Tuesday, November 1, 2022
How can Cardinal Matteo Zuppi be allowed to offer the Latin Mass when he rejects Catholic doctrine publically? This is an issue of doctrine and not only discipline.
How can Cardinal Matteo Zuppi be allowed to offer the Latin Mass when he rejects Catholic doctrine publically? This is not an issue of only discipline.
Cardinal Matteo Zuppi must be asked if the baptism of
desire refers to an invisible or visible person in 2022 for him. In the same
way does Unitatitis Reditigratio 3 (being saved in imperfect communion with the
Church) refer to an unknown or known person in the present times (1965-2022).
Cardinal Zuppi must be asked if he interprets Vatican
Council II with the Rational or Irrational Premise. Does LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA
2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases only or are they objective people
saved outside the Church in 2022?
The cardinal
does not deny that he rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
But now we can
interpret Vatican Council II rationally. So Vatican Council II is not a break
with Feeneyite EENS and the Syllabus of Errors. He must accept the Athanasius
Creed and interpret the Catechisms rationally.
PUBLIC CUSHINGITE
Cardinal Zuppi
was invited for the Latin Mass Vespers last Friday when he is a public Cushingite. He
rejects the de fide teachings of the Church. He changes the
understanding of the Creeds and Vatican Council II. This is an issue of doctrine and not just
discipline.
When the
Italian cardinal does not affirm the Creeds (Rational), the dogma EENS (Feeneyite)
and the Athanasius Creed (with no exceptions) is it a mortal sin? Is it a
scandal? Can he offer the Latin or Novus Ordo Mass? I interpret
the Creeds rationally. I affirm Feeneyite EENS.
THE SAME AS CARDINAL LUIZ LADARIA SJ, PREFECT OF THE CDF
But Cardinal
Zuppi like Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj.,interprets the Creeds, Catechisms, baptism
of desire, Vatican Council II, EENS etc., with irrational and heretical Cushingism.They do not deny
it. I interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. Why was
the cardinal invited to the Latin Mass?
VATICAN COUNCIL II MUST ONLY BE INTERPRETED RATIONALLY AND ETHICALLY
Cardinal Zuppi,President of the Italian Bishops conference, cannot deny what I have written here.
Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally with the Rational Premise and
Inference. It does not contradict Feeneyite EENS etc.The cardinal can no more
say that Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of
Errors. Since Vatican Council II rationally and ethically can only be interpreted
with the Rational Premise.
How can
Cardinal Zuppi be allowed to offer the Latin Mass when he rejects Catholic
doctrine publically? I repeat: this is not an issue of only discipline.
SUPPORTS THE NEW HERESY
He does not deny rejecting the Athanasius Creed and
the Syllabus of Errors and re-interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism (invisible
cases of the baptism of desire are visible in the present times).This is the New
Heresy.
He personally told me, when he was a priest at the Sant Egidio parish in Trastevere, Rome, that he does not accept extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
IF HE INTERPRETED VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY HE WOULD BE AFFIRMING FEENEYITE EENS
For
political reasons he cannot affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
So he will not interpret the Creeds, Vatican Council II and the baptism of
desire rationally. If he interpreted them rationally he would be affirming
Feeneyite EENS. So he rejects the rational interpretation of the Creeds etc.
This is a rejection of Church doctrine. He is changing doctrine and he does not
deny it.
HE WILL AGREE THAT HE REJECTS CHURCH DOCTRINE WITH CUSHINGISM
If you ask him if he interprets Vatican Council II
irrationally he will say “Yes”.If you ask him if he interprets the baptism of desire
irrationally, he will say “Yes”.Can he offer Mass in this condition?CHANGES THE NICENE CREED WITH THE IRRATIONAL PREMISE
He changes the Nicene Creed with his irrational
interpretation of the baptism of desire etc.
He cannot deny it. His Profession of faith is
different from mine. His Oath of Office would also be different from mine, if I
held an office. His Oath Against Modernism would be that of a Cushingite and
mine a Feeneyite.To offer
Holy Mass in any Rite he must affirm the de fide teachings of the Catholic Church.
But he denies de fide teachings to be politically correct with the Left. This
is a scandal.He also teaches it to others and supports Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School on Vatican Council II, interpeted irrationally. His
interpretation of Vatican Council II is dishonest. I choose the Rational
Premise and he chooses the Irrational Premise.His
interpretation of Church doctrine is schismatic. The schism comes with
Cushingism. -Lionel Andrades
OCTOBER 31, 2022
Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, a Cushingite offers the Latin Mass in Rome while rejecting de fide teachings : Archbishop Carlo Vigano does not want to be excommunicated : Bishop Athanasius Schneider recants his Khazakhistan statement
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/10/cardinal-matteo-zuppi-cushingite-offers.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
