason the faculty needs to announce that they do not teach the error points in red and instead support the orthodox points in blue, in the classroom.-Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 10, 2018

Mass offered by the Dominican priest Fr.Thomas Crean at the TMC chapel may be valid but it is in scandal. There is an impediment which is not denied by the TMC faculty https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/so-mass-offered-by-dominican-priest.html


DECEMBER 10, 2018


Mass offered by the Dominican priest Fr.Thomas Crean at the TMC chapel may be valid but it is in scandal. There is an impediment which is not denied by the TMC faculty

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/so-mass-offered-by-dominican-priest.html

DECEMBER 7, 2018

Featured Image

Alleged faithful college coming to New England,USA is Cushingite and not Feeneyite : interprets Vatican Council II and Catechism with an irrational premise to create a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/alleged-faithful-college-coming-to-new.html

 DECEMBER 9, 2018


Thomas More College of Liberal Arts (TMC) is unaware of the mistake in Vatican Council II: Church documents and saints contradict themselves for the faculty

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/thomas-more-college-of-liberal-arts-tmc.html


 DECEMBER 8, 2018

Thomas More College of Liberal Arts rejects Catholic Tradition by irrationally interpreting Vatican Council II. This has the approval of the two popes, the political Left and the college accreditors :I support Tradition by re-interpreting Vatican Council II rationally

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/thomas-more-college-of-liberal-arts.html
https://thomasmorecollege.edu/

Repost : Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with an irrationality as do the traditionalists: the result is heresy

 MARCH 31, 2016

Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with an irrationality as do the traditionalists: the result is heresy






  • Any journal that looks at a lunatic like Ann Barnhardt declaring Francis a "fag hag" and says, "This expresses my deepest inmost thoughts about the Church and the pope" has, in that instant, forever abandoned any claim to being a Catholic journal. The Remnant has now joined ranks with James White and other professional anti-Catholics in enmity to the Catholic Church.

      Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with an irrationality as do the traditionalists: the result is heresy


    The ecclesiology of Pope Francis and Cardinal Kaspar is based on the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/the-ecclesiology-of-pope-francis-and.html

    From Pope Paul VI to Pope Francis... : Can popes reject an ex cathedra teaching and offer Holy Mass ? Yes, defacto this is what is being done

    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/from-pope-paul-vi-to-pope-francis-can.html

    Pope Francis, Cardinal Muller and Cardinal Ladaria are refusing to interpret Vatican Council II without the irrationality

    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/pope-francis-cardinal-muller-and.html


    From Pope Pius XII to Pope Francis they all have been using an irrational premise in the interpretation of magisterial texts

    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/12/from-pope-pius-xii-to-pope-francis-they.html

    Pope Francis presents Protestant kerygma contradicts Vatican Council II

    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/01/pope-francis-presents-protestant.html

    Pope Francis like the sedevacantists uses Marchetti's irrational premise and inference. He accepts the Council with this error
    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/06/pope-francis-like-sedevantists-uses.html

    Pope Francis wants the Franciscans of the Immaculate to accept Vatican Council II with the IRRATIONAL RED column

    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/pope-francis-wants-franciscans-of.html

    No one denies that the pope has made a Cushingite error

    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/10/no-one-denies-that-pope-has-made.html

    What a long line of religious formators who will teach heresy like our pope
    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/11/what-long-line-of-religious-formators.html

    POPE FRANCIS AND CARDINAL BRAZ DE AVEZ EXPECT THE FRANCISCANS OF THE IMMACULATE TO BE OBEDIENT TO A FALSEHOOD EVEN AFTER BEING INFORMED
    HTTP://EUCHARISTANDMISSION.BLOGSPOT.IT/2015/11/POPE-FRANCIS-AND-CARDINAL-BRAZ-DE-AVEZ.HTML



    Cardinal Kaspar changed ecclesiology assuming B is an exception to A: he used an irrational model to interpret Vatican Council II


    Jesuits in first class heresy 
    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/07/jesuits-in-first-class-heresy.html#links


    -Lionel Andrades

    Image result for sacrilege photo
    TO OFFER HOLY MASS IN PUBLIC HERESY IS A  SACRILEGE.

    Image result for sacrilege photo

    Repost : Heresy is caused by directly not accepting a teaching of the Church which it is necessary to accept. However heresy is also caused if you mix up what is defacto as being dejure ( in principle), is you confuse what is hypothetical as being objective.

    SEPTEMBER 28, 2016

    Heresy is caused by directly not accepting a teaching of the Church which it is necessary to accept. However heresy is also caused if you mix up what is defacto as being dejure ( in principle), is you confuse what is hypothetical as being objective.



    (1:04:16) Tim Staples begins to explain the hermenutic of continuity as being one of approach, a dogmatic or pastoral approach.
    However if you interpret the baptism of desire as being visible or invisible, as known defacto or hypothetical, changes the heremeneutic of continuity. We have the hermeutic of rupture.
    Heresy is caused by directly not accepting a teaching of the Church which it is necessary to accept. However heresy is also caused if you mix up what is defacto as being dejure ( in principle), is you confuse what is hypothetical as being objective.
    So the baptism of desire becomes a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and so there is a change in a dogma of the Catholic Church.
    So the Council with LG 16 (visible) creates a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
    For me the LG 16 is invisible  and so there is a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
    -Lionel Andrades

    Image result for sacrilege photo

    For a priest or pope to offer Holy Mass in public heresy without removing the scandal and a recantation is a Sacrilege.
    Image result for sacrilege photo

    Repost : Pope continues with heretical statements : reinterprets the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with an irrationality : To offer Holy Mass in public heresy, public mortal sin is a Sacrilege

     DECEMBER 7, 2016

    Pope continues with heretical statements : reinterprets the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with an irrationality

    Pope Francis has subtly criticised the Great Commission of Jesus.He has done it befor too. He now mentioned it with reference to ISIS.
    Recently he again discouraged an ecumenism in which Orthodox Christians would have to convert into the Catholic Church.
    For me this is a direct attack and negation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was know in the 16th century.The pope does not say follow your conscience and affirm the rigorist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as did the 16th century missionaries.
    However he does suggest that a person in manifest mortal sin could follow his conscience and receive the Eucharist etc.
    His statement is continued-heresy. It is a contradiction of the dogma extra ecclesiam nullas salus, as I interpret it as a Catholic.
    Pope Francis and Pope Benedict do not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus like the Jesuit Fr. Leonard Feeney.I do.
    MY THESIS
    If the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance which is mentioned in some catechisms, in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and in Vatican Council II refers to invisible cases(since they are physically invisible) then it is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So Vatican Council II would then not be a rupture with this dogma. Neither would it contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX or Tradition in general.
    However if the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refers to visible cases,if it is interpreted as such, then it is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla slus and the Syllabus of Errors. Vatican Council II (LG 16, LG 14 etc) is a rupture with Tradition.
    The two popes are interpreting Vatican Council II with LG 16 etc being visible instead of invisible. This is a factual and objective mistake.
    It is no suprise that Pope Francis rejects an ecunmenism of return and the need for non Christians to formally convert into the Church for salvation ( to avoid Hell).Similarly it was no surprise for me when Pope Benedict in the interview with Avvenire said extra ecclesiam nulla salus is no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries.
    The discussion of the Fr. Leonard Feeney case may seem academic or a thing of the past however it has a direct relationship today, with how we interpret Vatican Council II.The SSPX's canonical status and the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate regularising their canonical status depends on this interpretation of Vatican Council II.
    -Lionel Andrades

    Image result for sacrilege photo

    To offer Holy Mass in public heresy, 
    public mortal sin is a Sacrilege.

    Image result for sacrilege photo