Peter Kwasniewski and Steve Skojec are comfortable with the error : in this way they are not obligated to affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus

Peter Kwasniewski and Steve Skojec have read what I have written and they are not going to affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Instead they will expediently maintain that invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions to EENS.Also for them unknown people referenced in Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ignorance) allegedly saved outside the Church,are personally known and physically seen non Catholics. So in this way they become exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.The irrationality helps. They do not want to be considered Anti-Semitic.It is the same with the SSPX bishops and priests.Even the St.Benedict Centers do not want to affirm Feeneyite EENS.

On March 1, 2018 Cardinal Ladaria denied it and in March 2016 Pope Benedict did the same.

I am the only one who is saying invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are invisible. They are  not visible.So I do not reject EENS according to the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century.Practically there are no exceptions.

Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct.Literally, there are no cases of BOD, BOB and I.I.

Literally, for me too there are no exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.

So the Catholic Church in Vatican Council II (AG 7) indicates that all non Catholics need to enter the Church as members, with Catholic faith and the baptism of water and there can be no known exception on earth.

It also means most people go to Hell since they die outside the Church. In Heaven there are only Catholics.The Catholic Church is the Mystical Body of Jesus and we do not know anyone saved outside the Church. Peter Kwasniewski,Steve Skojec, Fr.Brian Harrison, Joseph Shaw and the other traditionalists do not want to say this.

The SSPX website says BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS. Their Angelus Press sells a book written by Fr. Francois Laisney supporting visible for them cases of BOD,BOB and I.I ( Is Feeneyism Catholic?).
Michael Matt now at the Remnant approved this book and criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney.
The SSPX goes to doctrinal talks interpreting magisterial documents contradicting each other and they do not deny it.Since if they deny it they would have to affirm Feeneyite EENS.

Similarly the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX for Kwasniewski and Skojec and they do not deny it.Since if they deny it they would have to affirm Feeneyite EENS.

For Phil Lawler and the faculty at the St.Thomas More College for Liberal Arts, N.H, USA, St.Thomas Aquinas contradicts himself.The faculty do not deny it.Otherwise they would have to affirm what the secular media calls 'the rigorist interpretation' of the dogma EENS and the Archbishop of Boston,Cardinal Sean O'Malley,  would protest.

Prudent traditionalists Hilary White and Ann Barnhardt are comfortable with the error.Louie Verrecchio has a family to support, so also, the alleged conservatives Robert Fastiggi and Ralph Martin in Detroit, USA.

Bishops, only give the mandatam to teach theology to those who say BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known people saved outside the Church.The priests who are rational and deny this error cannot be incardinated.They are not allowed to licitly offer Holy Mass.With the irrational premise and inference, however they can licitly but heretically and sacrilegeously offer Holy Mass in any Rite.

So Fr. John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with the error and so do the dubbia cardinals and those who signed the Filial Correction.

None of them want to affirm Feeneyite EENS.They will be ready to accept the Catechisms contradicting themselves, Vatican Council II contradicting the past ecclesiology and there being a new understanding of the Apostles, Nicene and Athanasius Creed.A new Profession of Faith  with the Nicene Creed supporting modernism.
They will accept all this doctrinal and theological confusion as long as they do not have to affirm EENS like the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century when they offered the Tridentine Rite Mass.-Lionel Andrades

PARLò A TE NEL TUO CUORE ... MARIA CONDUCE A GESÙ ... MEDJUGORJE-PREGHIE...

Priest found vocation after miracles at apparition site

Religious Curiosities

It's both curious and distressing in our time how the devil has attacked religion, first, for decades, from the liberal side and now, too often, not just from far-left liberals but certain "religious" conservatives. He is a spirit of extremes (is the devil)!

Be on guard, therefore, for those who sow division. It's a (bad) "fruit," a telltale sign. Seek balance. As Scripture says, Satan comes to deceive even the elect. Great deception -- what Sister Lucia called "diabolical disorientation" -- there is now all around us.

Often we gain that balance through the Blessed Madonna. We gain inspiration. Discernment is made easier. Sometimes, we gain vocations (at top, priests at the apparition site of Medjugorje in Bosnia-Hercegovina).

The way men can be touched by Mary is powerfully told by California author Christine Watkins, who has penned book called Of Men and Mary, which we are pleased to make available -- fascinating and often miraculous accounts of how men are touched by the Virgin. "Turn these pages," says the preface, "and you will find yourself surprisingly inspired by a murderer locked up in prison, a drug-using football player who dreamed of the pros, and selfish, womanizing dare-devil who died and met God -- and lived again."

One case: that of Wisconsin priest Michael Lightner, of whom we have written before, but about whom there are amazing details with which we were not familiar.

When he was eight, Father Lightner recounts, he had an unusually lucid dream in which he saw himself playing for the Philadelphia Eagles against the Phoenix Cardinals. In the dream there were specific plays. He saw the faces of opposing linemen. He could hear the roar of the crowd.

Continued     https://www.spiritdaily.com/lightner.htm

Vatican Council II has a heretical theology but in a peculiar way it can be interpreted non heretically

Vatican Council II has a heretical base, with the New Theology.However the Council can be interpreted  rationally and traditionally without making any change in the text.

When the Council Fathers at Vatican Council II used the irrational reasoning of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) they were supporting heresy. So the Council has a heretical basis for its New Theology.It is propped by an irrational premise and inference.

This error of assuming hypothetical cases are not hypothetical runs through the Council like a theme ( LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 11( seeds of the Word) etc.It is human error and not the work of the Holy Spirit. So in this sense the Council is not magisterial.

However in this particular case, a peculiarity on this issue, is that even with the false New Theology, the Council can be interpreted rationally and traditionally.It requires no change in the text.

Since the hypothetical cases, which the Council Fathers assumed were non hypothetical, are still hypothetical for us.They can only be interpreted as being hypothetical. There is no other rational choice.

 So even though Pope Benedict, Cardinal Richard Cushing, Fr. Karl Rahner sj, the other Jesuits and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, were at the Council with heresy and irrationality, we can undo their bad work by simply interpreting  LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being theoretical, speculative and non objective in 2019.They are not examples of personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church. There is no non Catholic who is anonymous, and known to be saved with Catholic faith.Literally, there is no Anonymous Christian,of Fr. Karl Rahner sj, saved outside the Church as a Catholic.

So we can have a rational, traditional and non heretical interpretation of Vatican Council II, which is not a rupture with the strict interpretaton of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). Nor does it contradict the centuries-old exclusive ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.Nor is it a break with an ecumenism of return.
____________

Therefore, all must be converted to Him...and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door...

By means of this activity, the Mystical Body of Christ unceasingly gathers and directs its forces toward its own growth (cf. Eph. 4:11-16). The members of the Church are impelled to carry on such missionary activity by reason of the love with which they love God and by which they desire to share with all men the spiritual goods of both its life and the life to come.

Finally, by means of this missionary activity, God is fully glorified, provided that men fully and consciously accept His work of salvation, which He has accomplished in Christ.-Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II

________________________

With the majoirty of people on the way to Hell without faith and baptism(AG 7), the social and political priority must be the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King and the non separation of Church and State.

So the Council is really saying that all Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Pentecostals,Orthodox Christians and atheists are on the way to Hell, unless they covert into the Church as members.They need faith and the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.There are no practical exceptions mentioned in the text of the Council.

This is the teaching of the Church and its Magisterium according to the text of Vatican Council II,interpreted rationally.It is not necessarily the teaching of  the ecclesiastics at the Vatican or that of the present two popes.

It is also magisterial since it is in harmony with the past popes and Church Councils on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
The present two popes are in a schism with the past popes and they can only interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise and conclusion to create a non traditional conclusion.




With Cushingism we have the hermeneutic of rupture with the past with Feeneyism we have the hermeneutic of continuity.

So for the political Left, this non heretical interpretation of Vatican Council II would really be rigid, fundamentalistic, hate,Anti Semitic and other expressions of their fascism, to control the thinking and beliefs of Catholics.They openly express themselves and feel they have a right to tell Catholics what they are allowed to believe and that our religion, in some ways, is inadequate for them.

However the Catholic priest who holds to this rational interpretation of Vatican Council II would not be offering Holy Mass heretically and so sacrilegeously.
Theologically, he would not be in a rupture with Tradition( Syllabus of Errors,Church Councils on  EENS etc) and neither does he have to reject Vatican Council II. -Lionel Andrades